Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 14

The Destabilization Doctrine: ISIS, Proxies

and Patsies

The Destabilization Doctrine: ISIS, Proxies and Patsies

By Brandon Martinez-February 22, 2015

Islam and the West at War, reads a recent New York Times headline.
It would certainly seem that way if one were to take at face value the putrid assertions of
Western governments that are not particularly known for their honesty or integrity. But astute

observers of history and geopolitics can spot a deception when they see one, and the latest
theatrical performances being marketed to the masses as real, organic occurrences remind
one of a Monty Python sketch.

In the past week we have witnessed a number of expedient events that were
designed to legitimize the Wests imperialist foreign policies in the minds of the
masses. On Feb. 15 the Islamic State (also known as ISIS) released another highly
choreographed and visually striking video depicting the beheading of 21 Egyptian
Coptic Christians. Shortly following the videos release, the Egyptian dictator Abdel
Fattah el-Sissi launched air strikes against ISIS targets in Libya where the
execution video was allegedly filmed, although experts are now saying that the
production was faked.
ISISs continued provocations in the form of carefully crafted, emotionally
impactful execution videos (real or faked), such as the recent immolation of a
caged Jordanian pilot, cannot possibly be the work of rational actors seeking a
military victory in any capacity. The videos only ever work to ISISs disadvantage,
solidifying the resolve of their current coalition opponents as well as creating new
enemies upon every release.
Sixty-two countries and groups are presently fighting in the dubious coalition
against ISIS, most of which have modern militaries with advanced air and ground
forces. Why in the world does ISIS continue to entice more countries to join the
already over-crowded alliance against them? Why a group that purports to want to
establish a state which will ostensibly govern millions of people is deliberately
seeking more and more enemies and a constant state of war with them beggars
belief.
Does ISIS think it can do battle with the whole planet and achieve victory,
culminating in world domination? How do people who harbor such ridiculous
delusions have the wherewithal and resources at their disposal to organize and
recruit thousands of fighters from around the world to an utterly ludicrous cause
doomed to sheer failure? How can this be anything but a contrived prank of an
operation?
The only logical conclusion that many analysts have come to is that ISIS does not
represent a grassroots, organic movement, but rather operates entirely as a cats
paw of Western foreign policy in the Middle East and North Africa, which is
concurrently under the domination of Israel. ISISs actions expressly benefit

Muslims least of all and Israel/the West most of all, the extent of which increases
with every new atrocity and outrage ISIS inflicts upon innocents in Iraq and Syria
that gets endless play in Western media. In fact, the Western medias obsession
with ISIS is in and of itself an effective form of PR for the group. Western media
outlets are consciously performing an unqualified service for ISISs recruiting
efforts by affording the terrorist group premium level branding that will attract
criminally-inclined degenerates, Wahhabist religious zealots and disaffected,
suicidal lowlifes from around the world to join a cause predestined to abject
failure.
This senile ISIS vs. The World spectacle is little more than a melodramatic
screenplay engineered in a boardroom by professional propagandists and
marketing aficionados. It resembles a classic problem, reaction, solution dialectic
of deceit. Who in their right mind believes the rancid mythology surrounding this
orchestrated good vs. evil Hollywood blockbuster?
Proxy Warriors: Cannon Fodder for the Empire

The West is not sincerely at odds with ISIS nor is it seeking to degrade and
destroy the group, as US President Barrack Obama claims. One piece of
information that undermines this good cop/bad cop puppet show is the Wests
clandestine support of ISIS beginning with the artificial uprising in Libya. In 2011,
the West openly sought to depose Libyan strongman Muammar Gaddafi, and did
so by backing ISIS and al-Qaeda-affiliated rebel groups to do it. The maniac rebels
who sodomized and then murdered Gaddafi in the street like a dog were hailed
as freedom fighters by the repellant thugs in Washington, Paris and London, and
were fully aided and abetted with NATO air strikes against Gaddafis forces. The
rebel victory in Libya was only made possible through Western military
intervention. We came, we saw, he died,said Obamas former Secretary of State
Hilary Clinton in reference to the assassination of Gaddafi by Washingtons foot
soldiers, cackling like a witch at the demise of the Libyan potentate.
In a Nov. 19, 2014, article for Global Research, analyst Tony Cartalucci noted that
the so-called rebels NATO had backed [in Libya] were revealed to be terrorists
led by Al Qaeda factions including the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) and AlQaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). During the manufactured uprising
Gaddafi routinely declared in public speeches that al-Qaeda was leading the way.
Gaddafi blames uprising on al-Qaeda, read one Al Jazeeraheadline from
February 2011. A March 2011 Guardian report spoke of how hundreds of

convicted members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), an al-Qaida


affiliate, have been freed and pardoned under a reform and repent program
headed by Gaddafis son Saif al-Islam. The same article acknowledged that the
LIFG, which was established in Afghanistan in the 1990s, has assassinated dozens
of Libyan soldiers and policemen since its founding and that Britains MI6 had
previously supported the group. That group formed the backbone of the antiGaddafi insurgency, and received all manner of support from the West and allied
Gulf sheikhdoms.
In the aforesaid Global Research article, Cartalucci outlines how the synthetic
insurrection in Libya was spearheaded by al-Qaeda franchises that were later
subsumed into ISIS. A February 2015 CNN report entitled ISIS finds support in
Libya revealed that since the fall of Gaddafi, ISIS has established a large and
menacing presence throughout the North African country. The black flag of ISIS
flies over government buildings, according to CNNs reportage. Police cars carry
the groups insignia. The local football stadium is used for public executions. It
adds that, Fighters loyal to the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria are now in complete
control of the city of Derna, population of about 100,000, not far from the
Egyptian border and just about 200 miles from the southern shores of the
European Union.
NATO effectively carpet-bombed Libya into rubble, paving a path of blood for ISIS
and al-Qaeda death squads to seize power and institute their medieval ideology.
Thats the reward for falling afoul of the West and whatever drives it. Cartalucci
further proved in anotherreport entitled Libyan Terrorists Are Invading Syria
that as soon as Gaddafis regime collapsed and rebel gangs emerged triumphant,
thousands of battle-hardened and fanatical jihadist fighters took their Western
training and weapons over to Syria to fight Bashar al-Assad in accordance with
Washingtons bait and switch scheme. Apparently, these hired mercenaries
behave a lot like wild dogs chasing a piece of raw meat.
An absolutely identical scenario unfolded in Syria where Washington and its
regional puppets led by Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey have been subsidizing the
Islamist guerrillas from the outset. Do you know of any major Arab ally of the US
that embraces ISIL? US Senator Lindsey Graham facetiously asked General
Martin Dempsey at a Senate Armed Services Committee in 2014. To Grahams
surprise, Dempsey responded: I know major Arab allies who fund them. US Vice
President Joe Biden himself confirmed this in an October 2014 speech wherein
he toldstudents at Harvard University that Americas Gulf allies the Saudis and
Qataris especially were backing ISIS and Jahbat al-Nusra (an al-Qaeda affiliate)

with substantive sums of arms and funds. A former US General, Thomas


McInerney, told Fox News that the US government helped build ISIS by backing
some of the wrong people and by facilitating weapons to al-Qaeda-linked Libyan
rebels which ended up in the hands of ISIS militants in Syria. Retired US General
and former NATO Supreme Allied Commander, Wesley Clark, repeated this view in
a February 2015 interview with CNN, saying that ISIS got started through funding
from our friends and allies [in the Gulf] who sought to use religious fanatics to
assail the Shia alliance of Syria, Iran and Hezbollah. Its like a Frankenstein, he
concluded.
A June 17, 2014, World Net Daily report highlights how Americans trained Syrian
rebels who later joined ISIS in a secret base located in Jordan. Jordanian officials
told WNDs Aaron Klein that dozens of future ISIS members were trained [in a US
run training facility in Jordan] at the time as part of covert aid to the insurgents
targeting the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in Syria. Reports in Der
Spiegel, the Guardian, Reuters and other mainstream outlets all confirmed that
the US, Britain, France and their regional allies were training militants in secret
bases in Jordan and Turkey as part of the Wests proxy war against the Assad
regime.
The West has attempted to cover-up its support of ISIS and al-Qaeda elements by
running a two degrees of separation gambit. Washington claims to only provide
support to moderate, vetted rebel groupings, namely the Free Syrian Army (FSA),
but this amounts to a calculated ruse to confound the credulous masses. FSA is
the nom de gerre of a loose collection of rebel bandits who dont operate under a
central command framework or authority, rather acting independently or under
the umbrella of other factions. Aron Lund, an expert on Syrian rebel
groups, discerned in a March 2013 article titled The Free Syrian Army Doesnt
Exist that from the very beginning the FSA has been nothing more than a fictional
branding operation.
During the initial stages of the insurgency, any militant faction in Syria looking for
Western military aid called itself FSA and then took the weapons they received
from the West straight to ISIS and Jahbat al-Nusra. The FSA functions as a conduit
between Western governments and the Takfiri terrorists fighting Assad as well as
an arms distribution network for them. In the aforesaid article, Lund explains that
the FSAs General Staff was set up in Turkey in 2012 as a flag to rally the
Western/Gulf-backed factions around, and probably also a funding channel and
an arms distribution network, rather than as an actual command hierarchy.
Thousands of militants fighting under the FSA rubric have since joined or pledged

allegiance to ISIS and al-Nusra.


Western governments know this and are apparently totally comfortable with it,
revealing their bare complicity and collaboration with the Takfiri insurgents hellbent on beheading their way to power in Syria and Iraq.
The Counterfeit Campaign
This inevitably creates confusion for people not studied in imperial geopolitics,
especially after the West and its Gulf allies declared war on ISIS in late 2014. The
counterfeit campaign cannot be seen as anything other than a convenient,
disingenuous volte-face maneuver designed to whitewash all of the
aforementioned facts about the Wests dirty hands behind ISIS. Average plebs who
receive all of their information from TV news channels wont know about the
Wests clandestine activities that effectively spawned ISIS and facilitated its rise to
prominence in Iraq, Syria and Libya, so they will naturally take the Wests phony
confrontation with ISIS at face value.
The Wests crusade to degrade and destroy ISIS is a preposterous hoax. In fact,
evidence suggests that the West continues to covertly support ISIS with airdrops
of weapons and supplies, whilst concurrently bombing them in sketchy and
deliberately ineffective air strikes.
Irans President Hassan Rohani called the US-led anti-ISIS coalition a joke
considering how many of its participants significantly helped bolster the terrorist
group since its inception. In a January 2015 report, Irans Fars News
Agency quotes a number of Iranian generals and Iraqi MPs who believe that the
US is continuing to surreptitiously support ISIS with airdrops of weapons caches
and other supplies. General Mohammad Reza Naqdi, a commander of Irans Basij
(volunteer) Force, said that the US embassy in Baghdad is the command center
for ISIS in the country. The US directly supports the ISIL in Iraq and the US planes
drop the needed aids and weapons for ISIL, General Naqdi told a group of Basij
forces in Tehran. Fars News cited Majid al-Gharawia, an Iraqi Parliamentary
Security and Defense Commission MP, who said that the US are supplying ISIS
with weapons and ammunition in a number of Iraqi jurisdictions.
An Iraqi security commission spoke of unidentified aircraft making drops to ISIS
militants in Tikrit. Another senior Iraqi lawmaker, Nahlah al-Hababi, echoed these
claims about US planes and other unidentified aircraft making deliveries to ISIS.
She opined that, The international coalition is not serious about air strikes on ISIL

terrorists and is even seeking to take out the popular Basij (voluntary) forces from
the battlefield against the Takfiris so that the problem with ISIL remains unsolved
in the near future. General Massoud Jazayeri, the Deputy Chief of Staff of Irans
Armed Forces, called the US-led coalition against ISIS a farce. The US and the socalled anti-ISIL coalition claim that they have launched a campaign against this
terrorist and criminal group while supplying them with weapons, food and
medicine in Jalawla region (a town in Diyala Governorate, Iraq). This explicitly
displays the falsity of the coalitions and the US claims, the general said.
The US military claims these air deliveries are mistakenly ending up in ISISs
possession and that they were intended for Kurdish fighters, but such a ridiculous
assertion rings hollow among the true opponents of ISIS Iran, Syria, Hezbollah
and Shiite volunteers in Iraq. Meanwhile, the laughable nature of Washingtons
anti-ISIS gambit is underscored by the fact that its initial air strikes against ISISs
stronghold in Raqqa, Syria, in September 2014 did little more than destroy a
bunch of empty buildings. CNN let slip that ISIS fighters had evacuated their
command centers in the city 15 to 20 days before US air strikes commenced,
indicating that they were probably tipped off. A Syrian opposition activist told ARA
News that the targeted places [in Raqqa], especially refineries, were set on fire,
pointing out that IS militants evacuated their strongholds in the last two days to
avoid the U.S.-led strikes.
The Hidden Hand of Zionism

The sham rebellion in Syria was devised and executed by outsiders to serve a
nefarious anti-Syrian agenda. All of this seems very confusing if one doesnt take
into consideration the destructive proclivities of the state of Israel in the region.
Israel has essentially used the United States as a cats paw in the Middle East,
manipulating Americas Leviathan military to smash up her enemies. The
formidable Israeli lobby inside the US and its neoconservative lackeys who are a
dominant force in the war-making apparatus of the US Military Industrial Complex
is a key factor driving the Washington foreign policy establishments intransigent
approach to the Middle East. When it comes to Middle East policy, the Israelis
always get their way. America is a thing you can move very easily in the right
direction, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu once bragged. Dont worry about
American pressure on Israel. We control America, the former Israeli PM Ariel
Sharon boasted.
The destruction of Iraq, Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Libya, Egypt and other Middle

Eastern and North African states is a long-standing Zionist policy plan dating back
to the 1950s. In 1982 a stunning Israeli strategy paper was published which
outlined with remarkable candor a vast conspiracy to weaken, subjugate and
ultimately destroy all of Israels military rivals. Thedocument was called A
Strategy for Israel in the 1980s, authored by Oded Yinon, a prominent thinker in
Israeli Likud circles. In the vein of the Ottoman millet system, Yinon envisioned the
dissolution of Israels neighbors and a new Middle East made up of fractured and
fragmented Arab/Muslim countries divided into multiple polities along ethnic and
religious lines. In Yinons mind, the less unified the Arabs and Muslims are the
better for Israels designs. Better yet, have the Arabs and Muslims fight each other
over land and partition themselves into obscurity. Yinon suggests a way to
accomplish this, primarily by instigating civil strife in the Arab/Muslim countries
which will eventually lead to their dismemberment.
In the document, Yinon specifically recommended:
Lebanons total dissolution into five provinces serves as
a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt,
Syria, Iraq and the Arabian peninsula and is already
following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq
later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such
as in Lebanon, is Israels primary target on the Eastern
front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military
power of those states serves as the primary short term
target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic
and religious structure, into several states such as in
present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shiite Alawi
state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area,
another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern
neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe
even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in
northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the
guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long
run, and that aim is already within our reach today.
He later singled out Iraq as Israels most formidable enemy at the time, and outlined its
downfall in these terms:

Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on


the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israels
targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us
than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the
short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest
threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart
and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to
organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every
kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short
run and will shorten the way to the more important aim
of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in
Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along
ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is
possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the
three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and
Shiite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni
and Kurdish north. It is possible that the present IranianIraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization.
Yinons vision seems to be unfolding rapidly in Iraq which is today on the verge of
partition with the Sunni extremists of ISIS seizing vast swaths of territory for their
caliphate and the Northern Kurds still battling for independence from Baghdad
which is ruled by a Shia clique headed by Haider al-Abadi and Nour al-Maliki. Syria
too looks to be falling victim to Yinons venomous whims as ISIS has wrested
control of large chunks of Syrian territory and presently enforces its brutal
sectarianism on the Eastern population of the country.
The themes and ideas in Yinons Machiavellian manifesto are still held dear today
by the Likudnik rulers in Israel and their neocon patrons in the West. Pro-Israel
neocons basically replicated Yinons proposals in a 1996 strategy paper intended
as advice for Benjamin Netanyahu, although in less direct language.
Their report titled A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm spoke
of removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq as an important Israeli
strategic objective that serves as a means of weakening Syria. The Clean Break
authors advised that Israel should militarily engage Hezbollah, Syria and Iran
along its Northern border. They go on to suggest air strikes on Syrian targets in
Lebanon as well as inside Syria-proper. They also stipulate that, Syrian territory is

not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli proxy forces.


These neocon recommendations seem to be playing out today like a perfectly
gauged game of chess. The Syria crisis has unveiled Israels plans for destabilizing
the region to their benefit. At many points since the unrest in Syria began in 2011,
Israel has conducted air strikes on Syrian military sites, just as the Clean Break
criminals encouraged. In a January 2015 interview with Foreign Affairs magazine,
Syrias President Bashar al-Assad made note of Israels incessant attacks against
Syrian army installations during the conflict: [Tel Aviv is] supporting the rebels in
Syria. Its very clear. Because whenever we make advances in some place, they
make an attack in order to undermine the army. Assad further described Israel as
al-Qaedas air force.
Israels support of the Takfiri militants inside Syria goes beyond periodic air strikes
in their favor. According to a 2014 UN report, Israel has been providing sanctuary
and hospital care to thousands of anti-Assad terrorists, including those of ISIS and
al-Nusra, and then dispatching them back into the fight. A Russia Today report on
the issue headlined UN details Israel helping Syrian rebels at Golan
Heights noted: Israeli security forces have kept steady contacts with the Syrian
rebels over the past 18 months, mainly treating wounded fighters but possibly
supplying them with arms, UN observers at the Israeli-Syrian border reported.
Israels gains in this situation are manifold. Tel Aviv has been using the fog of war
to weaken its primary adversary in Damascus and consequently draw its other
foes Iran and Hezbollah into the quandary, thereby diminishing their collective
resolve to fight Israel itself. The Zionist regime not only views the Takfiris of ISIS
and al-Nusra as a lesser enemy, but also as proxy mercenaries against
Damascus, a strategy explicated in the neocons Clean Break document. In fact, Tel
Aviv doesnt view the Takfiris as much of a threat at all; a point that was validated
by ISIS itself which declared that it is not interested in fighting Israel. ISIS:
Fighting Infidels Takes Precedence Over Fighting Israel, reads an August 2014
headline in Arutz Sheva, an Israeli news outlet.
The former Israeli ambassador to the US, Michael Oren, substantiated all of this in
a September 2013 interview with the Jerusalem Post. Bad guys backed by Iran
are worse for Israel than bad guys who are not supported by the Islamic
Republic, he told the Post, adding that the greatest danger to Israel is the
strategic arc that extends from Tehran, to Damascus to Beirut. And we saw the
Assad regime as the keystone in that arc. That is a position we had well before the
outbreak of hostilities in Syria. With the outbreak of hostilities we continued to

want Assad to go. Oren further remarked with glee about the total capitulation of
the Gulf sheikhdoms Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to
Israels itinerary vis--vis Syria, Iran and the Palestinian issue, observing that in
the last 64 years there has probably never been a greater confluence of interest
between us and several Gulf States. With these Gulf States we have agreements
on Syria, on Egypt, on the Palestinian issue. We certainly have agreements on Iran.
This is one of those opportunities presented by the Arab Spring.
Roland Dumas, Frances former foreign minister, confirmed Israeli intrigue behind
Syrias internal woes. In a June 15, 2013, article for Global Research, journalist
Gearid Colmin quotes Dumas who told a French TV channel that the turmoil
in Syria, which has cost the lives of more than 100,000 Syrians, was planned
several years in advance. Dumas claimed that he met with British officials two
years before the violence erupted in Damascus in 2011 and at the meeting they
confessed to him that they were organizing an invasion of rebels into Syria.
When asked for his support in the endeavor, Dumas declined, saying, Im French,
that doesnt interest me. Dumas further pinpointed the architects of the madness
as Israeli Zionists, suggesting that the Syria destabilization operation goes way
back. It was prepared, preconceived and planned [by the Israeli regime]. Dumas
noted that Syrias anti-Israel stance sealed its fate in this respect and also revealed
that a former Israeli prime minister once told him well try to get on with our
neighbours but those who dont agree with us will be destroyed.
Israel planned this war of annihilation years ago in accordance with the Yinon
Plan, which advocates balkanization of all states that pose a threat to Israel,
writes Gearid Colmin in the aforesaid piece. The Zionist entity is using Britain
and France to goad the reluctant Obama administration into sending more
American troops to their death in Syria on behalf of Tel Aviv.
Colmin argues that the West are doing [Israels] bidding by attempting to drag
[the United States] into another ruinous war so that Israel can get control of the
Middle Easts energy reserves, eventually replacing the United States as the ruling
state in the world. It has also been necessary for Tel Aviv to remain silent so as not
to expose their role in the revolutions, given the fact that the Jihadist fanatics
dont realize they are fighting for Israel.
ISIS: A Repository of Patsies for the False Flaggers

At long last, this brings us to the second phase of the ISIS psyop: scaring
Westerners into submission.

Its no coincidence that the notorious belligerence of ISIS in its quest for a
caliphate aligns perfectly with the neocon agenda which aims to inculcate in the
minds of the masses the myth of a clash of civilizations between the West and
Islam. In its official magazine, Dabiq, ISIS ideologues advanced a parallel attitude
with the neocon desire for a civilizational conflict. Is that merely happenstance? Or
has ISIS been manufactured by the neocons to serve as the ultimate boogeyman
and straw man caricature of Islamic radicalism?
The godfather of neoconservatism, Leo Strauss, espoused a dogma of deception,
stipulating that in order to corral society behind the wishes of an elite vanguard
an external enemy must be fashioned. This enemy could be real, but enemies
usually exist in the eye of the beholder and in the minds of those seeking
opposition. Strauss made it clear that if this societal enemy did not exist or was
not formidable enough to generate an adequate amount of fear required to
paralyze and manipulate the masses, then one should be invented or inflated and
then advertised to the populace as a real, pressing danger.
For the neocons, this phantom nemesis forms the crux of their strategy of
subjugation. Without it, the public would never consent to their lunatic foreign
policies, nor would anyone feel threatened enough to willingly relinquish their
freedoms in the name of security. This is what ISIS is all about.
As demonstrated earlier, ISIS was cultivated by our own governments to
destabilize and ultimately overthrow various regimes in the Middle East and North
Africa that fell astray of the Globalist-Zionist program. The Western media has
purposely marketed the ISIS brand across the globe, making it a household
name. The Zionist globalists built up ISIS to do their bidding abroad, but despite
media sensationalism the group is not nearly strong enough to pose any serious
threat to Western countries. So while ISIS represents no legitimate military threat
to the West, its global reputation for brutality and obscene violence is seen as a
fantastic propaganda tool to frighten Western populations into consenting to the
extirpation of their freedoms at home.
The Zionist globalists have put that carefully crafted ISIS image to work, fabricating
a series of perfectly timed terror events inside Western countries which have
been used to curtail freedoms under the guise of keeping us safe from the
terrorists. What the gullible commoners dont realize is that these terrorists are
controlled by our own governments and are being wielded against us to vindicate

the construction of an Orwellian police state.


The string of lone-wolf attacks that hit Ottawa, Sydney, Paris and now
Copenhagen over the past five months since the West first declared war on ISIS
are all part of an organized neocon strategy of tension. The intelligence agencies
of the West and Israel stand behind them all. In every case, the terrorists had
long histories of mental illness and/or frequent run-ins with the law; the standard
rap-sheet of a patsy whose innumerable weaknesses are exploited by government
agents to produce a type-cast fall guy to play the part of the wily gunman who
hates our freedoms. ISIS therefore in effect provides the false flag con artists who
control our governments with an inexhaustible wellspring of patsies for their
operations.
As the researcher Joshua Blakeney pointed out, Some peasant in Yemen may be
angry [enough at the West to want to harm it] but he [could] never [physically
carry out] such an attack without it being made possible by the false-flag
planners. A let it happen or a made it happen scenario amounts to the same
thing without the connivance of the government in question there is no attack
to even discuss. Since ISIS is a global phenomenon, according to our controlled
media, authorities dont even have to prove that these deranged individuals are
members of the group. All they have to say is that they were inspired by the
groups message which can be accessed online, and thats enough to indict them
in the court of public opinion. Even if all that were true, it still wouldnt eliminate
potential state involvement, which usually comes in the form of equipping the
dupe with the necessary armaments to execute the plot and preventing wellmeaning police and intelligence people from intervening to stop it. These are the
kinds of queries the Wests big media patently refuses to pursue, knowing full well
that the state is almost always complicit with, and keen to exploit, whatever
tragedy befalls their population.
All of the latest traumatic terror events in Western capitals have been instantly
branded by lying, cynical politicians as attacks on free speech and the values of
Western civilization, a familiar trope first trotted out by George W. Bush and his
neocon puppet masters after the false flag attacks of 9/11.
However, what many are starting to realize is that whatever threat some mind
controlled junkie might pose to our lives, our own governments are a markedly
more dangerous menace to our liberties, well being and way of life. They prove

this point every single day with a manifold of new freedom-busting laws that they
pass using the comical excuse of protecting us from their own Frankenstein.
Thats the simple truth of the matter that the neocon false flaggers seek to
suppress at all costs as they desperately hold up the faade of their artificial
power which will inevitably collapse under its own weight.
Copyright 2015 Brandon Martinez
Brandon Martinez is an independent writer and journalist from
Canada who specializes in foreign policy issues, international
affairs and 20th and 21st century history. He is the co-founder of
Non-Aligned Media and the author of the 2014 books Grand
Deceptions and Hidden History.
If you found this article useful, considering contributing to NonAligned Media. Also visit our books page.