Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Session -19
Capital Structure
M&M Hypothesis
M&M reasoned that if the following conditions hold,
the value of the firm is not affected by its capital
structure:
Condition #1: Individuals and corporations are able to
borrow and lend at the same terms (referred to as equal
access).
Condition #2: There is no tax advantage associated with
debt financing (relative to equity financing).
Condition #3: Debt and equity trade in a perfect market.
Condition #4: There are no bankruptcy costs
5
M&M HypothesisContd
M&M reasoned that if the following conditions hold,
the value of the firm is not affected by its capital
structure:
Condition #5: All cash flow streams are perpetuities (i.e.,
no growth)
Condition #6: Corporate insiders and outsiders have the
same information (i.e., no signalling opportunities)
Condition #7: Managers always maximize shareholders
wealth (i.e., no agency cost)
S B
Stockholder Interests
There are two important questions:
1.Why should the stockholders care about maximizing
firm value? Perhaps they should be interested in
strategies that maximize shareholder value.
2.What is the ratio of debt-to-equity that maximizes the
shareholders value?
Current
Assets
$20,000
Debt
$0
Equity
$20,000
Debt/Equity ratio
0.00
Interest rate
n/a
Shares outstanding
400
Share price
$50
Proposed
$20,000
$8,000
$12,000
2/3
8%
240
$50
Expected
Expansion
EBIT
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
Interest
0
0
0
Net income
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
EPS
$2.50
$5.00
$7.50
ROA
5%
10%
15%
ROE
5%
10%
15%
Current Shares Outstanding = 400 shares
Expected
Expansion
EBIT
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
Interest
640
640
640
Net income
$360
$1,360
$2,360
EPS
$1.50
$5.67
$9.83
ROA
1.8%
6.8%
11.8%
ROE
3.0%
11.3%
19.7%
Proposed Shares Outstanding = 240 shares
10.00
EPS
8.00
6.00
4.00
No Debt
Advantage
to debt
Break-even
point
2.00
0.00
1,000
(2.00)
Disadvantage
to debt
2,000
3,000
Expected
Expansion
$800 2
3
S $1,200
Homemade (Un)Leverage: An
Example
Recession
Expected
Expansion
R0
RW ACC
B
( R0 RB )
SL
B
S
RB
RS
BS
BS
RB
RB
Debt-to-equity Ratio B
S
MM Propositions II
(With Taxes)
Proposition I (with Corporate Taxes)
Firm value increases with leverage
VL = VU + TC B
MM Propositions II
(With Taxes)
The total cash flow to all stakeholde rs is
( EBIT RB B ) (1 TC ) RB B
The present value of this stream of cash flows is VL
Clearly ( EBIT RB B) (1 TC ) RB B
EBIT (1 TC ) RB B (1 TC ) RB B
EBIT (1 TC ) RB B RB BTC RB B
The present value of the first term is VU
The present value of the second term is TCB
VL VU TC B
RS R0
RS R0
B
( R0 RB )
SL
B
(1 TC ) ( R0 RB )
SL
R0
RW ACC
B
SL
RB (1 TC )
RS
BSL
B SL
RB
20
21
22
24
25
VL = VU + TCB
Maximum
firm value
Present value of
financial distress costs
V = Actual value of firm
VU = Value of firm with no debt
Debt (B)
B*
Optimal amount of debt
26
28
Problem
A Company needs Rs.10 million capital for its new green
field project. The net operating earnings is expected to be
30 % of investment and the corporate tax rate is 40 %. The
company
expects the following alternatives for raising the capital.
a) 100 % equity at Rs.20 per share
b) 40 % debt at 12 % interest and 60 % equity at Rs.16 per share
c) 30 % debt at 11 % interest, 20 % 12 % preference shares and
50 % equity at Rs.18 per share.
Which is the best alternative for the company for raising the
capital?
Problem
Ans. Alternative (c)
Solution: We will undertake EBIT-EPS analysis
for the three alternatives.
Problem
Value of equity
Value of pref. shares
Value of debt
No. of shares (million)
EBIT
Interest
EBT
(a)
10
0.5
3.0
3.0
EBIT-EPS Analysis
(Fig. in Rs. Million)
Alternatives
(b)
(c)
6
5
2
4
3
0.375
0.278
3.0
3.0
0.48
0.33
2.52
2.67
Problem
EBT
3.0
2.52
2.67
Taxes
1.2
1.01
1.07
EAT
1.8
1.51
1.60
Preference dividend
0.24
Earnings available to
1.8
1.51
1.36
Equity holders
EPS
3.60
4.03
4.89
Alternative (c) is the best since EPS is maximized in this
case.
Thank You!
43