Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
______________________________
_____________________________________
_____________________________________
____________________________
degree at The University of Mississippi, I agree that the Library shall make it available to
borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable
made.
when, in the opinion of either, the proposed use of the material is for scholarly purposes.
Any copying or use of the material in this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed
Signature____________________________
Date________________________________
Comparison of Dielectric Breakdown Voltage of Different Composite
Materials
May 2009
DEDICATION
To all beloved ones without whose encouragement I would have given up long ago.
ii
Copyright © 2009 by Dinesh Kumar Dhunde
iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank Tim Hall of the Composite Materials Laboratory and James
McPhail of the Mechanical Engineering Machine shop for their valuable help in getting
the equipment setup and for the preparation of electrodes and also Marty Hickman from
iv
ABSTRACT
their very good electric and mechanical properties, composites are the preferred
duromeric materials for many high quality insulating systems nowadays. These materials
for outdoor and indoor use show different phenomena under high electric field which has
not been previously known for many materials. Owing to their great technical
importance, the dielectric breakdown voltage of composite materials has been a subject
obtain get reliable data on the dielectric breakdown voltage of different composites to
provide a basis from which one can estimate the use of composites for different
applications.
Reliable data measured according to the ASTM D 149-97(a) standard has been
recorded here. The system utilizes 51 mm opposing cylinders for 67.5 mm samples and
25 mm opposing cylinders for 37.5 mm samples. The Plexiglas fixture is filled with
mineral oil to cover the electrodes to at least a depth of 20 mm, and the sample is allowed
to set for at least 2 minutes without agitation. A 60 Hz sinusoidal wave voltage is applied
at a ramp rate of 500 V/20s till 50KV until breakdown occurs as indicated by passage of
a current through the sample of 0 to 40mA. This occurrence is used to trip a relay within
3 to 5 cycles that stops the voltage ramping and maintains the breakdown voltage. A
series of measurements are completed, which are then treated statistically to yield the
series of tests was carried out in which the samples were first subjected to 2 hours of
v
boiling water and then tested according to the D-149 standard to obtain the dielectric
breakdown voltage.
There is a reduction in the breakdown voltage of the samples which are subject to
moisture prior to the breakdown testing due to the water absorbed by the samples because
water helps the current to pass through the sample more easily.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................1
V. CONCLUSIONS ...........................................................................................................88
APPENDIX ........................................................................................................................94
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE PAGE
1.7 A pair of positively charged and negatively charged conductor planes in a vacuum.. 22
1.8 Schematic of a tree growing between two electrodes on two parallel plates...............26
2.1 Plot showing the slow rate rise method voltage application ........................................36
viii
3.5 Picture shows the two types of electrodes used ...........................................................58
4.1 Plot showing the dielectric breakdown field for a single kind of 67.5 mm sample…62
4.6 Breakdown Fields with standard deviation of different 67.5 mm Polyester samples
4.8 Breakdown Fields with standard deviation of all different 67.5 mm samples without
4.10 Plot showing the dielectric breakdown field with standard deviation for all kinds of
4.13 Breakdown Fields with standard deviation of different 37.5 mm Epoxy samples
4.15 Breakdown Fields with standard devation of different 37.5 mm Phenolic and
4.16 Breakdown Fields with standard deviation of all different 37.5 mm samples without
4.19 Breakdown Fields of different Epoxy glued samples without and with moisture
content……………………………………………………………………………………74
4.20 Breakdown Fields of different Polyester glued samples without and with moisture
content …………………………………………………………………………...………75
4.21 Breakdown Fields of different Phenolic glued samples without and with moisture
content. ...............................................................................................................................75
4.22 Breakdown Fields of different Polyurethane glued samples without and with
moisture content.................................................................................................................76
4.23 Breakdown Fields of different glued samples without and with moisture content....76
4.24 Breakdown Fields and standard deviation of different 67.5 mm samples with
4.25 Breakdown Fields with standard deviation of different 37.5 mm samples with
x
different resin .....................................................................................................................78
4.26 Breakdown Fields of different Glued samples with different resin systems
……………………………………………………………………………………………79
4.27 Plot showing the percentage increase in weight for all 67.5 mm samples ................79
4.28 Plot showing the percentage increase in weight for all 37.5 mm samples ................80
voltage…………………………………………….……………………………………...83
4.35 Power rating curves for 100M resistor through which we know the maximum
4.36 Power rating curves for 100K resistor through which we know the maximum
xi
4.41 SEM images of the breakdown area in polyester samples ………………………....87
4.42 SEM image of the breakdown area in polyester with mat and roving samples
….………………………………………………………………………………………..88
xii
LIST OF TABLES
TABLES PAGE
1.1 Table lists some aircraft in which significant amounts of composite materials are used
4.1 Table shows the average fields of 67.5 mm samples without moisture ......................65
4.2 Table shows the average fields of 67.5 mm samples with moisture ...........................66
4.3 Table shows the average fields of 37.5 mm samples without moisture.......................71
4.4 Table shows the average fields of 37.5 mm samples with moisture ............................72
xiii
APPENDIX
TABLES PAGE
A.1 Table shows the values for a Normal test for 67.5 mm Polyester and Polyurethane
sample ................................................................................................................................95
A.2 Table shows the values for a moisture test for 67.5 mm Polyester and Polyurethane
sample ................................................................................................................................96
A.3 Table shows the values for a normal test for 37.5 mm Epoxy, Polyester, Phenolic and
A.4 Table shows the values for a moisture test for 37.5 mm Epoxy, Polyester, Phenolic
A.5 Table shows the values for a normal test for Glued Epoxy, Polyester, Phenolic and
A.6 Table shows the values for a Moisture test for Glued Epoxy, Polyester, Phenolic and
A.7 Table shows the values of weights of different 67.5 mm samples before and after
xiv
A.8 Table shows the values of weights of different 67.5 mm samples before and after
A.9 Table shows the values of weights of different 37.5 mm samples before and after
A.10 Table shows the values of weights of different 37.5 mm samples before and after
xv
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
microscopic scale (molecular level), the new material is then called an alloy for metals or
a polymer for plastics. The different materials work together to give the composite unique
properties, but within the composite you can easily tell the different materials apart – they
long fibers of cellulose (a very complex form of starch) held together by a much weaker
substance called lignin. Cellulose is also found in cotton and linen, but it is the binding
power of the lignin that makes a piece of timber much stronger than a bundle of cotton
fibers.
flakes, and/or fillers) embedded in a matrix (polymers, metals, or ceramics). The matrix
holds the reinforcement to form the desired shape while the reinforcement improves the
overall mechanical properties of the matrix. When designed properly, the new combined
1
Humans have been using composite materials for thousands of years. Take mud
bricks, for example. A cake of dried mud is easy to break by bending, which puts a
tension force on one edge, but makes a good strong wall, where all the forces are
compressive. A piece of straw, on the other hand, has a lot of strength when you try to
stretch it but almost none when you crumple it up. But if you embed pieces of straw in a
block of mud and let it dry hard, the resulting mud brick resists both squeezing and
tearing and makes an excellent building material. Put more technically, it has both good
gravel) is bound together by cement. Concrete has good strength under compression, and
it can be made stronger under tension by adding metal rods, wires, mesh or cables to the
plastics used for automobile bodies and boat hulls, but the term usually is used to
properties of the separate components. Carbon fiber-reinforced plastics combine the high
strength and stiffness of the fiber with the low weight and resistance to fracture of the
polymeric matrix. Glass, wood, and other kinds of fibers are also used, and the fibers
2
1.2 Common Categories of Composite Materials
3
Figure 1.3. Particles as the reinforcement (Particulate composites)
Most composites are made up of just two materials. One material (the matrix or
binder) surrounds and binds together a cluster of fibers or fragments of a much stronger
material (the reinforcement). In the case of mud bricks, the two roles are enacted by the
mud and the straw; in concrete, by the cement and the aggregate; in a piece of wood, by
the cellulose and the lignin. In fiberglass, the reinforcement is provided by fine filaments
or fibers of glass, often woven into a sort of cloth, and the matrix is a plastic [7].
4
The filaments of glass in fiberglass are very strong under tension but they are also
brittle and will snap if bent sharply. The matrix not only holds the fibers together, it also
protects them from damage by sharing any stress among them. The matrix is soft enough
to be shaped with tools, and can be softened by suitable solvents to allow repairs to be
made. Any deformation of a sheet of fiberglass necessarily stretches some of the glass
fibers, and they are able to resist this, so even a thin sheet is very strong. It is also quite
Over recent decades many new composites have been developed, some with very
valuable properties. By carefully choosing the reinforcement, the matrix, and the
manufacturing process that brings them together, engineers can tailor the properties to
meet specific requirements. They can, for example, make the composite sheet very
strong in one direction by aligning the fibers that way, but weaker in another direction
where strength is not so important. They can also select properties such as resistance to
Common fiber reinforced composites are composed of fibers and a matrix. Fibers are
the reinforcement and the main source of strength while the matrix “glues” all the fibers
together in shape and transfers stresses between the reinforcing fibers. Sometimes, fillers
The primary function of the fibers is to carry the loads along their longitudinal
Asbestos
Carbon (Graphite)
Molybdenum
Polyester
Steel
Tantalum
Titanium
(also called resins). The use of plastics in the matrix explains the name 'reinforced
plastics' commonly given to composites. The plastics are polymers that hold the
reinforcement together and help to determine the physical properties of the end product.
Thermosets are liquid when prepared but harden and become rigid (i.e., they cure)
when they are heated. The setting process is reversible, so that these materials do not
become soft under high temperatures. These plastics also resist wear and attack by
6
chemicals, making them very durable, even when exposed to extreme environments.
Thermoplastics, as the name implies, are hard at low temperatures but soften when they
are heated. Although they are less commonly used than thermosetting plastics they do
have some advantages, such as greater fracture toughness, long shelf life of the raw
material, capacity for recycling, and a cleaner, safer workplace because organic solvents
Ceramics, carbon and metals are used as the matrix for some highly specialized
purposes. For example, ceramics are used when the material is going to be exposed to
high temperatures (e.g., heat exchangers) and carbon is used for products that are exposed
The primary functions of the matrix are to transfer stresses between the
reinforcing fibers (hold fibers together) and to protect the fibers from mechanical and/or
environmental damages. A basic requirement for a matrix material is that its strain at
break must be larger than the fibers it is holding. Most matrices are made of resins for
Resin Matrix
o Epoxy
o Phenolic
7
o Polyester
o Polyurethane
o Vinyl Ester
Among these resin materials, polyesters are the most widely used. Epoxies,
which have higher adhesion and less shrinkage than polyesters, come in second for their
higher costs.
Although less common, non-resin matrices (mostly metals) can still be found in
defense industry.
Metal Matrix
o Aluminum
o Copper
o Lead
o Magnesium
o Nickel
o Silver
o Titanium
Non-Metal Matrix
o Ceramics
8
The primary functions of the additives (modifiers, fillers) are to reduce costs, improve
Cost Reduction:
o Low cost to weight ratio, may fill up to 40% (65% in some cases) of the
total weight
Workability Improvement:
o Reduce shrinkage
o Decrease viscosity
o Control emission
Property Enhancement:
Filler Materials:
o Feldspar
o Glass microspheres
o Glass flakes
o Mica
o Silica
o Talc
o Wollastonite
Although glass fibers are by far the most common reinforcement, many advanced
composites now use fine fibers of pure carbon. Carbon fibers are much stronger and
stiffer than glass fibers, but are also more expensive to produce. Carbon fiber
composites are light as well as strong. They are used in aircraft structures and in sporting
goods (such as golf clubs), and increasingly are used instead of metals to repair or replace
damaged bones. Even stronger (and more costly) than carbon fibers are fibers of boron
[6].
10
Polymers are not only used for the matrix, they also make a good reinforcement
material in composites. For example, Kevlar is a polymer fiber that is immensely strong
that require lightweight and energy absorption (e.g., structural body parts of an aircraft)
[4]. Composite materials were not the original use for Kevlar – it was developed to
replace steel in radial tires and is now used in bulletproof vests and helmets.
Making an object from a composite material usually involves some form of mold.
The reinforcing material is first placed in the mold and then semi-liquid matrix material is
sprayed or pumped in to form the object. Pressure may be applied to force out any air
bubbles, and the mold is then heated to make the thermoset matrix set solid. The molding
process is often done by hand, but automatic processing by machines is becoming more
derived from the words 'pull' and 'extrusion'). This process is ideal for manufacturing
products that are straight and have a constant cross section, such as bridge beams. In
many thin structures with complex shapes, such as curved panels, the composite structure
is built up by applying sheets of woven fiber reinforcement, saturated with the plastic
matrix material, over an appropriately shaped base mold. When the panel has been built
In many advanced composites (such as those used in the wing and body panels of
aircraft), the structure may consist of a honeycomb of material sandwiched between two
11
skins of carbon-fiber reinforced composite material. Such sandwich composites combine
high strength, and particularly bending stiffness, with low weight. Like everything to do
aspect of our lives. Fiberglass, developed in the late 1940s, was the first modern
composite and is still the most common. It makes up about 65 per cent of all the
composites produced today and is used for boat hulls, surfboards, sporting goods,
swimming pool linings, building panels and car bodies. You may well be using
matrix material, manufacturers can produce properties that exactly fit the requirements
for a particular structure and a particular purpose. Modern aviation, both military and
civil, is a prime example. It would be much less efficient without composites. In fact,
the demands have been the main force driving the development of composites [1]. It is
common now to find wing and tail sections, propellers and rotor blades made from
advanced composites, along with much of the internal structure and fittings. The
airframes of some smaller aircraft are made entirely from composites, as are the wing, tail
12
In thinking about planes, it is worth remembering that composites are less likely
than metals (such as aluminium) to break up completely under stress. A small crack in a
piece of metal can spread very rapidly with very serious consequences (especially in the
case of aircraft). The fibers in a composite act to block the widening of any small crack
and to share the stress around. The right composites also stand up well to heat and
corrosion. This makes them ideal for use in products that are exposed to extreme
composite materials are very durable. Another advantage of composite materials is that
they provide design flexibility. Composites can be molded into complex shapes – a great
Among the first uses of modern composite materials was about thirty years ago
when boron-reinforced epoxy composite was used for the skins of the empennages of the
U.S. F14 and F15 fighters. Initially, composite materials were used only in secondary
structures, but as knowledge and development of the materials has improved their use in
because reduced airframe weight enables better fuel economy and therefore lowers
operating costs. The first significant use of composite material in a commercial aircraft
was by Airbus in 1983 in the rudder of the A300 and A310 and then in 1985 in the
13
Table 1.1. The following table lists some aircraft in which significant amounts of
The Boeing 7E7 will leverage extensive use of composite materials (estimates are
as high as 50 percent) in the quest for very high efficiency and performance with reduced
maximize payloads and performance in general. Boeing Vertol used composites for
rotorcraft fairings in the 1950s and made the first composite rotor blades in the 1970s.
Composites are used in major structural elements of many modern helicopters, including
the V22 tilt-rotor aircraft, which is approximately 50 percent composites by weight. The
manufacturing to reduce the numbers of component parts and therefore the costs. The
14
Figure 1.6. Boeing 7E7 Structural Compositions [9]
processes are often more efficient when composites are used, the raw materials are
expensive. Composites will never totally replace traditional materials like steel, but in
many cases they are just what we need. And no doubt new uses will be found as the
technology evolves. We have not yet seen all that composites can do [8].
Different materials are suitable for different applications. When composites are selected
over traditional materials such as metal alloys or woods, it is usually because of one or
Cost:
o Prototypes
15
o Mass production
o Part consolidation
o Maintenance
o Production time
o Maturity of technology
Weight:
o Lightweight
o Weight distribution
Dimension:
o Large parts
o Special geometry
Surface Properties:
o Corrosion resistance
o Weather resistance
Thermal Properties:
16
Electric Property:
o Non-magnetic
o Radar transparency
the above factors may not always be positive in all applications. An engineer has to
weigh all the factors and make the best decision in selecting the most suitable material(s)
optical instrumentation make use of lightweight and extremely stiff graphite reinforced
composites. The high stiffness, high strength and low density characteristics make
composites highly desirable in primary and secondary structures of both military and
civilian aircraft [12]. Composites are used in various forms in the transportation industry,
including automotive parts and automobile, truck and railcar frames. Ship structures
incorporate composites in various forms, thick section glass and carbon fiber composites
and sandwich construction. The latter consists of thin composite face sheets bound to a
17
Applications include minesweepers and corvettes. Composite ship structures
have many advantages such as insulation, lower manufacturing costs, low maintenance
and lack of corrosion. In the energy production field, carbon fiber reinforced composites
have been used in the blades of wind turbine generators that significantly improve power
output at a greatly reduced cost. Biomedical applications include prosthetic devices and
artificial limb parts. Infrastructure applications are the most recent development.
FRP is one of the candidates for a base of smart materials in which sensors, processors
and actuators are embedded. FRP composites are used for EM-transparent applications,
as a dielectric material. FRP composites exhibit very low loss over a range of
radomes to cell tower enclosures to RF transparent buildings for electronics testing. New
applications for EM transparent materials are emerging in industries that utilize radio
Electromagnetic wave absorbers are being manufactured using composites with glass
fabric reinforcement and epoxy matrix. Microwire composites have high permeability
18
and permittivity so they have great potential to be used for high attenuation and shielding
applications [14].
All materials conduct electricity to some extent, and all suffer some form of
breakdown in a sufficiently strong electric field. For low field strengths the conduction
process in most materials are ohmic, but as the field strength is increased the conductivity
usually becomes field dependent; if the field strength is increased further, some form of
The atoms in insulating materials have very tightly bound electrons, resisting free
electron flow very well. However, insulators cannot resist indefinite amounts of voltage.
With enough voltage applied, any insulating material will eventually succumb to the
electrical "pressure" and electron flow will occur. However, unlike the situation with
resistance), current through an insulator is quite nonlinear [15]. For voltages below a
certain threshold level virtually no electrons will flow, but if the voltage exceeds that
material's molecular structure has occurred. After breakdown, the material may or may
not behave as an insulator any more, the molecular structure having been altered by the
19
breach. There is usually a localized "puncture" of the insulating medium where the
listed in terms of volts per mil (1/1000 of an inch), or kilovolts per inch (the two units are
equivalent), but in practice it has been found that the relationship between breakdown
voltage and thickness is not exactly linear. An insulator three times as thick has a
dielectric strength slightly less than 3 times as much. However, for rough estimation use,
Dielectric materials refer to those having the basic electric property of being
polarized in the presence of an electric field and having an electrostatic field within them
under the state of polarization. (Polarization here refers to the molecular alignment along
the direction of the applied electric field). The dielectric has the ability to prevent
leakage of electrical charges from the body on which it is deployed. Hence, such
materials differ distinctly in basic electric properties from those classified as electric
Naturally occurring materials like wood, vegetable fibers, cotton, silk, oils,
rubber, resin, rocks, etc. are well known as electric insulators and are characteristically
dielectric. Added to these, is a gamut of manmade materials such as polymers etc., which
20
are also used widely as insulating/dielectric materials. The basis of dielectric properties
stems from the interaction of matter at the microscopic level with an external electric
field force. Its manifestation as the macroscopic electrical insulation property is rather
common in all states of matter [18]. This basic microscopic property dictates the extent
of electric field force of interaction between electric charges in the medium as quantified
by the well known Coulomb‟s law, i.e., the extent of dielectric properties of a material is
Where F is the columbic force of interaction between two charges q1 and q2 (each
Consider two metal plates connected to the two ends of a battery of voltage V.
Assuming the electrical resistance of the connecting wires is negligible, the potential
between the two plates is V. Assume the medium between the plates is vacuum. There
are numerous conduction electrons in the metal plates and the metal wires. The positive
end of the battery attracts conduction electrons, making the left plate positively charged
[16].
21
Figure 1.7. A pair of positively charged and negatively charged conductor planes in a
vacuum.
The negative end of the battery repels conduction electrons, making the right plate
negatively charged. Let the area of each plate be A. The magnitude of charge per unit
Q
D0 (2)
A
V
E , (3)
d
22
Where d is the separation of the plates. When E =0, D0 =0. In fact, D is
D0 0 E (4)
0 is called the permittivity of free space. The equation is called Gauss‟s law [16].
Q 0EA 0A
C0 . (5)
V Ed d
„ C0 ‟ is known as the capacitance. Its unit is coulomb/volt, or farad. In fact this is the
Let us consider that medium between the two plates is not a vacuum, but an
insulator, whose positive charge and center of negative charge coincide when V =0.
When V>0, the positive charge is shifted toward the negative plate while the center of
negative charge is shifted toward the positive plate. Such displacement of the centers of
positive and negative charges is called polarization. When polarization occurs, the center
of positive charge sucks more electrons to the negative plate, causing the charge on the
negative plate to be Q , where >1. Similarly the center of negative charge repels
more electrons away from the positive plate, causing the charge on the positive plate to
23
Q
Dm 0 (6)
A
The maximum electric field that an insulator can withstand before it loses its
insulating behavior is known as the dielectric strength. Dielectric strength is the ability of
voltage at which the insulation fails because of the electrostatic stress. Maximum
dielectric strength values can be measured only by raising the voltage of a TEST
Vacuum 787.41
24
Rubber 450 to 700
Shellac 900
Paper 1250
Teflon 1500
Mica 5000
Dielectric breakdown is a complex problem and has been studied for a long time.
While considering the dielectric breakdown in solids, the material is initially non-
conducting when an electric field is applied across the sample. If the field exceeds the
threshold, the material breaks down and conducts. The microscopic mechanisms of
dielectric breakdown in solid materials are much more complex than those in gases since,
in addition to the dielectric effects, mechanical and chemical effects can also intervene
and make the problem more difficult. From a practical viewpoint, dielectric breakdown
[19]. A well known example of such phenomena is the formation and growth of
electrical trees. The trees themselves may not cause breakdown unless they grow so
large that they span the thickness of the material. A diagrammatic representation of the
25
Figure 1.8. Schematic of a tree growing between two electrodes on two parallel plates.
sustained with indefinite increase of the applied external field. If the electric voltage is
increased progressively, there will be a “breakdown” at which the material will cease to
be a dielectric and will fail to exhibit electrical insulation properties. The breakdown
material which increases sharply with the increase in the applied voltage [18]. The point
26
Figure 1.9. Voltage-current characteristics of a dielectric.
A high dielectric breakdown voltage does not necessarily prove the absence of
contaminants. The dielectric breakdown voltage is not a constant of the material being
tested like the dielectric constant but it is a statistical process and as a result repetitive
determinations have to be done. The results can also be dependent on the design of the
electrodes, the spacing of the electrodes, the wave form of the applied voltage, and the
The first use of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composite dates back to 1930‟s as
part of boat hull manufacturing experiment using a fiberglass fabric and polyester resin.
In the 1940‟s FRP composites found extensive use in the defense industry. Due to their
high strength to weight ratio and their resistance to corrosion, FRP composites became an
integral part in aerospace and naval applications. In the 1950‟s, FRP composites gained
entry into the public sector especially in the oil and chemical industries. The need for
27
surface coating or protection was eliminated due to their inherent resistance to corrosion.
Advanced composites were developed in the 1960‟s. High modulus whiskers and
filament reinforced epoxy composites were not only used in the defense industry but also
in the sporting goods industry. In the 1970‟s, automobile and electrical industries were
the largest consumers of composite materials. Sports cars with fiberglass body panels
were made to reduce weight. In the 1980‟s, composites began to be used in civil and
construction industry. Highways, bridges, bridge decks were made using composites. In
electrical, optical and other properties when compared to conventional composites [3].
In 1997, Yilmaz and Kalenderli studied the electrical properties of polyester films
aged under cold and hot environment conditions between -40°C and +120°C. The
examined dielectric parameters were dielectric constant and dissipation factor in the
Experimental results have been shown that the AC breakdown strength is inversely
composites. Conducting particles are distributed at random in the insulating matrix, and
the dielectric breakdown propagates according to new rules to take into account electrical
properties and particle size [4]. In 2004 the dielectric breakdown model to describe
was developed. The 2004 model was an extension of a previous one. Particles are
28
distributed at random in a matrix with a variable concentration p. The generalized model
D and the parameters of the Weibull distribution. Studies were carried out as a function
defects in composite materials using a simple standardized test method was brought into
light by Madsen. There is a clear correlation between the tracking index and the
measure the tracking resistance of a composite in order to calculate its breakdown field
strength from that. This saves on expensive testing in high voltage laboratories [6].
Disruptive breakdown: This refers to the effect of high energy fields causing
model.
electric resistance across a dielectric could cause uneven leakage current to flow
29
through it. In regions where the localized current is intense, the resulting heat
that move in an electric field and produce a leakage current. The electric field
itself may produce additional ions by collision of electron and molecules so that
the current increases with increasing voltage stress. Eventually, the large flow of
dielectric. It often occurs in certain soft polymers at low temperatures and seldom
could cause a leakage current which over passage of time may include thermal
breakdown, causing run away build up of heat. Dielectric aging under impure
or thermal aging. Thus, they are prone to bubble formation which could
constitute a link of conducting chain across the electrodes causing a current surge
30
Corona-induced breakdown: Corona induced high speed electrons generated in
the surrounding air or within the void pockets of the dielectrics at high electrical
stresses could initiate erosion in the material with surface tracking and leakage
of moisture through the dielectrics “wets” them, impairing their electrical properties. A
host of solid dielectrics absorb moisture as per an empirically modified Henry‟s law
given by:
C ap n
solubility factor, p is the pressure of water vapor to which the material is subjected to and
n is an exponent greater than unity. Moisture diffuses through the dielectric material
31
CHAPTER II
STANDARDS
The details of the entire procedures for determining the dielectric breakdown
voltage of solid insulating materials and for the cylindrical electrodes as given in the
The electrode system utilizes 51 mm diameter circular disks that are 25 mm thick
with edges rounded to 6.4 mm radius for the 67.5 mm samples and 25 mm diameter
circular disks that are 25 mm thick with edges rounded to 3.2 mm radius for the 37.5 mm
samples. The glass chamber is filled with mineral oil to cover the electrodes to at least a
depth of 20 mm and the sample is allowed to set for at least 2 minutes without agitation.
A 60 Hz sinusoidal wave voltage is applied at a ramp rate of 500 V/20 sec until
breakdown occurs. A series of samples are measured, which are then treated statistically
32
1 Opposing cylinders 51 mm in Flat sheets of paper, films, fabrics,
diameter, 25 mm thick with edges rubber, molded plastics, laminates,
rounded to 6.4 mm radius. boards, glass mica and ceramic.
The more uniform electric field of the cylindrical electrode system makes this
method more sensitive to the presence of water or other conducting particulate material in
the fluid. It is for this reason that the oil must be circulated during the measurement to
This test method covers procedures for the determination of dielectric strength of
the tests shall be made at 60Hz. However this test method may be used at any frequency
from 25 to 800 Hz. At a frequency above 800 Hz dielectric heating may be a problem.
This test method may be used at various temperatures, and in any suitable liquid
surrounding medium. This test method is also suitable for determining the dielectric
2.1.2 Terminology
voltage: the potential difference at which the dielectric failure occurs under
electrodes.
33
Dielectric strength (or) electrical strength: the voltage gradient at which
test.
dielectric under tests limiting the electric field that can be sustained.
or in the surrounding medium, which may or may not cause permanent damage to
voltage is increased from zero or from a level well below the breakdown voltage,
failure of the test specimen occurs. In this project we apply the voltage in a step
by step way.
o Short time test: Apply voltage uniformly to the test electrodes from zero at
34
Table 2.2. Short time test voltage application method
Rates ((V/s) ± 20 %)
100
200
500
1000
2000
5000
o Step by step test: Apply voltage to the test electrodes at the preferred
5 or less 10% of Vs
Over 5 to 10 0.5
Over 10 to 25 1
Over 25 to 50 2
Over 50 to 100 5
Over 100 10
35
o Slow rate of rise test: Apply voltage to the test electrodes from the starting
voltage and at the rate shown in figure until the breakdown occurs.
Figure 2.1. Plot showing the slow rate rise method voltage application
1 t bd > 120 s
2 Vbd =>1.5Vs
5 Vbd =>1.5Vs
10 Vbd =>1.5Vs
20 Vbd =>1.5Vs
25 Vbd =>1.5Vs
50 Vbd =>1.5Vs
36
The step by step test and slow rate rise test methods give lower test results which
are more meaningful when different materials are being compared [20].
The test voltage is applied using simple test electrodes on opposite faces of the
specimen. The specimens may be molded or cast, or cut from a flat sheet or plate.
for any application where an electric field will be present. In many cases the
dielectric strength of a material will be the determining factor in the design of the
The test made as specified herein may be used to provide part of the information
needed for determining the suitability of a material for a given application and
environmental situations.
Results obtained by this test can be seldom used directly to determine the
37
2.1.5 Apparatus
Voltage source: Obtain the test voltage from a step up transformer supplied from
a variable sinusoidal low voltage source. The transformer shall have the following
capabilities:
o The ratio of crest to root mean square test voltage shall be equal to
2 5% , with the test specimen in the circuit, at all voltages greater than
o The capacity of the source shall be sufficient to maintain the test voltage
o The voltage source is equipped with a circuit breaking device that will
disconnect the voltage source from the power service and protect it from
specimen current.
o The current sensitivity setting can have a significant effect on the test
results. Make the setting high enough that the transients, such as partial
discharges, will not trip the breaker but not so high that excessive burning
38
of the specimen, with resultant electrode damage, will occur on
breakdown. The electrode area may have a significant effect on what the
o If the setting is set too high, the breaking circuit will not respond when the
Voltage measurement:
o A voltmeter must be provided for measuring the rms test voltage. A peak
rms values. The overall error of the voltage measuring circuit shall not
to the electrodes.
Electrodes:
vary considerably, depending upon the geometry and placement of the test
electrodes.
39
Table 2.5. Electrode designs based on applications
4 Flat plates 6.4 mm wide and 108 Same as for Type 1, particularly for
mm long with edges square and rubber tapes and other narrow widths
ends rounded to 3.2 mm radius. of thin materials.
7 Opposing circular flat plates, 150 Flat sheet, plate or board materials for
mm diameter, 10 mm thick with tests with the voltage gradient parallel
edges rounded to 3 to 5 mm radius. to the surface.
o The electrodes should be in contact with the test specimen over the entire
40
o Keep the electrode surface clean and smooth and free from projecting
o The flatness and surface finish of the electrode‟s faces must be such that
the faces are in close contact with the test specimen over the entire area of
the electrodes.
o Whenever the electrodes are dissimilar in size or shape, the one at which
the lowest concentration of stress exists, usually the larger in size and with
Surrounding medium:
o Since flashover must be avoided and the effects of partial discharges prior
liquid may not be comparable with those obtained in air. The nature of
liquid and the degree of previous use may influence the test values.
41
o The quality of the insulating oil may have an appreciable effect upon the
thin specimens (1 mil) are being tested. Depending upon the nature of the
oil and the properties of the material being tested, other properties,
Test chamber:
o The test chamber or area in which the tests are to be made shall be of
sufficient size to hold the test equipment, and shall be provided with
parts.
o For the purpose of most tests it is desirable to take samples from the areas
the material. The outer few layers of roll material, the top sheets of a
42
o When flat-faced electrodes are to be used, the surfaces of the specimens
which will be in contact with the electrodes shall be smooth parallel planes
specimens large enough to permit making more than one test on a single
piece.
o For thicker materials (more than 2mm thick) the breakdown strength may
Apply seals and shrouds around the electrodes in contact with the
Materials that are not in flat sheet form shall be tested using
sample.
43
2.1.7 Calibration
In making calibration measurements, take care that the values of voltage at the
electrodes can be determined with accuracy while the test specimens are in the
circuit.
voltage source to verify the accuracy of the measuring device. Voltage dividers
2.1.8 Conditioning
before testing.
For many materials, the moisture content has more effect on dielectric strength
before testing. This will usually reduce the possibility of surface flashover.
44
Dielectric breakdown consists of an increase in conductance, limiting the electric
field that can be sustained. The phenomenon is most commonly evidenced during the
test by an abrupt visible and audible rupture through the thickness of the specimen,
resulting in a visible puncture and decomposition of the specimen in the breakdown area.
sometimes result in failure at lower voltages, usually with additional damage at the
breakdown area. Such repeated applications of the voltage may be used to give positive
evidence of the breakdown and to make the breakdown path more visible.
A rapid rise in the leakage current may result in the tripping of the voltage source
without visible decomposition of the specimen. This type of failure, usually associated
with slow rise tests at elevated temperatures, may in some cases be reversible, that is,
recovery of the dielectric strength may occur if the specimen is allowed to cool to its
original test temperature before reapplying voltage. The voltage source should trip
The tripping of the voltage source may occur due to flashover, to partial discharge
breaker. Such interruptions of the test do not constitute breakdown and should not be
considered satisfactory tests. However, if the breaker is set for too high a current, or if
45
As previously discussed, the dielectric strength of most solid insulating materials
know the behavior of the composites with respect to added moisture content.
This test method covers the determination of the rate of absorption of water by
plastics when immersed in water. This test is valid for testing all types of plastics,
including cast, hit-molded, and molded resinous products, and both homogeneous and
molded plastics in rod and tube form and ion sheets that are 0.13 - 0.005 inches or greater
in thickness.
material, in which case a relation between the moisture and electrical properties can be
[22].
2.2.1 Apparatus
The test specimen of sheets shall be machined, sawed, or sheared from the sample so as
Repeated Immersion
Long-Term Immersion
In this experiment we have used the Two Hour Boiling Water Immersion Procedure,
where the specimens shall be placed in a container of boiling water, and shall be
supported on edge and be entirely immersed. At the end of 120±4 min, the specimens
shall be removed from the water and cooled in distilled water maintained at room
temperature. After 15±1 minutes, the specimens shall be removed from the water, one at
a time, all surface water removed with a dry cloth, and the specimens weighed to the
nearest 0.0001 g immediately. If the specimen is 1/16 inches. or less in thickness, it shall
2.2.3 Calculations
The percentage increase in weight during immersion, calculated to the nearest 0.01%,
47
wetweight conditionedweight
Increaseinweight ,% 100 (8)
conditionedweight
48
CHAPTER III
PROCEDURE
First, three samples are cut from each kind of composite sheet, then each of them
There are three major components in the hardware setup of the tester,
49
3.2 Transformer
employed for applying the voltage. A HIP / 750 – 2 – A model AC Dielectric test set was
used.
A diagram of the front panel of the test set is shown below, with the main parts
o Main Power Control: This is a toggle switch with a power rating of less
than 2 kVA.
50
o Control Power Circuit Breaker: This serves both as a switch and a
protection device for the control circuitry. An indicator lights when the
o The dielectric test set provides a range of discharge free test power for a
output.
51
Current Meter 0-40 mA ac, 2 percent accuracy
overload circuitry serves as the first overload for the system. Any
excessive amount of current flowing in the test loop activates the circuit
52
and de-energizes the high voltage transformer. The circuitry activates in
the control cabinet that enable the user to install safety interlocks in the
test area. When these interlocks are open, it is impossible to activate the
o High Voltage Button: The high voltage can be activated by pressing the
activating the high voltage unless the voltage regulator is set to zero.
When the HV OFF button is pressed, the high voltage transformer is de-
energized.
knob must always be returned to zero at the end of each test. There is an
resistive divider.
For this study the pre-operational test was performed by TRS Rentelco.
53
Test procedure:
Before any connections are made, a pre-operational test is to be made; this test
o Raise the voltage using the voltage control knob, observing the regulator
o Turn OFF the main power and source power breakers and connect primary
o Energize the main power source and activate the main power circuit
breaker. Repeat the steps and monitor the output voltage of the system.
o Set the overload sensitivity control so the unit shuts off the at the desired
resistance of the test sample between the high voltage output and
ground.
54
Press RESET pushbutton.
o Connect the low end of the test sample to ground with a conductor large
o Connect the high end of the test sample to the output bushing of the
transformer.
o Turn ON the main power circuit breaker, control power circuit breaker,
o Raise the output voltage to the desired test level by using the raise voltage
control knob.
o When the test is complete, return the raise voltage control knob to zero
For this study the current and voltage meters were calibrated by TRS Rentelco.
55
Connect a suitable 1 percent standard current meter between the
adjustment.
Increase the output current until the external current meter reading
transformer.
output.
A Plexiglas chamber which encloses the electrodes and the Plexiglas fixture
immersed in oil is used for measuring the dielectric breakdown voltage of different
56
composite materials. The left bottom electrode is connected to the supply voltage, the
right electrode is connected to the ground and the top electrode is connected to the
Ground.
The small Plexiglass fixture mainly helps to make a contact between the two
electrodes in between whom the samples are placed for testing. The glass fixture is
For the 67.5 mm Samples: The electrodes for measuring the breakdown voltage of these
[19].
57
Figure 3.5. Picture shows the two types of electrodes used
For the 37.5 mm Samples: The electrodes for measuring the breakdown voltage of
radius.
We used mineral oil for measuring the breakdown voltage to avoid flashover and the
effects of partial discharges prior to breakdown. Testing in air may require large
specimens or cause heavy surface discharges and burning before breakdown. The quality
of insulating oil can have an appreciable effect on the test results [20].
Particulate contaminants are especially important when very thin specimens are
being tested. Depending upon the nature of the oil and the properties of the material
58
being tested, other properties, including dissolved gas content, water content, and
dissipation factor of the oil may affect the test results. Frequent replacement of the oil or
the use of filters and other reconditioning equipment may be necessary to minimize the
effect of variations of the quality of the oil on the test results [20].
For this case we glued two 37.5 mm samples and measured the breakdown
voltage across them using the 51 mm electrodes. However, as we increased the voltage
there was a breakdown exactly at the middle of the two samples, at the point where the
glue was applied. This made us think that the glue which was used may be of a low
breakdown voltage [24]. So, to overcome the breakdown at the center of the samples, we
used a gel (Blue RTV Silicone Gel) that has better performance than a normal gel for
gluing the samples. Still, there were a couple of samples that did break at the glued
59
However, there was a significant increase in breakdown voltage when glued samples
tested with 51 mm diameter electrodes were compared to the individual samples tested
3.7 Observations
The ramping of the voltage should be done very patiently, since it is very
sensitive and a sudden ramp could destroy the samples, which is not reversible.
The current increased very slowly (as we followed the step by step voltage
application method) for most of the insulating samples while we increased the
voltage levels but once the breakdown occurred the current levels increase
quickly.
The current increased suddenly for the conductive samples as we ramped the
voltage.
For some of the samples (Phenolic, Polyester) with moisture content the current
increased to a higher level and then decreased as we ramped the voltage, but again
There was a big flash and sound when the breakdown occurred.
We observed some sparks between the electrodes and lots of smoke when the
The smoke and small particulates get settled and dispersed in the oil, which is not
sample breakdown which can be felt while replacing the samples or removing the
The electrodes left their marks on the samples if the electrodes were not properly
cleaned.
The samples should not be broken and should be smooth for testing.
The junction where the electrodes are connected to the ground and high voltage
should be sealed or shrouded properly with a silicone gel to minimize the effect of
A table made of an insulating material is preferred for use with these kinds of
Breakdown tree paths can be observed if the sample subjected to high voltages is
broken or divided into two pieces exactly at the point where the breakdown
61
CHAPTER IV
For this test we first tested the samples which are not immersed in mineral oil and
then we immersed the same kind of samples in mineral oil for 24 hrs and then tested
them, but as we can see there is no significant difference in the breakdown voltage. This
demonstrates that the test procedure of immersing the samples in the mineral oil did not
lead to different breakdown data due to absorbed mineral oil during the test. Thus we
didn‟t need to submerge the materials in the mineral oil for 24 hrs before we tested them.
( Note: Absence of error bars in any of the graphs indicates only one sample was tested
10
0
1 2 3 4
Samples
Figure 4.1. Plot showing the dielectric breakdown field for four different materials of
67.5 mm samples.
62
4.2 67.5 mm Samples
The electrical breakdown field of the materials without any moisture content was
first evaluated to quantify the influence of the changes due to moisture content. Figures
4.1 and 4.2 show the average breakdown value of 3 samples tested as normal (without
moisture content) composites for 67.5 mm samples, electrical samples (67.5 mm), 37.5
mm samples and some glued samples. As expected, the breakdown voltages reduced
significantly compared to the moisture-free samples. This can be mainly due to the
moisture content or water absorbed by the samples while immersed. It is also noteworthy
that some samples with moisture content were conductive as soon as they were subjected
63
Figure 4.4. Polyester with mat and roving Figure 4.5. Polyester with hemp filler
10
0
W.L S.P N.F Hub 1 Ark 12 AOC
polyester samples with different fillers
Figure 4.6. Breakdown Fields with standard deviation of different 67.5 mm Polyester
samples without and with moisture content (error bars indicate the standard deviation).
64
67.5 mm Polyurethane samples with
standard deviation
without moisture with moisture
0
BDD 1 BNX BNN BDD 2 BAS
Polyurethane samples with different fillers
Figure 4.7. Breakdown Fields with standard deviation of different 67.5 mm Polyurethane
samples without and with moisture content (error bars indicate the standard deviation).
Table 4.1. Table shows the average fields of 67.5 mm samples without moisture
65
BNX 05-32 BNX 12 0.6464
Table 4.2. Table shows the average fields of 67.5 mm sampleswith moisture
66
67.5 mm samples
without moisture with moisture
16
Polyester samples Polyurethane samples
14
Avg. Field (kV/mm) 12
10
8
6
4
2
0
W.L S.P N.F Hub 1 Ark 12 AOC BDD 1 BNX BNN BDD 2 BAS
Different 67.5 mm samples
Figure 4.8. Breakdown Fields of all different 67.5 mm samples without and with moisture
content.
samples are conductive, we can expect the breakdown voltage to be very low compared
to the insulating samples. The electrical samples showed this typical behavior by
conducting at low voltages and by breaking down quickly as we increased the voltage. (
Note: Absence of error bars in any of the graphs indicates only one sample was tested
67
Figure 4.9. 67.5 mm samples with carbon veil before test
Electrical Samples
without moisture with moisture
14
12
Avg. Fields (kV/mm)
10
8
6
4
2
0
1 2 3
Electrical Samples with different veils
Figure 4.10. Plot showing the dielectric breakdown field of 67.5 mm Electrical samples.
68
4.4 37.5 mm Samples
Figure 4.11. 37.5 mm sample before test Figure. 4.12. 37.5 mm sample after test
10
0
Fill 1 Fill 11 Fill 9
Epoxy samples
Figure 4.13. Breakdown Fields with standard deviation of different 37.5 mm Epoxy
samples without and with moisture content (error bars indicate the standard deviation).
69
37.5 mm polyester samples with
standard deviation
Avg.Field (kV/mm) without moisture with moisture
10
0
ATH HUB FUP FUP FUP 01 FUP 08 FUP 10 FUP 3 FUP 2 FUP 1
19 046 047
polyester samples
Figure 4.14. Breakdown Fields with standard devation of different 37.5 mm Polyester
samples without and with moisture content (error bars indicate the standard deviation).
10
0
NG 07 B&G
phenolic and polyurethane sample
70
Figure 4.15. Breakdown Fields with standard devation of different 37.5 mm Phenolic and
Polyurethane samples without and with moisture content (error bars indicate the standard
deviation).
Table 4.3. Table shows the average fields of 37.5 mm with moisture
71
Table 4.4. Table shows the average fields of 37.5 mm samples with moisture
72
37.5 mm samples
Polyurethane
without moisture with moisture
14
Phenolic
12
Epoxy Polyester
Avg. Field (kV/mm)
10
8
6
4
2
0
Fill 1 Fill Fill 9 ATH HUB FUP FUP FUP FUP FUP FUP FUP FUP NG B&G
11 19 046 047 01 08 10 3 2 1 07
Different 37.5 mm samples
Figure 4.16. Breakdown Fields of all different 37.5 mm samples without and with
moisture content.
These are the same sample as the 37.5 mm samples but two 37.5 mm samples are
joined at the edge with RTV blue silicone gel. (Note: Absence of error bars in any of the
73
Figure. 4.17. Glued sample before test Figure. 4.18. Glued sample after test
14
12
Field (kV/mm)
10
8
6
4
2
0
Fill 11 Fill 9
Glued epoxy samples
74
Glued polyester samples
without moisture with moisture
14
12
Field (kV/mm)
10
8
6
4
2
0
HUB 19 FUP 046 FUP 01 FUP 10 FUP 2 FUP 1
Glued polyester samples
Figure 4.20. Breakdown Fields of different Polyester-glued samples without and with
moisture content.
8
6
4
2
0
NG 07 without moisture NG 07 with moisture
Glued phenolic samples
Figure 4.21. Breakdown Fields of Phenolic-glued samples without and with moisture
content.
75
Glued Polyurethane Sample
14
12
Field (kV/mm)
10
8
6
4
2
0
B&G without moisture B&G with moisture
Figure 4.22. Breakdown Fields of Polyurethane-glued samples without and with moisture
content.
14 Polyester
Epoxy
12
Field (kV/mm)
10
8
6
4
2
0
Fill 11 Fill 9 HUB FUP FUP 01 FUP 10 FUP 2 FUP 10 NG 07 B&G
19 046
Glued samples
Figure 4.23. Breakdown Fields of different glued samples without and with moisture
content.
76
4.6 Comparison of Breakdown fields with different resin types
For this test we considered only the different types of resins tested. For 67.5 mm
samples we considered:
Polyester resin
Polyurethane resin
(Note: Absence of error bars in any of the graphs indicates only one sample was tested)
67.5 mm Samples
without moisture with moisture
14
Avg. Fields (kV/mm)
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Polyurethane Polyester (Ark) Polyester with Polyester with
(BNX) mat and roving hemp filler(NF)
(WL)
Samples
Figure 4.24. Breakdown Fields and standard deviation of different 67.5 mm samples with
77
For the one inch samples we considered,
Epoxy resin
Polyurethane resin
Phenolic resin
37.5 mm Samples
without moisture with moisture
14
Avg. Fields (kV/mm)
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Epoxy (Fill 11) Polyester 1 Polyester 2 Phenolic (NG Polyurethane
(FUP 2) (Hub 19 ) 07) (B&G)
Samples
Figure 4.25. Breakdown Fields with standard deviation of different 37.5 mm samples
with different resin systems (error bars indicate the standard deviation).
78
Glued Samples
without moisture with moisture
14
Figure 4.26. Breakdown Fields of different Glued samples with different resin systems
5
Polyester Polyurethane
4
percent increase
1 1.52 1.43
0.49 0.45 1.26 1.23 0.11 0.82 0.085 0.068 0.069
0
W.L S.P N.F Hub 1 Ark 12 AOC BDD 1 BNX BNN BDD 2 BAS
67.5 mm samples
Figure 4.27. Plot showing the percentage increase in weight for all 67.5 mm samples
79
percent increase in weight for 37.5 mm
samples Polyurethane
4 4.69
3
2
1
0.084 0.009 0.16 1.29 0.119 0.147 0.136 0.213 0.112 0.112 0.103 0.108 0.129 0.007
0
Fill 1 Fill 11 Fill 9 ATH HUB FUP FUP FUP FUP FUP FUP 3 FUP 2 FUP 1 NG B&G
19 046 047 01 08 10 07
37.5 mm samples
Figure 4.28. Plot showing the percentage increase in weight for all 37.5 mm samples
The main challenge during the whole process of testing the breakdown voltage
came when the voltage divider built in the dielectric test set malfunctioned. The test set
was not showing the correct value where the breakdown was occurring, while most of the
samples were breaking at what seemed to be below 5 kV. The current levels were high
for a 5 kV applied voltage and the samples were breaking very easily.
relatively thick sheet piling samples, which broke down at what read as less than 4 kV.
The noise from the transformer, which originally was not loud until nearly 25 kV, made
set was not working properly and we needed to build a new circuit. Meanwhile we tested
using the center knob which is rated from 0-100 percent of the total voltage; however this
knob is not calibrated so we made a note of all the values following the knob and at the
end we calibrated the knob using the newly built voltage divider circuit connected across
the two electrodes. We would have waited to do this, but parts had to be ordered and the
input voltage, E. The output voltage is measured using a voltmeter. The input voltage is
the voltage of the voltage source. For the Voltage divider circuit, the resistors used are of
high wattage. The power rating indicates how much power the resistor can safely
tolerate. If the maximum rating of the resistor is exceeded, it will become extremely hot
and even burn. We opted for high wattage resistors to find the exact readings of the
81
circuit. We used 3 resistors of value 100 MΩ (R1), 100 MΩ (R2) and 100 KΩ (R3) in
order to make the calculations easy. In this process we also simulated the voltage divider
circuit in Multisim [26] and looked at the power of 100M resistors and the power of the
100K resistor, Fig. 4.35 and Fig. 4.36 show the power rating curves for both resistors.
Also a Table has been listed in the appendix with the specifications of the resistors we
used.
Center knob
used for testing.
82
The power ratings for the 100M resistor was 10W and the maximum power was
6.24W, when the source voltage was 50kV, similarly the power ratings for the 100K
resistor was 5W and the maximum power was 62mW, when the source voltage was
50kV.
Figure 4.32. Voltage divider circuit used for measuring the output voltage
83
Figure 4.34. Output voltage Vs Source voltage 100K resistor
Figure 4.35. Power rating curves for 100M resistor through which we know the
84
Figure 4.36. Power rating curves for 100K resistor through which we know the maximum
R3
Vout E (2)
R1 R2 R3
R1 R2 R3
E Vout (3)
R3
4.10 SEM
Observation of the breakdown paths was performed with a JSM -6100 scanning
technique was performed [27]. A straight line was first scored in one time on either sides
of the perforation hole, purposely avoiding the vicinity of the hole (Figure 4.36).
The scanning electron microscope was operated under the following conditions:
85
Accelerating Voltage 2KeV to 5KeV
The samples were then broken away at room temperature using a Buehler
diamond wafer dial. SEM photographs of the polyester samples without and with mat
and roving are shown in Figure 4.38 thru 4.42. Fibers in the extended thin layer were
totally non-sustained, as we can see in the Figures 4.38 and 4.39. The unidirectional
glass fibers seem to be melted and formed into chunks of glass due to high temperature
during the breakdown. The photographs were not clearly visible during the SEM analysis
because of the charging of the non-conductive samples from these glass fibers-formed
chunks. Figures 4.40 and 4.41 clearly show the SEM image of the composite.
86
Figures 4.38. and 4.39. The SEM images of the Polyester samples.
Figure 4.38 shows the breakdown area of the composite where we can clearly see
the unidirectional glass fibers in the middle and then a big dark area on either side of the
sample where there is significant charging of the sample. Figure 4.39 shows the area
which is not affected by the breakdown; here we can see the unidirectional glass fibers.
In Figures 4.40 and 4.41, the breakdown is clealry visible; we can see the unidirectional
glass fibers melted down into glass chunks and a breakdown path is created. Similarly in
Figure 4.42, the SEM image of a polyester sample with mat and roving sample is shown.
The glass fibers in this sample have also melted due to the high temperature attained
Figures 4.40. and 4.41. The SEM images of the breakdown area in polyester samples.
87
Figures 4.42 shows the SEM image of the breakdown area in polyester with mat and
roving samples.
88
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS
In this work, the dielectric breakdown voltages for different composites with
different resin systems have been discussed and compared. We tested both 67.5 mm and
data was recorded which can be useful for designing any electrical apparatus where
breakdown voltage is one of the main factors. The samples were tested in two different
conditions, without any moisture and with moisture content, according to ASTM D 570 -
95. However, the samples with moisture content did show a reduction in the breakdown
voltage when compared. Also an analysis was done to study the leakage currents when
applying voltage. Most of the samples did not allow any currents until 10-12 kV, but
then they started to pass current slowly allowing a high current at the breakdown. The
phenolic and some of the polyester samples did show a different property compared with
all other samples in the case when samples subjected to moisture were tested for
breakdown strength. These two samples behaved in a similar way to the electrical
samples which are conductive and pass high currents at low voltages. The main reason
for this could be the moisture in the phenolic and some polyester samples. These samples
absorb a good amount of water when they are boiled in water for 120 min. As a result,
the voids inside the samples store the moisture and release it when a high voltage is
applied.
89
We have also analyzed the effect of oil-immersed samples on the breakdown
voltage, and the analysis revealed that oil immersion does not affect the samples‟
breakdown voltage in this case. However, the analysis on glued samples showed us that
if a proper gluing technique is used the breakdown values are the same for 1 inch and
glued 2 inch samples. An SEM analysis was done for the ladder rail and phenolic samples
to study the molecular damage that occurred when a high voltage passed through them.
90
REFERENCES
91
[1] http://www.science.org.au/nova/059/059key.htm
[2] http://composite.about.com/library/glossary/n/bldef-n3566.htm
[3] Mahesh Akula, “Effect of Heat and Moisture on the Mechanical Properties of
2009.
Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, 1997. IEEE 1997 Annual Report.,
1 2 2 1,2 1
[5] P. Bergero, F. Peruani, G. Solovey, I. M. Irurzun, J. L. Vicente, and E. E.
1, “
Mola Dielectric breakdown model for conductor-loaded and insulator-loaded
1
composite materials” INIFTA (CONICET, CICPBA,Universidad Nacional de La
2
Plata), Sucursal 4, Casilla de Correo 16,(1900LaPlata,Argentina Departamento de
[7] http://www.eod.gvsu.edu/eod/manufact/manufact-254.html#pgfId-511624
92
[8] http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Evolution_of_Technology/composites/Te
ch40.htm
[10] http://compositeadvantage.com/
[11] http://www.composites.co.nz/advantages&properties.htm
[12] http://composite.about.com/od/applications/Applications_of_Composites_and_Pla
stics.htm
[13] http://www.msm.cam.ac.uk/phase-trans/2001/stef/stef.htm
[16] John Joseph O'Dwyer, “The Theory of Electrical Conduction and Breakdown in
[17] Electrical Insulation Magazine, IEEE. Volume 3, Issue 1, Jan. 1987 Page(s):46 -
51
[18] Ekberg, M.; Gustafsson, A.; Leijon, M.; Bengtsson, T.; Eriksson, T.; Tornkvist, C.;
93
Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation”, IEEE Transactions on, Volume 2, Issue 5,
[20] ASTM D 149 – 97a, “Standard Test Method for Dielectric Breakdown Voltage and
Frequencies”, 1997.
Insulation”, 1983.
[22] ASTM D 570 – 95, “Standard Test Method for Water Absorption of Plastics”,
1998.
[24] Electrical Power Equipment Maintenance and Testing, By Paul Gill, Edition: 2,
[25] http://hobby_elec.piclist.com/e_resistor.htm
94
APPENDIX
95
Table A.1. Table shows the values for a Normal test for 67.5 mm Polyester and
Polyurethane sample
11. 12.
10.
BDD
96
2 5
Table A.2. Table shows the values for a moisture test for 67.5 mm Polyester and
Polyurethane sample
11. 11.
W.L 4 4 11.4 0 3.86 0 2.946
15. 22.
S.P 4 4 18.9 4.949 3.85 1.00 4.092
34. 30.
Ark 12 7 6 32.65 2.899 10.23 0.905 3.2
BDD
36.
1 1 33 34.55 2.192 10.72 0.680 3.22
34. 36.
BNX 7 1 35.4 0.989 11 0.307 3.22
36.
BDD 37 1 36.55 0.636 11.42 0.198 3.2
97
2
14.
BAS 6 11 12.8 2.545 4.1 0.815 3.12
Table A.3. Table shows the values for a normal test for 37.5 mm Epoxy, Polyester,
Fill 3.27
HUB 3.5
FUP 3.42
FUP 3.30
FUP 3.75
98
FUP 3.75
FUP 3.73
FUP 3.47
FUP 3.47
FUP 3.58
NG 0.964 3.35
2.450 3.35
Table A.4.Table shows the values for a moisture test for 37.5 mm Epoxy, Polyester,
Standard Thickne
99
Fill 1 28.2 19.2 23.7 6.363 7.24 1.9496 3.27
HUB 3.5
FUP 3.42
FUP 3.30
4.525 3.35
7.424 3.35
100
Table A.5. Table shows the values for a normal test for Glued Epoxy, Polyester, Phenolic
Fill 11 38 9.17
Fill 9 27 7.54
NG 07 17.7 5.28
B&G 37 11.04
Table A.6. Table shows the values for a Moisture test for Glued Epoxy, Polyester,
101
Name Average (kV) Average (kV/mm)
Fill 11 34 10.4
Fill 9 25 6.98
FUP 01 27 7.2
NG 07 17 4.94
Table A.7. Table shows the values of weights of different 67.5 mm samples before and
102
HUB 1 0.123 18.3822 18.6070
Table A.8.Table shows the values of weights of different 67.5 mm samples before and
103
Table A.9.Table shows the values of weights of different 37.5 mm samples before and
104
Table A.10.Table shows the values of weights of different 37.5 mm samples before and
105
Table A.11.Table shows the specifications of the 100K resistor
Category Resistors
Family Wire wound
Series RS
Resistance In Ohms 100K
Power (Watts) 5W
Tolerance ±1%
Lead Style PC Pins (Through Hole)
Case Axial
Packaging Cut Tape (CT)
Composition Wire wound
Temperature Coefficient ±20ppm/°C
Category Resistors
Family Metal Oxide Film
Series SUPER-MOX
Resistance In Ohms 100M
Power (Watts) 10W
Tolerance ±1%
Lead Style PC Pins (Through Hole)
Case Axial
Packaging Bulk
Composition Metal Oxide Film
Temperature Coefficient ±50ppm/°C
106