Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
(1988) self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior posits that individuals behave in a manner that maintains or enhances
positive self-evaluation. Likewise, the need for self-enhancement
is suggested to underlie the egos fabrication and revision of
personal history (Greenwald, 1980, p. 603)that is, various
cognitive biases organize self-knowledge with the goal of protecting or increasing self-esteem. Furthermore, Sedikides and Strubes
(1997) Self-Concept Enhancing Tactian model proposes that selfenhancement is fundamental to other key motives involved in
self-appraisal. Individuals seek to maintain consistency among
existing self-concepts, reduce uncertainty regarding the self, and
make genuine improvement in their traits and abilities so as to
maintain or enhance the positivity of their self-conceptions. Taken
together, these self-theories provide converging formulations of
individuals motivation to maintain positive self-evaluations at
least in western cultures (see Heine & Lehman, 1997; Heine,
Lehman, Markus, & Kitayama, 1999, on the issue of universality
vs. cultural specificity of the self-enhancement need).
SELF-ENHANCING EVALUATIONS
Method
Sample
The sample consisted of 301 participants from the Wisconsin Study of
Community Relocation (RELOC; Kling et al., 1997; Kling, Seltzer, &
Ryff, 1997; Ryff & Essex, 1992; Smider, Essex, & Ryff, 1996). Criteria for
eligibility and procedure for participant recruitment were detailed in Kling
et al. (1997).
All participants completed four waves of data collection: Most T1
assessments (87%) were conducted at least 1 month (Mdn 4 months,
range 1 to 33 months) before the move date. The three postmove
assessments were conducted at approximately 12 months (T2), 7 8
months (T3), and 14 15 months (T4) after the move. Because 35 (12%) of
the 301 participants reported missing data in at least one of the study
variables, the final sample for the present study was reduced to 266 women
(88%) who provided complete data for all four waves of assessments.
In terms of demographic background at T1, the women in the final
sample were, on average, 69 years old (SD 8) and had completed 14
years of education (SD 3). About half of the participants were widowed,
27% were married or living with a partner, 13% were divorced, 8% were
never married or not living with a partner, and 1% was separated. The
majority of the participants (98%) were White. Prior to their moves, most
participants owned a home (56%) and lived alone (66%). Finally, most
participants were healthy, as indicated by their mean rating of 5.22
(SD 1.03) on their overall health on a scale of 1 ( poor) to 7 (excellent).
Participants in the final sample and those excluded from it were comparable with respect to the above background characteristics at T1 except that
the latter were slightly older (M 72, SD 8; t 1.89, p .06).
All participants reported strong reasons for needing to relocate. High
costs of home (e.g., taxes, utilities, maintenance), that the home is larger
than needed, and the desire for a safer, more secure place to live were rated
by the highest percentages of participants (41%, 40.6%, and 38%, respectively) as moderately or extremely important reasons for moving. In
terms of the extent to which relocation was the participants idea rather
than someone elses, a summary index of involuntariness on a 9 54 scale
was created by summing the ratings from nine items of involuntariness on
a 1 6 scale. Higher scores indicated higher levels of involuntariness. On
average, the participants were quite voluntary in their decision to relocate,
as indicated by the relatively low average score on the summary index
(M 19.43, SD 6.71).
Measures
Self-enhancing evaluations. Based on Rosenbergs (1979) self-concept
theory, measures of self-enhancing evaluations were constructed (Ryff &
Essex, 1992). Participants were asked to evaluate themselves based on their
perceptions of how they fare when compared with others in their social
environment (social comparisons) and their perceived feedback from others about themselves (reflected appraisals). Each kind of evaluation was
measured by four items balanced between negative and positive phrasing
framed in five life domains, including health, friends, daily activities,
family, and economics, resulting in a 20-item scale. A strongly disagree (1)
to strongly agree (6) response format was adopted. A sample item of social
comparisons in the friends domain was I feel my relationships with my
friends are closer than most peoples are. A sample item of reflected
appraisals in the health domain was My friends and family give me the
impression that my health is failing.
This scale was used in previous studies of RELOC data and has shown
good reliability (Ryff & Essex, 1992; Kling et al., 1997). In the present
study, strong reliability coefficients were obtained for each subscale as
follows: alpha coefficients .80 at T1, .81 at T2, and .83 at T3 for reflected
appraisals, and alpha coefficients .81 at T1, .84 at T2, and .84 at T3 for
social comparisons. Higher scores indicate higher levels of social comparisons and reflected appraisals.
Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to assess whether social
comparisons and reflected appraisals could be parsimoniously represented
by a composite 40-item self-enhancing evaluations scale. A one-factor
model and a two-factor model were fitted to 10 domain-specific subscale
scores, 5 specific to social comparisons and 5 specific to reflected appraisals. Error variances between subscale scores of the same life domains were
allowed to be correlated. Results revealed that the two-factor model provided a significantly better fit than the one-factor model, 2(1) 24.77,
p .001. In addition, given the sample size and number of model
parameters, the two-factor model provided an excellent fit to the data
(root-mean-square error of approximation .047). Thus, social comparisons and reflected appraisals were examined separately in subsequent
analyses.
Psychological well-being. Positive mental health was assessed using
Ryffs six scales of psychological well-being; (Ryff, 1989a, 1989b; Ryff &
Keyes, 1995). Derived from the literatures on life-span development,
mental health, and personal growth, these cover multiple dimensions of
positive psychological functioning, including positive relations with others,
autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, personal growth, and
self-acceptance. Shortened versions (14-item scales) of the original scales
were used in the present study. Satisfactory internal reliability was obtained
(alpha coefficients ranged from .77 to .85 at T1, and from .81 to .90 at T4).
Items for the scales were mixed into a single self-report inventory administered according to a strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (6) response
format.
To minimize content overlap between self-evaluations and psychological well-being, we removed psychological well-being items that connote
social-comparison or reflected-appraisal activities from the scales. As a
result, the scales for positive relations with others and self-acceptance
consisted of only 11 items for the present analyses.
Depressive symptoms. Negative mental health was assessed with the
Center for Epidemiological StudiesDepression scale (CESD; Radloff,
1977). This 20-item measure assesses depressed mood or affect rather than
clinical depression. Reliability was satisfactory at T1 ( .82) and T4 (
.89). One item with connotation of social comparison was dropped to
Results
Cross-Time Mean Level Analyses
To reiterate, the present study sought to investigate the connections between social self-evaluations and mental health. The first
analyses examined cross-time mean-level differences in the predictor and outcome variables. The key predictors, social comparisons and reflected appraisals, were considered dynamically across
time (T1T2, T2T3). Changes in psychological well-being and
CESD from T1 to T4 were the outcome variables.
Table 1
Self-Evaluations and Mental Health From T1 Through T4: Means and Standard Deviations (N 266)
T1
T2
T3
T4
Subscale
SD
SD
SD
SD
Fa
Social Comparisons
Reflected Appraisals
Positive Relations
Autonomy
Environmental Mastery
Personal Growth
Purpose in Life
Self-Acceptance
CESD
82.38
89.41
53.84
62.07
64.74
67.62
64.48
49.99
10.19
13.39
12.19
8.31
8.71
8.80
9.28
9.66
8.21
7.48
83.67
90.41
54.48
63.20
67.39
69.00
65.88
51.43
8.00
13.75
12.71
7.99
9.26
9.19
9.27
9.79
8.17
6.99
83.96
91.47
54.79
64.06
67.93
68.92
65.86
51.64
7.02
13.76
12.56
8.17
9.19
9.28
9.21
9.83
8.24
7.06
82.72
89.96
53.86
62.52
66.81
67.25
64.24
51.07
8.00
13.74
12.82
8.21
8.91
9.17
9.57
10.13
8.26
8.30
4.25**
7.47***
4.16*
10.25***
27.49***
12.85***
10.77***
10.05***
16.87***
SELF-ENHANCING EVALUATIONS
Table 2
Correlations Among Mental Health Variables at T1 and T4 (N 266)
Variable
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
T1PR
T1AU
T1EM
T1PG
T1PL
T1SA
T1CESD
T4PR
T4AU
T4EM
T4PG
T4PL
T4SA
T4CESD
10
11
12
13
14
.20
.48
.36
.50
.54
.31
.80
.16
.46
.33
.45
.48
.34
.35
.39
.32
.36
.16
.29
.78
.39
.40
.35
.42
.23
.40
.65
.66
.49
.53
.32
.73
.37
.58
.61
.47
.63
.40
.18
.35
.33
.36
.80
.56
.39
.17
.71
.37
.51
.28
.52
.55
.77
.59
.36
.42
.50
.32
.55
.39
.63
.77
.40
.31
.12
.37
.08
.31
.40
.50
.30
.63
.42
.58
.62
.35
.47
.44
.40
.46
.14
.48
.70
.75
.54
.70
.54
.17
.77
.44
.50
Note. PR Positive Relations with others, AU Autonomy, EM Environmental Mastery, PG Personal Growth, PL Purpose in Life, SA
Self-Acceptance, CESD Center for Epidemiological StudiesDepression Scale. Correlations with an absolute value larger than .20 are significant at
p .001. Correlations with an absolute value larger than .16 are significant at p .01. Correlations with an absolute value larger than .12 are significant
at p .05.
quent mental health changes, after the effect of premove background differences were partialed out.
To examine the effect of early changes (T1T2) in selfevaluations on mental health changes over the course of relocation
(T1T4), we added T2 social comparisons or reflected appraisals at
Step 3 as the key predictor variable in two sets of analyses.1 The
various baseline measures entered at Steps 1 and 2 accounted for
considerable amount of variance of all dimensions of well-being
(for social comparisons, R2 .58 to .69, p .001; for reflected
appraisals, R2 .59 to .69, p .001) and CESD (for both
self-evaluative measures, R2 .37, p .001). With regard to the
residualized variance, Table 3 revealed that T2 social comparisons
significantly predicted improvements in all dimensions of wellbeing except purpose in life. On the other hand, T2 reflected
appraisals were associated with fewer dimensions of well-being,
namely, only positive relations and environmental mastery. Finally, neither self-evaluative measures in the early period of relocation were related to changes in depressive symptoms.
Table 4 shows findings from Step 3 of another two sets of
analyses on the effect of late changes (T2T3) in social comparisons and reflected appraisals on the same outcomes.2 Here T2
social comparisons or reflected appraisals were entered at Step 1 to
partial out the effect of the change in the respective measure from
shortly after the move to approximately 7 8 months later. After
both T1 and T2 social comparisons or reflected appraisals as well
as background differences were controlled at Steps 1 and 2, T3
1
In checking whether these analyses met the assumptions of multiple
regression, evidence of heteroscedasticity was found in the equations for
CESD. To address this issue, we normalized T1 and T4 CES-D distributions by taking the square root of the scale scores before using them in
regression analyses. This procedure yielded homogeneous residual variances over the range of predicted CESD values.
2
Evidence of heteroscedasticity was again observed in regression equations for CESD. T1 and T4 CESD were taken square root before being
used in regression analyses to resolve this issue.
Table 3
Regression Analyses: Effect of T1 to T2 Changes in Social Comparisons and Reflected
Appraisals on T1 to T4 Changes in Psychological Well-Being and Depression (N 266)
Social comparisons
Reflected appraisals
Outcome variable
R2
Positive Relations
Autonomy
Environmental Mastery
Personal Growth
Purpose in Life
Self-Acceptance
CESDa
.094
.103
.152
.130
.062
.107
.009
.158
.160
.227
.187
.084
.178
.084
.010**
.010**
.020***
.013***
.003
.012**
.003
.158
.079
.161
.044
.038
.049
.008
.245
.112
.224
.059
.047
.075
.069
.019***
.004
.016***
.001
.001
.002
.002
Table 4
Regression Analyses: Effect of T2 to T3 Changes in Social Comparisons and Reflected
Appraisals on T1 to T4 Changes in Psychological Well-Being and Depression (N 266)
Social comparisons
Outcome variable
Positive Relations
Autonomy
Environmental Mastery
Personal Growth
Purpose in Life
Self-Acceptance
CESDa
.037
.015
.192
.042
.166
.127
.035
.061
.023
.287
.060
.213
.211
.330
Reflected appraisals
R2
.001
.001
.019***
.001
.011**
.010**
.025***
.091
.017
.238
.161
.293
.242
.037
.140
.024
.326
.212
.363
.367
.321
R2
.005*
.001
.025***
.011**
.030***
.032***
.024**
SELF-ENHANCING EVALUATIONS
Table 5
Regression Analyses: Effect of T1 to T2 Changes in Psychological Well-Being and Depression on
T1 to T4 Changes in Social Comparisons and Reflected Appraisals (N 266)
Social comparisons
Reflected appraisals
Predictor variable
R2
Positive Relations
Autonomy
Environmental Mastery
Personal Growth
Purpose in Life
Self-Acceptance
CESD
.255
.144
.340
.128
.241
.430
.158
.151
.099
.232
.088
.175
.261
.082
.009**
.004
.022***
.003
.011**
.023***
.005
.192
.167
.330
.118
.238
.347
.154
.120
.121
.237
.085
.181
.221
.084
.006*
.006*
.023***
.003
.011**
.016***
.005*
Note. Only results at Step 3 are shown. CESD Center for Epidemiological StudiesDepression scale.
p .10. * p .05. ** p .01. *** p .001.
Discussion
This study examined the connection between self-enhancing
evaluations and psychological health in a later life transition,
community relocation. Our guiding conceptual framework was
that self-enhancing social comparisons and reflected appraisals
would be associated with gains in psychological well-being and
declines in depressive symptoms. Generally, the findings revealed
that older women who showed increased levels of social comparisons and reflected appraisals evidenced considerable gains in
Table 6
Regression Analyses: Effect of T2 to T3 Changes in Psychological Well-Being and Depression on
T1 to T4 Changes in Social Comparisons and Reflected Appraisals (N 266)
Social comparisons
Reflected appraisals
Predictor variable
R2
Positive Relations
Autonomy
Environmental Mastery
Personal Growth
Purpose in Life
Self-Acceptance
CESD
.202
.089
.316
.248
.266
.244
.211
.123
.061
.218
.170
.194
.149
.111
.004
.001
.014***
.008*
.010**
.007*
.007*
.249
.057
.239
.292
.218
.179
.212
.159
.041
.173
.210
.168
.115
.117
.007*
.001
.009**
.012**
.007**
.004
.008**
Note. Only results at Step 3 are shown. CESD Center for Epidemiological StudiesDepression scale.
p .10. * p .05. ** p .01. *** p .001.
10
multiple dimensions of psychological well-being as well as reductions of depression symptoms over the course of relocation. These
effects were found after controlling for age, education, marital
status, home ownership, subjective health ratings, involuntariness
of making the move, and premove levels of all psychological
variables.
While self-enhancement during this transition showed generally
strong connections to subsequent psychological changes, interesting patterns emerged regarding the differential actions of social
comparisons and reflected appraisals in early (T1T2) versus late
(T2T3) periods of the transition. Specifically, social comparisons
in both periods were linked to an encompassing variety of aspects
of psychological adaptation, suggesting that comparison processes
were active throughout the transition and had pervasive connections to mental health. Underscoring different evaluative processes, reflected appraisals were associated with gains in only
limited aspects of mental health in the early period, with their more
encompassing connections to mental health emerging later. To the
extent that reflected appraisals require knowing other people and
letting other people know oneself, this evaluative mechanism may
be used less frequently in the initial period of the move. It was
further into relocation (i.e., 1 month to 8 months after move) when
perception of feedback from others became more consequential for
most aspects of mental health.
Moving beyond our guiding conceptual framework, we also
examined the possibility that changes in mental health might
predict changes in self-evaluations. In fact, other studies have
suggested that mental health could be legitimately construed as an
antecedent to emotional reactions to relocation (Smider et al.,
1996). Here, a comparison of alternative regression models suggested that for select aspects of mental health, reciprocal causal
directionality indeed appeared to be operative. In particular, regardless of the temporal period, strong evidence of reciprocal
influence was observed for social comparisons with environmental
mastery and self-acceptance, suggesting that while higher levels of
self-enhancing social comparisons contributed to increased mastery of environmental challenges and increased self-acceptance,
these aspects of psychological wellness also led to higher levels of
self-enhancement via comparison processes. Likewise, regardless
of the temporal period, strong evidence of reciprocal influence was
found for reflected appraisals and environmental mastery, indicating that while increased self-enhancing reflected appraisals contributed to gains in environmental mastery, such gains in turn led
to perception of more positive social feedback. Overall, the apparent reciprocal influence between environmental mastery and both
evaluative mechanisms highlighted the fact that relocation is essentially a transition that requires adapting to and managing
changes in a new living environment. It appears that positive
self-construals via both evaluative mechanisms could help one
negotiate the many challenges associated with this transition (e.g.,
creating new daily routines; using resources available in the new
home), whereas being able to manage the new environment could,
in turn, lead to positive comparisons with others and perception of
positive social feedback about oneself.
The present study provides two contributions to the literature of
self-enhancement. First, given that much prior work in selfenhancing mechanisms has focused on social comparisons (Buunk
& Gibbons, 1997; Suls & Wills, 1991), this study is unique in
highlighting reflected appraisals as an additional avenue through
SELF-ENHANCING EVALUATIONS
References
Ahrens, A. H., & Alloy, L. B. (1997). Social comparison processes in
depression. In B. P. Buunk & F. X. Gibbons (Eds.), Health, coping, and
well-being (pp. 389 410). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in
depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of
Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441 485.
Armor, D. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1998). Situated optimism: Specific outcome
expectancies and self-regulation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 309 379.
Asendorpf, J. B., & Ostendorf, F. (1998). Is self-enhancement healthy?
Conceptual, psychometric, and empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 955966.
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on
successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 134). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bond, L. A., Cutler, S. J., & Grams, A. (Eds.). (1995). Promoting successful and productive aging. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Buunk, B. P., & Gibbons, F. X. (1997). Health, coping, and well-being:
Perspective from social comparison theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Colvin, C. R., & Block, J. (1994). Do positive illusions foster mental
health? An examination of the Taylor and Brown formulation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 320.
Colvin, C. R., Block, J., & Funder, D. C. (1995). Overly positive selfevaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 11521162.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York:
Scribner.
Felson, R. B. (1993). The (somewhat) social self: How others affect
self-appraisals. In J. M. Suls (Ed.), The self in social perspective:
Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 126). Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human
Relations, 7, 117140.
Gibbons, F. X., & Gerrand, M. (1991). Downward comparison and coping
with threat. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 317345). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goldscheider, F. K. (1994). Divorce and remarriage: Effects on the elderly
population. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 4, 253259.
Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of
personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603 618.
Heidrich, S. M. (1993). The relationship between physical health and
psychological well-being in elderly women: A developmental perspective. Research in Nursing and Health, 16, 123130.
Heidrich, S. M., & Ryff, C. D. (1993a). Physical and mental health in later
life: The self-system as mediator. Psychology and Aging, 8, 327338.
Heidrich, S. M., & Ryff, C. D. (1993b). The role of social comparison
processes in the psychological adaptation of elderly adults. Journal of
Gerontology, 48, P127P136.
Heine, S. H., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). The cultural construction of
self-enhancement: An examination of group-serving biases. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1268 1283.
11
12
of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 549 573.
Smider, N. A., Essex, M. J., & Ryff, C. D. (1996). Adaptation to community relocation: The interactive influence of psychological resources and
contextual factors. Psychology and Aging, 11, 362372.
Staudinger, U. M., Marsiske, M., & Baltes, P. B. (1993). Resilience and
levels of reserve capacity in later adulthood: Perspectives from life-span
theory. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 541566.
Suls, J., & Wills, T. A. (1991). Social comparison: Contemporary theory
and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of
cognitive adaptation. American Psychologist, 38, 11611173.
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social
psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103,
193210.
Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat:
Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review, 96,
569 575.
Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social
behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181227). New York: Academic Press.
Thuen, F., Reime, M. H., & Skrautvoll, K. (1997). The effect of widowhood on psychological well-being and social support in the oldest group
of the elderly. Journal of Mental Health UK, 6, 265274.
Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245271.