Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 9

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana

2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points


State

Frequency
Valid

Indiana

Valid
Percent

Percent

608

100.0

Cumulative
Percent

100.0

100.0

2002. How likely are you to vote in national elections?

Frequency
Valid

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Definitely

443

72.8

72.8

72.8

Very likely

116

19.0

19.0

91.8
100.0

Somewhat likely
Total

50

8.2

8.2

608

100.0

100.0

Party

Frequency
Valid

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Democratic

207

34.0

34.0

34.0

Republican

237

39.0

39.0

73.0

Independent

164

27.0

27.0

100.0

Total

608

100.0

100.0

1. President Obama has announced his intention to take executive action that would allow about 5 million illegal immigrants to live
and work legally in the United States. He plans to take this action without authorization from Congress. Do you support or oppose
the president acting on his own to allow about 5 million illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S. and grant them work authorization?

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Strongly support

64

10.5

10.5

10.5

Somewhat support

97

16.0

16.0

26.5

Somewhat oppose

101

16.6

16.6

43.1

Strongly oppose

307

50.4

50.4

93.5

39

6.5

6.5

100.0

608

100.0

100.0

Don't know
Total

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 1
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
2. The House of Representatives recently passed a bill that fully funds the Department of Homeland Security through
the remainder of this year, but prohibits the use of that money to carry out the president's plan to shield millions of illegal
aliens from deportation and grant them work authorization. Do you support or oppose passage of a bill that fully funds
the Department of Homeland Security but prohibits the use of those funds to carry out the president's immigration plan?

Frequency
Valid

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Strongly support

223

36.6

36.6

36.6

Somewhat support

129

21.1

21.1

57.8

Somewhat oppose

94

15.5

15.5

73.3

Strongly oppose

95

15.6

15.6

88.9

Don't know

67

11.1

11.1

100.0

608

100.0

100.0

Total

3. Last year, Sen. Joe Donnelly opposed the president taking executive action on immigration, saying 'the president
shouldn't make such significant policy changes on his own.' However, this month Senator Donnelly voted against legislation
that would bar the use of federal funds to implement the president's plan to shield millions of illegal aliens from deportation
and grant them work authorization. Which of the following statements best reflects your views on Sen. Donnelly's stance?

Frequency
Valid

Sen. Donnelly should support


legislation to defund the
president's executive action on
immigration.
Sen. Donnelly should oppose
legislation to defund the
president's executive action on
immigration.

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

244

40.2

40.2

40.2

206

33.8

33.8

74.0

Don't know.

158

26.0

26.0

100.0

Total

608

100.0

100.0

4. President Obama has said that if Congress sends him a Department of Homeland Security bill that
prohibits him from using funds to implement his executive action on immigration, he will veto the bill. In
your opinion, would the president be justified in vetoing the Homeland Security funding bill because it limits
his ability to carry out his plan to shield illegal aliens from deportation and grant them work authorization?

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Yes, the president would be


justified in vetoing the Homeland
Security funding bill.

175

28.8

28.8

28.8

No, the president would not be


justified in vetoing the Homeland
Security funding bill.

345

56.8

56.8

85.6

87

14.4

14.4

100.0

608

100.0

100.0

Don't know.
Total

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 2
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
5. If the House and Senate cannot come to an agreement on legislation to fund the Department of Homeland Security,
there is a possibility that about 15 percent of the department's operations could be shutdown. The other 85 percent of
DHS personnel are considered essential workers and would remain on the job even if a spending bill is not approved.
In your opinion, who would be most responsible if a partial shutdown of DHS operations were to occur?

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

House Republicans who insist


on including provisions
preventing the president from
carrying out his executive action
on immigration.

145

23.8

23.8

23.8

Senate Democrats and


President Obama who insist on
allowing Homeland Security
funds to be used to carry out the
president's executive action on
immigration.

213

35.0

35.0

58.8

251

41.2

41.2

100.0

608

100.0

100.0

Both would be equally


responsible.
Total

6. Supporters of the president's executive action on immigration argue that it would make the country more secure because it will
help us identify the people who are currently living here illegally. Opponents of the president's plan argue that it would make the
country less secure because it would divert resources and manpower away from the department's primary mission of securing
the homeland. In your opinion, what effect would the president's executive action on immigration have on homeland security?

Frequency
Valid

It would make the country


more secure.
It would make the country
less secure.
It would have little or no
effect on homeland security.
Don't know.
Total

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

108

17.7

17.7

17.7

244

40.1

40.1

57.8

164

27.0

27.0

84.8

92

15.2

15.2

100.0

608

100.0

100.0

Gender

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Male

304

50.0

50.0

50.0

Female

304

50.0

50.0

100.0

Total

608

100.0

100.0

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 3
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
What is your current employment status?

Frequency
Valid

Working (full or part time)

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

335

55.2

55.7

55.7

35

5.7

5.7

61.5

25

4.2

4.2

65.7

Temporarily unemployed and


looking for work
Temporarily unemployed and not
looking for work
Student

20

3.2

3.3

69.0

62

10.3

10.4

79.4

Retired

124

20.4

20.6

100.0

Total

602

99.0

100.0

1.0

608

100.0

Stay at home parent/spouse

Missing

Percent

.00

Total

Household Income

Frequency
Valid

< $25K

Total

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

108

17.8

19.1

19.1

$25-35K

72

11.9

12.7

31.8

$35-50K

125

20.5

21.9

53.7

$50-75K

142

23.3

24.9

78.7

$75-100K

55

9.1

9.7

88.4

$100-150K

50

8.2

8.8

97.1

$150K+

16

2.7

2.9

100.0

568

93.4

100.0

40

6.6

608

100.0

Total
Missing

Percent

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 4
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Age group A

Frequency
Valid

Cumulative
Percent

18-29

121

20.0

20.0

20.0

30-49

225

36.9

37.0

57.0

50-64

176

29.0

29.0

86.0

85

14.0

14.0

100.0

607

99.8

100.0

.2

608

100.0

65+
Total
Missing

Valid
Percent

Percent

Total

Age group B

Frequency
Valid

Cumulative
Percent

18-24

44

7.3

7.3

7.3

25-34

132

21.7

21.7

29.0

35-54

217

35.7

35.8

64.8

55-69

177

29.1

29.1

94.0

37

6.0

6.0

100.0

607

99.8

100.0

.2

608

100.0

70+
Total
Missing

Valid
Percent

Percent

Total

Generation

Frequency
Valid

176

29.0

29.0

29.0

Nikes

147

24.1

24.2

53.2

Woodstockers

237

38.9

39.0

92.2

47

7.8

7.8

100.0

607

99.8

100.0

.2

608

100.0

Total

Total

Cumulative
Percent

First Globals

Privates

Missing

Valid
Percent

Percent

.00

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 5
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Education

Frequency
Valid

Missing

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

No College Degree

271

44.6

44.8

44.8

College Degree+

334

55.0

55.2

100.0

Total

606

99.6

100.0

.4

608

100.0

Percent

Valid
Percent

.00

Total

Race

Frequency
Valid

Missing

White

Cumulative
Percent

500

82.3

83.0

83.0

Hisp

36

6.0

6.0

89.0

AfrAmer

54

8.9

9.0

98.0

Asian

1.0

1.0

99.0

Other

1.0

1.0

100.0

Total

603

99.2

100.0

.8

608

100.0

.00

Total

Live

Frequency
Valid

Missing
Total

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Lge City

131

21.6

21.6

21.6

Sm City

175

28.7

28.8

50.5

Suburbs

158

26.0

26.1

76.6

Rural

142

23.3

23.4

100.0

Total

606

99.6

100.0

.4

608

100.0

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 6
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Ideology Recoded

Frequency
Valid

Missing

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Liberal

142

23.4

24.9

24.9

Moderate

173

28.4

30.2

55.0

Conservative

257

42.2

45.0

100.0

Total

571

94.0

100.0

37

6.0

608

100.0

.00

Total

Religion

Frequency
Valid

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Catholic

125

20.6

20.6

20.6

Protestant

288

47.4

47.4

68.0

.7

.7

68.7

Other/None

191

31.3

31.3

100.0

Total

608

100.0

100.0

Jewish

BornAgain

Frequency
Valid

Missing

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Yes

172

28.2

59.6

59.6

No/NS

116

19.1

40.4

100.0

Total

288

47.4

100.0

320

52.6

608

100.0

Total

Union member

Frequency
Valid

Yes

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

77

12.7

12.7

12.7

No

531

87.3

87.3

100.0

Total

608

100.0

100.0

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 7
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Child under 17?

Frequency
Valid

Missing

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Yes

169

27.7

27.9

27.9

No

436

71.7

72.1

100.0

Total

604

99.4

100.0

.6

608

100.0

Total

Residency

Frequency
Valid

Missing

Valid
Percent

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

My city or town

202

33.3

33.6

33.6

America

300

49.3

49.8

83.4

The planet earth

100

16.4

16.6

100.0

Total

602

99.0

100.0

1.0

608

100.0

Total

Lost a job due to corporate downsizing within the past year? <hr>

Frequency
Valid

Yes

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

56

9.1

9.1

9.1

No

552

90.9

90.9

100.0

Total

608

100.0

100.0

Been afraid of losing a job within the next year? <hr>

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Yes

143

23.5

23.5

23.5

No

465

76.5

76.5

100.0

Total

608

100.0

100.0

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 8
2/22/2015

Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana


2/20/15 - 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Worked at a job that pays less than an immediate previous job? <hr>

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Yes

195

32.1

32.1

32.1

No

413

67.9

67.9

100.0

Total

608

100.0

100.0

Gone without food for 24 hours in the past month due to a lack of food or money? <hr>

Frequency
Valid

Yes

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

29

4.8

4.8

4.8

No

579

95.2

95.2

100.0

Total

608

100.0

100.0

Veteran/Armed Forces?

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid
Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Yes

108

17.8

17.8

17.8

No

500

82.2

82.2

100.0

Total

608

100.0

100.0

Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set. As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small
subsets of the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than quantitative
Zogby Analytics
Page 9
2/22/2015

Вам также может понравиться