Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CONTENTS
Abstract
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1Background--------------------------------------------------------------------------10
1.2Purpose
of
the
Dissertation--------------------------------------------------------13
1.3Objectives
of
the
Dissertation-----------------------------------------------------13
1.4Expected
Outcomes-----------------------------------------------------------------13
1.5Research
Plan------------------------------------------------------------------------13
Islamic
Banking
System-----------------------------------------------------------15
2.1.1
Shariah
Theory
in
Islamic
Banking
and
Finance--------------------------18
2.1.2
Interest
View--------------------------------------------19
and
Major
Religions
Differences
Islamic
and
Conventional
Banking-------------------------------22
2.3
Basic
services
offered
by
Islamic
banking
institutions----------------------24
2.3.1
Murabahah-------------------------------------------------------------------------24
2.3.2
Musharakah------------------------------------------------------------------------26
2.3.3
Mudarabah-------------------------------------------------------------------------27
2.3.4
Ijarah--------------------------------------------------------------------------------28
2.4
Global
Financial
Crises-------------------------------------------------------------29
2.4.1 Causes of financial crises from the perspective of Islamic
banking----31
2.4.2 Impact of financial crises on Islamic banking and
finance---------------32
Research
Method------------------------------------------------------------------36
3.2
Collection
of
Empirical
Data-----------------------------------------------------37
3.3
Validity
and
Reliability
of
the
Research---------------------------------------38
Data
Collection
and
Sample
period---------------------------------------------39
4.2
Analysis
Data-------------------------------------------------------42
of
Empirical
4.2.1
Eq1
(ROA)-------------------------------------------------------------------------44
4.2.2
Hausman
Test
(ROA)-------------------------------------------------------------46
4.2.3
Final
Regression
(ROA)----------------------------------------------------------48
4.2.4
Eq2
(ROE)---------------------------------------------------------------------------49
4.2.5
Hausman
Test
(ROE)--------------------------------------------------------------51
4.2.6
Final
Regression
(ROE)-----------------------------------------------------------53
4.2
Conclusion-----------------------------------------------------------------------------54
Summary
of
the
of
the
Dissertation-----------------------------------------------------55
5.2
Conclusion
Dissertation---------------------------------------------------55
5.2.1
Weakness
of
the
dissertation
and
further
research-----------------------57
References-------------------------------------------------------------------------------58
Appendix---------------------------------------------------------------------------------64
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
During the previous years, Financial Institutions have contributed to
an undeniable function in the expansion of the global economy in
terms
of
progress
and
expansion
(Chapra,
2008).
Banking
the
housing
bubble,
World
Financial
Disparities,
complication
of
financial
Mechanisms,
Extreme
financial meltdown. Academics from the west are of the view that
the just revealed problems can be solved by improving the rules and
regulations of banking institutions and tougher regulatory or
supervisory measures, while some Muslim academics such as
(Chapra, 2008) are of the view there are two issues that makes
banking institutions assume that they will not experience losses.
The first factor is the collateral, which is essential and inevitable in
any system of finance for managing risk of default. Chapra (2008)
and others have held the view that the collateral itself is wide-open
to a valuation risk and also stated that collateral value could be
lessened by the same reason that decreases the debtor's capability
to pay back. The Muslim academics support shariah law compliance
and have the view of using profit and loss sharing system and which
may reduce this problem. They maintain that without this system of
profit and loss sharing, banking institutions will not always
commence a thorough assessment of the collateral and the
customers credit worthiness and will spread financing for any
purpose (Chapra, 2008). The second issue that offers protection for
banking institutions from default is that they assume that they are
too big to fail or default, which implies that the central bank
guarantees the banking institutions that it will bail them out in the
event of a crises or a meltdown. The banking institutions that are
assured of this bailout have encouragement to undertake taking of
unwarranted than what they are supposed to take (Frederic, 1997).
This unrealistic sense of invulnerability from losses offered to the
banking institutions as well as its customers weakens the capacity
of the market to enforce the essential supervision and this has
headed to an unsustainable growth in the total size of credit, to
undue influence, to even subprime debt, and also living beyond
means (Chapra, 2008).
The concept of Islamic system of banking and finance was
conceived during the turbulent identity political years of the middle
Twentieth century. It was argued that that Arab, Indian, and
To
investigate
how
the
Islamic
finance
system
works
10
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter covers the theories behind Islamic banking system, and
gives an idea on how they carryout their financial operations or
activities. As going to be mentioned in this, this system of banking is
based on the principle of profit and loss sharing. This chapter will
also discuss the growth, profit, and customers of Islamic banks, and
lastly it will define financial crises and discuss its impact on the
competiveness of Islamic Banks.
11
Some
Islamic
banks
and
financial
institutions
are
12
ones to Islamic ones due to the rules and regulations of their host
countries like in Sudan, and Iran. Also, there are Islamic countries
that undertake both Islamic bank and finance system together with
the western system like for example in Bahrain, Egypt, Pakistan, and
Saudi Arabia (Mariani et.al, 2009). Islamic banking and finance is
evolving as another option to western interest based system of
finance. Islamic banks successful operations along with increasing
number of Muslims in the western countries have drew the attention
of the western countries towards the Islamic system of finance. This
has also lead to an increasing number of conventional banks in the
west to start to offer Islamic financial services to their Muslim
clients. For example Citi Islamic bank opened in Bahrain in 1996
which is owned by Citi Corp, Chase Manhattan provides Islamic
finance products through its Islamic finance arm known as Islamic
Windows, and also many Multinational institutions like General
Motors (GM), and IBM have raised cash through an Islamic leasing
fund (Abdus-samad et.al, 2013).
13
scholars
throughout
the
ages,
which
are
carefully
14
on
specific
issue,
Qiyas
that
is
analogical
16
(Mervyn, 2010).
3. Interest leads to a nervy relationship between persons, which
will lead to conflict and discord and also remove people of its
goodliness (Mervyn, 2010).
4. Interest also does not allow sharing of risk and reward
between the rich and poor when they carry out business
transactions (Muhammad and Kaviyarasu, 2014).
5. The ban of Interest is proved by the sayings in the holy Quran
and which is not important for an individual to know the
reason behind it since the Muslims believe it is actual words of
God (Mervyn, 2010).
For a business transaction that has interest to be forbidden under
Islamic Shariah, it must fulfill the minimum of three conditions and
they are, the rate of the interest that is going to be paid must be a
fixed rate because the outlook is not known in which a loss can
occur, the Islamic Shariah opposes to this. The second condition is
that the interest must be entwined to a certain time period and also
the sum of the credit, which implies that during this period, the
borrower will never make any profit, and lastly, the third condition is
that the payment of the interest is certain irrespective of the result
of the business transaction that is embarked upon (Mallat, 1988).
The reason for the ban of a fixed rate of return for an investment
before undertaking it is that the profit that is going to be gained
from the investment in the future is not actually known and also
there might be a likelihood of a loss that can occur, this is not
ethically justified in the Islamic law. Also according to Islamic
instructions, the contributor of the principal should also share the
risk if he is prepared to share the profit with his other business
partner and also according to Islamic Shariah it is not permissible to
17
18
19
2.3.1 MURABAHAH:
20
ISLAMIC
BANKING
CUSTOM
ER
SUPPLIE
R OF
PRODU
CT
SALES
OF
2.3.2 MUSHARAKAH:
ISLAMIC
BANK
INSTITUTI
ON
INVESTOR
Both bank and Investor contribute
capital to finance a project
22
Both bank and Investor
manage
share
The bank and the investor
the
target
investment
the profit or loss made
2.3.3 MUDARABAH:
BUSINESS
PARTNER
that
Islamic
banks
provides
2.3.4 IJARAH:
24
25
26
group
many
financial
organizations,
real
estate
27
Saddy
(2009)
stated
that
conclusions
made
by
some
that
29
30
31
32
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
In this chapter of research methodology, the research method,
collection of data, and validity of the research will be outlined. The
research method is first outlined and also the reason why it was
used to carry out this research will be mentioned. The collection of
data, which is the second sub-heading, will be outlined and also how
it was carried out, and the last sub-heading, which is the validity
and reliability of the research, will be outlined briefly.
research
method
34
is
to
collect
numerical
or
35
36
Abbreviatio
n
Estimation
method
Sample
period
Return on
Equity
ROE
Net
Income/sharehold
ers equity
2008 2013
Return on
Assets
ROA
Net Income/Total
Assets
2008 2013
Capital
Adequacy
Ratio
CAR
Tier 1 capital +
Tier 2 capital /Risk
weighted assets
2008 2013
Total Assets
TA
2008 - 2013
BLOOMBERG TICKER
ADIB
DIB
SHIB
4. Bank Islam.
BI
38
CIMB
HLISB
AISB
8. Al-Rajhi Bank.
ALRB
QIB
10.
QNB
11.
Bank Asya.
ASYA
The table 2 above shows the list of the eleven Islamic banks with their
Bloomberg tickers.
39
40
ROA
ROE
CAR
TA
REGION
Mean
1.900000
15.57672
17.57492
79669.19
0.545455
Median
1.585000
13.91500
16.72000
39173.80
1.000000
Maximum
5.990000
49.86000
35.54000
443486.1
1.000000
Minimum
-0.290000
-3.070000
10.72000
3171.900
0.000000
Std. Dev.
1.144177
8.574562
5.815116
94922.11
0.501745
Skewness
1.079266
1.072826
1.832667
1.918331
-0.182574
Kurtosis
4.629841
5.948614
6.083974
6.427299
1.033333
Jarque-Bera
17.67947
32.13720
58.31997
68.37142
11.00306
Probability
0.000145
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.004081
Sum
110.2000
903.4500
1072.070
4939490.
36.00000
Sum Sq.
Dev.
74.62100
4190.817
2028.935
5.50E+11
16.36364
58
58
61
62
66
Observations
41
42
Effects Test
Statistic
Period F
Period Chi-square
d.f.
Prob.
3.377332
(5,48)
0.0108
17.182137
0.0042
43
Variable
Coefficient
Std. Error
t-Statistic
Prob.
C(1)
-0.020752
0.021319
-0.973403
0.3348
C(2)
0.007177
0.030008
0.239168
0.8119
C(3)
0.003363
0.001924
1.747394
0.0864
C(4)
0.003861
0.005077
0.760487
0.4503
R-squared
0.226441
Mean
dependent var
0.019026
Adjusted R-squared
0.182655
S.D. dependent
var
0.011542
S.E. of regression
0.010435
Akaike info
criterion
-6.219802
0.005771
Schwarz
criterion
-6.076430
Log likelihood
181.2644
Hannan-Quinn
criter.
-6.164083
F-statistic
5.171494
Durbin-Watson
stat
0.481488
Prob(F-statistic)
0.003293
44
45
Test Summary
Chi-Sq. Statistic
Chi-Sq. d.f.
Prob.
Period random
15.520938
0.0014
Random
Var(Diff.)
Prob.
** Warning:
estimated period
random effects
variance is zero.
Period random
effects test
comparisons:
Variable
Fixed
CAR/100
0.044799
0.007177
0.000103
0.0002
LOG(TA)
0.005249
0.003363
0.000000
0.0002
REGION
-0.002051
0.003861
0.000003
0.0002
Coefficient
Std. Error
t-Statistic
Prob.
-0.044066
0.020228
-2.178463
0.0343
Period random
effects test
equation:
Dependent
Variable: ROA/100
Method: Panel
Least Squares
Date: 07/10/14
Time: 13:27
Sample: 2008 2013
Periods included: 6
Cross-sections
included: 11
Total panel
(unbalanced)
observations: 57
46
CAR/100
0.044799
0.028958
1.546999
0.1284
LOG(TA)
0.005249
0.001813
2.894366
0.0057
REGION
-0.002051
0.004854
-0.422578
0.6745
Effects
Specification
Period fixed
(dummy variables)
R-squared
0.427759
Mean
dependent var
0.019026
Adjusted R-squared
0.332385
S.D. dependent
var
0.011542
S.E. of regression
0.009430
Akaike info
criterion
-6.345804
0.004269
Schwarz
criterion
-6.023217
Log likelihood
189.8554
Hannan-Quinn
criter.
-6.220436
F-statistic
4.485084
Durbin-Watson
stat
0.416999
Prob(F-statistic)
0.000410
Coefficient
Std. Error
t-Statistic
Prob.
-0.044066
0.020228
-2.178463
0.0343
CAR/100
0.044799
0.028958
1.546999
0.1284
LOG(TA)
0.005249
0.001813
2.894366
0.0057
REGION
-0.002051
0.004854
-0.422578
0.6745
Effects
Specification
Period fixed
(dummy variables)
48
R-squared
0.427759
Mean
dependent var
0.019026
Adjusted R-squared
0.332385
S.D. dependent
var
0.011542
S.E. of regression
0.009430
Akaike info
criterion
-6.345804
0.004269
Schwarz
criterion
-6.023217
Log likelihood
189.8554
Hannan-Quinn
criter.
-6.220436
F-statistic
4.485084
Durbin-Watson
stat
0.416999
Prob(F-statistic)
0.000410
Redundant Fixed
Effects Tests
Equation: EQ1
Test period fixed
effects
Effects Test
Statistic
Period F
Period Chi-square
d.f.
Prob.
4.341558
(5,48)
0.0024
21.267330
0.0007
49
Coefficient
Std. Error
t-Statistic
Prob.
-0.445893
0.146334
-3.047099
0.0036
CAR/100
0.062071
0.205975
0.301351
0.7643
LOG(TA)
0.061677
0.013209
4.669353
0.0000
REGION
-0.115052
0.034852
-3.301198
0.0017
R-squared
0.340156
Mean
dependent var
0.157228
Adjusted R-squared
0.302807
S.D. dependent
var
0.085777
S.E. of regression
0.071622
Akaike info
criterion
-2.367243
0.271873
Schwarz
criterion
-2.223871
Log likelihood
71.46643
Hannan-Quinn
criter.
-2.311524
F-statistic
9.107358
Durbin-Watson
stat
1.319244
Prob(F-statistic)
0.000058
50
ratio test is a test that is used in comparing the fit of two models in
which one is nested within the other. This takes place when testing
whether a streamlining assumption of the model is valid or not.
Since the value of the probability equals to zero, this regression is
ignored and the Null postulation, and so the Hausman test is carried
out so as to know the impact of the variables.
51
Test
Equation: EQ1
Test period random
effects
Test Summary
Chi-Sq. Statistic
Chi-Sq. d.f.
Prob.
Period random
17.436351
0.0006
Random
Var(Diff.)
Prob.
Period random
effects test
comparisons:
Variable
Fixed
CAR/100
0.329630
0.088212
0.004062
0.0002
LOG(TA)
0.076233
0.063235
0.000010
0.0000
REGION
-0.159083
-0.119579
0.000098
0.0001
Coefficient
Std. Error
t-Statistic
Prob.
Period random
effects test
equation:
Dependent
Variable: ROE/100
Method: Panel
Least Squares
Date: 07/10/14
Time: 13:32
Sample: 2008 2013
Periods included: 6
Cross-sections
included: 11
Total panel
(unbalanced)
observations: 57
52
-0.622763
0.133958
-4.648950
0.0000
CAR/100
0.329630
0.191772
1.718863
0.0921
LOG(TA)
0.076233
0.012009
6.347940
0.0000
REGION
-0.159083
0.032143
-4.949232
0.0000
Effects
Specification
Period fixed
(dummy variables)
R-squared
0.545639
Mean
dependent var
0.157228
Adjusted R-squared
0.469912
S.D. dependent
var
0.085777
S.E. of regression
0.062451
Akaike info
criterion
-2.564916
0.187209
Schwarz
criterion
-2.242329
Log likelihood
82.10009
Hannan-Quinn
criter.
-2.439547
F-statistic
7.205363
Durbin-Watson
stat
1.433772
Prob(F-statistic)
0.000003
53
Coefficient
Std. Error
t-Statistic
Prob.
-0.622763
0.133958
-4.648950
0.0000
CAR/100
0.329630
0.191772
1.718863
0.0921
LOG(TA)
0.076233
0.012009
6.347940
0.0000
REGION
-0.159083
0.032143
-4.949232
0.0000
54
Effects
Specification
Period fixed
(dummy variables)
R-squared
0.545639
Mean
dependent var
0.157228
Adjusted R-squared
0.469912
S.D. dependent
var
0.085777
S.E. of regression
0.062451
Akaike info
criterion
-2.564916
0.187209
Schwarz
criterion
-2.242329
Log likelihood
82.10009
Hannan-Quinn
criter.
-2.439547
F-statistic
7.205363
Durbin-Watson
stat
1.433772
Prob(F-statistic)
0.000003
4.2 CONCLUSION
Considering these two performance measures (ROA and ROE) of the
eleven Islamic banks presented above with the empirical evidence,
it can be concluded that the Capital Adequacy ratio from equation 1
(ROA) has no impact whatsoever while the Islamic banks Total
assets (TA) has a negative impact on the banks profitability, and
also from the equation 2 (ROE), it can be deduced that the capital
adequacy ratio has a positive impact with Islamic banks from Asia
performing better than their counterparts from the middle east.
Lastly from the data used for this panel data analysis, which is in the
55
5. CONCLUSION
5.1 SUMMARY OF THE DISSERTATION
This piece of Dissertation investigated the impact of the global
financial crises on Islamic banking and financial institutions. The
data of eleven Islamic banking institutions from the Middle East and
Asia were used to carry out an empirical analysis of this research. It
also enumerated how Islamic banking institutions work and what
56
How
does
Islamic
banking
works
compared
to
the
conventional system?
58
more
further
research
to
specialization.
59
carried
out
on
this
area
of
6.REFERENCE LIST
Chapra, M. (2008). The Global Financial Crisis: Can Islamic Finance
help? Available at: http://www.isdbforum.org/presentation Papers/5M_Umer_Chapra.pdf (Accessed: 10th June 2014).
International Monetary Fund (2010) Islamic Banks: More Resilient to
Crises?
[Online].
Available
at
www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2010/res100410a.htm
(Accessed: 15th June 2014).
Joseph. E. Stiglitz. (2003), Globalization and its Discontents. Google
books [Online]. http://books.google.co.uk/ (Accessed: 20th June
2014).
Renata, Janka, Toth. (2011). Islamic Economics and the Effect of the
Global
Financial
Crises
[Online].
Available
at:
www.academia.edu/2940821/Islamic_Economics_and_the_Effect_of_t
he_Global_Financial_Crises (Accessed: 15th June 2014).
Hasan, Maher, and Dridi, Jemma. (2010) The Effects of the Global
Crises on Islamic and Conventional Banks: A Comparative Study
[Online]. Available at: www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.cfm?
sk=24183.0 (Accessed: 10th June 2014).
Mark, Jickling. (2010) Causes of the Financial Crises [Online].
Available at: www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40173.pdf (Accessed: 24th
June 2014).
Frederic. S. Mishkin. (1997) The Causes and Propagation of Financial
Instability:
Lesson
for
Policymakers
60
[Online].
Available
at:
www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/sympos/1997/pdf/s97mishk.pdf
(Accessed: 1st June 2014).
Mahmoud. A. El-Gamal. (2006), Islamic Finance: Law, Economics,
and Practice. Google books [Online]. http://books.google.co.uk/
(Accessed: 20th June 2014).
Islamic Financial Service Board (2010). Islamic Finance and Global
Stability Available at: http://www.ifsb.org/docs/IFSB-IRTI-IDB2010.pd
(Accessed: 10th June 2014).
Ali, Malik, Muhammad, Shaukat, Malik, and Haider, Shah. (2011) An
Analysis of Islamic banking and finance in West: From Lagging to
Leading,
Asian Social
Science,
7, 1,
[Online].
Available
at:
Finance,
9,
1,
[Online].
www.emeraldinsight.com/1526-5943.htm
Available
(Accessed:
17th
at:
June
2014).
Ali, Said. (2012) Efficiency in Islamic Banking During a Financial
Crises- An Empirical Analysis of forty seven banks, Journal of
Applied
Finance
and
Banking,
2,
3,
[Online].
Available
at:
www.papers.ssm.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2084626
(Acessed: 19th June 2014).
Mariani, Abdul-Majid, David. S. Saal, and Guiliana, Battisti. (2009)
Efficiency in Islamic and Conventional banking: An International
Comparison, J Prod Anal, 34, 25 43, [Online] DOI 10.1007/s11123009-0165-3 (Accessed: 21st June 2014).
61
Law
Journal,
46,
[Online].
Available
at:
World
Economics,
13,
62
3,
[Online].
Available
at:
http://www.world-economics-journal.com/Realising%20the
%20Potential%20of%20Islamic%20Finance.details?AID=531
(Accessed: 18th June 2014)
Muhammad, Hanif. (2011) Differences and Similarities in Islamic
and Conventional Banking, International Journal of Business and
Social
Science,
2,
2,
[Online].
Available
at:
http://www.ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol._2_No._2%3B_February_2011/2
0.pdf (Acessed: 18th June 2014).
Quran 3: 130.
Quran 30: 39.
Mervyn, K. Lewis, (2010). Accentuating the Positive, governance of
Islam investment funds, Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business
Research,
vol.1
No.1
[Online].
Available
at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/17590811011033406
(Accessed: 16th June 2014).
Mohamed, Yusuf, Abdulle, and Salina, H. Kassim, (2012) Impact of
Global
Financial
Crises
on
the
Performance
of
Islamic
and
63
School
of
Economics
[Online].
Available
at:
www.epub.lib.aalto.fi/en/thesis/pdf/12737/hse_ethesis_12737.pdf
(Accessed: 2nd June 2014).
Muhammad, M. Said, and Kaviyarasu, (2014) Prosperity and Social
Justice consequences of Applying Ethical Norms of Islamic Finance:
Literature
Review,
Development,
Journal
5,
of
2,
Economics
[Online].
and
Sustainable
Available
at:
www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEDS/article/viewfile/10703/10908
(Accessed: July 2nd 2014).
Mohammad, Nejetullah, Siddiqi. (2004). Riba, Bank Interest and the
Rationale of its Prohibition. Islamic Development Bank Research and
Training
Institute
[Online].
Available
at:
www.globalwbpost.com/farooqm/study_res/i_econ_fin/nejatullahs_rib
a.pdf (Accessed: 17th June 2014).
Chapra,
Umer,
M.
(2007)
The
case
against
interest:
Is
it
Available
at:
www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tie.20138/abstract
(Accessed: 20th June 2014).
Luca, Errico, and Mitra, Farahbaksh. (1998) Islamic Banking: Issues
in prudential regulations and supervisions, [Online]. Available at:
www.papers.ssrn.com/s0l3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=882267
(Accessed: 4th July 2014).
Usmani, Ashraf, Imran, Muhammad. (2002) Meezan Banks Guide to
Islamic
Banking,
[Online].
www.meezanbank.com/docs/gibcomplete.pdf
2014).
64
Available
(Accessed:
at:
7th
July
[Online].
Available
at:
65
Help?,
NewHorizon,
170,
[Online].
Available
at:
http://www.newhorizonislamicbanking.com/index.cfm?
section=archive&action=view&id=81 D (Acessed 20th August 2014)
Ernst and Young (2014) World Islamic Banking Competitiveness
Report
2013
-2014
[Online].
Available
at:
www.ey.com/publication/vwLUAssets/World_Islamic_Banking_Compet
itiveness_Report_2013-14/$FILE/WORLD%20Islamic
%20Competitiveness%20Report202013-14.pdf (Accessed: June 5th
2014).
Chris
Brooks.
(2008)
Cambridge
Introductory
Econometrics
[Online].
for
finance.
Available
at:
Lewis,
and Adrian,
Thornhill.
(2009)
APPENDIX
ROA
1 ADIB
CAPITAL
RATIO
ROE
2008
1.79
15.4
11.84
2009
0.13
1.22
13.52
2010
1.47
13.42
16.03
2011
1.54
13.85
17.39
2012
1.5
11.34
21.42
66
TOTAL
ASSETS
REGION
51,210.1
0
1
64,084.0
0
1
75,245.5
0
1
74,335.1
0
1
85,664.6
0
1
2 DIB
3 SHIB
4 BI
2013
1.53
11.3
16.89
2008
1.84
16.22
12
2009
1.43
13.62
17.9
2010
0.64
6.04
17.8
2011
1.12
10.94
18.2
2012
1.22
12.62
17.4
2013
1.52
13.78
18.2
2008
1.75
7.25
2009
1.65
6.18
34.47
2010
1.63
6.19
35.54
2011
1.46
5.74
35
2012
1.51
6.15
34.71
2013
1.53
6.84
31
2008
1.83
32.9
13.15
2009
2010
0.63
11.36
13.87
2011
2012
2013
5 CIMB
6 HLISB
16.72
1.23
14.46
13.99
103,160.
50
84,756.6
0
84,304.3
0
89,884.4
0
90,588.5
0
98,611.2
0
113,288.
40
15,535.9
0
15,974.5
0
16,667.2
0
17,733.1
0
18,316.2
0
21,731.9
0
23,556.4
0
27,488.5
0
32,207.3
0
37,422.9
0
2009
0.95
21.8
11.34
2010
2.42
49.86
17.21
2011
1.64
27.47
14.21
2012
2013
2008
2009
1.53
23.71
13.27
20,528.6
0
31,805.8
0
39,074.9
0
47,863.0
0
58,907.9
0
10.59
17.97
22.85
8,120.80
9,142.00
2008
11.69
0.86
67
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7 AISB
8 AlRB
9 QIB
10 QNB
2010
0.88
10.8
20.78
2011
0.64
8.42
16.99
2012
0.85
14.15
13.24
2013
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
1.04
17.86
10.72
-0.29
1.01
1.14
0.84
-3.07
12.69
14.31
9.78
13.92
13.21
13.37
14.19
13.72
2008
4.53
25.77
21.39
2009
4.05
24.27
19.39
2010
3.81
22.93
20.63
2011
3.64
23.37
20.03
2012
3.23
22.76
19.83
2013
2.75
19.87
19.60
2008
5.99
27.91
17.04
2009
3.63
16.37
17.33
2010
2.77
13.98
17.37
2011
2.48
13.48
18.58
2012
1.89
10.95
15.05
2013
1.77
11.45
16.51
2008
2.74
23.95
13.90
2009
2.54
23.13
13.20
2010
2.83
25.97
15.30
2011
2.86
22.67
22.00
2012
2.49
18.72
21.00
2013
2.34
18.98
15.60
68
9,962.00
12,178.6
0
21,902.5
0
21,728.5
0
3,171.90
4,881.80
6,223.10
6,508.20
6,825.10
163,373.
20
170,729.
70
184,840.
90
220,813.
40
267,382.
60
279,870.
70
33,543.2
0
39,272.7
0
51,877.2
0
58,286.1
0
73,192.1
0
77,354.2
0
151,973.
60
179,328.
90
223,382.
40
301,955.
30
366,853.
80
443,486.
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11 ASYA
2008
3.3
21.19
13.22
2009
2010
3.07
1.99
19.78
14.47
14.81
13.46
2011
1.39
10.91
13.48
2012
0.93
8.06
13.57
2013
0.72
7.32
14.06
8,156.30
11,738.6
0
14,661
17,348.5
0
21,574.0
0
27,903.6
0
69
0
0
0
0
0
0
70
71