SPEN, the fashionable winter playground for Americas jet-set, where
5 the average house price is $1.1 million (666,000) and hedonism is a way of life, seems an unlikely setting for the debate of an emotionally-charged issue that could have worldwide repercussions. 10 Although the town, set in the Colorado Rockies, is dependent on its tourists for survival, it is those expensively-dressed, fur-clad visitors who find themselves unwittingly in the eye of a gathering storm. 15 For as the rich and famous ski by day and party by night, the towns 3,500 electors are preparing to go to the polls to vote on whether to make Aspen the first city in the world to ban the sale of fur coats made from 20wild animals. It is an issue that has turned the picturesque resort into something like a war zone, with the strident pro- and anti-ban fractions flinging insults and accusations against each other. It is 25also directly responsible for a separate motion on the ballot to oust from office the pro-ban mayor and three city councillors. To the unknowing visitors, it may seem a pointless battle. There are only a handful of fur 30shops in Aspen, and many of the furs in the town have flown in on the backs of visitors. But since Aspen was the first city in the U.S. to ban smoking in restaurants a trend that mushroomed across the country it is 35being seen as an issue of national importance. Nowadays, Aspen, which was once so proud of its community spirit, is a divided town. On one side is bookshop owner Katherine Thalberg, 54. She and her husband, Bill 40Sterling, the towns mayor, run the Aspen Society for Animal Rights. On the other side is the Aspen Concerned Citizens Coalition, headed by local fur shop manager Mark Kirkland, which is opposed to the ban. 45 Both sides are pouring money into the fight with television and full-page newspaper ad-
vertisements. The Animals Rights Societys
advertisements show graphic pictures of creatures with their legs caught in steel traps 50and the caption: Fur. Its Not a Pretty Business. The Concerned Citizens Coalition is countering with: If they can ban fur, they can ban meat and The American Way Freedom of 55Choice. The issue has become so heated that a group of women who went into a restaurant wearing fur coats were booed and jeered until they left. Other incidents are reported in which 60people wearing furs have been made to wait long time for tables in the towns restaurants, and, when seated, find the service is unusually slow. Some residents say they have received tele65phone calls from out-of-town friends asking if they were still allowed to wear their furs in the town.. Mr Kirkland says the ban would deter rich tourists who bring in millions of dollars. Its a 70public relations disaster, he says. We have created the most expensive ski resort in the world, and people who patronise it are the people who wear fur. They come to Aspen to wear their furs. 75 Although the furriers see the ban campaign as simply an attempt to put them out of business, there is far more to it. Generally, those in favour of the ban are the long-term residents, many of whom resent affluent tourists and 80second-home owners, who have pushed up prices and forced much-needed seasonal workers and restaurant staff to live far away. [Shortened and adapted from THE SUNDAY TELEGRAPH, Jan 28, 1990; 564 words.]