Planted ID card exposes Paris false flag

HomeFeaturedViewpoints Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:38AM

Police investigators search for evidence during an operation in the eastern
French city of Reims, January 8, 2015.
Police investigators search for evidence during an operation in the eastern
French city of Reims, January 8, 2015.
By KEVIN BARRETT
French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve says the terrorists who attacked
Charlie Hebdo would never have been caught had they not made one fatal
mistake: They conveniently left an ID card in their abandoned getaway car.

Since when did criminals leave their identification cards in abandoned

getaway cars?

An ordinary citizen, taking no precautions, might accidentally leave a wallet

or purse in their parked car. I have driven automobiles approximately 50,000
times in my life, and I think my wallet might have slipped out of my pocket
and fallen into the crack between the drivers seat and the door...once.

What are the odds that skilled terrorists who have just carried out an ultraprofessional special-forces style attack will accidentally leave their ID card in
the abandoned getaway car? Answer: Effectively zero.

So why are police reporting an event that cannot have happened?

Assuming that French police really did find terror suspect Said Kouachis ID
card in an abandoned getaway car, that ID card must have been planted by
someone wishing to incriminate Kouachi. Even the legendary French idiot
detective, Inspector Clouseau, could not fail to make this thunderingly
obvious inference.

The discovery of Kouachis ID does not implicate him; it exonerates him. It

shows that he is an innocent patsy who is being framed by the real

perpetrators of the attack.

Police and intelligence agencies routinely plant evidence to support false

narratives, convict innocent people, and exonerate themselves. American
police who kill unarmed citizens often plant a gun on the corpses to support
their claims of having killed in self-defense. Such throw-down guns, which the
police call ham sandwiches, are kept in police locker rooms and carried in
police cars in case they are needed.

Likewise, throw-down ID cards and other incriminating documents are

routinely used by the military, intelligence, and special forces professionals
who orchestrate false flag operations. Consider the ludicrously-obvious
planted evidence used in the mother of all false-flag operations: the
September 11th, 2001 inside job.

Intelligence agents planted not just one, but two magic suitcases designed
to incriminate Mohamed Atta, the innocent patsy framed for the crimes of
September 11th. According to Der Spiegels book Inside 9/11: What Really
Happened, the first Atta suitcase was handed to German police by a selfdescribed good Samaritan burglar. The so-called burglar claimed to have
stolen Attas suitcase during the course of a burglary and discovered
terrorism-related information in it. As an honorable citizen, this kind-hearted
burglar felt compelled by his conscience to deliver the suitcase to the
authorities.

According to Der Spiegel, the German police, not being fools, knew that the
self-styled burglar was not really a burglar at all, but an intelligence agent
planting fake evidence against Atta. Der Spiegel quotes German police as
saying: The only question is, which intelligence agency was he working for?
(CIA and Mossad, answered former German Intelligence Minister Andreas
Von Blow in his book The CIA and September 11th.)

Despite its absurd origins, this suitcase full of fabricated documents provides
virtually the only purported evidence supporting the official story of Attas
supposed terrorism-related activities in Germany. Aside from the good
Samaritan burglars suitcase, it seems that the original Egyptian Atta the

one in Germany was a gentle, shy, sensitive, soft-spoken architecture

student with no connections to terrorism of any kind. Yet the Atta who made
a spectacle of himself in Florida before 9/11, staging memorable public
scenes while all but wearing an I am an al-Qaeda terrorist sign around his
neck, was a coarse, obscene, violent loudmouthed braggart who dated
strippers, disemboweled kittens, and spoke fluent Hebrew.

The Hebrew-speaking Attas second and better-known magic suitcase was

the one he allegedly checked in on his early morning flight from Portland,
Maine to Boston on September 11th, 2001. According to the 9/11 Commission
Report, the suitcase was miraculously preserved and delivered to the
authorities when it somehow failed to make the transfer from Attas Portlandto-Boston commuter flight onto Flight 11, which Atta supposedly piloted into
the North Tower of the World Trade Center. Had the suitcase been transferred
as it should have been, we are told, it would have been destroyed in a fireball
at the World Trade Center.

This magic suitcase provided the only evidence allowing authorities to

identify the alleged 19 hijackers within 24 hours of the event. (None of the
9/11 passenger lists contained any Arab names; no airline employees
remember having ticketed or boarded any of the alleged hijackers; and none
of the hundreds of security cameras at Bostons Logan Airport, Washington
D.C.s Dulles Airport, or Newark Airport took a single authenticated frame of
any of the 19 Arabs blamed for 9/11.)

This suitcase not only contained a list of the 19 patsies, but also Attas
supposed last will and testament. (Why would a suicide hijacker check his will
onto a doomed plane?) Britains dean of Middle East journalism Robert Fisk
has ridiculed Attas alleged will, pointing out that it begins with a botched
bismillah: In the name of God, myself, and my family... No Muslim would
ever write such a thing. As Fisk suggests, the document purporting to be
Attas will must have been forged by an incompetent intelligence agent. The
suitcase was obviously planted.

And that is not just Robert Fisks opinion. Seymour Hersh, the dean of
American investigative journalism, quotes a senior US intelligence source as
saying, with regard to Attas magic suitcase: Whatever trail was left was left
deliberatelyfor the FBI to chase.

Attas two magic suitcases are not the only examples of clumsily-planted 9/11
evidence. Another is the magic passport of alleged 9/11 hijacker Satam alSuqami. That passport, looking as pristine as the magic bullet of the JFK
assassination, was allegedly discovered by an anonymous individual, with no
chain of custody, near the two flat spots of smoking ground where two 110story towers somehow exploded into very fine dust.

But Attas magic suitcases, the magic passport, beside the most patheticallyplanted 9/11 item of them all: The Fatty Bin Laden confession video
supposedly discovered in December 2001 by an anonymous US soldier in
Jalalabad, and delivered with no chain of possession to be brandished by the
Bush Administration as supposed proof of Bin Ladens guilt.

Professor Bruce Lawrence, a respected expert on Bin Laden, has categorically

stated of this video: Its bogus! Lawrence adds that his many
acquaintances in the US intelligence communitys Bin Laden units know that
the video is bogus but are afraid to say so in public, because they are afraid
of the implications of Bin Ladens innocence.

These and other examples show that the intelligence agents who orchestrate
false-flag terror spectacles often do not even bother to disguise the blatantlyfabricated nature of the planted evidence used to implicate patsies.

So we should not be terribly surprised when the French police tell us with a
straight face that a highly professional fleeing terrorist would leave his ID
card in an abandoned getaway car.