Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Under common law, an EDA can only hold the water rights
for our domestic use, [as in] in our water district.
BUT we hold a fiduciary trust to protect our Electoral District
[ED] from being bound to especially past licensing practices of
regulators that permitted bulk exporting of water from any water
district, or [God forbid] re-selling us our water, in order to protect the
ED itself, from even a projected threat of domestic water shortages
There are so many ways to affirm that [by standing under voter rights]
there is simply no statutory regulation that can stop us from protecting
our inalienable right to the water itself, which is exactly what statutory
regulators want to control with their UN take-over of regional districts.
We're certain that this wall of statutory regulation road block
created by Agenda 21 bureaucrats has stopped more than
one bright eyed entrepreneur, and frankly no business can
afford to say - we're NOT letting them get away with it,
because this business would be crushed by those regulators
BUT AN EDA IS NOT A BUSINESS [Electoral District Ass]
IN FACT; we can claim a fiduciary right to protect our ED
Let's face it, look around you, the monetizing /piratization of
our water is happening all over the world, and it's gotten to
the point where it's a crime to collect /use 'their' rain water.
We hold no false illusions: We expect bureaucrats to file
a charge or a notice on a member eventually, and when
they do, let it be made clear that our EDAs will get a
BCSC injunction to protect our voters right to our Peaceful trespass,
on their bogus contract to claim ownership or dominion over our water.
PROVIDING A PLAN TO PROCEED WITH OUR COMMERCIAL PREMISE
1st: Farmers in general and greenhouse operators have the
most to benefit by using a large Grander Water Revitalizer to
improve their operations with better water, and our EDA right
to water Certificate [that comes with the unit] will give this
farmer an express right to water, because the gadget itself
betters the overall health of the water in their water district.
This claim thru any EDA to benefit from better water must be respected, by
authority, especially when some water-works authority says you have no
such privilege to the water on your farm without a license fee for their water.
ON THIS: no business or farmer [by itself] could defend that
it can say 'NO' to a Water District Official who is just following
new orders that are harmful to the farmers operation, because
a new Agenda 21 Water District policy is being implemented.
BUT a farmer [for example] with a Grander gadget can defend that they
use less water and the run-off water is environmentally better than before
AND by holding a Certificate from the EDA itself means an organized
body of concerned voters will defend this right for and with the accused.
The courts will respect our EDA, even tho a farmer would loose the case