Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Dr. Inga van den Bongard
Dr. Erik Fernau
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
Lecturer
Dr. Inga van den Bongard
Email: ivdb@uni-mannheim.de
Office: L 9, 1-2, Room 401
Office hours: on appointment
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
Chair of Finance
Chair of Finance:
L9,1-2
http://finanzierung.bwl.uni-mannheim.de/en/home/
Research & teaching at the Chair of Finance
Market Microstructure
Corporate Finance
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
Time schedule
Monday
Tuesday
Lecture
10.02.2014
11.02.2014
17.02.2014
18.02.2014
No lecture
24.02.2014
25.02.2014
03.03.2014
04.03.2014
10.03.2014
11.03.2014
17.03.2014
18.03.2014
24.03.2014
25.03.2014
31.03.2014
01.04.2014
07.04.2014
08.04.2014
14.04.2014
15.04.2014
21.04.2014
22.04.2014
28.04.2014
29.04.2014
05.05.2014
06.05.2014
12.05.2014
13.05.2014
19.05.2014
20.05.2014
26.05.2014*
27.05.2014
Easter break
* Question time
University of Mannheim, Chair of Finance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
Password: CorpGFSS2014
University of Mannheim, Chair of Finance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
Exam
Student evaluation is based on a written exam
(60 minutes, closed book)
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
6 ECTS
Prerequisites
Introductory course in corporate finance on the level of
Brealey/Myers/Allen is strongly recommended.
Brealey, R.A., Myers, C.S. and F. Allen, 2008, Principles of
corporate finance, 9th edition, Mcgraw-Hill Higher Education.
Focus of the course
The course covers both theoretical concepts and empirical
studies in the field of corporate governance.
University of Mannheim, Chair of Finance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
Learning outcomes
By the end of this course, students should be able to:
1. Contrast the different definitions of corporate governance
2. Critically review the principal-agent model
3. Describe differences in corporate control across the world
4. Explain the reasons why control may be different from
ownership
5. Compare the main classifications of corporate governance
systems
6. Assess the effectiveness of the different corporate governance
mechanisms, such as for example the board of directors
7. Critically assess the empirical evidence on the importance and
effectiveness of various corporate governance mechanisms
University of Mannheim, Chair of Finance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
Recommended reading
Goergen, M., 2012, International Corporate Governance, Prentice
Hall.
Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny, 1997, A survey of corporate
governance, Journal of Finance 52, 737-784.
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Dr. Inga van den Bongard
Dr. Erik Fernau
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
Background
1946: Kozlowski was born in New Jersey
1960: Tyco is founded as a research laboratory doing experimental
work for the government.
1962: change focus to high-tech products for the commerical sector
Went public in 1964
Between 1970 and 1980: growth through acquisitions/ market
leadership across a range of electronics, fire & safety products and
packaging
1974: Tyco stock is listed on the NYSE
1975: Dennis Kozlowski joined Tyco as an assistent controller
1992: Appointment of Kozlowski as CEO
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
The Party:
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
The Party:
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
The Outcome:
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
The idea is not new and the fundamental insight dates back at least
as far as 1776
A much quoted comment by Adam Smith shows that he understood
the issue of corporate governance (even though he did not know the
phrase):
The directors of companies, being managers of other peoples
money than their own, it cannot well be expected that they should
watch over it with the same anxious vigilance with which the
partners in a private copartnery frequently watch over their own.
(Smith, 1776, The wealth of nations)
However, the phrase corporate governance was scarcely used
until the 1980s
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
Definition(s)
There exist several definitions of CG in the academic literature (and
elsewhere):
Corporate governance deals with the ways in which suppliers
of finance to corporations assure themselves of getting a
return on their investment (Shleifer and Vishny, 1997, JF)
Denis (2001) describes corporate governance as the set of
institutional and market mechanisms that induce selfinterested managers (controllers) to maximize the value of the
residual cash flows of the firm on behalf of its shareholders
(the owners) (Denis, 2001, RFE)
Shareholder perspective: Maximization of shareholder value!
What about other stakeholders?
Creditors, employees, customers, suppliers, etc.
University of Mannheim, Chair of Finance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
Definition(s)
stakeholder society, e.g. Tirole (2001):
Corporate governance explicitly mentions stakeholder
maximization
The traditional shareholder value approach is too narrow a view
for an economic analysis of corporate governance. I will, perhaps
unconventionally for an economist, define corporate governance
as the design of institutions that induce or force management to
internalize the welfare of stakeholders. The provision of
managerial incentives and the design of a control structure must
account for their impact on the utilities of all stakeholders [] in
order to, respectively, induce or force internalization.
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
FSS 2014
Corporate Governance
Suggested readings
Goergen, M., 2012, International corporate governance, 1st edition,
Chapters 1.
Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny, 1997, A survey of corporate
governance, Journal of Finance 52, 737-784.
FSS 2014