-1FIR No.

250/1995
PS- R.K. Puram
State v. R.K. Puram
05-02-2015
PW 22:

Ms. Deepa Verma W/o Shri Deepak Raj Soni,

Deputy Director, FSL, Rohini, Delhi

On S.A.
On 24-10-1996

I was posted as Sr. Scientific Officer

(Documents) at FSL, Malviya Nagar. I am M.Sc in chemistry from

Meerut university, Meerut.

I have more than 24 years of

experience in the field of documents examination. I had reported

lacs of exhibits and deposed in approx. 800 courts.
On 24-10-1996 the present case was marked to me for
examination of documents. The documents which were examined
in this case were signatures and writings on cheques, share
transfer forms etc. which were the questioned documents marked
as Q1 to Q14 with sub-markings. The standard/specimen writings
and signatures of one Ramesh Gupta were also received for
comparison which were marked as S1 to S-44, S-19/1 and S-19/2.
After thorough forensic examination, I furnished my
report

FSL-95/D-308

dated

24-10-1996

and

the

same

is

Ex.PW22/1 bearing my signature at point A. In the said report, I

opined that similarities in writing habits of the writings marked Q1
to Q14 and Q14/1 with the standard writings marked S-1 to S-19,
S-19/1, S-19/2 and S-22, S-44, which led me to the opinion of
common authorship. The details of examination and analysis is
mentioned in my above said report. However, on rest of the items
-2-

it was not possible to express definite opinion.

XXXXX by accused accused Ramesh Gupta.
Nil ; opportunity given.
XXXXX By Dayanand Arya, Counsel for accused Vinod Malik.
Nil ; opportunity given.
XXXXX By Tej Narain, Legal Aid Counsel for accused Vinod Kumar
Aggarwal and Sandeep Kumar.
Nil ; opportunity given.
XXXXXX By Shri Rajeev Jain, counsel for accused Ajay Kalia,
Upender Sehrawat and Kanwar Sain.
Nil ; opportunity given.
RO & AC
(VIVEK KUMAR GULIA)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (South)
Saket Courts, New Delhi/05-02-2015

-1FIR No. 281/2006

PS- Crime Branch
State v. Anil Kumar
Dhawan
05-02-2015
PW 19 : Shri Arun Kumar S/o Shri Sube Singh, aged about
30 years R/o Village Jouri Khurd, District Gurgaon,
Haryana.
On S.A.
In the year 2005 I was unemployed. My foofaji, Vijay
Kumar, came to our house at above mentioned address and told
that both of his sons, namely, Ranvir and Ravi, were getting
employment in Aakashwani Bhawan.

He told that accused,

present in the court today (correctly identified by the witness),

was providing the said job. My parents also asked for my
employment and told my Foofaji to talk to accused in this regard.
I went to Anil Kumar Bhawan and he demanded Rs.1.5 Lac for
employment for the post of LDC. I returned back to my house and
informed my parents about the same. My parents took loan of Rs.
One lac. I went to accused, who called me in Aakashwani Bhawan.
I along with accused went inside Aakashwani Bhawan and I
handed over Rs. One Lac to him and accused filled one form and
got my signatures on it. He told me that he would intimate about
the job after some days. After few days, he showed me one I-card
and appointment letter pertaining to myself and told that soon I
will get the job.

I was also got medically examined at Charak

Palika Hospital. However, after many days he was

-2-

ignoring on one pretext or the other. Lastly, I along with other

victims, namely, Inderjeet, Ranvir, Ravi, Krishan, Subhash and
Sunil, took I-cards and appointment letters from the accused and
lodged the complaint against him in Crime Branch Office, R.K.
Puram. We had given the I-cards and appointment letters to the
police.
(At this stage, five documents are shown to the witness and
witness stated that the same were given by accused and he had
signed on those documents. The documents are collectively
Ex.PW19/1 bearing the signature of witness at point A on each
page.)
(At this stage, one original I-card is shown to the witness and
witness stated that the same was given by accused. The I-card is
Ex.PW19/2 bearing the signature of witness at point A.)
(At this stage, one appointment letter is shown to the witness and
witness stated that the same was given by accused. The original
appointment letter is Ex.PW19/3.)
(At this stage, Ld. APP seeks permission to cross examine the
witness as he is not disclosing the complete facts of the case.
Heard. Allowed.
XXXXXX By Shri Anil Kumar Paswan, Ld. APP for the State
It is correct that my foofa ji told that accused was
working in Aakashwani Bhawan as Assistant. I had handed over
the appointment letter, which was photostate copy as well as
-3original, to the IO.

XXXXXX By Shri D.K. Sharma, counsel for accused

I have studied up to 12th standard. Accused had shown
the advertisement about the said vacancy in the newspaper. I had
not stated about this fact to the police.

VOL: It was not asked

from me. I did not handed over the copy of said advertisement
to police. My foofa ji is residing at Bagdola, Delhi. I know accused
through my foofaji only. I did not knew accused prior to that. It is
wrong to suggest that accused had not demanded the amount of
Rs. 1.5 Lac from me.

I had not stated to police that I was

medically examined at Charak Palika Hospital. VOL: As it was not

asked from me. It is correct that Ex.PW19/1 is not completely
filled. It is correct that their is no seal or name of any official on
Ex.PW19/1. I had not taken any receipt regarding payment of Rs.
One Lac to accused.

Only I myself had went to Aakashwani

Bhawan for payment of Rs. One Lac to accused. I was called by

accused through mobile phone.

I has not stated to the police

about the fact of calling me through phone. No acknowledgment

was given regarding delivery of I-card and appointment letter. It is
wrong to suggest that accused had not given any I-card and
appointment letter to me. It is correct that I have received Rs.
75,000/- out of said amount of Rs. One Lac from my foofaji
(complainant). I had not given any written complaint to the crime
branch. It is wrong to suggest that I never met accused or that I
gave Rs. One Lac to my foofa ji for my job or that I had not made
the payment to accused. It is correct that the photograph put on
-4Ex.PW19/3 bears my signature at point A. It is wrong to suggest
that the photographs were not taken by the accused but by my

foofa ji.

I had not handed over documents of my educational

qualification to police. It is wrong to suggest that I am deposing

falsely just for obtaining Rs.25,000/- from my foofaji.
RO & AC
(VIVEK KUMAR GULIA)
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (South)
Saket Courts, New Delhi/05-02-2015

CC No. 4211/2014
PS- Sangam Vihar
Suman v. Seema Devi
05-02-2015
Present :
Ms. Suman, complainant in person with counsel Shri
Arpit Sharma.
Accused Seema Devi on bail with counsel Shri L.A
Vashist.
Matter put up before this court pursuant to order
dated 23-01-2015 passed by the appellate court of Ld. ASJ-03,
South, Saket Courts, Delhi, for proceedings further with the trial of
this case or to assign it to any other court of competent
jurisdiction.
Put up for consideration on 11-02-2015 at 2 PM.

(VIVEK KUMAR GULIA)

Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (South)
Saket Courts, New Delhi/05-02-2015

FIR No. 281/2006

PS- R.K. Puram
State v. Anil Kumar
Dhawan
05-02-2015
Present :
Shri Anil Kumar Paswan, Ld. APP for the State.
Accused on bail with counsel Shri D.K. Sharma.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of accused.
PW19 Shri Arun Kumar examined and discharged.
PW Shri Sushil Kumar failed to turn up despite service
of summons. Issue BW in the sum of Rs.5000/- with one surety in
the like amount against him for the next date of hearing.
Put up for PE on 28-04-2015.

(VIVEK KUMAR GULIA)

Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (South)
Saket Courts, New Delhi/05-02-2015

FIRNo.200/99
PSKotlaMubarakpur
05.02.2015
Statevs.AshokParshad
StatementofaccusedAshokParshadsonoflateSh.JanviPrasadage:59
years,R/o.H.No.1,AwasVikasColony,Gorakhpur,Delhi,u/s.313Cr.P.C
WithoutOath.
Q1.
IthascomeinevidencethatDr.MammenChandy(PW7)had
writtenaletterdated05.01.1999MarkAtoSecretary,MedicalCouncilof
India,mentioningthatlettersdated03.06.98(MarkC/Ex.PW12/C)andletter
dated 05.06.1998 (Mark D/Ex.PW12/D) addressed to Honble Secretary,
RACP,werenotwrittenbyhim.Whatyouhavetosay?
A.
Icametoknowaboutitonlyaftertheregistrationofthiscase.
Q2.
ItisfurthercomeinevidencethatPW1Dr.K.K.Arorastated
thathereceivedaforesaidletterfromPW7andoninquiryitwasfoundthat
aforesaidlettersdated03.06.98and5.6.98,purportedlyissuedbySecretary,
MCI,Sh.MammenChandy,ontheletterheadofMCI,wereforgedsince
MCIhadneveroperatedfromtheaddressH73A,NDSEI,NewDelhi110
024,givenonsaidletterheadsandtelephonenumbersmentionedthereon
werealsonotusedbyMCIatanypointoftime.Further,hementionedthat
hegaveacomplaintEx.PW1/1topolicealongwithphotocopyofdifferent
documentsMarkAtoMarkE,onthebasisofwhichFIRwasregistered.
Whatyouhavetosay?
A.
Icametoknowaboutitaftertheregistrationofthiscase.
Q3.
Itisfurthercomeinevidencethatonthebasisofrukkasentby
SIOmbirSingh,FIREx.PW3/AinthiscasewasregisteredbyPW3ASI
Pratap Singh and further he made endorsement on the rukka Ex.PW3/B.
Whatyouhavetosay?
A.
Iamnotawareaboutthis.
Q4.
It is further come in evidence that PW4 Sh. Mehtab Alam
disclosedthatgroundfloorofH73A,SouthExtn.PartI,NewDelhiwas
givenonrenttoafirmfrom1993to1997andafterthatitremainedinhis
possession.Whatyouhavetosay?
A.
Ihadneverresidedintheaforesaidproperty.However,onefirm
namelyTrikayaInternationalwasoperatingfromthesaidpropertyatthe

relevanttimeandmybrotherwasoneofitspartnertill1997.
Q5.
ItisfurthercomeinevidencethatPW5Sh.GolakNarainSewak
PandeytestifiedthatheinformedpoliceofficialofCrimeBranchthatyou
wereresidinginH.No.1,AwasVikasColony,Gorakhpur.Whatyouhaveto
say?
A.
Itistrue.
Q6.
It is further come in evidence that in response to letter
Ex.PW12/EofIOPW12InspectorPratapSingh,replyreceivedfromIndian
CouncilofMedicalResearchEx.PW8/Atotheeffectthatyouwereneither
anadvisorinICMRnorremainedassociatedwithitinanyposition.What
youhavetosay?
A.
ItiscorrectthatIhadneverremainedassociatedwithICMR.
Q.7.
It is further come in evidence that in response to letter
Ex.PW12/F of IO PW12 Inspector Pratap Singh, reply received from
DirectorIndianNationalScienceAcademyEx.PW2/AgivenbyPW2Sh.
S.P.Sharmatotheeffectthatyouwerenotafellowoftheacademyand
ShreeDhanwantariwasneverawardedtoyouin1995.Whatyouhaveto
say?
A.
Itiscorrect.
Q.8.
Itisfurthercomeinevidencethatinresponsetoletterwrittenby
IO PW12 Inspector Pratap Singh, a reply was received from Ministry of
DefenceEx.PW6/AgivenbyPW6Sh.G.B.Singhtotheeffectthatyouwere
neverawardedPadamshreein1984andPadambhushanin1991.Whatyou
havetosay?
A.
Itiscorrect.
Q.9.
It is further come in evidence that on the request of IO sent
throughletterMarkPW12/P,PW10Sh.N.C.Jha,beingpostedasAssistant
DirectorInterpolDelhi,sentthecopyofreportreceivedfromtheconcerned
agencyregardingyoualongwithhisletterEx.PW10/A.Whatyouhaveto
say?
A.
Iamnotawareaboutthesaidreport.
Q.10.
It is further come in evidence that in response to letter
Ex.PW12/E written by IO PW12 Inspector Pratap Singh, a reply was
receivedfromDirectorofNutritionFoundationofIndiaEx.PW11/Atothe

effect that you were never the member of Advisory board of Nutrition
FoundationofIndia.Whatyouhavetosay?
A.
Itiscorrect.
Q.11.
ItisfurthercomeinevidencethatyouwerearrestedfromPatna
videarrestmemoEx.PW9/AandpersonalsearchmemoEx.PW9/B.Further,
yourdisclosurestatementEx.PW9/Cwasalsorecorded.Whatyouhaveto
say?
A.
Itiscorrect.
Q.12.
ItisfurthercomeinevidencethatIOPW12InspectorPratap
Singh took your specimen handwriting in seven sheets Ex.PW12/A on
19.02.2001andontensheetsEx.PW12/Son17.09.2002andagainonten
sheets Ex.PW12/T on 18.09.2002. Further, in response to letters of IO,
RACPsenttwooriginallettersEx.PW12/CandEx.PW12/Dalongwiththeir
reply Ex.PW12/B. Further, in response to email sent by IO to General
Medical Council, Glasgow, email Ex.PW12/G was received alongwith
attachedfileEx.PW12/H.Further,inresponsetoemailofIOEx.PW12/I,
emailwasreceivedfromRCPSEx.PW12/J.Further,IOreceivedtwoletters
dated22.11.97and30.07.98Ex.PW12/K,purportedlywrittenbyProf.K.K.
Kapoor,bypostandcopyofFaxdated03.05.1999and10.09.2000sentby
you and Sh. Ashola respectively are mark 12/L and 12/M respectively.
Further, the original letter dated 20.04.2001 purportedly written by Sh
AsholaPrasadEx.PW12/Mandcopyofletterdt.18.06.2001writtenbyhim
ismark12/O.Further,inresponsetoemailofIO,hereceivedemailfrom
RCPSGlasgowEx.PW12/R.Whatyouhavetosay?
A.
My specimen hand writing was obtained by IO only once at
GorakhpurwhenIwasaskedtoreproducetheallegedforgedlettergivenby
Dr.MammenChandyandsubsequentlymyspecimensignaturesweretaken
onseveralsheets.IamnotawareaboutthecorrespondencedonebyIO.
Q.13.
ItisfurthercomeinevidencethathandwritingexpertPW13Sh.
AmiLalDakshgavehisreportEx.PW13/Atotheeffectthatyouhadwritten
questioneddocumentsi.e.alettersdated03.06.1998,05.06.1998,22.12.1997,
31.07.1998,03.05.1999,10.09.2000and20.04.2001,purportedlywrittenby
Secretary,MCI,Prof.K.K.Kapoor,AsholiaPrasadandAshulaPrasad.What
youhavetosay?

A.
The handwriting expert has given wrong opinion. The first
reportwasgiveninnegativeandthe2ndreportcamethreeyearsafterfiling
ofthiscaseintheCourt.
Q.14.
Whytheprosecutionwitnesseshavedeposedagainstyou?
A.
Noonehasdeposedagainstme.
Q.15.
Doyouwantsayanythingelse?
A.
Ihadworkedfor32yearsabroadpracticingpsychiatricandafter
comingbacktoIndia,IestablishedaCharitableclinicinGorakhpurin1999.
One police official namely Ombir Singh telephoned my house and
threatenedmymothertosendmetoDelhioffice.ThenIcalledbackatEOW
officeandtalktoACPTyagi.ThenIsentacomplainttoCommissionerof
policeagainstACPTyagiandOmbirSinghfortheirmisconduct.Amonth
after,InspectorPratapSinghcametomyplaceatGorakhpurandcollected
myhandwritingsampleoneightsheets,copyofmypassport,mycertificates
andmedicalregistration.Noneofthesedocumentsmentionedmynameas
A.S.J.Prasad,hascomeintheforgedletters.Mydateofbirthshowninthe
CVbroughtbyIOwasalsowrong.Ihadalsoinformedthatsincebeginning
Ihavepracticedasapsychiatricinsevencountrieswhereasthequalification
showninthedocumentsbroughtbyIOwasrelatedtohaematology.Ialso
informedthatIhadneverstayedatanyplaceinNOIDA.Ihavebeenfalsely
implicatedinthiscase.
Q.16.
Doyouwanttoleaddefenceevidence?
A.
No.

RO&AC
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
Certifiedthattheabovestatementofaccusedhasbeenrecorded
by undersigned personally and it contains the true and full account of
explanationgivenbyhim.
(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015

FIRNo.380/01
P.S.HauzKhas
Statevs.MadanjeetSingh&
Ors.

05.02.2015
Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
AccusedSwamiVikramanandonbailwithcounselSh.Rajiv
Dayal.
AccusedSurenderKumarAroraandR.P.Prasadonbail.
ProceedingsagainstaccusedMadanjeetSinghabatedvide
orderdated1972013.
AccusedJyotiPrasadconvictedandsentencedvideorder
dated21092004.
AccusedY.L.Sachdeva,AtmaRamGupta,JaiveerNagar
andR.R.Sakiadischargedvideorderdated02092014.
File is in Sessions Court where next date of hearing is
10.02.2015. In view of this, put up for further proceedings on
21.03.2015.

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015

FIRNo.213/06
P.S.LodhiColony(EOW)
05.02.2015
Statevs.SriNiwasSharma&Ors.
Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
AccusedS.N.SharmaonbailwithcounselSh.UdaiRaj.
AccusedRakeshJainisabsent.
ProxycounselforaccusedRakeshJain.
SonofcomplainantinpersonwithcounselSh.NiteshRana.
Application for exemption from personal appearance has been
movedonbehalfofaccusedRakeshJain.Heard.Inviewofreasonsstated
intheapplication,sameisallowed.
ItissubmittedbycomplainantaswellasaccusedS.N.Sharma
thatalltheformalitiesforexecutingnecessarydocumentstotransferthe
titleofpropertymeasuring2772.305sq.ydscomprisinginkhasrano.565,
VillageBisnoli,TehsilDadri,U.P,infavourofcomplainantSh.A.K.Govil
have been completed and date may be fixed for registration of title
documentsintheofficeofconcernedregistrar.Onbeingasked,itisstated
that11.02.2015issuitedtoboththesides.Accordingly,complainantaswell
as accused S.N. Sharma are directed to appear in person before the
concernedregistrarforregistrationoftitledocumentsofaforesaidproperty
infavourofcomplainant.Thesaleconsiderationwouldbedeemedtohave
beenpaidbycomplainantinviewofSupremeCourtdirectionsasfixed
depositreceiptinthesumofRs.1,02,57,510/hasalreadybeenplacedon
recordon16.12.2014andthisfactbeincorporatedinthetitledocuments
accordingly.
Copy of registered title documents be placed on record on
NDOH.
Putupforfurtherproceedingson09.03.2015.

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015

DeokinandanChaturvedivs.
RajShreeGroup

05.02.2015
Present: DH/oneofthevictiminperson.
JD/accusedSriNiwasSharmainpersonwithcounselSh.
UdaiRaj.
Itissubmittedonbehalfofpartiesthatmatterislikelytobe
settledandsettlementamountwouldbepaidinMarch,2015.
Inviewofthis,putupwithStatecaseon09.03.2015.

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015

05.02.2015
Present: None.

CCNo.235/1/12
P.S.HauzKhas
SantoshKumarBaglavs.M/s
MausmiBhattacharjee

StatusreportfiledonbehalfofIOSINitinKumartothe
effectthathehasbeenhandedovertheinvestigationtwodaysback
andFSLreportisawaited.
Earlierreport hascomethat inconnectedmatterFIRNo.
128/05 P.S. Defence Colony, cancellation report is pending
considerationintheCourtofLd.CMM,SouthEast,NewDelhiand
investigationincaseFIRNo.21/05ispendingawaitingtheFSLresult.
Inviewofthis,putupforfurtherproceedingson01.05.2015.

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015

FIRNo.168/11
P.S.CrimeBranch
Statevs.VimalKumar

05.02.2015
Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
Accusedisabsent.
Complainantinperson.
Itisobservedthataccusedwasabsentonthelastdate.In
viewofthis,bailbondofaccusedstandsforfeited.IssueNBWagainst
accusedwithnoticetohissuretyforNDOH.
Putupforfurtherproceedingson15.04.2015.

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015

FIRNo.207/06
P.S.MalviyaNagar(EOW)
Statevs.Sanjay&Anr.

05.02.2015
Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
Boththeaccusedonbail.
ThebounddownwitnessPWSh.AnilKumarfailedtoturn
up.IssueB/WagainsthiminthesumofRs.5,000/withonesuretyin
thelikeamount.Further,heisdirectedtoproduceoriginalGPA.
DespiteexecutionofB/W,Ct.Dharampalfailedtoturnup.
Considering that allthepoliceofficialsarebusyinurgentdutyin
connectionwithcomingassemblyelections,nofurtheradverseorder
ispassedagainsthim.IssuefreshB/WagainstCt.Dharampalinthe
sumofRs.5,000/withonesuretyinthelikeamount.
PWSISureshKumarispresent.Headmittedhismistakefor
hisnonappearanceonthelastdatedespiteexecutionofB/W.Inthe
interestofjustice,NBWorderedtobeissuedagainsthimiscancelled.
ItissubmittedbyLd.APPfortheStatethatsinceSISureshKumaris
IO,hebedischargedandhistestimonywouldberecordedafterthe
testimonyofotherwitnesses.
PutupforPEon24.04.2015.

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015

FIRNo.108/11
P.S.R.K.Puram(AATS)
Statevs.Vikram@Ravi&Ors.

05.02.2015
Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
AccusedVikram@Raviisabsent.
AccusedBishanSinghonbailwithcounselSh.S.K.Soni.
AccusedNiwas@Sunilacquittedvideorderdt.25.11.2013.

ItisobservedthataccusedVikram@Raviwasabsentonthe
lastdate.Inviewofthis,hisbailbondisforfeited.IssueNBWagainst
himwithnoticetohissuretyforNDOH.
Earlier,ithadbeenreportedthataccusedVikram@Raviis
inJCinthreecasesinRohiniCourt.Inviewofthis,P/Wbealso
issuedagainstaccusedVikram@RaviforNDOH.
Summons sent to PW Ct. Amit Kumar and HC Arvind
Kumar have been served but they have sent request in writing to
exempt their personal appearance on account of urgent duty in
connectionwithcomingassemblyelections.Inviewofthis,theybe
summonedafreshforNDOH.
PutupforPEon27.04.2015.

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015

FIRNo.372/1998
P.S.VasantKunj(CB)
Statevs.K.N.Ramchandran&
Anr.

05.02.2015
Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
AccusedVinayTyagionbail.
AccusedK.N.Ramachandranisabsent.

DespiteexecutionofB/W,IOSIJ.P.Singhfailedtoturnup.
Considering that allthepoliceofficialsarebusyinurgentdutyin
connectionwithcomingassemblyelections,nofurtheradverseorder
ispassedagainsthim.IssuefreshB/WagainstIOSIJ.P.Singhinthe
sumofRs.5,000/withonesuretyinthelikeamountforNDOH.
Putupforfurtherproceedingson11.03.2015.

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015
Lateron:
Sh.DeepakTyagi,counselforboththeaccusedappeared
andrequestedforchangeofdate.Asprayedfor,dateischangedto
16.03.2015.Thedategivenas11.03.2015iscancelled.

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015

CCNo.22/1/S
CentralBankofIndiavs.Anup
SinghTanwar&Ors.

05.02.2015
Statement of Sh. Rajpal Singh, Advocate, D/1789/07, Chamber no.
579,PatialaHouseCourts,NewDelhi.
W.O.
Iamcounselforpetitionerandhavebeendulyauthorizedto
make statement on its behalf. As per instructions from the
petitioner/CentralBankofIndia,Imaykindlybeallowedtowithdraw
thepresentpetitionwithlibertytofilethefreshpetitioninaccordance
withlaw.

RO&AC

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015

FIRNo.359/13
P.S.HauzKhas
Statevs.RanveerSinghRana

05.02.2015
Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
AccusedonpolicebailwithcounselSh.ShailenderSharma.
Freshvakalatnamafiledforaccused.
Copyofchargesheetsuppliedtoaccused.
Anapplicationforbailu/s437Cr.P.Cmoved.Heard.Since
the offence is bailable in nature, accused Ranveer Singh Rana is
admittedtobailonhisfurnishingapersonalbondinthesumofRs.
50,000/withonesuretyinthelikeamount.Bailbondfurnishedand
acceptedtillNDOH.
Putupforscrutinyofdocumentson16.04.2015.

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015

FIRNo.279/03
P.S.LodhiColony(CB)
Statevs.PradeepKumar

05.02.2015
Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
AccusedinpersonwithcounselSh.SudhirKumar.
Suretyinperson.

AnapplicationforcancellationofNBWmovedbyaccused.
Heard. In view of the reasons given in the application, same is
allowed.
In view of previous order, issue B/W in the sum of Rs.
5,000/eachagainstPWPoojaShashiandBalbirwithonesuretyin
thelikeamount.
PutupforPEon13.05.2015.

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015

FIRNo.180/08
P.S.EOW
Statevs.AvdheshMittal

05.02.2015
Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
AccusedAvdheshMittalonbailwithcounselSh.S.S.Wani.
AccusedNarenderKumarChauhanonbailwithcounselSh.
VikasArora.
Complainantinpersonwithproxycounsel.
NoticesenttoIOforclarificationbuthehassentrequestin
writingtoexempthispersonalappearanceonaccountofurgentduty
inconnectionwithcomingassemblyelections.Inviewofthis,fresh
noticebeissuedtoIOforNDOH.
On joint request, matter is adjourned for arguments on
applicationu/s173(8)Cr.P.Candforsummoningofotherpersonsas
accusedfor23.03.2015.

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015

M.No.46/1/M
Avdheshvs.RajenderChhabra

05.02.2015
Present: Applicant/accusedinpersonwithcounsel.
Respondentinperson.
PutupwithStatecaseon23.03.2015.

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015

FIRNo.200/99
P.S.K.M.Pur
Statevs.AshokParshad

05.02.2015
Present: Sh.AnilKumarPaswan,APPfortheState.
Accusedonbail.
StatementofaccusedU/s313Cr.P.Crecorded.Hehasopted
nottoleaddefenceevidence.
Putupforfinalargumentson20.02.2015.

(VIVEKKUMARGULIA)
ChiefMetropolitanMagistrate(South)
SaketCourts,NewDelhi/05.02.2015