Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DOI 10.1007/s10529-006-9299-9
REVIEW
J. T. Kraemer (&)
Department of Civil Engineering, University of
Toronto, 35 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, Canada
M5S 1A4
e-mail: jeremy.kraemer@utoronto.ca
D. M. Bagley
Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering,
University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave.
Dept. 3295, Laramie, WY, USA 82071
Introduction
Biological H2 production via dark fermentation of
organic wastes is being investigated as a potential
source of renewable energy (Hawkes et al. 2002).
Fermentative H2 production is carried out by
anaerobic bacteria that ferment organic compounds to volatile fatty acids (VFAs), alcohols,
CO2, and H2. Many different substrates can be
fermented to produce H2 (Kapdan and Kargi 2006;
Nishio and Nakashimada 2004), although carbohydrates (e.g. glucose) have been most commonly
used. The reactor environmental conditions capable of achieving H2 production are well understood, as demonstrated by several recent reviews
(Hallenbeck 2005; Hawkes et al. 2002; Nath and
Das 2004). For example, completely-mixed reactors with a pH of 5.5 and solids retention time of
612 h can achieve H2 production.
123
686
Fig. 1 Interactions
between fermenter,
acetogen, and
methanogen metabolic
groups in a fermentative
H2-producing system. KLa
is the overall masstransfer coefficient
assuming the liquid-phase
is mass-transfer limiting
H2,gas
CO2,gas
CH4,gas
headspace
liquid
KLaH2
glucose
H2
HCO3
H2,dissolved
CO2,dissolved
HCO3
acetate, butyrate
ethanol, butanol
acetogen
KLaCH4
KLaCO2
fermenter
CH4,dissolved
H2
HCO3
methanogen
H2 HCO3
acetate
123
687
Table 1 Microbial community assessments using molecular techniques for continuous-flow mixed-culture biohydrogen
systems
Heat
Treatment
Inoculum
Observed Organisms
Study
no
secondary sludge
no
secondary sludge
no
no
no
digester sludge
thermophilic digester
sludge
compost
yes
digester sludge
yes
soil
yes
digester sludge
yes
yes
digester sludge
soil
yes
sludge
123
688
123
glucose
ATP
G3P
G3PDH
NADH
1,3-BPG
NFOR
ATP
pyruvate
PFOR
H2ase
Fd
acetyl -CoA
ATP
CO 2 acetate
H2
ethanol
butyryl- CoA
butyrate
butanol
689
Table 2 Comparison of gas sparging during fermentative H2 production in continuous-flow mixed-culture systems
Sparge
Gas
Study
Sparge flow, Qs
(ml min1)
Yield
Increase (%)
No
With
Sparging Sparging
N2
CO2
Kraemer and
Bagley (2006)
Kim et al. (2006a)
110
58
55
630
100
200
300
400
160
2.3
2.3
2.3
9.3
5
5
5
5
2
48
25
24
68
20
40
60
80
80
0.85
1.26
1.00
1.23
0.77
0.77
0.77
0.77
1.30
1.43
1.87
1.80
1.65
0.91
0.92
0.95
0.92
1.80
68
48
66
34
18
19
23
19
38
100
200
300
400
2
100
200
300
400
5
5
5
5
0.4
5
5
5
5
20
40
60
80
5
20
40
60
80
0.77
0.77
0.77
0.77
n/r a
0.77
0.77
0.77
0.77
1.40
1.65
1.68
1.54
n/r
0.86
0.83
0.77
0.82
82
114
118
100
88
12
8
0
6
123
690
75%
50%
25%
0%
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
ature. For example, Liu et al. (2006) used methane sparging at only 2 ml/min and observed an
88% increase in H2 yield.
Non-sparging techniques
Other techniques to decrease dissolved gas concentrations include increased stirring, decreasing
the reactor headspace pressure (i.e. applying a
vacuum), and using an immersed membrane to
directly remove dissolved gases.
Vigorous stirring of Clostridium thermocellum
cultures decreased the dissolved H2 content by a
factor of 3 and the ethanol/acetate ratio decreased compared to unstirred cultures (Lamed
et al. 1988). Lay (2000) stated that increased
mixing caused a release of H2. Thus, sufficient
mixing is important for aiding mass-transfer of
metabolic gases from the liquid to the reactor
headspace.
Kataoka et al. (1997) did not observe any
significant difference between continuous cultures
of Clostridium butyricum strain SC-E1 at
0.28 atm headspace pressure (vacuum operation)
compared to the control (non-vacuum operation).
In contrast, Mandal et al. (2006) observed double
the H2 yield during batch culture of Enterobacter
cloacae DM 11 at 0.5 atm headspace pressure
compared to non-vacuum operation. The H2 yield
during vacuum operation was 3.9 mol H2/mol
glucose, which was extremely high considering
enteric bacteria usually produce <1 mol H2/mol
glucose (Nishio and Nakashimada 2004), but
Mandal et al. (2006) used a chemically-selected
123
691
Table 3 Comparison of studies that varied the organic loading rate (OLR) by changing the substrate concentration
Study
Substrate
S0 (g COD l1)
Low
high
11.2
7.3
10.7
2.5
2.5
10
10
14
56.1
29.2
32
10
10
40
40
36
10
5
5
varied
5
60
40
40
varied
15
high
low
OLR
high
OLR
12
4
10
10
2.5
6
2
2
22.4
43.9
25.6
6
24
40
120
168
112.2
175.4
76.8
24
96
160
480
432
1.65
1.30
2.20
2.80
2.40
1.84
2.10
1.89
0.81
1.05
2.00
2.20
1.90
1.36
1.96
1.79
12
8.9
6
varied
4.5
20
13.5
20
10
26.7
120
107.9
160
40
80
0.25
1.69
1.34
0.50
0.72
1.00
2.49
2.17
0.85
1.04
123
692
Effects of OLR
The reason for such diverse H2 yield observations
for lower or higher OLRs is unknown. For those
studies where higher OLRs decreased H2 production some possible reasons are: (1) increased
inhibition by VFAs at higher OLR, (2) lower
dissolved H2 concentrations at lower OLRs
decrease thermodynamic regulation, (3) OLR
affects acetogenic activity, and (4) lower dissolved
CO2 concentrations decrease CO2 inhibition.
These hypotheses will each be discussed.
VFA inhibition at higher OLRs appears to be a
valid explanation. The addition of external VFAs
has been demonstrated to decrease or inhibit H2
production in mixed-culture continuous-flow systems, although there is consensus that butyrate
causes greater inhibition than acetate. Kyazze
et al. (2006) observed inhibition of H2 production
when 4 g butyrate/l was added to the reactor
(18.9 g butyrate/l in total) whereas no inhibition
was observed when only 2 g butyrate/l was added
(12.2 g butyrate/l in total). Van Ginkel and Logan
(2005a) attributed the inhibition to the undissociated form of the VFAs because changing the pH
from 5.5 to 5.0 (increasing the un-ionized fraction
of the VFAs) at the same total acid concentration
decreased H2 production. However, this hypothesis does not support their results when the OLR
was changed. The H2 yield was constant at 2 mol
H2/mol glucose for 1030 g glucose/l (producing
42116 mM total VFAs) and decreased to 1.6 mol
H2/mol glucose at 40 g glucose/l (producing
75 mM total VFAs). Thus, the total VFAs (and
un-ionized VFAs) were lower at 40 g/l than at
30 g/l, so undissociated VFAs may not be the only
contributing factor to the inhibition of H2 production at higher OLRs.
Van Ginkel and Logan (2005b) suggested
lower OLRs may decrease the dissolved H2
concentration thereby removing the thermodynamic inhibition on hydrogenase. This is the same
hypothesis as discussed above for dissolved gas
removal. Although no one has measured dissolved gas concentrations while varying the OLR,
it is unlikely that changes in the OLR can
decrease the dissolved H2 concentration sufficiently to alter NADH:Fd oxidoreductase thermodynamics. The OLR used by Kraemer and
123
693
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the
William H. Doherty Ontario Graduate Scholarship in
Science & Technology and the Natural Sciences and
Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada for
funding.
References
Ahn Y, Park EJ, Oh YK, Park S, Webster G, Weightman
AJ (2005) Biofilm microbial community of a thermophilic trickling biofilter used for continuous biohydrogen production. FEMS Microbiol Lett 249(1):3138
Angenent LT, Karim K, Al-Dahhan MH, DomiguezEspinosa R (2004) Production of bioenergy and
biochemicals from industrial and agricultural wastewater. Trends Biotechnol 22(9):477485
Benemann JR (1996) Hydrogen biotechnology: Progress
and prospects. Nat Biotechnol 14(9):11011103
Cheong DY, Hansen CL (2006) Bacterial stress enrichment enhances anaerobic hydrogen production in
cattle manure sludge. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol
72(4):635643
Crabbendam PM, Neijssel OM, Tempest DW (1985)
Metabolic and energetic aspects of the growth of
clostridium-butyricum on glucose in chemostat culture. Arch Microbiol 142(4):375382
Dixon NM, Kell DB (1989) The inhibition by CO2 of the
growth and metabolism of microorganisms. J Appl
Bacteriol 67(2):109136
Fang HHP, Liu H, Zhang T (2002a) Characterization of a
hydrogen-producing granular sludge. Biotechnol Bioeng 78(1):4452
Fang HHP, Zhang T, Liu H (2002b) Microbial diversity of
a mesophilic hydrogen-producing sludge. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58(1):112118
Hallenbeck PC (2005) Fundamentals of the fermentative
production of hydrogen. Water Sci Technol
52(12):2129
Hawkes FR, Dinsdale R, Hawkes DL, Hussy I (2002)
Sustainable fermentative hydrogen production: Challenges for process optimisation. Int J Hydrogen
Energy 27(1112):13391347
Hussy I, Hawkes FR, Dinsdale R, Hawkes DL (2005)
Continuous fermentative hydrogen production from
sucrose and sugarbeet. Int J Hydrogen Energy
30(5):471483
Hussy I, Hawkes FR, Dinsdale R, Hawkes DL (2003)
Continuous fermentative hydrogen production from a
wheat starch co-product by mixed microflora. Biotechnol Bioeng 84(6):619626
Iyer P, Bruns MA, Zhang HS, Van Ginkel S, Logan BE
(2004) H2-producing bacterial communities from a
heat-treated soil inoculum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66(2):166173
Kapdan IK, Kargi F (2006) Bio-hydrogen production from
waste materials. Enzyme Microbial Technol
38(5):569582
Kataoka N, Miya A, Kiriyama K (1997) Studies on
hydrogen production by continuous culture system
123
694
of hydrogen-producing anaerobic bacteria. Water Sci
Technol 36(67):4147
Kawagoshi Y, Hino N, Fujimoto A, Nakao M, Fujita Y,
Sugimura S, Furukawa K (2005) Effect of inoculum
conditioning on hydrogen fermentation and pH effect
on bacterial community relevant to hydrogen production. J Biosci Bioeng 100(5):524530
Kim DH, Han SK, Kim SH, Shin HS (2006a) Effect of
gas sparging on continuous fermentative hydrogen
production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 31(15):
21582169
Kim SH, Han SK, Shin HS (2006b) Effect of substrate
concentration on hydrogen production and 16S
rDNA-based analysis of the microbial community in
a continuous fermenter. Process Biochem 41(1):199
207
Kraemer JT, Bagley DM (2006) Supersaturation of
dissolved H2 and CO2 during fermentative hydrogen
production with N2 sparging. Biotechnol Lett
28(18):14851491
Kraemer JT, Bagley DM (2005) Continuous fermentative
hydrogen production using a two-phase reactor system with recycle. Environ Sci Technol 39(10):3819
3825
Kyazze G, Martinez-Perez N, Dinsdale R, Premier GC,
Hawkes FR, Guwy AJ, Hawkes DL (2006) Influence
of substrate concentration on the stability and yield of
continuous biohydrogen production. Biotechnol Bioeng 93(5):971979
Lamed RJ, Lobos JH, Su TM (1988) Effects of stirring and
hydrogen on fermentation products of Clostridium
thermocellum. Appl Environ Microbiol 54(5):1216
1221
Lay JJ (2000) Modeling and optimization of anaerobic
digested sludge converting starch to hydrogen. Biotechnol Bioeng 68(3):269278
Liang TM, Cheng SS, Wu KL (2002) Behavioral study on
hydrogen fermentation reactor installed with silicone
rubber membrane. Int J Hydrogen Energy 27(11
12):11571165
Lin C, Wu S, Chang J (2006) Fermentative hydrogen
production with a draft tube fluidized bed reactor
containing silicone-gel-immobilized anaerobic sludge.
Int J Hydrogen Energy 31(15):22002210
Liu DW, Liu DP, Zeng RJ, Angelidaki I (2006) Hydrogen
and methane production from household solid waste
in the two-stage fermentation process. Water Res
40(11):22302236
Logan BE (2004) Extracting hydrogen and electricity from
renewable
resources.
Environ
Sci
Technol
38(9):160A167A
Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Parker J (2000) Brock biology
of microorganisms, 9th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper
Saddle River, NJ
Mandal B, Nath K, Das D (2006) Improvement of
biohydrogen production under decreased partial
pressure of H2 by Enterobacter cloacae. Biotechnol
Lett 28(11):831835
Mizuno O, Dinsdale R, Hawkes FR, Hawkes DL, Noike T
(2000) Enhancement of hydrogen production from
123
695
Zhang JJ, Li XY, Oh SE, Logan BE (2004) Physical and
hydrodynamic properties of flocs produced during
biological hydrogen production. Biotechnol Bioeng
88(7):854860
Zhu H, Beland M (2006) Evaluation of alternative
methods of preparing hydrogen producing seeds from
digested wastewater sludge. Int J Hydrogen Energy
31(14):19801988
123