Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 24

369

Compression of granular materials

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Gholamreza Mesri and Barames Vardhanabhuti

Abstract: Compression data on over 100 sands were examined to clarify the role of particle rearrangement through interparticle slip and rotation and particle damage on primary compression, including the yield stress, secondary compression,
and coefficient of lateral pressure at rest. During the increase in effective vertical stress, mechanisms such as tighter packing that promote particle locking and interparticle slip and particle damage that promote particle unlocking together determine the relationship between void ratio and effective vertical stress. Three levels of particle damage together with
interparticle slip and rotation determine three types of compression behavior and a yield stress at the abrupt onset of particle fracturing and splitting. The ratio of secondary compression index to compression index is independent of whether
compression results from overcoming interparticle friction through interparticle slip, from overcoming particle strength
through particle damage, or both; and therefore it is a constant independent of the effective stress range. The coefficient of
lateral pressure at rest of an initially dense sand starts with a value defined by the Jaky equation and the maximum friction
angle and remains constant up to the abrupt onset of particle fracturing and splitting, at which point it begins to increase
with an increase in effective vertical stress.
Key words: sand, compression, yield stress, secondary compression, coefficient of earth pressure at rest.
Resume : Des donnees de compression de plus de 100 sables ont ete examines afin declaircir le role du rearrangement
des particules par glissement et rotation inter-particulaire et du dommage sur les particules lors de la compression primaire,
incluant la limite decoulement, la compression secondaire, et le coefficient de pression laterale au repos. Pendant laugmentation de la contrainte verticale effective, les mecanismes tels que le serrage qui entrane le blocage des particules, et
le glissement inter-particules et le dommage qui entranent le deblocage des particules, determinent ensemble la relation
entre lindice des vides et la contrainte verticale effective. Trois niveaux de dommage aux particules, en plus du glissement et de la rotation inter-particules, determinent trois types de comportement en compression ainsi que la limite decoulement au moment ou` il y a fracture et separation des particules. Le ratio entre lindice de compression secondaire et
lindice de compression est independant de lorigine de la compression, que ce soit le surpassement de la friction entre les
particules par glissement inter-particulaire ou le surpassement de la resistance des particules par du dommage, ou les deux,
alors ce ratio est une constante independante de lintervalle des contraintes effectives. Le coefficient de pression laterale
au repos dun sable initialement dense est premie`rement definit par lequation de Jaky avec langle de friction maximal, et
demeure constant jusquau moment ou` les particules commencent soudainement a` fracturer et a` se separer; a` partir de ce
point le coefficient de pression laterale commence a` augmenter avec laugmentation de la contrainte verticale effective.
Mots-cles : sable, compression, limite decoulement, compression secondaire, coefficient de la pression des terres au repos.
[Traduit par la Redaction]

Introduction
In all soils, one-dimensional compression and isotropic
compression are achieved through particle rearrangement
into a tighter packing. In some soils, particle rearrangement
is accompanied by particle deformation, such as bending
and particle compression, as in fibrous peats. In all soils,
particle rearrangement into a more compact configuration is
achieved by overcoming interparticle friction through interReceived 13 March 2008. Accepted 5 December 2008.
Published on the NRC Research Press Web site at cgj.nrc.ca on
3 April 2009.
G. Mesri.1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 205 North Mathews
Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
B. Vardhanabhuti. Department of Civil Engineering, Kasetsart
University, 50 Phahonyotin St., Ladyao Jatujak, Bangkok 10900,
Thailand.
1Corresponding

author (e-mail: gmesri@uiuc.edu).

Can. Geotech. J. 46: 369392 (2009)

particle slip and rotation. In some soils, particle rearrangement is also facilitated by overcoming particle strength
through particle damage as in granular soils. Particle damage may be quantified as level I damage (abrasion or grinding of particle surface asperities), level II damage (breaking
or crushing of particle surface protrusions and sharp particle
corners and edges), and level III damage (fracturing, splitting, or shattering of particles) (Roberts and de Souza 1958;
Hendron 1963; Marsal 1967; Hardin 1985; Rahim 1989;
Coop 1990; Pestana and Whittle 1995; Nakata et al. 2001a,
2001b; Chuhan et al. 2002, 2003).
Compression, i.e., more intimate packing of particles, promotes locking, including engaging surface roughness, among
soil particles and increases the stiffness of a granular aggregate (Vesic and Clough 1968; Lambe and Whitman 1969).
However, interparticle slip and especially particle damage
are unlocking mechanisms that decrease the stiffness of a
granular mass. During compression of granular materials,
both unlocking and locking mechanisms operate simultaneously. The net effect determines the shape of the void ratio

doi:10.1139/T08-123

Published by NRC Research Press

370

Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 46, 2009

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 1. Scanning electron micrographs of the surface of three particles of Ottawa sand (ac) and three particles of Lake Michigan sand (df).
a, 1401; b, 21552; c, 5000; d, 560; e, 1647; f, 835.

or volumetric strain versus effective stress relationship and,


in the case of one-dimensional compression, the behavior of
the tangent-constrained modulus (M Ds v0 =D3v ) versus effective vertical stress (s v0 ) relationship, where 3v is the vertical strain. When the locking effect of more intimate packing
dominates over the unlocking effect of interparticle slippage
and particle damage, a net locking behavior develops and M
increases with an increase in s v0 (Chuhan et al. 2002, 2003).
A net unlocking behavior results when the unlocking effects
of particle damage and interparticle slip exceed the effect of

improved locking through denser particle packing and M decreases with an increase in s v0 . An equal balance behavior is
also possible when unlocking and locking effects are equal
and M remains constant with s v0 .
One-dimensional and isotropic compression of all soils
can be interpreted in terms of primary compression that occurs during the increase in effective stress and secondary
compression that follows at constant effective stress. Onedimensional compression is observed in a laterally constrained condition in response to an increase in s v0 , and
Published by NRC Research Press

Mesri and Vardhanabhuti

371

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 1. (continued). Scanning electron micrographs of the surface of three particles of Niigata sand (gi) and three particles of Toyoura sand
(jl). g, 2364; h, 1674; i, 3700; j, 40000; k, 7500; l, 1200.

isotropic compression is observed under an equal all-around


pressure (p) in response to an increase in p. The mechanisms that facilitate compression during an increase in effective stress continue with time during secondary compression.
An inherent manifestation of internal friction is the fraction of the vertical force that is transmitted to the vertical
planes under the laterally constrained deformation condition.
The angle of friction that is mobilized in one-dimensional
compression, and therefore the behavior of the coefficient
of lateral pressure at rest Ko s h0 =s v0 , where s h0 is the effec-

tive horizontal stress, is determined by the nature of particles, nature and history of particle packing, and particle
damage.
In this paper, we utilized data from 182 oedometer tests
on 98 sands and 17 isotropic loading tests on six sands reported in the literature (Vardhanabhuti 2005) to examine
and clarify the role of particle rearrangement through interparticle slip and rotation and particle damage on primary
compression including the yield stress, secondary compression, and coefficient of lateral pressure at rest. This paper
Published by NRC Research Press

372

Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 46, 2009

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 2. Type A compression behavior of a loose Ottawa sand (data from Roberts and de Souza 1958). CU, uniformity coefficient; Dr, relative density; D50, mean grain size; Mmax, tangent constrained modulus at the first inflection point; Mmin, tangent constrained modulus at the
second inflection point; s v0 Mmax , effective vertical stress at the yield point defined at the first inflection point; s v0 Mmin , effective vertical
stress at the yield point defined at the second inflection point; s v0 MC , effective vertical stress at the yield point defined at the point of
maximum curvature.

Fig. 3. Type A compression behavior of a dense Ottawa sand (data from Roberts and de Souza 1958). eo, initial void ratio.

does not consider compression resulting from vibration of


granular materials (Mesri and Vardhanabhuti 2007).

Primary compression
Laboratory information on the compressibility of granular

soils comes from oedometer tests in which a soil specimen


is subjected to laterally constrained vertical loading and
from triaxial tests in which a soil specimen is subjected to
equal all-around pressure. Most laboratory tests on granular
soils have been conducted on dry (and less frequently on saturated), reconstituted specimens using incremental or conPublished by NRC Research Press

Mesri and Vardhanabhuti

373

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 4. Type A compression behavior of Toyoura sand (data from Nakata et al. 2001a).

Fig. 5. Type A compression behavior of Ottawa sand (data from Pestana and Whittle 1995).

tinuous loading. Because of the dry condition or high permeability of saturated granular soils, primary consolidation
of a laboratory specimen essentially is completed as soon as
the load is applied, and the end-of-primary (EOP) void ratio
or volumetric strain for incremental loading is defined at
several seconds or minutes past the application of the load
increment. The EOP void ratio or volumetric strain sometimes corresponds to a relatively fast constant rate of loading (e.g., 0.01 MPa/s in oedometer tests conducted by
Chuhan et al. 2002, 2003) or constant rate of compression

(e.g., 0.01 mm/min in oedometer tests by Nakata et al.


2001b). The compression data are interpreted either in terms
of EOP void ratio versus effective vertical stress or EOP
void ratio versus the logarithm of effective vertical stress
(log s v0 ). Most of the existing data on primary compression
of granular soils can be summarized in terms of type A, B,
or C void ratio versus effective stress relationships.
Type A void ratio e versus s v0 behavior (such as that
shown in Fig. 2) displays three distinct stages of compression (Chuhan et al. 2003). During the first stage, small parPublished by NRC Research Press

374

Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 46, 2009

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 6. Type A compression behavior of mono-quartz sand (data from Chuhan et al. 2003).

Fig. 7. Type A compression behavior of a quartz sand (data from Nakata et al. 2001b).

ticle movements further engage particle surface roughness


and enhance interparticle locking. There is minor to small
level I and level II particle damage (e.g., Vaid et al. 1985;
Yudhbir and Rahim 1987; Rahim 1989); however, improved
locking dominates over unlocking effects, and M increases
with an increase in s v0 . The second compression stage begins
with level III particle damage, i.e., fracturing of the heavily
loaded particles and collapse of the load-bearing aggregate
framework (Cundall and Strack 1979; McDowell 2002;
McDowell and Harireche 2002). Particle fracturing unlocks

the aggregate framework, allowing larger interparticle movements, and M begins to decrease with an increase in s v0 . The
first inflection point in the e versus s v0 relationship marks
the beginning of the second stage at an effective vertical
stress s v0 Mmax , and a second inflection point at s v0 Mmin
marks the end at which major particle fracturing and splitting are substantially complete (Nakata et al. 2001a,
2001b). Figure 1 shows examples of sand particle surface
roughness that is further engaged during small interparticle
movements of the first stage of compression and is disenPublished by NRC Research Press

Mesri and Vardhanabhuti

375

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 8. Type B compression behavior of Ganga sand (data from Rahim 1989).

Fig. 9. Type B compression behavior of Wabash River sand (data from Hendron 1963).

gaged during large interparticle movements of the second


stage of compression. During the third compression stage,
the stiffness gain from improved particle packing exceeds
the unlocking effect of level I, level II, and some level III
particle damage (to both original particles and new angular
fragments) and interparticle slip, and M continuously increases with an increase in s v0 . During this stage, particle
damage may decrease with an increase in the uniformity coefficient as a result of particle fragmentation and particle

concentration and a decrease in the void ratio, and the associated relative movement among grains is small (DeBeer
1963, 1965; Hagerty et al. 1993; Lade et al. 1996; Bopp
and Lade 1997; Nakata et al. 2001a, 2001b; Chuhan et al.
2002, 2003). Examples of type A e versus s v0 behavior are
shown in Figs. 27. Type A compression behavior is most
commonly, but not exclusively, observed for clean wellrounded, strong (high degree of hardness) coarse particles
(Nakata et al. 2001b; Chuhan et al. 2002).
Published by NRC Research Press

376

Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 46, 2009

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 10. Type B compression behavior of Mol sand (data from DeBeer 1963).

Fig. 11. Type B compression behavior of Feldspar sand (data from Pestana and Whittle 1995).

Type B e versus s v0 behavior (such as that shown in


Fig. 8) represents a transition between type A and type C
compression behavior. It is similar to type A compression
behavior, as it displays three stages of compression; and to
type C compression behavior, as M never decreases with an
increase in s v0 throughout the compression. During the first
compression stage, starting at low stresses, there is level I
and level II particle damage, but improved locking domi-

nates and M gradually increases with an increase in s v0 . During the second stage, improved packing just balances the
unlocking produced by level III particle damage, and M remains constant with s v0 . During the third stage, improved
packing dominates over the effects of particle damage and
interparticle slip, and M gradually increases with an increase
in s v0 (Nakata et al. 2001a, 2001b; Chuhan et al. 2003). Examples of type B e versus s v0 behavior, which is less comPublished by NRC Research Press

Mesri and Vardhanabhuti

377

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 12. Type C compression behavior of Quiou sand (data from Pestana and Whittle 1995).

Fig. 13. Type C compression behavior of carbonate sand (data from Chuhan et al. 2003). D60, grain size at which 60% of the sample is
finer.

mon than type A and type C behavior, are shown in Figs. 8


11 where vertical line segments mark the effective vertical
stress range where M remains constant.
In type C, e versus s v0 behavior of granular soils (such as
that shown in Fig. 12) significant level I and level II particle
damage begins early at low effective stresses and continues
with or without gradual level III particle damage at higher
effective stresses (Coop 1990; Coop and Lee 1993; Chuhan

et al. 2003). The locking effect of improved gradation and


packing dominates over unlocking effects of gradual particle
damage and interparticle slippage, and M continuously increases with an increase in s v0 (e.g., Pestana and Whittle
1995). Examples of type C e versus s v0 behavior are shown
in Figs. 1217. Type C compression behavior is especially
observed for angular weak (low degree of hardness) particles such as carbonate sands, in the presence of platy parPublished by NRC Research Press

378

Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 46, 2009

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 14. Type C compression behavior of silty sand (data from Huang et al. 1999). FC, fines content passing number 200 US standard sieve.

Fig. 15. Type C compression behavior of mono-quartz sand (data from Chuhan et al. 2003).

ticles of mica or clay minerals, or for very fine granular materials for which particle damage is a minor factor (Hardin
1985; Chuhan et al. 2002, 2003).

Yield stress
Yield stress traditionally has been considered to mark the
abrupt onset of increased deformability or increased compressibility as in the present case. For soils where particle

damage is not a factor, the yield stress in oedometer loading,


0
called preconsolidation pressure (s p0 or s pI
for isotropic
loading; Terzaghi et al. 1996), defines the boundary between
the recompression range where compressibility is small and
the compression range where compressibility is much larger.
Recompression results from particle deformation and minor
interparticle slip; and therefore the preconsolidation pressure
marks the onset of major interparticle slip, which is quite
Published by NRC Research Press

Mesri and Vardhanabhuti

379

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 16. Type C compression behavior of Ganga sand (data from Rahim 1989).

Fig. 17. Type C compression behavior of silica-2 sand (data from Nakata et al. 2001b).

abrupt for the bonded clays such as those from eastern


Canada (Terzaghi et al. 1996).
The yield stress for granular materials has been assumed
to signal the abrupt onset of particle fracturing and splitting
and associated particle rearrangement (e.g., Coop and Lee
1993; McDowell and Bolton 1998; Nakata et al. 2001a).
Therefore, s v0 Mmax defined at the first inflection point of
the EOP e versus s v0 relationship best conforms to the phe-

nomenological definition of the yield stress, as it corresponds to the abrupt onset of level III particle damage. The
values of s v0 Mmax for 61 oedometer tests on 57 sands in
Fig. 18 show that the yield stress may range from less than
0.3 MPa for an angular biogenic carbonate sand to near
30 MPa for a well-rounded quartz sand. (The other sands
category corresponds to the mixtures of quartz, carbonate,
and other minerals.) Figure 18 also shows that the net unPublished by NRC Research Press

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

380

Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 46, 2009

Fig. 18. Data on s v0 Mmax and s v0 Mmin for 42 sands.

Fig. 20. Comparison of s v0 MC and s v0 Mmin .

Fig. 19. Comparison of s v0 MC and s v0 Mmax .

of the data in Figs. 1820 correspond to type A e versus s v0


behavior. For type B behavior, the values for s v0 Mmax and
s v0 Mmin were taken as the beginning and end, respectively,
of the s v0 range where M remains constant. However, as
there is no abrupt onset of compressibility change (no inflection point) for type C e versus s v0 compression behavior, a
yield stress determined at s v0 MC is only an artifice of a
semilogarithmic plot (e.g., Figs. 12, 16).
The
values
of
tangent
compression
index
Cc De=Dlog s v0 as a function of effective vertical stress
are summarized in Fig. 21 for three groups of sands, namely
quartz sands, quartz sands with 10%20% fines content, and
carbonate sands. In the effective vertical stress range of
0.0011000 MPa, the values of Cc are in the range of
0.0021.0. However, the values of the compression index of
sands at an effective vertical stress range beyond s v0 MC are
in the range of 0.11.0. In addition to sand particle mineralogy and aggregate relative density, the value of Cc at the
low effective stress range is determined by sand particle
shape and surface characteristics.
The degree of abruptness of the onset of level III particle
damage may be characterized in terms of the magnitude of
Mmax/Mmin (e.g., Figs. 2, 3). The highest values are observed
for well-rounded coarse uniform strong particles. The transition from the first stage to the second stage is most sudden
in uniformly graded sands when yielding is a manifestation
of the fracturing of the largest particles that form the aggregate framework. The transition is not as sudden in wellgraded sands because of the higher particle concentration
and because fracturing begins with smaller particles that
does not cause as dramatic an unlocking of the aggregate
structure (McDowell and Bolton 1998; Nakata et al. 2001b).
The onset of level III particle damage takes place at
higher effective stresses in isotropic compression than in
one-dimensional compression, as illustrated by a comparison

locking effect of major fracturing and splitting for different


sands is substantially complete at about 25 times the effective vertical stress at which level III particle damage begins.
The yield stress for compression of granular soils has
been previously determined at the point of maximum curvature in the e versus log s v0 relationship, s v0 MC (Hagerty et
al. 1993; McDowell et al. 1996; Nakata et al. 2001a,
2001b; McDowell 2002; Chuhan et al. 2003). Figures 19
and 20 compare s v0 MC with s v0 Mmax and s v0 Mmin , respectively. The values of s v0 MC =s v0 Mmax and s v0 MC =s v0 Mmin
are in the range of 0.72.5 and 0.30.8, respectively. Most

Published by NRC Research Press

Mesri and Vardhanabhuti

381

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 21. Data on Cc for three groups of sands.

of Toyoura sand data in Figs. 4 and 22 (Kwag et al. 1999;


Nakata et al. 2001a). This is because shear stresses in onedimensional compression contribute to particle damage
(DeBeer 1963; Bishop 1966; Lee and Farhoomand 1967;
Coop and Lee 1993; Pestana and Whittle 1995). Compression data in Figs. 4, 5, 6, and 22 show that, in general, level
III particle damage occurs at higher s v0 Mmax or p0 Mmax as
initial relative density increases, where p0 Mmax is the allaround pressure at the yield point defined at the point of
maximum curvature of e vesus p. This behavior is a result
of a larger number of interparticle contacts, and therefore
lower contact stresses at a higher relative density (Roberts
and de Souza 1958; DeBeer 1963; Hendron 1963; Coop and
Lee 1993; Hagerty et al. 1993; Lade et al. 1996; Nakata et
al. 2001a). For the same reason, at a given initial relative

density and particle characteristics, a well-graded sand is expected to display a higher s v0 Mmax than a uniformly graded
sand (Hall and Gordon 1964; Lade and Yamamuro 1996;
Nakata et al. 2001b). An increase in particle angularity promotes level I and level II particle damage during the first
stage of compression, leads to higher normal and shear
stresses at interparticle contacts, and results in lower values
of Mmax/Mmin and s v0 Mmax (Kjaernsli and Sande 1963; Hagerty et al. 1993; Lade and Yamamuro 1996; McDowell and
Bolton 1998).

Secondary compression
Secondary compression is a continuation of the processes
that begin during an increase in effective stress. All mechaPublished by NRC Research Press

382

Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 46, 2009

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 22. Type A compression behavior of Toyoura sand in isotropic compression (data from Kwag et al. 1999). p0 MC , equal all-around
pressure at the yield point defined at the point of maximum curvature of e versus log p; p0 Mmax , equal all-around pressure at the yield point
defined at the first inflection point of e versus p; p0 Mmin , equal all-around pressure at the second inflection point of e versus p defining the
end of the second stage of compression.

Fig. 23. Data on Ca versus Cc for 17 granular materials (from Mesri


et al. 1990).

nisms of compression (including particle rearrangement


through interparticle slip and rotation and through particle
damage) and particle deformation (including bending and
compression) that operate during primary compression continue into the secondary compression. In other words, all
phenomena playing a role in compression are timedependent (e.g., Terzaghi and Peck 1948; Roberts and de

Fig. 24. Data on the ratio Ca/Cc for Antelope Valley sand in onedimensional and isotropic compression (data from Lade and Liu
1998).

Souza 1958; Lee and Farhoomand 1967; Mesri and Godlewski 1977; Mejia et al. 1988; Lade et al. 1997; Mesri 2001).
The term creep should not be used to refer to secondary
compression observed under drained, laterally constrained,
one-dimensional loading or drained, equal all-around loading. The term creep should be reserved for time-dependent
deformation that may develop under both drained and undrained conditions when a soil is subjected to external shear
stresses (e.g., Mesri et al. 1981; Murayama 1983; Murayama
et al. 1984). A major distinction is that time-dependent deformation due to creep may lead to global failure, whereas
secondary compression does not.
Published by NRC Research Press

Mesri and Vardhanabhuti

383

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 25. Compression behavior of silica sand used to study secondary compression (data from Yet 1998).

Fig. 26. The Ca/(1+eo) and Cc/(1+eo) data for silica sand (data from
Leung et al. 1996 and Yet 1998).

Table 1. Computed and measured s 0pI for test IC-8-1 of Lade and
Liu (1998).
Preconsolidation pressure in
0
isotropic compression, ppI
(kPa)
Pressure
No.
1
2
3
4
5

The Ca/Cc law of compressibility (where Ca is the secondary compression index and Cc is the compression index) indicates that Ca/Cc is a constant at all instances during
secondary compression. At any instant (e, s v0 , t, where t is
the time) during secondary compression, Cc De=Dlog s v0
is the slope of the e versus log s v0 relationship, and Ca =

Equal all-around
pressure, p (kPa)
50
100
197
393
785

Measured
70
121
246
500

Computed
61
120
250
500
1004

De/Dlog t is the slope of the e versus log t relationship


(Mesri and Godlewski 1977; Mesri 1987, 2001; Mesri and
Castro 1987; Mesri et al. 1994, 1997). Mesri et al. (1990)
previously summarized data on Ca versus Cc for granular
soils, as shown in Fig. 23. These data, which suggest a Ca/
Cc range of 0.010.03 for granular soils, were obtained in
the s v0 range of 0.053 MPa. In fact, most of the data were
observed in the s v0 range of less than 1 MPa on sands with
strong particles. In this stress range, particle rearrangement
during both primary and secondary compression mainly occurs by interparticle slip and rotation. In addition to the
references cited in Fig. 23, secondary compression of granular soils, including rock fill, has been reported by Roberts
and de Souza (1958), Holestol et al. (1965), Sowers et al.
Published by NRC Research Press

384

Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 46, 2009




Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 27. Behavior of Ko for normally consolidated young loose Wabash River sand with Dr = 5% (data from Hendron 1963). K , slope of s h0
versus s v0 Ds h0 =Ds v0 ; Kop, coefficient of earth pressure at rest in normally consolidated young loose sands.

(1965), Lee and Farhoomand (1967), Leung et al. (1996),


Lade and Liu (1998), Yet (1998), and Takei et al. (2001).
Terzaghi and Peck (1948, p. 59) observed that compression of a sand is not instantaneous but continues over a considerable period of time: if the process of loading is
interrupted, the void ratio decreases at constant load. . .
Terzaghi and Peck (1948) illustrated the time-dependent behavior by secondary compression of a loose silica sand at an
effective vertical stress 60% of the pressure at which . . .
the grains begin to crush. . . Incidentally, the Terzaghi and
Peck (1948) data suggest Ca/Cc = 0.028 for their silica sand.
Takei et al. (2001) reported secondary compression at s v0
equal to 1.11, 2.34, 4.82, 9.95, and 20 MPa for a granular
soil consisting of 2.004.75 mm angular quartz particles.
The values of Cc/(1+eo) from an EOP e versus log s v0 relationship defined at 10 s, where eo is the initial void ratio,
and reported values of Ca/(1+eo) lead to Ca/Cc = 0.012
0.002 for this granular material.
Figure 24 shows the compressibility data interpreted from
laboratory measurements reported by Lade and Liu (1998)
for a subangular 0.0750.250 mm micaceous Antelope Valley sand, with eo = 0.96, void ratio in the loosest state emax =
1.24, and void ratio in the densest state emin = 0.98. Both

isotropic and one-dimensional compression tests were carried out on saturated, reconstituted specimens in a triaxial
cell in the pressure range of 0.051.5 MPa. The laterally
constrained condition for one-dimensional compression was
realized through proportional loading (i.e., axial strain =
volumetric strain). Consistent with secondary compression
behavior observed for soft clay and silt deposits (e.g., Mesri
1987), Ca/Cc has the same value for both isotropic and onedimensional compression despite the fact that EOP e versus
the logarithm of effective stress relations for isotropic and
one-dimensional compression are different. Lade and Liu
(1998) reported that 20% of the particles passed the number
200 US standard sieve after a compression test, whereas
none of the sand passed this sieve before testing.
A comprehensive series of one-dimensional compression
tests with secondary compression measurements have been
reported by Leung et al. (1996) and Yet (1998) on a uniform, subangular, fine (D50 = 0.2 mm) silica sand with
CU = 2.4, emax = 0.9820, and emin = 0.5904. Reconstituted
specimens were prepared in a relative density range of
37%77% and tested in a s v0 range of 0.0537 MPa. A series of EOP compression curves are shown in Fig. 25. All
three initial relative densities display type A compression
Published by NRC Research Press

Mesri and Vardhanabhuti

385

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 28. Behavior of Ko for normally consolidated young dense Wabash River sand with Dr = 71% (data from Hendron 1963).

behavior with s v0 Mmax values of 13.5, 18.0, and 20.0 MPa


for Dr of 37%, 52%, and 77%, respectively. The end of the
second stage of compression for the specimen with Dr =
37% was reached at s v0 Mmin = 26.5 MPa; however, s v0 Mmin
was beyond the s v0 range used for the Dr = 52% and 77%
specimens. In the one-dimensional compression tests on this
silica sand, particle rearrangement at very low stress levels
was facilitated by interparticle slip and rotation; however,
level I and level II particle damage started at relatively low
stress levels (*1 MPa), as suggested in Fig. 25b by the
gradual transition from the first to the second compression
stage (e.g., Mmax/Mmin = 1.22 for Dr = 37%). Therefore, the
compression that started at low stress levels with interparticle slip and rotation was facilitated through level I, level
II, and subsequently level III particle damage in the s v0
range that was utilized in these tests.
The Cc/(1+eo) values at each value of s v0 were evaluated
from the EOP e versus log s v0 curves and together with corresponding values of Ca/(1+eo) from Fig. 16 of Leung et al.
(1996) are shown in Fig. 26. It is apparent that for any one
sand of grain mineralogy, grain size, grain shape, and gradation, Ca/Cc is a constant, independent of initial relative density and the effective stress level. The latter factor suggests

that Ca/Cc for a given sand is a constant, independent of


whether compression is facilitated mainly through interparticle slip or predominantly through particle damage (including levels I, II, and III).
Lade and Liu (1998, p. 912) concluded that (i) the amount
of secondary compression increases with confining pressure, particularly after crushing becomes important at high
stresses; and (ii) loose sands and sands consisting of weak
particles generally exhibit more time-dependent deformation
than dense sands or sands with strong particles. These conclusions are correct to the extent that, for any one sand, Ca/
Cc is a constant and Ca is directly related to Cc, which does
take the highest values when particle damage becomes important and for loose sands with weak particles. However,
for both initially loose and initially dense conditions in
some sands, Cc takes the same value at a certain range of
pressure, and both particle damage and Cc begin to decrease
at very high pressures, as is shown by the data in Fig. 21.
The Ca/Cc law of compressibility predicts not only the
magnitude of Ca but also the behavior of Ca with time in
terms of the shape of the EOP e versus log s v0 relationship.
The magnitude of Ca is expected to increase, remain constant or decrease with time, respectively, in the range of s v0
Published by NRC Research Press

386

Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 46, 2009

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 29. Behavior of Ko for normally consolidated young dense Pennsylvania sand with Dr = 63% (data from Hendron 1963).

at which Cc increases, remains constant, or decreases with


an increase in s v0 . The shape of most EOP e versus log s v0
relationships for granular soils includes increasing Cc, constant Cc, and at very high pressures (e.g., Yamamuro et al.
1996) decreasing Cc with an increase in s v0 .
The increases in Ca/(1+eo) with an increase in time are
plotted in Fig. 26, based on secondary settlement observations for about 100 h by Yet (1998) on silica sand specimens with an initial Dr = 75% at effective vertical stresses
of 15.4 and 37.4 MPa at which Cc/(1+eo) increases with an
increase in s v0 (Fig. 25). The increase in Ca/(1+eo) with an
increase in time at 15.4 MPa is shown by points a and b
and that at 37.4 MPa it is shown by points c, d, and e. The
values of Cc/(1+eo) at points a and c were determined from
the EOP e versus log s v0 curve at 15.4 and 37.4 MPa, respectively. The Cc/(1+eo) values corresponding to points b,
d, and e, which show the observed increase in Ca/(1+eo)
with an increase in time, were computed using Ca/Cc =
0.018 for the silica sand.
Secondary compression is an important aging mechanism
for granular soils (Mesri et al. 1990). The preconsolidation
pressures resulting from secondary compression can be computed using the following equation (Mesri 1987; Mesri and
Castro 1987):

1

Ca =Cc
 1C
r =Cc
t

tp
s v0

s p0

where s p0 is the preconsolidation pressure resulting from


secondary compression, s v0 is the effective vertical stress at
which secondary compression takes place, Cr is the recompression index, t is the age of the sand, and tp is the duration
of primary compression. As an example, Table 1 compares
values of preconsolidation pressure observed by Lade and
Liu (1998) after secondary compression under equal allaround pressure with values computed according to eq. [1],
0
with Ca/Cc = 0.026 and Cr/Cc = 0.1. The s pI
values predicted using eq. [1] agree well with the measured values.

Coefficient of lateral pressure at rest


The coefficient of lateral pressure at rest, Ko s h0 =s v0 , of a
normally consolidated, young, loose sand starts at
2

0
Kop 1  sin fcv

0
where fcv
is the constant-volume friction angle. Kop is the
coefficient of earth pressure at rest in normally consolidated
young loose sands and remains constant with s v0 (Jaky 1944,
1948; Mesri and Hayat 1993; Vardhanabhuti and Mesri

Published by NRC Research Press

Mesri and Vardhanabhuti

387

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 30. Behavior of Ko for normally consolidated young dense Pennsylvania sand with Dr = 74% (data from Hendron 1963).

2007). This is illustrated by the oedometer test result in


Fig. 27 for Wabash River sand with Dr = 5%. During
type B

e versus s v0 compression behavior, the slope K Ds h0 =Ds v0
remains constant and equal to Kop = 0.44. On the other hand,
the coefficient of lateral pressure of an initially dense sand
starts at (Mesri and Hayat 1993)
3

K 1  sin f0


where f0 is the maximum friction angle. The value of K ,


which is less than Kop, remains constant until the onset of
level III particle damage, at which point it begins to increase. Level III particle damage disengages particle interlocks, leading to an increase in s h0 =s v0 . This type of behavior
is observed in Fig. 28 for a Wabash River sand with Dr =
71% and in Figs. 29 and 30 for Pennsylvania sand with

Dr = 63% and 74%, respectively. In all of these cases, K is
initially less than Kop, however, K begins to increase at
s v0 Mmax . There is some evidence to suggest that,
even for a

normally consolidated young loose sand with K Kop during the first stage of compression, which displays dramatic
type A e versus s v0 behavior with high Mmax/Mmin (i.e.,
abruptly destructured
by level III particle damage), starting

at s v0 Mmax , K may temporarily increase, returning to

K Kop by the end of the second stage of compression.


For the Minnesota sand (a well-rounded quartz sand) with
Dr = 89% in Fig. 31, K starts at a value significantly less
than Kop = 0.41 and remains constant in the entire range of
s v0 up to 23 MPa of the oedometer test, during which no inflection point is observed. In other words s v0 Mmax is greater
than 23 MPa for this sand specimen.
In summary, these data suggest that, for initially loose,
young, and normally consolidated granular materials, Ko
starts at Kop and remains constant with s v0 . On the other

hand, for initially dense granular materials, Ko starts at a K ,
which is less than Kop, remains constant until s v0 Mmax , and
then begins to increase with an increase in s v0 toward Kop.
Laterally constrained compression tests in the triaxial cell
were conducted by Coop (1990) on Dogs Bay biogenic carbonate sand (D50 = 0.29 mm, CU = 2.07, relatively unbroken
angular shells) by keeping the measured volumetric strain
equal to the axial strain (Bishop 1958). An initially loose
specimen of Dogs Bay sand displayed a type A e versus s v0
compression behavior; however, both s v0 Mmax 0:04 MPa
and s v0 Mmin 0:25 MPa were small. For this carbonate
sand, level I, II, and III particle damage began at low effective stresses and gradually continued with s v0 . The laterally
Published by NRC Research Press

388

Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 46, 2009

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Fig. 31. Behavior of Ko for normally consolidated young dense Minnesota sand with Dr = 89% (data from Hendron 1963).

constrained compression stress paths reported by Coop


(1990) suggest that, beyond about s v0 = 0.3 MPa,
Ko s h0 =s v0 remained constant in the entire stress range of
the test up to 5 MPa. The measured value of Ko = 0.51,
however, was significantly higher than Kop = 0.36, according
0
to eq. [2] with fcv
= 408, which was independent of effective stress level. Coop (1990) observed an increase in Ko
during secondary compression, concluding that Ko values
obtained from triaxial tests are likely affected by the speed
of testing. Because the Bishop (1958) method previously
has been used successfully to measure Kop corresponding to
the end of primary compression, the high value of Ko determined by Coop (1990) for a sand consisting largely of skeletal bodies apparently included the increase in coefficient of
lateral pressure resulting from secondary compression. Mesri
and Hayat (1993) have suggested an equation to estimate the
increase in Ko during secondary compression. For a normally consolidated, initially loose granular material
 Ca =Cc
t
4
Ko Kop
tp
Incidentally, for Mexico City clay, which contains a significant proportion of siliceous skeletal fragments (Mesri et

0
al. 1975) and displays fcv
= 438, a Kop = 0.31 was directly
measured (Diaz-Rodriguez et al. 1992) and is very close to
the value according to eq. [2] (Mesri and Hayat 1993). It appears from the following that the constant-volume friction
angle of granular materials is independent of the level of
particle damage, ranging from none to level III: (i) the be0
of Dogs Bay carbonate sand, which was indehavior of fcv
pendent of effective stress level; (ii) the observed behavior
of Kop of initially young loose sands, in which Kop remains
constant with s v0 (e.g., Fig. 27); and (iii) constant
0
a sin fcv
, independent of initial relative density in the
Schmidt (1966) equation for the Ko of overconsolidated
sands unloaded from a stress level greater than s v0 Mmin
(Mesri and Hayat 1993) (for a further examination of this
issue, reference is made to Yamamuro and Lade (1996) and
Lade and Yamamuro (1996)).
Yamamuro et al. (1996) inferred the lateral pressures during one-dimensional compression from measurements of radial strain of a thick-walled oedometer confining ring. For a
uniform angular quartz sand and a uniform rounded Cambria
sand of intermediate hardness, they inferred values of Ko &
0.4, which remained constant in the s v0 range from 50 to
850 MPa. For a soft uniform gypsum sand, the inferred Ko
increased at a decreasing rate to values in the range of 0.7

Published by NRC Research Press

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Mesri and Vardhanabhuti

389

0.9 at s v0 = 850 MPa. Yamamuro et al. (1996) attributed the


increase in Ko with an increase in time to plastic deformation of the soft gypsum sand particles. Yamamuro et al.
(1996) reported an increase in Ko during secondary compression for both the Cambria and gypsum sands. However, the
measurements, which extended over a period of only
30 min, suggest a rate of increase in Ko with an increase in
time, which is less than that predicted by eq. [4] with Ca/Cc
in the range of 0.010.03.

(7)

Conclusions

(8)

The following conclusions are based on a review and interpretation of data from 182 oedometer tests on 98 sands
and 17 isotropic loading tests on six sands.

(9)

(1) In granular soils, subjected to static loading, particle


rearrangement into a more compact configuration is
achieved by overcoming interparticle friction through
interparticle slip and rotation, by overcoming particle
strength through particle damage, or both.
(2) Particle damage may be level I damage (abrasion or
grinding of particle surface asperities), level II damage
(breaking or crushing of particle surface protrusions
and sharp particle corners and edges), and level III damage (fracturing, splitting, or shattering).
(3) Particle rearrangement into more intimate packing promotes locking, whereas interparticle slip and especially particle damage are unlocking mechanisms that
decrease the stiffness of the granular mass.
(4) During compression, both unlocking and locking mechanisms operate simultaneously, and the net effect
determines the shape of the void ratio or vertical strain
versus effective vertical stress relationship and the behavior of the tangent constrained modulus with effective vertical stress, M Ds v0 =D3v .
(5) When locking through tighter particle packing dominates over the unlocking effect of interparticle slip
and particle damage, the constrained modulus increases with an increase in effective vertical stress,
whereas when unlocking produced by level III particle
damage and interparticle slip exceeds the locking effect of denser packing, the constrained modulus decreases with an increase in effective vertical stress.
(6) Three types of end-of-primary (EOP) void ratio versus
effective vertical stress relationship have been observed. Type A compression behavior, which is most
common for clean well-rounded strong medium to
coarse sands, consists of three stages of compression.
A net locking first stage during which M increases
with an increase in s v0 is followed by a net unlocking
second stage as a result of an abrupt onset of level III
particle damage with M decreasing with an increase in
s v0 . This is followed by a locking third stage. Type B
compression behavior also consists of three stages of
compression. Net locking behavior during the first
and third stages, respectively, precedes and follows an
equal balance second stage compression behavior during which unlocking and locking effects are equal and
M remains constant with s v0 . Type C compression behavior, which is especially observed for angular weak
particles such as carbonate sands, for which significant

(10)

(11)
(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)

(16)

level I and level II particle damage begins at low effective stress and continues with or without gradual level III particle damage, displays a net locking effect
throughout the effective stress range.
A yield stress for type A and type B compression behavior is defined at s v0 Mmax , which marks the abrupt
onset of particle fracturing and splitting. The values
of s v0 Mmax range from less than 0.3 MPa for an angular biogenic carbonate sand to near 30 MPa for a wellrounded quartz sand.
The effective stress that marks the end of the second
stage of compression, s v0 Mmin , is two to five times
the value of s v0 Mmax .
The yield stress commonly defined at the point of
maximum curvature of void ratio against the logarithm
of effective vertical stress, s v0 MC , is 0.72.5 times the
value of s v0 Mmax and 0.30.8 times the value of
s v0 Mmin .
All mechanisms of compression, including particle rearrangement through interparticle slip and rotation and
particle damage, that operate during primary compression continue into secondary compression.
Secondary compression of granular materials follows
the Ca/Cc law of compressibility, with Ca/Cc in the
range of 0.010.03.
The Ca/Cc for any one granular material is independent of the mechanism that facilitates particle rearrangement. Therefore, Ca/Cc is a constant independent of
effective vertical stress range. For any one sand, Ca/Cc
has the same value for both one-dimensional compression and isotropic compression.
The Ca/Cc law of compressibility also correctly predicts the behavior of Ca with time: when Cc increases
with an increase in s v0 , Ca increases with an increase
in time; and when Cc is constant with s v0 , Ca remains
constant with time.
The coefficient of lateral pressure at rest of a normally
consolidated
young
loose
sand
starts
at
0
and remains constant with an inKop 1  sin fcv
crease in effective vertical stress.
The coefficient of earth pressure at rest of an initially

dense sand starts with K 1  sin f0 , which is less
than Kop, and remains constant up to s v0 Mmax , at
which point the onset of level III particle damage destructures the aggregate framework
and K begins to

increase, however, returning to K = Kop by the end of
the second stage of compression.
In summary, it is possible to provide a rational explanation of the observed primary compression, including
yielding of the aggregate framework, secondary compression, and lateral pressure in constrained compression, of granular materials in terms of particle
rearrangement facilitated through interparticle slip and
rotation and particle damage.

References
Bishop, A.W. 1958. Test requirements for measuring the coefficient
of earth pressure at rest. In Proceedings of the Conference on
Earth Pressure Problems, Brussels, Belgium, Vol. 1, pp. 214.
Bishop, A.W. 1966. The strength of soils as engineering materials.
Geotechnique, 162: 89130.
Published by NRC Research Press

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

390
Blumel, W., and Lackner, F. 1981. Performance of foundations for
masts on sand. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden, 1519 June 1981. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the
Netherlands. Vol. 2, pp. 4952.
Bopp, P.A., and Lade, P.V. 1997. Effect of initial density on soil
instability at high pressures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 123: 671677. doi:10.1061/
(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:7(671).
Castro, G. 1969. Liquefaction of sands. Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Harvard Soil Mechanics, Series 81.
Chuhan, F.A., Kjeldstad, A., Bjorlykke, K., and Hoeg, K. 2002.
Porosity loss in sand by grain crushing experimental evidence and relevance to reservoir quality. Marine and Petroleum
Geology, 19: 3953. doi:10.1016/S0264-8172(01)00049-6.
Chuhan, F.A., Kjeldstad, A., Bjorlykke, K., and Hoeg, K. 2003.
Experimental compression of loose sands: relevance to porosity
reduction during burial in sedimentary basins. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 40(5): 9951011. doi:10.1139/t03-050.
Coop, M.R. 1990. The mechanics of uncemented carbonate sands.
Geotechnique, 40: 607626.
Coop, M.R., and Lee, I.K. 1993. The behavior of granular soils at
high stresses. In Predictive soil mechanics. Edited by G.T. Housbly and A.N. Schofield. Thomas Telford, London, U.K. pp. 186
198.
Cundall, P.A., and Strack, O.D.L. 1979. A discrete element model
for granular assemblies. Geotechnique, 29: 4765.
Davisson, M.T., and Salley, J.R. 1972. Settlement histories of four
large tanks on sand. In Proceedings of the Specialty Conference
on Performance of Earth and Earth Supported Structures, Lafayette, Ind., 1114 June 1972. ASCE, New York. Vol. 1, Part 2,
pp. 981996.
DeBeer, E.E. 1963. The scale effect in the transposition of the results of deep sounding tests on the ultimate bearing capacity of
piles and caisson foundations. Geotechnique, 13: 3975.
DeBeer, E.E. 1965. The scale effect on the phenomenon of progressive rupture in cohesionless soils. In Proceedings of the 6th
International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Montreal, Que. University of Toronto Press, Toronto,
Ont. Vol. 2, pp. 1317.
Diaz-Rodriguez, J.A., Leroueil, S., and Aleman, J.D. 1992. Yielding of Mexico City and other natural clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 118: 981995.
Hagerty, M.M., Hite, D.R., Ullrich, C.R., and Hagerty, D.J. 1993.
One-dimensional high pressure compression of granular material. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 119: 118.
Hall, E.B., and Gordon, B.B. 1964. Triaxial testing with large-scale
high pressure equipment. In Laboratory Shear Testing of Soils.
American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Penn.
Special Technical Publication STP-361, pp. 315328.
Hansen, B. 1961. The bearing capacity of sand, tested by loading
circular plates. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Paris,
France, 1722 July 1961. Dunod, Paris. Vol. 1, pp. 659664.
Hardin, B.O. 1985. Crushing of soil particles. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 10: 1177
1192.
Hendron, A.J. 1963. The behavior of sand in one-dimensional compression. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
Holestol, K., Kjaernsli, B., and Torblaa, I. 1965. Compression of
tunnel spoil at Venemo Dam. In Proceedings of the 6th Interna-

Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 46, 2009


tional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Montreal, Que., 815 September 1965. University of
Toronto Press, Toronto, Ont. Vol. 2, pp. 490494.
Huang, A.-B., Hsu, H.-H., and Chang, J.-W. 1999. The behavior of
a compressible silty fine sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,
36(1): 88101. doi:10.1139/cgj-36-1-88.
Jaky, J. 1944. A nyugalmi nyomas tenyezoje The coefficient of
earth pressure at rest. Magyar Mernok es Espitesz-Egylet Kozlonye. pp. 355358.
Jaky, J. 1948. Pressure in silos. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, June 1948. Vol. 1, pp. 103
107.
Kjaernsli, B., and Sande, A. 1963. Compressibility of some coarsegrained materials. In Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Weisbaden, Germany. pp. 245251.
Kwag, J.M., Ochiai, H., and Yasufuku, N. 1999. Yielding stress
characteristics of carbonate sand in relation to individual particle
fragmentation strength. In Engineering for calcareous sediments.
Edited by K.A. Al-Shafei. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. pp. 7987.
Lade, P.V., and Liu, C.T. 1998. Experimental study of drained
creep behavior of sand. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,
ASCE, 124: 912920. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)
124:8(912).
Lade, P.V., and Yamamuro, J.A. 1996. Undrained sand behavior in
axisymmetric tests at high pressures. Journal of Geotechnical
and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 122: 120129.
Lade, P.V., Yamamuro, J.A., and Bopp, P.A. 1996. Significance of
particle crushing in granular materials. Journal of Geotechnical
and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 122: 309316.
Lade, P.V., Yamamuro, J.A., and Bopp, P.A. 1997. Influence of
time effects on instability of granular materials. Computers and
Geotechnics, 20: 179193. doi:10.1016/S0266-352X(97)00002-5.
Lambe, T.W., and Whitman, R.V. 1969. Soil mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Lee, K.L., and Farhoomand, I. 1967. Compressibility and crushing
of granular soil in anisotropic triaxial compression. Canadian
Geotechnical Journal, 4: 6899. doi:10.1139/t67-012.
Leung, C.F., Lee, F.H., and Yet, N.S. 1996. The role of particle
breakage in pile creep in sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,
33(6): 888898. doi:10.1139/t96-119.
Marsal, R.J. 1967. Large scale testing of rockfill materials. Journal
of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 93: 27
43.
McDowell, G.R. 2002. On the yielding and plastic compression of
sand. Soils and Foundations, 42: 139145.
McDowell, G.R., and Bolton, M.D. 1998. On the micromechanics
of crushable aggregates. Geotechnique, 48: 667679.
McDowell, G.R., and Harireche, O. 2002. Discrete element modeling of yielding and normal compression of sand. Geotechnique,
52: 299304. doi:10.1680/geot.52.4.299.41018.
McDowell, G.R., Bolton, M.D., and Robertson, D. 1996. The fractal crushing of granular materials. Journal of the Mechanics and
Physics of Solids, 44: 20792102. doi:10.1016/S0022-5096(96)
00058-0.
Mejia, C.A., Vaid, Y.P., and Negussey, D. 1988. Time dependent
behavior of sand. In Proceedings of the International Conference
on Rheology and Soil Mechanics, Coventry, UK, 1216 September 1988. Edited by M.J. Keedwell. Elsevier Applied Science,
London. pp. 312326.
Mesri, G. 1987. Fourth law of soil mechanics: a law of compressibility. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on GeoPublished by NRC Research Press

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

Mesri and Vardhanabhuti


technical Engineering of Soft Soils, Mexico City, Mexico, 13
14 August 1987. Mexican Society for Soil Mechanics, Mexico
City, Mexico. Vol. 2, pp. 179187.
Mesri, G. 2001. Primary compression and secondary compression.
In Soil behavior and soft ground construction. Edited by J.J.
Germaine, T.C. Sheahan, and R.V. Whitman. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication 119, pp. 122166.
Mesri, G., and Castro, A. 1987. The Ca/Cc concept and Ko during
secondary compression. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 113: 230247.
Mesri, G., and Godlewski, P.M. 1977. Time- and stress-compressibility interrelationship. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 103: 417430.
Mesri, G., and Hayat, T.M. 1993. The coefficient of earth pressure
at rest. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 30(4): 647666. doi:10.
1139/t93-056.
Mesri, G., and Vardhanabhuti, B. 2007. Coefficient of earth pressure at rest for sands subjected to vibration. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 44(10): 12421263. doi:10.1139/T07-032.
Mesri, G., Rokhsar, A., and Bohor, B.F. 1975. Composition and
compressibility of typical samples of Mexico City clay. Geotechnique, 25: 527554.
Mesri, G., Febres-Cordero, E., Shields, D.R., and Castro, A. 1981.
Shear stress strain time behavior of clays. Geotechnique, 31:
537552.
Mesri, G., Feng, T.W., and Benak, J.M. 1990. Postdensification penetration resistance of clean sands. Journal of Geotechnical and
Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 116: 10951115.
Mesri, G., Lo, D.O.K., and Feng, T.W. 1994. Settlement of embankments on soft clays. In Vertical and horizontal deformations
of foundations and embankments. Edited by A.T. Yeung and
G.Y. Feaalio. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication 40,
pp. 856.
Mesri, G., Stark, T.D., Ajlouni, M.A., and Chen, C.S. 1997. Secondary compression of peat with or without surcharging. Journal
of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE,
123: 411421. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:5(411).
Murayama, S. 1983. Formulation of stressstraintime behavior of
soils under deviatoric stress condition. Soils and Foundations,
23: 4157.
Murayama, S., Michihiro, K., and Sakagami, T. 1984. Creep characteristics of sands. Soils and Foundations, 24: 115.
Nakata, Y., Kato, Y., Hyodo, M., Hyde, A.F.L., and Murata, M.
2001a. One-dimensional compression behavior of uniformly
graded sand related to single particle crushing strength. Soils
and Foundations, 41: 3951.
Nakata, Y., Hyodo, M., Hyde, A.F.L., Kato, Y., and Murata, H.
2001b. Microscopic particle crushing of sand subjected to high
pressure one-dimensional compression. Soils and Foundations,
41: 6982.
Nonveiler, E. 1963. Settlement of a grain silo on fine sand. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Engineering, Weisbaden, Germany. Vol. 1, pp. 285
294.
Parkin, A.K. 1977. The compression of rockfill. Australian Geomechanics Journal, 7: 3339.
Pestana, J.M., and Whittle, A.J. 1995. Compression model for cohesionless soils. Geotechnique, 45: 611631.
Rahim, A. 1989. Effect of morphology and mineralogy on compressibility of sands. Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Technology
Kanpur, Kanpur, India.
Roberts, J.E., and de Souza, J.M. 1958. The compressibility of
sands. Proceedings of the American Society for Testing and Materials, 58: 12691272.

391
Schmidt, B. 1966. Earth pressure at rest related to stress history:
discussion. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 3: 239242. doi:10.
1139/t66-028.
Sowers, G.F., Willams, R.C., and Willace, T.S. 1965. Compressibility of broken rock and the settlement of rockfills. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Engineering, Montreal, Que., 815 September 1965.
University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ont. Vol. 2, pp. 561565.
Swiger, W.F. 1975. Evaluation of soil moduli. In Proceedings of
the Conference on Analysis and Design in Geotechnical Engineering, Austin, Tex., 912 June 1974. ASCE, New York.
Vol 2, pp. 7992.
Takei, M., Kusakabe, O., and Hayashi, T. 2001. Time-dependent
behavior of crushable materials in one-dimensional compression
tests. Soils and Foundations, 41: 97121.
Terzaghi, K., and Peck, R.B. 1948. Soil mechanics in engineering
practice. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Terzaghi, K., Peck, R.B., and Mesri, G. 1996. Soil mechanics in
engineering practice. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Vaid, Y.P., Chern, J.C., and Tumi, H. 1985. Confining pressure,
grain angularity and liquefaction. Journal of Geotechnical and
Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 10: 12291235.
Vardhanabhuti, B. 2005. Vibration of sands. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
Vesic, A.S., and Clough, G.W. 1968. Behavior of granular materials under high stresses. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 94: 661688.
Whitman, R.V., Miller, E.T., and Moore, P.J. 1964. Yielding and
locking of confined sand. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and
Foundations Division, ASCE, 90: 5784.
Yamamuro, J.A., and Lade, P.V. 1996. Drained sand behavior in
axisymmetric test at high pressures. Journal of Geotechnical
and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 122: 109119.
Yamamuro, J.A., Bopp, P.A., and Lade, P.V. 1996. Onedimensional compression of sands at high pressure. Journal of
Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 112:
147154.
Yet, N.S. 1998. Time-dependent behavior of piles in sand. Ph.D.
thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Yudhbir, and Rahim, A. 1987. Compressibility characteristics of
sands. In Proceedings of the 9th Southeast Asian Geotechnical
Conference, Bangkok, Thailand. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the
Netherlands. Vol. 1, pp. 483494.

List of symbols
compression index ( De=Dlog s v0 )
recompression index ( De=Dlog s v0 )
uniformity coefficient (= D60/D10)
secondary compression index (= De/Dlog t)
grain size at which 10% of the sample is finer
mean grain size
grain size at which 60% of the sample is finer
relative density
void ratio
initial void ratio
void ratio in loosest state
void ratio in densest state
coefficient of earth pressure at rest
coefficient of earth pressure at rest in normally con solidated young loose sands
K slope of s h0 versus s v0 Ds h0 =Ds v0
M tangent constrained modulus (Ds v0 =D3v )

Cc
Cr
CU
Ca
D10
D50
D60
Dr
e
eo
emax
emin
Ko
Kop

Published by NRC Research Press

Can. Geotech. J. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by King's College London - CHAN Journals on 05/05/11
For personal use only.

392
Mmax tangent constrained modulus at the first inflection
point of s v0 versus 3v or p versus 3v
Mmin tangent constrained modulus at the second inflection point of s v0 versus 3v or p versus 3v
p equal all-around pressure
(p)MC equal all-around pressure at the yield point defined
at the point of maximum curvature of e versus log
p
p0 Mmax equal all-around pressure at the yield point defined
at the first inflection point of e versus p
p0 Mmin equal all-around pressure at the second inflection
point of e versus p defining the end of the second
stage of compression
t time
tp duration of primary consolidation
3v vertical strain; volumetric strain

Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 46, 2009


f0
0
fcv
s h0
s p0
0
s pI
s v0
s v0 MC
s v0 Mmax
s v0 Mmin

maximum friction angle


constant-volume friction angle
effective horizontal stress
preconsolidation pressure
preconsolidation pressure in isotropic compression
effective vertical stress
effective vertical stress at the yield point defined at
the point of maximum curvature of e versus log s v0
effective vertical stress at the yield point defined at
the first inflection point of e versus s v0
effective vertical stress at the second inflection
point of e versus s v0 defining the end of the second
stage of compression

Published by NRC Research Press

Вам также может понравиться