Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Multilateral Well :
Analysis
Petroleum Economics
Contents
Introduction
.........................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................Page 3
Objectives & Technical Assumptions
.........................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................Page 3
Technical Assumptions
.........................................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................Page 3
Multilateral Well Calculation on Double Junctions
.........................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................Page 4
Multilateral Well Calculation on Three Junctions
.........................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................Page 7
Discussion
.........................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................Page 10
Conclusion
.........................................................................................................................................................
Page 2
Petroleum Economics
................................................................................Page 12
References
.........................................................................................................................................................
...........................................................................................Page 14
Introduction
The oil and gas industry, affected by the flows of technology recently even in the past. Therefore, there are many options for
the business to choose the best alternative to maximise profit by utilizing optimally the capital expenditures and operation
expenditures effectively and efficiently. To efficiently develop a field, each reservoir must be completed with a well system
that maximises the hydrocarbon energy. In this assignment, we are interested in multilateral well by using several
alternatives based on feasibility of the system, revenue vs cost, and risk and uncertainty are involved. By using the data from
Guntong oil field, the multilateral well system is analyzed based on Malaysia fiscal agreement. There are several methods of
building a well; vertical, horizontal and multilateral. The main goal is to maximize the production which can be achieved
through technical analysis and to minimize the cost which can be obtained by performing economic analysis.
Page 3
Petroleum Economics
Objectives
1. To learn how to calculate the two and three junctions of multilateral wells.
2. To understand the methodology of technical analysis in deciding type of multilateral wells.
Technical Assumptions
We assume that these parameters will be constant in our analysis:
1. The prices of oil stay constant throughout the years.
2. The operating cost per barrel also will be the same.
Page 4
Petroleum Economics
Production
: 350bbl/day
Tax
: 40%
Royalty rate
: 10%
-5.12USD
: USD80/bbl
: 5%
USD4500/well
(only
LEVEL 2
JUNCTION
for
one well)
Variable operating cost
: $6/bbl
: $2/bbl
: $6 million
=USD78,000
Cost ceiling rate
: 50%
Depreciation rate
: 20%
: 44%
Page 5
LEVEL 2
JUNCTION
Petroleum Economics
SUBJECT
Annual oil
Production
(AOP)
FORMULA
2011
Prod bbl/day *
365
day
*
Junction
Production
Rate
*Production
Decline Rate
CAPEX
Drilling
and
completion cost
+
Multilateral
junction cost
Fixed operating
cost +(Variable
operating cost *
AOP)+(Water
disposal
cost*AOP)
OPEX
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
361350
343282.5
326118.4
309812.4
294322
2,895,300
2,750,760
2,608,947
2,478,499
2,354,576
6,078,000
revenue
28,908,000
.00
27,462,600
.00
26,089,472
.00
24,784,992
.00
23,545,760
.00
royalty
Royalty
rate*
Revenue
CCr*revenue
2,890,800
2,746,260
2,608,947
2,478,499
2,354,576
14,454,000
.00
13,731,300
.00
13,044,736
.00
12,392,496
.00
11,772,880
.00
Ccf+
Cost 6,078,000
incurred
Min cost(cc or 0
cb)
9,012,300
2,750,760
2,608,947
2,478,499
2,354,576
9,012,300
2,750,760
2,608,947
2,478,499
2,354,576
Cost
ceiling
Cost bank
Cost
recovered
Page 6
Petroleum Economics
6,078,000
17,004,900
21,965,580
20,871,578
19,827,994
18,836,608
7,482,156.0
0
9,664,855.2
0
9,183,494.1
4
8,724,317.1
8
8,288,107.5
2
16,494,456.
00
12,415,615.
20
11,792,441.
34
11,202,816.
38
10,642,683.
52
13,599,156.
00
9,664,855.2
0
9,183,494.1
4
8,724,317.1
8
8,288,107.5
2
Discount rate * 0
CAPEX
Income before
taxCapital
allowance
Tax rate * Tax 0
income
1,223,400
1,223,400
1,223,400
1,223,400
1,223,400
12,375,756.
00
8,441,455.2
0
7,960,094.1
4
7,500,917.1
8
7,064,707.5
2
4,950,302.4
0
3,376,582.0
8
3,184,037.6
6
3,000,366.8
7
2,825,883.0
1
Income
after tax
Income before 0
tax tax paid
7,425,453.6
0
5,064,873.1
2
4,776,056.4
9
4,500,550.3
1
4,238,824.5
1
Cash out
7,845,602.4
0
6,127,342.0
8
5,792,984.8
6
5,478,866.0
7
5,180,459.0
1
8,648,853.
6,288,273.
5,999,456.
5,723,950.
5,462,224.
Unrecover
ed cost
profit
Contractor
profit
Cash in
Income
before tax
Capital
allowance
Taxable
income
Tax paid
Net
Cost bank
Cost recovered
Revenue
Royalty Cost
recovered
Contractor
profit rate *
Profit
Cash
recovered
+
Contractor
profit
Cash in- OPEX
cash Cashin
6,078,00
Page 7
Petroleum Economics
flow
Cashout
60
49
:350bbl/day
Tax
: 40%
Royalty rate
: 10%
: 5%/year
:6 USD/bbl
: 2 USD/bbl
: USD 6 million
31
51
Petroleum Economics
Cost ceiling rate
: 50%
Depreciation rate
: 20%
: 44%
SUBJECT
Annual oil
Production
(AOP)
FORMULA
2011
Prod bbl/day *
365
day
*
Junction
Production
Rate
*Production
Decline Rate
CAPEX
Drilling
and
completion cost
+
Multilateral
junction cost
Fixed operating
cost +(Variable
operating cost *
AOP)
+(Water
disposal
cost*AOP)
OPEX
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
361350
343282.5
326118.4
309812.4
294322
2,895,300
2,750,760
2,608,947
2,478,499
2,354,576
6,117,000
revenue
28,908,000
.00
27,462,600
.00
26,089,472
.00
24,784,992
.00
23,545,760
.00
royalty
Royalty
2,890,800
2,746,260
2,608,947
2,478,499
2,354,576
rate*
Page 9
Petroleum Economics
Revenue
Cost
ceiling
CCr*revenue
Cost bank
Ccf+
Cost
incurred
Min cost(cc or
cb)
Cost bank
Cost recovered
Revenue
Royalty Cost
recovered
Contractor
profit rate *
Profit
Cash
recovered
+
Contractor
profit
Cash in- OPEX
Cost
recovered
Unrecover
ed cost
profit
Contractor
profit
Cash in
Income
before tax
Capital
allowance
Taxable
income
Tax paid
14,454,000
.00
13,731,300
.00
13,044,736
.00
12,392,496
.00
11,772,880
.00
6,117,000
9,012,300
2,750,760
2,608,947
2,478,499
2,354,576
9,012,300
2,750,760
2,608,947
2,478,499
2,354,576
6,117,000
17,004,900
21,965,580
20,871,578
19,827,994
18,836,608
7,482,156.0
0
9,664,855.2
0
9,183,494.1
4
8,724,317.1
8
8,288,107.5
2
16,494,456.
00
12,415,615.
20
11,792,441.
34
11,202,816.
38
10,642,683.
52
13,599,156.
00
9,664,855.2
0
9,183,494.1
4
8,724,317.1
8
8,288,107.5
2
1,223,400
1,223,400
1,223,400
1,223,400
1,223,400
12,375,756.
00
8,441,455.2
0
7,960,094.1
4
7,500,917.1
8
7,064,707.5
2
4,950,302.4
3,376,582.0
3,184,037.6
3,000,366.8
2,825,883.0
Discount rate * 0
CAPEX
Income before
taxCapital
allowance
Tax rate * Tax 0
Page 10
Petroleum Economics
income
Income
after tax
Income before 0
tax tax paid
7,425,453.6
0
5,064,873.1
2
4,776,056.4
9
4,500,550.3
1
4,238,824.5
1
Cash out
7,845,602.4
0
6,127,342.0
8
5,792,984.8
6
5,478,866.0
7
5,180,459.0
1
8,648,853.
60
6,288,273.
12
5,999,456.
49
5,723,950.
31
5,462,224.
51
Net
flow
Discussion
In any economics analysis, usually we implement several economic indicators that are commonly used in industry to
rank and evaluate projects. For the case of well at Guntong Field, economics analysis regarding that well has been made by
using the expected production to generate revenue and cash flows. Table 1.1shows the input data that has been used at
each well system. Overall, the cost for each wells are the same except for the construction cost at which the three junctions is
slightly higher than the two junctions.
Economic Input Data for Oil Well
Multilateral Well
Three Junctions
Page 11
Two Junctions
Petroleum Economics
80
80
4500
4500
Variable
$/well
6,117,000
6,078,000
operating
cost,
Table 1.1
NPV, internal rate of return, profitability index and well payout period are the key indicators that are used to make
economic analysis toward these two types of wells system. However, for the NPV, the lifetime for the well should has been
used to calculate the future sum received, due to lack of data, the fifth year of production has been used in the formula as
the well life.
Economics Results
Multilateral Well
Three Junctions
Two Junctions
94,000,000 USD
69,770,000 USD
492.52%
355.17%
Internal
return
rate
of
Page 12
Petroleum Economics
Profitability index
15.36
11.48
Well payout
75 days
101 days
Table 1.2
Page 13
Petroleum Economics
Capex
Cumulative Revenue
100
0 200
Days
Cumulative Revenue
2000000
0
0
100 200
Days
Petroleum Economics
results. Three junction of multilateral well internal rate of return exceed the two junctions with 492.52%. Moreover, for the
profitability index, every dollar invested in three junctions will yield 15.36 more cash flow, higher compare with two junctions
at only 11.48. Three junctions take 75 days for well payout while two junctions will need an extra one month more.
Figure 1.1
Figure 1.2
Page 15
Petroleum Economics
Three Junctions
10000000
Two Junctions
5000000
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-5000000
-10000000
Year
Three Junctions
Two Junctions
5000000
0
Year Page 16
Petroleum Economics
Three Junctions
Two Junctions
5000000
0
Year
Figure 1.3
While looking at the cumulative net cash flow (Fig 1.3), the three junctions exceed the two junctions in the first year of
production and keep on widening the gap each year. Thus the total cash flow for three junctions will be more than the two
junctions.
Conclusion
For the economic analysis it can be seen that constructing a three junctions of multilateral well will produce more cash flow
compare with only two junctions. However, there are several things that need to be taken into consideration when making the
decision. Firstly, the economic analysis is made with limited data available. Moreover, many essential data that are no
present are made into a constant assumption. The assumptions are made based on average characteristics that can be found
at any normal well.
Page 17
Petroleum Economics
Recommendation
1. The research on the multilateral well should be done more in order to decrease cost to build it. This
somehow will contribute to the overall profit.
2. In order to obtain higher amount of revenue, the project should be extended to a few more years so that
the profit can be maximized, given that the oil price and production rate remain constant.
3. It is more saving to drill a multilateral well from the beginning phase itself. It will be costly and troublesome
to build one from a completed vertical well.
#Extra notation
*Well Payout (The amount of time needed for investment return)
(Multilateral 3 Junction)
(Multilateral 2 Junction)
Petroleum Economics
References
1. Technical, Economic and Risk Analysis of Multilateral Wells, Texas A&M University, December
2008
2. Exxon Reservoir Management Paper, EPMI, ML Trice Jr, Jan 1991
3. ESSO Production Malaysia Inc on Reservoir Management Practices by M.L. Trice Jr, SPE and B.A.
Dawe
4. Maria, D. 2008. TECHNICAL, ECONOMIC AND RISK ANALYSIS OF MULTILATERAL WELLS THESIS,
Instituto Technologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Mexico, December 2008.
5. Model of Production Sharing Contract under Petroleum Act
Page 19