Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
REPLY
I, Nena Rose Bugrong, in my own behalf, respectfully submit
hereunder my reply to the Answer of the defendant Roshan Lanes
Tagalibod, to wit:
By way of Reply to Defendants Answer:
The Petitioner admits the content of Paragraph 1 of the
answer insofar as the contracting of a loan amounting to Fifty
Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) and the existence of promissory
note for the payment of such loan.
That the Petitioner specifically denies the content of
Paragraph 2 that she had made a complete payment in the
amount of P50,000.00 evidenced by the receipt annexed herein.
Such receipt presented were obtained
fraudulently by the
defendant.
The content of paragraph 3 of the answer is likewise denied,
It is clear from the foregoing promissory note annexed herein that
in the event that the borrower fails to pay on the due date, 30 %
will accrue as an interest and another 30% will accrue as a
penalty which amounts to a total of 60% annually.
With respect to paragraph 4 of the answer the same is
likewise rejected, the defendant herself have received the
demand letters evidenced by a return copy, signed by her and
attached herein as annexedC.