ABSTRACT
Purpose. To review the outcomes of 53 patients who
underwent minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis
(MIPO) for distal tibial fractures.
Methods. Medical records of 31 men and 22 women
aged 22 to 78 (mean, 51) years who underwent MIPO
using a locking compression plate for distal tibial
fractures of the left (n=28) and right (n=25) legs with
or without intra-articular extension were reviewed.
Results. Patients were followed up for a mean of 26
(range, 2438) months. The mean time from injury to
surgery was 9 (range, 312) days. The mean operating
time was 105 (range, 75180) minutes. The mean
hospital stay was 16 (range, 825) days. Non-weight
bearing walking with a crutch was started after a
mean of 5.7 (range, 39) days. The mean time to callus
formation was 12 (range, 815) weeks. The mean time
to full weight bearing was 15 (range, 822) weeks.
The mean time to bone union was 25 (range, 2030)
weeks. All except 2 fractures united anatomically. At
10 months, the range of motion of the ankle joint in
INTRODUCTION
The optimal treatment for unstable distal tibial
fractures remains controversial. Non-operative
treatment can be technically demanding and is
associated with joint stiffness (up to 40%) as well
as shortening and rotational malunion (>30%).1,2
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) requires
extensive soft tissue dissection and may lead to
periosteal injury. ORIF is associated with high
rates of infection, delayed union, and non-union.36
External fixation is preferred when soft tissue injury
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr Pramod Devkota, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Gandaki
Medical College Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal. Email: devkotap@gmail.com
(b)
Sex/
Side
age
(years)
Cause*
AO
Open
fracture fracture
type
type
F/63
M/28
F/66
M/70
F/22
Left
Left
Left
Right
Right
FFH
RTA
RTA
FFH
RTA
43.A2
42.B1
43.A2
42.C1
43.A3
No
I
No
No
I
M/68
F/52
M/45
M/50
M/57
F/58
M/37
M/78
F/45
F/22
M/29
M/46
F/69
F/46
M/66
F/49
M/57
F/35
M/39
M/61
F/71
M/75
Right
Left
Right
Right
Left
Left
Right
Right
Left
Left
Right
Left
Left
Left
Right
Right
Left
Right
Left
Right
Right
Left
42.B3
43.A2
42.B1
42.B3
43.A3
42.A2
43.A2
42.A1
43.A3
43.A2
42.A1
42.B1
43.A2
42.A2
42.C1
43.A2
43.A1
43.A3
43.A3
43.C1
43.A3
43.A3
No
No
No
I
No
No
I
No
No
No
No
I
No
No
No
No
No
I
No
No
No
No
M/62
F/44
M/53
M/32
F/54
M/29
F/49
Left
Right
Left
Left
Right
Right
Left
43.A2
43.A3
42.B3
43.C1
42.A1
43.A2
42.C1
M/61
F/71
F/56
M/48
Right
Right
Left
Left
F/65
M/24
Right
Right
F/28
M/53
M/61
F/66
M/47
M/64
Left
Left
Right
Left
Right
Left
M/49
Left
M/25
F/67
M/37
Right
Left
Left
M/45
F/63
Left
Right
RTA
Direct hit
RTA
RTA
FFH
RTA
RTA
FFH
FFH
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
RTA
FFH
RTA
FFH
RTA
FFH
Direct hit
RTA
Physical
assault
FFH
RTA
Direct hit
FFH
RTA
Direct hit
Physical
assault
RTA
FFH
Direct hit
Physical
assault
FFH
Physical
assault
RTA
FFH
Direct hit
FFH
RTA
Physical
assault
Physical
assault
FFH
FFH
Physical
assault
RTA
FFH
M/23
Right
RTA
Associated injuries
No
No
I
No
No
No
No
No
No
Right distal radial fracture
Posterior malleolar fracture
Right ulnar and radial
fractures
No
No
No
Right distal fibular fracture
No
Lateral malleolar fracture
Right humeral fracture
No
Left distal fibular fracture
No
No
Undisplaced pelvic fracture
Right distal radial fracture
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Left middle and index fingers
fractures
No
No
No
No
No
No
Undisplaced pelvic fracture
43.A3
42.A1
42.B1
42.A1
I
No
No
No
42.B1
42.A2
Time to
Full
Bone
radio- weight union
logical bearing (weeks)
union (weeks)
(weeks)
13
10
18
19
22
80
90
75
110
100
4
6
3
5
9
11
9
13
15
10
10
9
13
16
18
21
20
25
24
30
17
21
20
23
16
21
8
25
10
11
15
9
18
24
17
14
20
23
9
25
21
25
80
85
120
105
90
125
110
95
80
100
80
75
95
100
120
125
130
140
120
130
75
80
3
8
5
7
3
5
7
9
9
6
4
3
6
8
5
9
7
6
9
6
7
7
12
14
13
11
13
12
11
14
13
10
10
12
11
8
9
12
9
14
13
15
13
15
12
19
17
13
21
16
22
20
21
20
18
19
22
10
8
13
10
18
12
15
12
22
20
29
28
22
27
20
26
25
28
29
27
28
30
20
22
26
29
28
27
23
29
28
10
12
9
12
17
13
11
85
90
80
150
95
100
110
4
8
5
3
7
8
7
10
12
14
14
12
13
15
9
11
14
13
17
12
15
20
23
26
24
28
20
22
No
No
No
No
19
16
23
9
115
120
110
100
6
3
4
6
14
15
12
13
13
21
11
13
27
22
20
28
I
No
No
Left distal radial fracture
25
10
90
180
7
3
10
8
12
9
22
27
43.A3
43.C1
43.A3
43.A2
43.C1
43.A2
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Left ulnar fracture
11
14
16
22
12
10
100
95
90
160
100
150
4
3
6
3
7
5
10
11
13
12
14
13
10
16
13
11
13
13
23
22
21
27
28
22
43.A1
No
No
17
105
12
20
42.A3
42.B1
42.B1
No
No
No
No
No
No
11
20
12
115
110
95
6
3
8
10
15
12
12
13
14
21
27
25
43.A2
42.C1
No
No
13
19
80
115
3
7
14
15
20
15
22
20
43.A3
No
No
Right intercondylar of
humeral fracture
No
10
120
13
15
21
* RTA denotes road traffic accident and FFH fall from a height
posterior tibial arteries; disruption of this extraosseous blood supply is greater in open plating than
MIPO.23 Thus, it is challenging to achieve mechanical
stability without impairing the blood supply.9
In our study, the delay in surgery was due to
swelling, medical problems, unavailability of the
operating room, and financial reasons. Longer hospital
stay was due to the long distance to the patients
homes and transportation problems. The longer time
needed to non-weight bearing walking was because
elderly patients and those multiple contusions
were reluctant to mobilise earlier (isometric muscle
exercises were nonetheless encouraged). The longer
time needed for callus formation was due to the poor
nutritional status of the patients. Nonetheless, the
times to full weight bearing and bone union were
comparable to other studies24,25
CONCLUSION
MIPO using the locking compression plate is effective
for closed, unstable fractures of the distal tibia. It
reduces surgical trauma and preserves fracture
haematoma.
DISCLOSURE
No conflicts of interest were declared by the authors.
REFERENCES
1. Oni OO, Stafford H, Gregg PJ. A study of diaphyseal fracture repair using tissue isolation techniques. Injury 1992;23:467
70.
2. Russell TA. Fractures of the tibia and fibula. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, Buckolz RW, Heckman JD, editors. Fractures in
adults. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1996:213957.
3. Fisher WD, Hamblen DL. Problems and pitfalls of compression fixation of long bone fractures: a review of results and
complications. Injury 1978;10:99107.
4. McFerran MA, Smith SW, Boulas HJ, Schwartz HS. Complications encountered in the treatment of pilon fractures. J Orthop
Trauma 1992;6:195200.
5. Redi T. Fractures of the lower end of the tibia into the ankle joint: results 9 years after open reduction and internal fixation.
Injury 1973;5:1304.
6. Ruedi TP, Allgower M. The operative treatment of intra-articular fractures of the lower end of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat
Res 1979;138:10510.
7. Rammelt S, Endres T, Grass R, Zwipp H. The role of external fixation in acute ankle trauma. Foot Ankle Clin 2004;9:45574.
8. Blauth M, Bastian L, Krettek C, Knop C, Evans S. Surgical options for the treatment of severe tibial pilon fractures: a study
of three techniques. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:15360.
9. Krackhardt T, Dilger J, Flesch I, Hntzsch D, Eingartner C, Weise K. Fractures of the distal tibia treated with closed reduction
and minimally invasive plating. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005;125:8794.
10. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Guy P, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and vascularity:
preliminary results of a cadaver injection study. Injury 1997;28(Suppl 1):A712.
11. Helfet DL, Shonnard PY, Levine D, Borrelli J Jr. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of distal fractures of the tibia. Injury
1997;28(Suppl 1):A428.
12. Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 2003;34(Suppl 2):B6376.
13. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long
bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:4538.
14. Mller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Berlin: SpringerVerlag; 1990.
15. Hasenboehler E, Rikli D, Babst R. Locking compression plate with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in diaphyseal
and distal tibial fracture: a retrospective study of 32 patients. Injury 2007;38:36570.
16. Siebenrock KA, Schillig B, Jakob RP. Treatment of complex tibial shaft fractures. Arguments for early secondary intramedullary
nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;290:26974.
17. Skoog A, Soderqvist A, Tornkvist H, Ponzer S. One-year outcome after tibial shaft fractures: results of a prospective fracture
registry. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:2105.
18. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) using the
DCS in proximal and distal femoral fractures. Injury 1997;28(Suppl 1):A2030.
19. Oh CW, Kyung HS, Park IH, Kim PT, Ihn JC. Distal tibia metaphyseal fractures treated by percutaneous plate osteosynthesis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003:408:28691.
20. Collinge CA, Sanders RW. Percutaneous plating in the lower extremity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000;8:2116.
21. Rhinelander FW. The normal microcirculation of diaphyseal cortex and its response to fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am
1968;50:784800.
22. Whiteside LA, Lesker PA. The effects of extraperiosteal and subperiosteal dissection. II. On fracture healing. J Bone Joint
Surg Am 1978;60:2630.
23. Borrelli J Jr, Prickett W, Song E, Becker D, Ricci W. Extraosseous blood supply of the tibia and the effects of different plating
techniques: a human cadaveric study. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:6915.
24. Redferin DJ, Syed SU, Davies SJ. Fractures of the distal tibia: minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. Injury 2004;35:615
20.
25. Hazarika S, Chakravarthy J, Cooper J. Minimally invasive locking plate osteosynthesis for fractures of the distal tibia
results in 20 patients. Injury 2006;37:87787.
Гораздо больше, чем просто документы.
Откройте для себя все, что может предложить Scribd, включая книги и аудиокниги от крупных издательств.
Отменить можно в любой момент.