Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
BY
THE JOURNAL
OF
BONE
AND JOINT
SURGERY, INCORPORATED
Posterior Dislocation
of the Elbow with Fractures
of the Radial Head and Coronoid
BY DAVID RING, MD, JESSE B. JUPITER, MD, AND JEFFREY ZILBERFARB, MD
Investigation performed at the Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Background: Posterior dislocation of the elbow with associated fractures of the radial head and the coronoid
process of the ulna has been referred to as the terrible triad of the elbow because of the difficulties encountered in its management. However, there are few published reports on this injury.
Methods: Eleven patients with this pattern of injury were evaluated after a minimum of two years. The radial
head fracture had been repaired in five patients, and the radial head had been resected in four. None of the
coronoid fractures had been repaired, and the lateral collateral ligament had been repaired in only three patients. All eleven patients returned for clinical examination, functional evaluation, and radiographs.
Results: Seven elbows redislocated in a splint after manipulative reduction. Five, including all four treated with
resection of the radial head, redislocated after operative treatment. At the time of final follow-up, three patients
were considered to have a failure of the initial treatment. One of them had recurrent instability, which was
treated with a total elbow arthroplasty after multiple unsuccessful operations; one had severe arthrosis and instability resembling neuropathic arthropathy; and one had an elbow flexion contracture and proximal radioulnar
synostosis requiring reconstructive surgery. The remaining eight patients, who were evaluated at an average of
seven years after injury, had an average of 92 (range, 40 to 130) of ulnohumeral motion and 126 (range,
40 to 170) of forearm rotation. The average Broberg and Morrey functional score was 76 points (range, 34 to
98 points), with two results rated as excellent, two rated as good, three rated as fair, and one rated as poor.
Overall, the result of treatment was rated as unsatisfactory for seven of the eleven patients. All four patients
with a satisfactory result had retained the radial head, and two had undergone repair of the lateral collateral ligament. Seven of the ten patients who had retained the native elbow had radiographic signs of advanced ulnohumeral arthrosis.
Conclusions: Elbow fracture-dislocations that involve a fracture of the coronoid process in addition to a fracture
of the radial head are very unstable and prone to numerous complications. Identification of the coronoid fracture is therefore important, and computed tomography should be used if there is uncertainty. With operative
treatment, the surgeon should attempt to restore stability by providing radiocapitellar contact (preserving the
radial head when possible and replacing it with a prosthesis otherwise), repairing the lateral collateral ligament,
and perhaps performing internal fixation of the coronoid fracture.
THE JOUR NAL OF BONE & JOINT SURGER Y JBJS.ORG
VO L U M E 84-A N U M B E R 4 A P R I L 2002
sixty-seven years). Six patients sustained the injury as the result of a fall from a standing height and five, as the result of a
fall from a greater height. One patient had an open wound
that was Grade 2 according to the system of Gustilo and Anderson4. Two patients had an ipsilateral fracture of the distal
part of the radius. One patient had multiple injuries.
The fracture of the radial head was classified, according
to the system of Mason5, as Type 2 (involving part of the head)
in two patients and Type 3 (a comminuted fracture involving
the entire head) in nine patients. The fracture of the coronoid
process was classified, according to the system of Regan and
Morrey6, as Type 2 (more than a small fleck but <50% of the
height of the coronoid) in all eleven patients.
Each patient initially underwent manipulative reduction
and immobilization in a posterior plaster splint with the elbow
in 90 of flexion. Seven elbows redislocated in the splint. One
patientwho had long-standing diabetes mellitus and advanced peripheral neuropathywas treated with four weeks of
P O S T E R I O R D I S L O C A T I O N O F T H E E L B OW
R A D I A L H E A D A N D C O RO N O I D
WITH
FR ACTURES
OF THE
Fig. 1-B
Initial operative treatment consisting of open reduction, partial resection of the radial head, and reattachment of the lateral collateral ligaFig. 1-A
Figs. 1-A, 1-B, and 1-C A sixty-seven-year-old woman tripped and fell
onto the left, nondominant elbow; the elbow dislocated, with fractures
of the radial head and the coronoid process. Fig. 1-A After manipulative reduction, a lateral radiograph showed persistent subluxation of
cast immobilization only. The seven patients who had redislocation of the elbow in the splint and three others had subsequent operative treatment. In one patient, the operative
treatment was limited to dbridement of a traumatic wound.
Of the remaining nine patients, five had open reduction and internal fixation of the radial head fracture and four were treated
with radial head resection. In three patients, the origin of the
lateral collateral ligament complex was reattached to the lateral
epicondyle. None of the coronoid fractures were repaired. All
patients were treated with a postoperative dressing that incorporated a posterior plaster splint with the ulnohumeral joint
held in 90 of flexion and the forearm in neutral rotation.
Fig. 1-C
THE JOUR NAL OF BONE & JOINT SURGER Y JBJS.ORG
VO L U M E 84-A N U M B E R 4 A P R I L 2002
sis and elbow capsular release eight months after the injury.
Evaluation
The patient who required a total elbow arthroplasty was
considered to have had a failure of the index treatment. The
final overall result for the remaining ten patients was rated
according to the system of Broberg and Morrey7 and with the
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons elbow evaluation
instrument8. When the score was calculated according to the
system of Broberg and Morrey, 95 to 100 points was considered an excellent result; 80 to 94 points, good; 60 to 79 points,
fair; and 0 to 59 points, poor. Radiographic signs of arthrosis
were also rated according to the system of Broberg and
Morrey7. According to this system, a normal elbow is Grade 0,
an elbow with slight joint-space narrowing with minimum
osteophyte formation is Grade 1, an elbow with moderate
joint-space narrowing and moderate osteophyte formation is
Grade 2, and an elbow with severe degenerative change and
gross destruction of the joint is Grade 3.
Results
n addition to the patient treated with total elbow arthroplasty, two patients who retained the native elbow were
considered to have had a failure of the index treatment. One, a
diabetic patient with a peripheral neuropathy, had advanced
radiographic signs of destruction suggestive of a neuropathic
arthropathy and severe instability but had only mild pain. The
other patient had a proximal radioulnar synostosis and elbow
contracture. This patient had a good result after a second operative procedure was performed to release these constraints.
The remaining eight patients were evaluated at an average of seven years (range, three to ten years) after the injury.
The flexion-extension arc averaged 92 (range, 40 to 130),
with an average arc of flexion of 123 (range, 110 to 140) and
an average flexion contracture of 31 (range, 5 to 70). The
arc of forearm rotation averaged 126 (range, 40 to 170),
with supination averaging 60 (range, 20 to 90) and pronation averaging 66 (range, 20 to 90).
The average score on the American Shoulder and Elbow
Surgeons elbow evaluation instrument8 was 80 points (range,
52 to 100 points), with 100 points representing the best possible score. The average score according to the system of Broberg and Morrey7 was 76 points (range, 34 to 98 points), with
100 points representing the best possible score. There were
two excellent results, two good results, three fair results, and
one poor result. Of the eleven patients in the series, seven had
an unsatisfactory result of early treatment. The four patients
with a satisfactory result had had successful internal fixation
of the radial head. Two of these patients also had had reattachment of the lateral collateral ligament complex to the lateral epicondyle.
Of the ten patients who retained the native elbow, nine
had ulnohumeral arthrosis; it was rated as Grade 1 in two patients, Grade 2 in two, and Grade 3 in five (including the patient with neuropathic arthropathy). Elbow arthrosis was less
severe among the four patients with successful internal fixa-
P O S T E R I O R D I S L O C A T I O N O F T H E E L B OW
R A D I A L H E A D A N D C O RO N O I D
WITH
FR ACTURES
OF THE
THE JOUR NAL OF BONE & JOINT SURGER Y JBJS.ORG
VO L U M E 84-A N U M B E R 4 A P R I L 2002
P O S T E R I O R D I S L O C A T I O N O F T H E E L B OW
R A D I A L H E A D A N D C O RO N O I D
WITH
FR ACTURES
OF THE
Fig. 2-A
Figs. 2-A, 2-B, and 2-C A sixty-seven-year-old man fell from a standing
height, injuring the left, nondominant elbow. Fig. 2-A A manipulative
reduction proved unstable in spite of splint immobilization. The small
fragment of bone adjacent to the trochlea of the distal part of the
humerus is the coronoid fracture fragment.
Fig. 2-C
A lateral radiograph made one year after open reduction and internal
fixation of the fracture of the coronoid with use of a suture placed
through drill-holes in the ulna and two screws. There is heterotopic
bone anterior to the radial head, but a stable concentric reduction and
a functional range of motion were achieved.
Fig. 2-B
twenty-six fractures of the coronoid in patients with an anterior or posterior olecranon fracture-dislocation of the elbow
treated during the same period. Larger coronoid fractures have
been reported to be more difficult to manage6, but we have
found that these larger fractures are more straightforward to
repair and that the repair usually restores elbow stability12,13. As
the treatment of olecranon fracture-dislocationsincluding
large coronoid fracturesbecomes more predictable, it seems
that the smaller fractures of the coronoid associated with elbow
instability should now be regarded as the most troublesome.
Given that these fractures of the coronoid are so small,
it is not clear whether the substantial decrease in elbow stability can be ascribed entirely to them. The anterior aspect of
the capsule is attached to this fragment14, but anterior capsu-
THE JOUR NAL OF BONE & JOINT SURGER Y JBJS.ORG
VO L U M E 84-A N U M B E R 4 A P R I L 2002
P O S T E R I O R D I S L O C A T I O N O F T H E E L B OW
R A D I A L H E A D A N D C O RO N O I D
WITH
FR ACTURES
OF THE
Jesse B. Jupiter, MD
Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Massachusetts General Hospital, ACC 527, 15 Parkman Street, Boston,
MA 02114. E-mail address: jjupiter1@partners.org
Jeffrey Zilberfarb, MD
1101 Beacon Street, Brookline, MA 02146
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or
more of the authors received grants or outside funding from the AO
Foundation. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a
commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial
entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct,
any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or
other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are
affiliated or associated.
References
1. Broberg MA, Morrey BF. Results of treatment of fracture-dislocations of the
elbow. Clin Orthop. 1987;216:109-19.
10. Ring D, Jupiter JB. Fracture-dislocation of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
1998;80:566-80.
3. Hotchkiss RN. Fractures and dislocations of the elbow. In: Rockwood CA Jr,
Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, editors. Rockwood and Greens fractures
in adults. 4th ed, vol 1. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p 929-1024.
12. Ring D, Jupiter JB, Simpson NS. Monteggia fractures in adults. J Bone Joint
Surg Am. 1998;80:1733-44.
4. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of the long bones: retrospective and prospective analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:453-8.
5. Mason ML. Some observations on fractures of the head of the radius with a
review of one hundred cases. Br J Surg. 1954;42:123-32.
6. Regan W, Morrey B. Fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:1348-54.
7. Broberg MA, Morrey BF. Results of delayed excision of the radial head after
fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:669-74.
8. King GJ, Richards RR, Zuckerman TD, Blasier R, Dillman C, Friedman RJ,
Gartsman GM, Iannotti JP, Murnahan JP, Mow VC, Woo SL. A standardized
method for assessment of elbow function. Research Committee, American
Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8:351-4.
9. Morrey BF. Instructional Course Lectures, American Academy of Orthopaedic
Surgeons. Complex instability of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;
79:460-9.
13. Ring D, Jupiter JB, Sanders RW, Mast J, Simspon NS. Transolecranon
fracture dislocation of the elbow. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:545-50.
14. Cage DJ, Abrams RA, Callahan JJ, Botte MJ. Soft tissue attachments of the
ulnar coronoid process. An anatomic study with radiographic correlation. Clin
Orthop. 1995;320:154-8.
15. Drig M, Mller W, Redi TP, Gauer EF. The operative treatment of elbow dislocation in the adult. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:239-44.
16. Josefsson PO, Johnell O, Wendeberg B. Ligamentous injuries in dislocations
of the elbow joint. Clin Orthop. 1987;221:221-5.
17. Ring D, Jupiter JB. Operative fixation and reconstruction of the coronoid. Tech
Orthop. 2000;15(2):147-54.
18. Mansat P, Morrey BF. The column procedure: a limited lateral approach for
extrinsic contracture of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1603-15.
19. Cohen MS, Hastings H 2nd. Post-traumatic contracture of the elbow. Operative release using a lateral collateral ligament sparing approach. J Bone Joint
Surg Br. 1998;80:805-12.