0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
58 просмотров2 страницы
4/5 Quality Assessment documents published by the Thai government at http://www.cheqa.mua.go.th that allegedly contain assessment scores based on fraudulent research and faculty data. Members of the WUT Academic Committee allege that Rector Ratish Thakur and Academic Director Nisha Ray-Chaudhuri have purposefully submitted fraudulent research to the Thai Ministry of Education multiple years in a row in order to maintain their university-level QA ratings, despite refusing to fund actual research at WUT, while at the same time "borrowing" millions of Thai baht from student tuition fees for their own personal travel, living, and education expenses.
4/5 Quality Assessment documents published by the Thai government at http://www.cheqa.mua.go.th that allegedly contain assessment scores based on fraudulent research and faculty data. Members of the WUT Academic Committee allege that Rector Ratish Thakur and Academic Director Nisha Ray-Chaudhuri have purposefully submitted fraudulent research to the Thai Ministry of Education multiple years in a row in order to maintain their university-level QA ratings, despite refusing to fund actual research at WUT, while at the same time "borrowing" millions of Thai baht from student tuition fees for their own personal travel, living, and education expenses.
4/5 Quality Assessment documents published by the Thai government at http://www.cheqa.mua.go.th that allegedly contain assessment scores based on fraudulent research and faculty data. Members of the WUT Academic Committee allege that Rector Ratish Thakur and Academic Director Nisha Ray-Chaudhuri have purposefully submitted fraudulent research to the Thai Ministry of Education multiple years in a row in order to maintain their university-level QA ratings, despite refusing to fund actual research at WUT, while at the same time "borrowing" millions of Thai baht from student tuition fees for their own personal travel, living, and education expenses.
Eugene and John Jilka v. Saline County, Kansas, Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Committee, Its Review Committee, and United States of America, 330 F.2d 73, 10th Cir. (1964)