Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
labour shortages, orderly and well-managed labour migration can lighten labour
scarcity and facilitate mobility.
International labour migration
There are several general trends which characterize contemporary international
labour migration. Most of them are related to changes in the world economy over
the last two decades. These changes include the contraction of the manufacturing
sector in industrialized countries, the rise in oil prices during the 1970s followed
by their decline in the 1980s, and the persistent economic crisis in much of the
developing world since the early 1980s. The following section summarizes
contemporary changes in the nature of international labour migration and the
driving forces behind it (Russell1986, Jones 1990, Allen & Hamnett 1995, King
1995, World Bank 1995):
Globalization.
More and more countries are incorporated into international migration systems,
resulting in a growing spatial spread and cultural diversity of origins and
destinations. A growing share of international labour migration comes from lowincome countries.
Differentiation.
International migration flows are increasingly stratified and segmented along lines
of skill and legality, as well as length of stay, ranging from international
commuting to semi-permanent and permanent resettlement.
Polarization.
Related to the increasing differentiation is a growing polarity between cheap, lowgrade, casual migratory labour on one hand, and a much smaller, but rapidly
growing number of highly qualified executive nomads (King 1993) on the other.
Stahl (1991) terms the latter capital-assisted migration, as it is often associated
with foreign direct investment.
Feminization.
While labour migrations in the past were male-dominated, women now play a
leading role in many migration streams. Examples include Asian women working
as housemaids in the Middle East, Filipino nurses in the United States and
Ghanaian prostitutes in CtedIvoire (Brydon 1993).
Acceleration.
International labour migration is accelerating in the sense that the number of
migrants grows, while the average length of their stay becomes shorter. Since the
1960s, there has been a shift in the pattern of international migration, from
permanent migrations for resettlement to temporary migration of workers for
employment. At the same time, however, international labour migrants constitute a
declining share of the total world population.
Volatility.
Compared with the relative stability of labour migration flows during the long
boom (1945-1973), the last two decades has witnessed rapid changes in migration
flows. Politically and economically motivated mass expulsions of foreign workers
from several host countries have been a major issue for countries of origin.
Examples from the1980s include expulsions from Nigeria, Libya and Venezuela
3
(Castao1988). During the 1991 Gulf War, two million foreign workers were
uprooted, with detrimental impacts on countries of origin (Connell 1992).
Push-pull balance.
In general, push factors from countries of origin are becoming more important
than pull factors in countries of employment, especially in the industrialized
countries. Deteriorating standards of living in many developing countries are
becoming ever more sharply contrasted with increasing knowledge of conditions in
developed countries. In the countries of employment, the decline in manufacturing
industry has led to reduced demand for traditional labour migrants. At the same
time, the expansion of service industries and informal sector activities creates new
niches of casual, seasonal and insecure employment for post-industrial migrants
(King 1993, Sassen 1988). It is worth emphasizing, however, that although the
push-pull balance is shifting, actual migration is still primarily demand-induced,
not supply-induced (Weiner 1987).
comment briefly on the map in the next chapter, a few caveats are in order at the
outset. First of all, there is a shortage of reliable, well defined data, and the
accuracy. The stocks of migrants in each pole of attraction only includes those
with the assumed intention of returning home.
International trade theories assume factors of production are not mobile between
countries . supporters of free trade argued that free movement of goods between
the countries participating in trades.
The General Agreement on Traiffs and Trade (GATT) and subsequently the World
Trade Organisation (WTO) promoted free or liberal trade in goods and services.
WTO also promoted liberal movement of capital between nations.such a liberal
approach, however, was not extended to the movement of labour access to their
countries on several reasons such as security of the host country, culture, religion,
economic and political.
There was a large scale migration of European to the New World ( North
America). Indians had migrated to African countries contries and in recentdecades
to USA, Canada, and European contries.
In the last few years, issues related to international migration are receiving
increasing attention from policy makers. This reflects mainly the changes in the
magnitude and composition of migration flows. Net migration into the EU has
risen again during the period 1998 to 2003. With an overall level of around 4 per
thousand, relative immigration levels into the EU appear to be at present somewhat
higher than those into the US (3.3 per thousand). High irregular migration, with
estimates of the relation between regular and irregular immigration running
between 1:0,3 and 1:1, and high numbers of asylum applicants indicate an increase
5
in migration pressure during the last decade. Major changes in the source and
destination of migrants have also taken place: traditional receiving countries have
lost prominence while Southern European countries, who were sending countries
until fairly recently, have become receiving countries, and some Eastern European
Member States are now both sending and receiving migrants. Still, it is not
straightforward to answer questions such as what is the size of the immigrant
population, how many of them are labour migrants, what their skills are and how
do successive cohorts perform in their host countries. The data generally available
do not provide a clear idea about the number of immigrants across countries,
mainly because countries have different concepts of who is an immigrant
depending on whether migration is temporary or permanent, or whether
immigrants are considered to be foreigners or foreign-born people who have
immigrated into their country of residence at a point in their lives. When the
criterion used is nationality, immigrants who are naturalised cease to be counted
and they become difficult to distinguish from the majority of native citizens.
Moreover, the people born in a country, such as the children and grand-children of
immigrants, do not always acquire that country's nationality.
Using foreign country of birth has several advantages: first, it conforms to the
international standard definition of immigrant, second, it is not affected by return
migration of those who lived abroad and come back to their home country (who
are counted as immigrants if the variable used is "previous foreign country of
residence") and, third, it is not affected by naturalisation. From a European
perspective, it is appropriate to further distinguish nationals from other Member
States, for whom free movement within the EU is in place, from third country
nationals, subject to the immigration and asylum legislations of each Member
State. In most Member States, over 20% of immigration flows currently originate
6
from another Member State and over 15% are nationals returning from abroad. A
Community immigration and asylum agenda is under development under the area
of freedom, security and justice created by the treaty of Maastricht of 1991/93.
Immigration and asylum of third-country nationals was inserted in the Treaty of
Amsterdam of 1997/99 (Title IV). The European Council, at its meeting in
Tampere in October 1999, provided an important input and agreed that the ()
issues of asylum and migration call for the development of a common EU policy.
It also stressed the assessment of the economic and demographic developments
within the Union, as well as the situation in the countries of origin, as a basis for
decisions on the approximation of national legislations on the conditions for
admission and residence of third country nationals.
In November 2000, the Commission published a Communication on a Community
Immigration Policy2 in which it recognised that immigration has an important role
to play in increasing Europes growth potential and realising the goals of the
Lisbon Strategy more generally. In addition, it notes a growing recognition that the
zero immigration policies of the past 30 years are no longer appropriate and that
channels for legal immigration to the Union should be made available for labour
migrants. In its Communication of June 2003 on Immigration, Integration and
Employment3, the Commission explored the role of immigration in the context of
demographic ageing and outlined policy orientations and priorities to promote the
integration of immigrants. The Thessaloniki European Council of June 2003
welcomed this Communication and stressed the need to explore legal means for
third country nationals to migrate to the Union, taking into account the reception
capacities of the Member States. As a ifollow-up, the Commission adopted its
first Annual Report on Migration and Integration in June 2004, where it announced
its intention to work towards the definition of common basic principles for
7
10
Historical-structural perspective
Within the historical-structural perspective, migration is seen as historically- based
and structurally-ordered. Historical factors are important in the emergence of
migration flows, while structural factors influence migration through their impact
on the spatial variation in demand for labour. Migration is therefore seen as a
macro-social rather than an individual process. Obviously, the individual migrant
makes the decision to migrate, but the individual motives are conceived as
secondary to structural forces.
The historical-structural approach contends the treatment of migration asa discrete
dimension of social reality. As indicated in Amins statement above, unequal
11
Migration systems
It can be useful to conceptualize labour migration as a core-periphy process, with
poles of attraction (core countries) attracting labour from a surrounding sphere of
influence (peripheral countries). This does not signify a wholesale adoption of
world systems or dependency theory. Rather, it relates labour migration to what
Johnston (1994: 113) calls the well-known core-periphery organization of
economic space. The vast majority of labour migrants travel from relatively poor
countries to relatively prosperous countries, often, but not always, within the same
region. The same countries usually engage in a broader asymmetrical exchange of
people, goods and capital which provides a multi-dimensional context for labour
migration.
This approach is broadly consistent with migration systems analysis, which is not
a separate theory of migration so much as a generalization drawing from several
theories. It can be seen as a part of the historical structural approach to migration
inasmuch as explanations are sought in the totality of relations between different
countries.
12
13
14