Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The court heard on 2 April 2009 that Mrs Lee was working 10-hour shifts
without a break when she supplied the wrong drug.
The judge said Mrs Lee bore no factual or legal responsibility for Mrs
Shellers death, which a pathologist had determined was due to Mrs
Shellers underlying long-term illness.
However, he said: The public, just as the Sheller family were, are entitled to
expect the highest standard of care from those responsible for the dispensing
of medication.
That is why the offence exists as a criminal offence punishable with
imprisonment.
He continued: Everything that I have read and heard about you, and indeed
your family, indicates that you as an individual and as a family are decent
people with consideration for others, who in ordinary circumstances would
not have come anywhere near a court like this let alone intentionally break
the law.
Also I have been impressed and act upon what I have been told you did back
in September 2007 when this matter came to light.
You have not sought to avoid responsibility, you did not then and you have
not now.
It is worthy of note that you resigned from the Royal Pharmaceutical
Society immediately and I am told and accept you will not seek again to work
as a pharmacist.
Ultimately it was her responsibility to check and make sure no error was
made and although an error was made it was a genuine error under pressure.
Mrs Lee admitted supplying a medicinal product with a misleading label on
the package a charge brought under the 1968 Medicines Act.
She had been due to face trial on a further charge of supplying a medicinal
product that was not of the nature specifically prescribed. But after legal
arguments her plea was accepted by prosecutors. The second charge against
her will remain on file.
12503941
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12503941?report=abstract
Naomi is an insulin dependent diabetic who has to take insulin throughout the day and at night.
On 31st December 2010, she obtained a repeat prescription from her GP practice for her short-acting
insulin. She took the prescription to the pharmacy near to the GP surgery. However instead of being
dispensed the correct insulin as prescribed, a locum pharmacist gave her the wrong insulin cartridges.
The dispensing error caused Naomi to receive an underdose of insulin which meant that her high blood
sugar following meals was not blunted to the same extent. She also received an overdose of
intermediate acting insulin which she was not supposed to take at all.
Throughout January 2011, Naomi's blood sugar levels were up and down. She felt unwell, tired and
lacking in energy. Her legs felt heavy and she struggled to get out of bed.
On 31st January 2011, she suffered a major hypoglycaemic episode and fell, suffering a dental and jaw
injury.
Court proceedings were served against the pharmacy and the locum pharmacist in May 2012.
Defences were received from both defendants, essentially blaming the other for the mistake.
The pharmacy admitted that the incorrect medication had been picked off the shelf by the dispenser
but the locum pharmacist had a responsibility to check that the correct medication had been picked
from the shelf.
- See more at: http://www.claims-medneg.co.uk/our-cases/prescription-and-medicationerrors/insulin-dispensing-error-pharmacist#sthash.ykE9jJR4.dpuf
http://www.claims-medneg.co.uk/our-cases/prescription-and-medication-errors/insulin-dispensingerror-pharmacist
within
the
pharmacy,
and
thus
breached
Rights
4(1)
and
4(2).
The pharmacy and rest home both had adequate policies and procedures for the
dispensing and checking of medication, and it was reasonable to expect staff to
adhere to such protocols.
http://www.hdc.org.nz/decisions--case-notes/case-notes/dispensing-error-(02hdc04619)
Quicklinks
03HDC13660
Previous Page
http://www.hdc.org.nz/decisions--case-notes/case-notes/warfarin-dispensing-error-(03hdc13660)
HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMISSIONER
However, after taking several dosses of the medication, our client began to suffer symptoms of dizziness, problems
sleeping, blurred vision, acid reflux and muscle ache. Our client continued to take the medication as he initially
believed that his symptoms may be due to his gall bladder surgery. A week after taking the medication, our client
began to suspect that his medication may be the cause of his quite sudden onset of symptoms. Upon checking the
name of the medication on the box and the enclosed leaflet, on the internet, it was realised that the tablets were for
patients with high blood pressure. He had therefore been dispensed the incorrect medication by the chemist.
Our client highlighted this error to his GP and to the chemist involved who then provided him with the correct
medication and apologised for the serious error that occurred. It took our client months to fully recover from the error
made. Thompsons were successful in representing this client by submitting a claim, obtaining a formal acceptance of
fault from the chemist and finally receiving compensation for the damage caused to the client as a result of the
dispensing error.
Repeat Prescription dispensed incorrectly
Our client, in this case was a gentleman from Wales who attended his GP for a repeat prescription of Amitriptyline of
which he normally took 3 tablets daily. This medication is an anti-depressant. The medication was prescribed and
then collected from his local chemist.
After taking several doses of the medication, our client suffered from a lack of sleep, severe headaches, nausea,
dizziness and a feeling of disorientation. Our client continued to take the medication in the assumption that his
symptoms may be unrelated. Some days after taking the medication, he noticed that the printed label on the
medication box read Amitriptyline but the actual box and the enclosed information leaflet read Amlodipine. This
medication treats patients with high blood pressure and therefore acts to reduce a patients blood pressure.
Our client contacted NHS Direct and was advised to attend his local hospital immediately. Upon attending the
hospital, he was seen by a Cardio-Vascular consultant who explained the seriousness of the incident to our client and
admitted him for 2 days for treatment. Our client was left with continuing symptoms of dizziness and blurred vision
which lasted just under a year.
The error was highlighted to the chemist who acknowledged the error but did not take any further action. Thompsons
successfully represented this gentleman in a Clinical negligence claim against the chemist due to their incorrect
dispensing of medication and obtained an admission of fault from the chemist and compensation for the client after
submitting a claim and obtaining necessary medical evidence on his behalf.
http://www.thompsons.law.co.uk/clinical-negligence/prescription-errors.htm
Cases
A patient was admitted to hospital with unexplained abdominal bleeding. On investigation he was found to
have an abnormally high INR, even though he had never been prescribed anticoagulant therapy. His elevated INR
was eventually attributed to a dispensing error. The pharmacist had inadvertently made a selection error and
dispensed 5mg Coumadin instead of 5 mg Coversyl as prescribed.
Due to a pharmacists selection error, the cytotoxic medication Hydrea was dispensed instead of the
prescribed antihypertensive Hydopa. The young woman happened to be pregnant and claimed the error resulted in
her suffering a miscarriage.
A customer successfully claimed for loss of income when she was unable to work for an extended period
after a dispensing error. Although the customer had been prescribed Lamictal 25mg, the pharmacist inadvertently
dispensed 200mg tablets. The customer subsequently took the higher dose for a number of months and suffered liver
damage. While the pharmacist said she usually used barcode scanning, she failed to do so on this occasion.
Make use of the safety features available in your dispensing software. Set up different alerts to remind
people to perform certain tasks. Likewise, make use of advanced scanning features that automatically print a
barcode on the dispensing label.
Avoid positioning these medications in strict alphabetical order. For example, storing Coumadin under W for
Warfarin, limits the chance of inadvertently selecting Coumadin instead of Coversyl which has similar packaging.
Consider storing other high risk medications separately.
Adhere to the PDL Guide to good dispensing every time. When errors occur, pharmacists often say if only
Id taken the time to. Dont be coerced into rushing or cutting corners.
Promote a culture where all staff are confident to point out risky practices when they occur.
Seek help if you are feeling intimidated or uneasy about contacting the prescriber to clarify a script.
Be careful with zeros and abbreviations. Transcription or interpretation errors involving a zero, decimal point
or abbreviation are common causes of serious dispensing errors. For example 6U of insulin could easily be
interpreted as 60 units.
Reducing distractions when a pharmacist is dispensing is everyones responsibility. Agree strict rules for
minimising interruptions and distractions in your pharmacy.
Review the dispensary layout to ensure workflow supports each step of good dispensing.
When handing medications to a customer, point out all warnings and directions on the label and packaging.
This not only helps with counselling, but serves as a final check against any dispensing error.
http://www.riskequip.com.au/pharmacy/case-studies/dispensing-errors-wrong-medication-wrongstrength
Case
A woman was prescribed a two week course of Ciprofloxacin 500mg to treat a chest infection.
However, the pharmacist only dispensed a one week supply by mistake. The woman claimed she developed
pneumonia as a result of the pharmacists error.
Adhere to the PDL Guide to good dispensing every time. When errors occur, pharmacists often say if
only Id taken the time to . Dont be coerced into rushing or cutting corners.
Seek help if you are feeling intimidated or uneasy about contacting the prescriber to clarify a script.
Display posters or reminders in the dispensary to promote compliance with dispensing procedures.
Orientate all new staff and locums to these procedures.
Make use of the safety features available in your dispensing software. Set up different alerts to remind
people to perform certain tasks. Likewise, make use of advanced scanning features that automatically print a
barcode on the dispensing label.
Be careful with zeros and abbreviations. Transcription or interpretation errors involving a zero, decimal
point or abbreviation are common causes of serious dispensing errors.
Consider placing flags or warnings in the dispensing basket when handling a script for an unusual
quantity of medication. For example, a simple card statingRISK WARNING different quantity could reduce
the chance of you automatically selecting a standard quantity.
Review the dispensary layout to ensure workflow supports each step of good dispensing.
When handing medications to a customer, point out all warnings and directions on the label and
packaging. This not only helps with counselling, but serves as a final check against any dispensing error.
Promote a culture where all staff are confident to point out risky practices when they occur.
http://www.riskequip.com.au/pharmacy/case-studies/dispensing-errors-wrong-quantity-of-medication