Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Center for Studies of Hong Kong, Macao and Pearl River Delta, Sun Yat-Sen University, Xingang Xi Road, Guangzhou, China
Department of Management Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 21 August 2012
Received in revised form 18 January 2013
Accepted 8 May 2013
Keywords:
Trafc violations
Accident severity
Risk factors
Road safety
Transport facility improvement
a b s t r a c t
With the recent economic boom in China, vehicle volume and the number of trafc accident fatalities have
become the highest in the world. Meanwhile, trafc accidents have become the leading cause of death in
China. Systematically analyzing road safety data from different perspectives and applying empirical methods/implementing proper measures to reduce the fatality rate will be an urgent and challenging task for
China in the coming years. In this study, we analyze the trafc accident data for the period 20062010 in
Guangdong Province, China. These data, extracted from the Trafc Management Sector-Specic Incident
Case Data Report, are the only ofcially available and reliable source of trafc accident data (with a sample size >7000 per year). In particular, we focus on two outcome measures: trafc violations and accident
severity. Human, vehicle, road and environmental risk factors are considered. First, the results establish
the role of trafc violations as one of the major risks threatening road safety. An immediate implication
is: if the trafc violation rate could be reduced or controlled successfully, then the rate of serious injuries
and fatalities would be reduced accordingly. Second, specic risk factors associated with trafc violations
and accident severity are determined. Accordingly, to reduce trafc accident incidence and fatality rates,
measures such as trafc regulations and legislationtargeting different vehicle types/driver groups with
respect to the various human, vehicle and environment risk factorsare needed. Such measures could
include road safety programs for targeted driver groups, focused enforcement of trafc regulations and
road/transport facility improvements. Data analysis results arising from this study will shed lights on
the development of similar (adjusted) measures to reduce trafc violations and/or accident fatalities and
injuries, and to promote road safety in other regions.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Deaths due to road trafc accidents have become one of the
top three causes of death for populations aged 5 to 44 years, and
the direct economic loss has accounted for approximately 13%
of Chinas annual gross domestic product (GDP) (WHO, 2009). In
China, given the surging economy, vehicle volume and the number of trafc accident fatalities have become the highest in the
world. In 2010, road trafc accidents resulted in 65,225 deaths and
over 900 million RMB (equivalent to USD 143 million, exchange
rate: 1 USD = 6.3 RMB) in direct property losses (Trafc Management Research Institute, Ministry of Public Security, China, 2011
Road Accidents White Paper, 2011). Trafc accidents as a cause of
death are now the leading killer in China (Liu Jun, Trafc accidents
have become the No. 1 killer, Peoples Daily 2010-8-5). Given these
Corresponding author. Tel.: +852 3442 8585; fax: +852 3442 0189.
E-mail addresses: zsuzgn@hotmail.com (G. Zhang),
mskyau@cityu.edu.hk (K.K.W. Yau).
0001-4575/$ see front matter 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.004
alarming gures, and with the launching of the United Nations Road
Safety Action for the Decade, the State Council of China established
a goal of decreasing the trafc fatality rate by 36% in the recent
12th Five-Year national strategic plan. With such a severe situation in Chinas road trafc safety, there is an urgent need to study
the risk factors that determine trafc violations and trafc accident
severity.
Since Haddon (1968) introduced his famous Haddon matrix
model, in which he considered three sets of interactive factors,
namely human, vehicle and environment, before, during and after
a collision, a large number of studies have shown that some of the
most important factors associated with trafc accident incidence
and injuries/fatalities are driving behaviors such as speeding, drunk
driving, fatigue driving and not using protective devices. Moreover,
because driving behaviors are habits that form in accordance with
living standards and social culture, they naturally are related to
personal characteristics such as the drivers gender, age, education
level and income. Specically, Sabey and Taylor (1980) suggested
that drivers personal characteristics account for 95% of the factors that cause accidents. Miaou and Lum (1993) further suggested
that, among these personal characteristics, the most important factors are age and gender. Personal characteristics not only relate to
trafc accident incidence, but they are also associated with trafc violations. For example, Shinar et al. (2001) demonstrated that
seat belt usage is positively correlated with age and education
level. Drivers are more willing to limit their speed as age increases,
while such willingness diminishes as drivers education level and
income increase. Fosgerau (2005) found that driving speed is negatively correlated with drivers age and is positively correlated with
drivers income. Male drivers tend to drive faster than their female
counterparts. Drivers with single marital status have an average
driving speed that is slightly faster than that of married drivers.
In addition to the effect of personal characteristics, it has also been
found that as urbanization rates increase, the average driving speed
drops. Other studies have focused on more specic perspectives.
Factor et al. (2008) applied a logistic regression procedure to analyze Israeli data and concluded that the varied trafc accident risks
were due to different social habits and technological advancements.
Social and cultural characteristics are important determining factors affecting trafc safety no matter which social sector a driver
belongs to. They found that in Israel, Muslims, separated, widowed, male, young, low-skilled workers and low-educated drivers
tended to have higher accident rates. Yamamura (2008) used panel
data from Japans 46 counties to assess the impact of social capital, social structure and social norms on drivers driving attitudes.
He concluded that formal legal restrictions have nearly no impact
on dangerous driving behaviors as mandatory security checks make
drivers even less careful. However, informal restrictions can reduce
the occurrence of dangerous driving behaviors.
In sum, the literature generally concluded that male drivers usually exhibit a higher probability of committing trafc violations and
consequently have a higher risk of being involved in serious/fatal
trafc accidents (Holubowycz et al., 1994; Massie et al., 1995; Zhang
et al., 2000; Hayakawa et al., 2000; Valent et al., 2002; Yau, 2004;
Yau et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2008). Median-aged drivers have a
lower probability of becoming involved in serious injury/fatal accidents, in contrast with younger and older drivers (Cooper, 1990;
Holubowycz et al., 1994; Massie et al., 1995; Hayakawa et al., 2000;
Hijar et al., 2000; Norris et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2000; Derrig et al.,
2002; Valent et al., 2002). Furthermore, Abdel-Aty and Radwan
(2000) applied descriptive statistics, conditional probability and
linear regression to analyze drunk-driving accidents in Florida, USA.
It was found that 2534 year-old drivers exhibited the highest accident rate. As drivers age decreased, male, white and local residents
demonstrated higher rates of accident occurrence. Hasselberg et al.
(2005) investigated the impact of socio-economic status on trafc
accidents for young drivers. Considering the importance of drivers
age and gender on trafc accidents, Bedard et al. (2002) indicated
that the implementation of specic safety measures is necessary.
Research studies have also suggested that road type, street light
condition and weather conditions are important factors that affect
the severity of vehicle trafc crashes (Hijar et al., 2000). However,
weather conditions, though they are important, are not a factor that
policymakers can control when attempting to reduce the risk of
severe trafc accidents. Nevertheless, an assessment of the impact
of weather conditions on trafc safety is valuable to road infrastructure designers and the motor insurance companies that set
premium rates. Yakovlev and Inden (2010) examined trafc fatalities in 48 American states from 1982 to 2006 and concluded that
weather indicators, such as temperature and hail, are the most
important factors that determine trafc safety.
Moreover, other factors including time of day and whether the
accident occurred on a weekend are found to be signicant in determining accident severity (Massie et al., 1995; Hijar et al., 2000;
Valent et al., 2002; Lam et al., 2003). For example, out-of-control
accidents often occur during the evening and nighttime (Laapotti
19
20
after 17:00 is similar to those occurring on Saturday and Sunday (MacLeod et al., 2011). Public holidays refer to the holidays
stipulated by the State Council of China (before 2007 public holidays in China included New Year, Chinese New Year, International
Labor Day and National Day. From 2008 onwards, three holidays
were added following the holiday reform in 2007; they are Qing
Ming Festival, Dragon Boat Festival and Mid-Autumn Festival.).
Time has been classied into six groups according to working
time pattern and peoples lifestyle in China: 00:0006:59 (midnight to dawn), 07:0008:59 (morning rush hours), 09:0011:59
(morning working hours), 12:0016:59 (afternoon working
hours), 17:0019:59 (afternoon rushing hours), and 20:0023:59
(nighttime). Seasons are dened, according to the Bureau of
Meteorology Category, China, as spring (MarchMay), summer (JuneSeptember), autumn (OctoberNovember) and winter
(DecemberFebruary).
2.3. Statistical data analysis
Contingency tables are constructed to assess the association
between risk factors and (i) trafc violation and (ii) injury severity.
Chi-square tests of independence are conducted with the level of
signicance at 5%.
To estimate the effect of different predictor variables on the
likelihood of the occurrence of (i) trafc violation and (ii) injury
severity, logistic regression analyses are conducted. We consider
the use of multivariate stepwise logistic regression to identify
signicant factors determining (i) trafc violation and (ii) injury
severity and to estimate the magnitude of adjusted odds ratios
(ORs) for each signicant factor while controlling for other confounding factors (Hosmer and Lemeshow, 1989). The adjusted ORs
of signicant factors and their 95% condence intervals (CIs) are
computed using a stepwise logistic regression model in which
all factors were initially included, and insignicant factors are
subsequently removed by the stepwise procedure. Entry and
removal probabilities for the stepwise procedure are both set
at 0.05.
3. Empirical results
Table 1 displays the chi-square statistics for assessing the
dependence between the predictor variables and (i) trafc violations and (ii) fatal/serious injury. To further assess the casual
relationship, via the stepwise logistic regression analysis, adjusted
odds ratios and the corresponding 95% CIs for each of the signicant
factors are displayed in Table 2.
Before going into the detailed data analysis results, preliminary ndings point to an important conclusion. Overall, among all
trafc accidents (N = 37,340) recorded, 74.34% of those involved
trafc violations. Separating the data according to whether trafc violation is involved (N = 27,759) or not (N = 9581), it is found
that the fatal/serious injury proportion occurring with trafc violations (41.38%) is signicantly higher than (p-value < 0.001) the
proportion of fatal/serious injuries occurring in the absence of
trafc violations (35.16%). The immediate implication is that: trafc violations associate positively with accident severity. Thus, for
xed trafc accident number, increased trafc violation events
will imply more severe trafc accident events. In this context,
it is even more alarming to note that the trafc violation proportion in on an increasing trend (2006 = 70.15%, 2007 = 71.84%,
2008 = 73.52%, 2009 = 77.76%, 2010 = 78.73%). Trafc violation
events are becoming the major latent threat to road safety in China.
If the trafc violation rate can be reduced or controlled successfully, the number of fatal/serious injury victims would be reduced
accordingly.
21
Table 1
Independence test and measure of association for trafc violations and accident severity in China.
Factors
Human factors
Drivers gender
Drivers age
Drivers driving experience
Drivers hukou origin
Drivers occupation
Vehicle factors
Vehicle type
Vehicle safety status
Vehicle overload condition
Whether the vehicle had any
compulsory third party insurance
Whether the vehicle was a
commercial vehicle
Road factors
Types of trafc lanes
Road type
Environmental factors
Street-light condition
Weather condition
Visibility level
Whether it was a weekend
Whether it was a public holiday
Time
Seasons
Years
Trafc violation
*
Trafc violations
(N = 37,340)
2 (P-value), degree of
freedom
79.287* (<0.001), 1
23.163* (<0.001), 4
18.999* (0.002), 5
10.481* (0.001), 1
123.370* (<0.001), 8
142.362* (<0.001), 1
7.811 (0.099), 4
38.928* (<0.001), 5
350.314* (<0.001), 1
266.85* (<0.001), 8
80.350* (<0.001), 1
7.301(0.121), 4
23.412* (<0.001), 5
131.333* (<0.001), 1
89.228* (<0.001), 8
497.959* (<0.001), 2
228.656* (<0.001), 1
3.151 (0.076), 1
0.060(0.807), 1
644.248* (<0.001), 2
301.659* (<0.001), 1
260.959* (<0.001), 1
36.542* (<0.001), 1
224.911* (<0.001), 2
18.939* (<0.001), 1
139.716* (<0.001), 1
0.123(0.726), 1
41.403* (<0.001), 1
693.446* (<0.001), 1
267.816* (<0.001), 1
136.353* (<0.001), 1
378.502* (<0.001), 8
8.309* (0.004), 1
1300* (<0.001), 8
13.724* (<0.001), 1
532.426* (<0.001), 8
6.093* (0.048), 2
30.705* (<0.001), 1
19.42* (<0.001), 1
6.13* (0.013), 1
2.497(0.114), 1
4.820(0.306), 5
7.913* (0.048), 3
217.465* (<0.001), 4
1300.000* (<0.001), 5
577.599* (<0.001), 2
0.329(0.566), 1
63.118* (<0.001), 1
15.973* (<0.001), 1
13.429* (<0.001), 1
116.186* (<0.001), 5
37.248* (<0.001), 3
18.896* (0.001), 4
343.741* (<0.001), 5
311.027* (<0.001), 2
5.265* (0.022), 1
5.127* (0.024), 1
0.043(0.835), 1
0.314(0.575), 1
51.059* (<0.001), 5
16.535* (0.001), 3
8.002 (0.092), 4
75.721* (<0.001), 5
Signicant at 5% level.
lower risk of trafc violations. Goods vehicles and passenger vehicle drivers, compared to motorcycle drivers, exhibit a higher risk
of trafc violation. Unt safety status and overload are also found
to be signicant factors relating to trafc violations. For environmental factors, street light condition, weather condition, visibility
level, whether it was a weekend, time of day and the year of the
accident are identied as signicant factors associated with trafc
violations. Specically, no street lighting, bad visibility, weekends
and the hours 7:008:59 and 17:0019:59 present a higher risk of
trafc violation.
Factors including the drivers age, whether the vehicle had
compulsory third party insurance, whether the vehicle was a commercial vehicle, whether it was a public holiday and the season
are found to be not signicant in the stepwise logistic regression
analysis when other confounding factors are being controlled.
3.2. Risk factors affecting injury severity
Further analysis has also been conducted to identify the impact
of the risk factors on accident severity, conditional on the presence
or absence of a trafc violation. The last two columns in Table 1 display the chi-square statistics for assessing the dependence between
the predictor variables and accident severity by trafc violation
and non-trafc violation groups respectively. Referring to the trafc violation group data (N = 27,759), the overall proportion of
severe (fatal/serious injury) accidents of 41.38% serves as a base
for comparison. Among all factors relating to the driver, gender
difference is clearly seen. In particular, female drivers involving in
severe accident proportion is 25.78%, which is much lower than
the male drivers group (42.18%). Higher severe accident proportion
for rural hukou offenders (51.12%) is also evident. For vehicle factors, goods vehicles (52.48%), unt safety status (59.63%), overload
(58.65%), no compulsory third party insurance (46.24%) and noncommercial vehicles (52.90%) demonstrate a higher proportion of
22
Table 2
Adjusted odds ratios (95% condence intervals) in stepwise logistic regression analysis of risk factors associating with trafc violations and accident severity in China.
Factors*
Trafc Violations
25
2635
3645
4655
1115
1620
Yes
Street-light condition (base: daylight)
Good street-lighting
1.197(1.110,1.291)
No street-lighting
Weather condition (base: good)
0.850(0.803, 0.899)
Bad weather
Visibility level (base: good)
1.097(1.006, 1.196)
Bad visibility
Whether it was a weekend (base: no)
Yes
1.065(1.011, 1.122)
Whether it was a public holiday (base: no)
Yes
07:008:59
1.186(1.087, 1.295)
12:0016:59
17:0019:59
1.108(1.035, 1.186)
20:0023:59
Summer
Winter
Years (base: 2006)
2007
1.111(1.042, 1.184)
2008
1.359(1.270, 1.453)
2009
1.471(1.375, 1.575)
2010
Trafc violations (base: other trafc violations behaviors)
NA
Speeding
NA
Drunk-driving
NA
Illegal meeting
NA
Not giving way according to stipulations
Model prediction measures
Percent correct
74.37
0.644
ROC
37,340
N
*
Serious Injury/Fatality
(trafc violations group)
Serious Injury/Fatality
(non-trafc violations group)
1.382(1.213, 1.574)
1.653(1.353, 2.019)
0.911(0.852, 0.973)
1.154(1.038, 1.283)
1.146(1.022, 1.285)
1.345(1.264, 1.432)
1.496(1.350, 1.657)
1.371(1.284, 1.464)
0.808(0.733, 0.891)
1.774(1.609, 1.956)
1.443(1.124, 1.851)
1.289(1.164, 1.427)
1.472(1.228, 1.765)
0.774(0.715, 0.837)
1.347(1.260,1.440)
1.480(1.334,1.641)
1.173(1.096,1.255)
1.536(1.414,1.667)
1.212(1.085,1.354)
1.806(1.581,2.063)
1.130(1.036, 1.233)
1.107(1.048, 1.169)
1.155(1.049, 1.272)
1.299(1.200, 1.406)
0.816(0.757, 0.879)
0.852(0.748, 0.971)
0.882(0.828, 0.940)
0.827(0.779, 0.877)
0.849(0.773, 0.933)
1.598(1.422, 1.795)
1.232(1.009, 1.505)
1.255(1.110, 1.419)
0.932(0.869, 0.999)
NA
NA
NA
NA
65.12
0.687
27,759
68.01
0.688
9581
For brevity, results for drivers occupation and road factors are omitted.
regulations have a higher risk of severe injury/fatal accidents compared to motorcycle drivers. Unt safety status, overload and
commercial vehicles demonstrate an increased risk of severe accidents. Compulsory third party insurance is not found to be a
signicant factor. For environmental factors, no street lighting at
night has the highest risk of leading to a severe accident. Good street
lighting at night exhibits median risk, while daylight presents the
lowest risk. Bad visibility, weekends and public holidays demonstrate a signicantly higher risk of severe accidents. Moreover,
midnight to dawn (00:006:59) is found to have a higher risk
of fatal/serious injury accidents, compared to 9:0016:00. However, accidents happening during evening rush hour 17:0019:59
have a decreased risk of accident severity. The autumn season,
compared with spring and summer, presents an increased risk of
fatal/serious injury accidents. In addition, it is worth emphasizing
that, among all trafc violations, speeding, drunk driving and illegal
meeting all have a signicantly higher risk of leading to fatal/serious
injury accidents. Drivers age, weather condition and the year are
not found to be signicant factors associated with accident injury
severity when other factors are controlled in the stepwise logistic
regression procedure.
In addition, risk factors determining injury severity are also
studied for accidents not involving trafc violations. The last column in Table 2 shows that the risk factors that impact injury
severity differ when trafc regulations are not violated. Interestingly, whether or not a trafc violation occurs makes a difference
in terms of the signicant risk factors determining accident severity and their corresponding effects on fatal/serious injury accident
occurrence. For example, in cases where trafc violations are not
present, 610 years of driving experience and 1115 years of
driving experience are more signicantly associated with injury
severity, while novice driver status (2 years of driving experience)
exhibits an insignicant association; passenger vehicles become
a signicant factor for injury severity, while goods vehicles are
an insignicant factor. Moreover, some factors that have previously been identied as signicant factors, including compulsory
third party insurance, weekends, public holidays, the midnight to
dawn hours and the spring season, are found to be not signicantly
associated with injury severity. Such ndings have important
implications for organizing road safety promotion activities for targeted road user groups as well as establishing relevant regulations
and policies to reduce trafc accident severity at a macro level.
4. Discussion
The results indicate that some risk factors are found to be signicant in the logistic regression analysis for both trafc violations
and injury severity. As a summary, males, goods vehicles, an unt
safety status, overload, no street lighting at night, bad visibility
and weekends not only exhibit an increased likelihood of being
associated with a trafc violations, but they also imply a higher
risk of accident severity. Novice drivers (2 years of driving experience) display a signicantly higher risk of trafc violations, yet
their risk on accident severity is signicantly lower than the other
categories of drivers. Drivers with 35 years of driving experience, passenger vehicles, bad weather and the morning rush hour
(7:008:59) display an increased risk of trafc violations, while
their association with a fatal/severe injury is not signicant. Furthermore, since 2007, trafc violation rates increased signicantly;
in fact, an increasing trend was observed, while the fatal/serious
injury accident rate remained rather stable. Commercial vehicles,
good street lighting at night, public holidays and mid-night to dawn
(00:0006:59) do not have a signicant effect on trafc violations,
but when trafc violations do occur, these factors confer a higher
risk of a fatal/serious injury. Nevertheless, compulsory third party
23
24
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to an Associate Editor and two reviewers for very helpful comments on earlier version of the paper. This
research was supported in part by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China grant no. 71173244 We would also like to
thank Dr. Han Zhang of Sun Yat-Sen University and Mr. Zeyi Chen
of GuangDong Provincial Public Security Department for their constructive suggestions and advice.
References
Abdel-Aty, M.A., Radwan, A.E., 2000. Modeling trafc accident occurrence and
involvement. Accident Analysis and Prevention 32, 633642.
Al-Ghamdi, A.S., 2002. Using logistic regression to estimate the inuence of accident
factors on accident severity. Accident Analysis and Prevention 34, 729741.
Bedard, M., Guyatt, G.H., Stones, M.J., Hirdes, J.P., 2002. The independent contribution of driver, crash, and vehicle characteristics to driver fatalities. Accident
Analysis and Prevention 34, 717727.
Cooper, P.J., 1990. Differences in accident characteristics among elderly drivers and
between elderly and middle-aged drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention 22,
499508.
Derrig, R.A., Segui-Gomez, M., Abtahi, A., Liu, L.L., 2002. The effect of population
safety belt usage rates on motor vehicle-related fatalities. Accident Analysis and
Prevention 34, 101110.
Factor, R., Mahalel, D., Yair, G., 2008. Inter-group differences in road-trafc crash
involvement. Accident Analysis and Prevention 40, 20002007.
Fosgerau, M., 2005. Speed and income. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy
39, 225240.
Haddon Jr., W., 1968. The Changing approach to the epidemiology, prevention, and
amelioration of trauma: the transition to approaches etiologically rather than
descriptively based. American Journal of Public Health 58, 14311438.
Hasselberg, M., Vaeza, M., Laamme, L., 2005. Socioeconomic aspects of the circumstances and consequences of car crashes among young adults. Social Science &
Medicine 60, 287295.
Hayakawa, H., Fischbeck, P.S., Fischhoff, B., 2000. Trafc accident statistics and risk
perceptions in Japan and the United States. Accident Analysis and Prevention
32, 827835.
Hijar, M., Carrillo, C., Flores, M., Anaya, R., Lopez, V., 2000. Risk factors in highway trafc accidents: a case control study. Accident Analysis and Prevention 32,
703709.
Holubowycz, O.T., Kloeden, C.N., McLean, A.J., 1994. Age, sex, and blood alcohol concentration of killed and injured drivers, riders, and passengers. Accident Analysis
and Prevention 26, 483492.
Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley, New York.
Huang, Y.H., Rau, P.L.P., Zhang, B., Roetting, M., 2008. Chinese truck drivers attitudes
toward feedback by technology: a quantitative approach. Accident Analysis and
Prevention 40, 15531562.
Huang, Y.H., Zhang, W., Morphy, L., Shi, G., Lin, Y., 2011. Attitudes and behavior
of Chinese drivers regarding seatbelt use. Accident Analysis and Prevention 40,
889897.
Kim, K., Brunner, I.M., Yamashita, E., 2008. Modeling fault among accident-involved
pedestrians and motorists in Hawaii. Accident Analysis and Prevention 40,
20432049.
Kong, C., Yang, J., 2010. Logistic regression analysis of pedestrian casualty risk
in passenger vehicle collisions in China. Accident Analysis and Prevention 42,
987993.
Laapotti, S., Keskinen, E., 1998. Differences in fatal loss-of-control accidents between
young male and female drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention 30, 435442.
Lam, L.T., Norton, R., Woodward, M., Connor, J., Ameratunga, S., 2003. Passenger
carriage and car crash injury: a comparison between younger and older drivers.
Accident Analysis and Prevention 35, 861867.
25
Wang, Y., Hasseberg, M., Wu, Z., Laamme, L., 2008. Distribution and characteristics of road trafc crashes in the Chaoyang District of Beijing, China. Accident
Analysis and Prevention 40, 334340.
WHO, 2004. World Report on Road Trafc Injury Prevention. World Health Organization.
World Health Organization, 2009. Global Status Report On Road Safety: Time for
Action. World Health Organization.
Yakovlev, P.A., Inden, M., 2010.
Mind the weather: a panel data analysis of time-invariant factors and trafc fatalities. Economics Bulletin 30,
26852696.
Yamamura, E., 2008. Impact of formal and informal deterrents on driving behavior.
Journal of Socio-Economics 37, 25052512.
Yau, K.K.W., 2004. Risk factors affecting the severity of single vehicle trafc accidents
in Hong Kong. Accident Analysis and Prevention 36, 333340.
Yau, K.K.W., Lo, H.P., Fung, S.H.H., 2006. Multiple-vehicle trafc accidents in Hong
Kong. Accident Analysis and Prevention 38, 11571161.
Yu, X., Ke, L., Ivers, R., Du, W., Senserrick, T., 2011. Prevalence rates of helmet use
among motorcycle riders in a developed region in China. Accident Analysis and
Prevention 43, 214219.
Zhang, J., Lindsay, J., Clarke, K., Robbins, G., Mao, Y., 2000. Factors affecting the
severity of motor vehicle trafc crashes involving elderly drivers in Ontario.
Accident Analysis and Prevention 32, 117125.
Zhang, W., Huang, Y.H., Roetting, M., Wang, Y., Wei, H., 2006. Drivers views and
behaviors about safety in Chinawhat do they NOT know about driving? Accident Analysis and Prevention 38, 2227.
Zhuang, X., Wu, C., 2011. Pedestrians crossing behaviors and safety at unmarked
roadway in China. Accident Analysis and Prevention 43, 19271936.