Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
SSttrreennggtthheenniinnggm
moonniittoorriinnggaannddeevvaalluuaattiioonnpprraaccttiicceess
iinntthheeccoonntteexxttooffssccaalliinngguupptthheeIIH
HPP++ccoom
mppaaccttaanndd
1
CCoouunnttrryyH
HeeaalltthhSSyysstteem
mssSSuurrvveeiillllaannccee 1
ZAMBIA
ThisreportwasbasedonamissiontoZambia(1618February2009)byateamofWHO(TiesBoerma,Patrick
Kadama,AnnetMahanani,WilliamSoumbeyAlley)andHealthMetricsNetwork(NosaOrobaton,HabtamuAddo).The
missionincludedconsultationswithMinistryofHealth,
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
1
Background
Thescaleupforbetterhealthisunprecedentedinbothpotentialresourcesandthenumberof
initiativesinvolved.Thisrequiresaharmonizedmonitoringandevaluationeffortthatreinforces
bothcountryandglobalneedstodemonstrateresults,securefuturefunding,andenhancethe
evidence base for intervention. Eventually, the scaleup efforts will be judged by country
progress towards the healthrelated MDGs, the degree to which major health constraints in
countrieshavebeenaddressed,andadherencetotheParisDeclarationonAidEffectiveness.
The IHP+ common framework for monitoring performance and evaluation of the scaleup for
betterhealthaimstoensurethatthedemandforaccountabilityandresultsfromsingledonors
and joint initiatives is translated into wellcoordinated efforts to monitor performance and
evaluateprogressincountries,inlinewiththeprinciplesoftheParisdeclaration.Itstressesthe
importanceofworkinginwaysthatcontributetostrengtheningcountryorganizationalcapacity
and health information systems, as well as enabling evidenceinformed decision making and
improvedcountryperformance.
The global framework needs to be made operational at the country level. The Country Health
Systems Surveillance platform (CHeSS) aims to improve the availability, quality and use of the
data needed to inform country health sector reviews and planning processes, and to monitor
healthsystem performance. 2 There are three dimensions to this process to strengthen the
monitoringandevaluationcomponentofthecountrycompact:
Demandanduseofinformation:improvetheuseofevidenceindecisionmakingprocesses,
focusingoncountryplans
Supply of data and statistics: increase availability and quality of data used for decision
making
Enhance institutionalcapacity:support countrycapacityforassessmentand monitoringof
healthsystemsandtheirperformance
InApril2009,theGovernmentofZambiaandDevelopmentPartnersintendtosigntheCompact
forthescalingupforreachingthehealthMDGs,asanAddendumtotheMemorandumof
Understandingof2006betweentheGovernmentandtheCooperatingPartners.
2
Demandanduseofinformation
2.1
Countryreviewprocessesandmechanisms
TheNationalHealthSectorStrategicPlan20062011(NHSP)setsoutthepriorityareasforhealth
interventionsandprovidesabasisformonitoringprogressinitsimplementation.Therearetwo
majorreviewcycles,namelytheJointAnnualReview(JAR)andthemidtermandfinalreviews.
CountryHealthSystemsSurveillance.ReportofameetinginBellagio,October2008.WHOandRockefeller
Foundation.
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
TheJARprocessincludestheMinistryofHealth(MoH)andCooperatingPartners(CPs).TheJAR
2008isinprogressatthetimeofthisreport.Eachyearthereareselectedthemes,andthe
reviewoutcomesincludehighlightsofthemainachievements,constraintsandchallenges,and
recommendationsonthewayforward.Theprocessusuallyincludesfourphases:deskreviewof
keydocumentsandreports,semistructuredinterviewswithkeystakeholders,fieldvisitsto
selectedprovinces,andpresentationofthefindingstotheHealthSectorAdvisoryGroup(SAG)
meetinginApril.
In2008afairlyextensiveMidTermReview(MTR)wasdonebyateamthatworkedonthebasis
ofagreedTermsofReference(TOR)adoptedbytheMOHandCPs.AswithJAR,theprocess
includesreviewofreportsanddocuments,fieldvisitstoselectedprovinces,interviewswith
stakeholders,andastakeholderworkshopwithsome150participantstopresentpreliminary
analysisandsolicitfeedback.
The Ministry of Health also develops an annual action plan with activity lists. For each action
plan, there are a large number of process and output indicators are developed, with some
outcome indicators. These are discussed at beginning of each year by the monitoring and
evaluationsubcommitteeofSAG.Thesubcommitteeisalsothemaincoordinationmechanism
forM&E.
2.2
Indicators
The NHSP contains some 270 indicators, around 80% of which have clear targets. Sixteen are
consideredcoreindicators.The2008MTRreviewedtheresultsof250indicators,with51core
indicators,mostlyoverlappingwiththoseofNHSP.Datawereavailablefor185oftheindicators
reviewed. The 2009 draft annual action plans includes about 275 indicators with targets. The
IHP+proposalasofFebruary2009includes23indicators.ThePAFincludes5healthindicators
andanother5forHIV/AIDS,outoflessthan40indicatorsforallsectorscombined.
Theclassificationofindicatorsintothecategoriesofalogicalmonitoringandevaluation(M&E)
framework differs from standard practices in several instances. Table 1 shows the number of
indicators by category in different plans and reports (See Annex A for details). 3 There is fairly
goodoverlapoftheindicators,withtheNHSPasthebasis.
The16noninputindicatorsoftheIHP+proposalwerescoredbasedonthefollowingcriteria(seeAnnexB):Good
baseline data; target setting feasible; Sensitive to scaling up / change; Equity dimension well represented;
Measurable with current data sources; Data quality tends to be good. The scores range from 613 points out of
maximumof15.Severalindicatorsscorepoorly,includingmaternalmortality7;condomuseatlastsex6;rural
population within 5 km of facility 5; malaria case fertility rate among children under5 6; CHWs implementing
packagelow.SomeindicatorsthatareinNHSPandscorehighwerenotincludedintheproposedlist,suchasITN
coverage, outpatient attendance and contraceptive prevalence rate. The 7 proposed input indicators on compact
goalsfor"behaviouralchange"includedtwogeneralindicator, threeonfinancing,oneoninformationandtwoon
humanresources.
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
Table1
Useofindicators(withtargets)inNHSPandmonitoringprocesses,bycategory,Zambia
AIHP+missionofDevelopmentPartnerswasconductedinSeptember2008atwhichtheglobal
IHP+commonmonitoringframeworkwasdiscussedwiththeZambiancountryhealthsector
teamandconsideredwellalignedwiththeresultsframeworkintheHSDPIII.
3
Supplyofdataandstatistics
3.1
Datasources
HealthManagementInformationSystems(HMIS)
The HMIS in Zambia forms the basis for annual data for many indicators. There are efforts to
improvecompleteness,timelinessandaccuracyofreport.TheDHIS/OpenHealthdistrictproject
hasbeendevelopedduringthepastyears,supportedbyanECgrantandtheHISPproject,butis
notyetoperational.WHO/HMNarecurrentlysupportingthefinalization.
Populationbasedsurveys
The Central Statistics Office is in charge of surveys. The most recent Demographic and Health
Surveys (DHS) was conducted in 2007. The intervals between population based surveys to
monitor the key coverage and other indicators are relatively long in Zambia (six years). Most
countriesaremovingtowardsa45yearintervalwithoftenanintermediatenationalcoverage
or other type of health survey. At the same time, Zambia has a record number of sexual
behavioursurveys(fiveintenyears).
Facilityassessments
Afewassessmentsofthestatusoffacilitiesandservicedeliveryhavebeenconducted:
2004:ServiceAvailabilityMapping
2006:NationalFacilityCensus
ThereisnonationaldatabaseoffacilitieswithGPScoordinates.Themostrecentnationalhealth
facilitieslistingwaspublishedin2008.
Vitalevents
There are major gaps in the information which cannot be solved in the short run. Currently,
separateinvestmentsaremadebydonorsintwosystemsofdemographicsurveillance,onerun
by Ministry of Health and one by the Central Statistical Office, without much coordination.
Furthermore, no investments are made into improving cause of death registration in health
facilities and strengthening registration of births and deaths, which should start with urban
areas.
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
Administrativedata
Humanresourcesandfinancialdataareakeycomponentofhealthsystemsstrengtheningand
included in joint annual reviews. The data need to be integrated better in HMIS, as "semi
permanentdata",andbesupportedbyacomprehensivefacilitydatabasethatcoversallpublic
andthebulkofprivatefacilities.
Surveillance
SurveillanceofTBhasbeenfunctioningfairlywellinrecentyears.HIVsurveillanceinantental
clinicsisinfrequent,buthasreliedheavilyonthepopulationbasedsurveys.Outbreakdiseasesis
not integrated within HMIS and may benefit from the advances made by introducing the
DHIS/OHsoftware.
3.2
Dataqualitycontrolmechanisms
Atpresent,thereisnotransparentsystemthatallowsdataqualityassessment,andformsthe
basis for adjustments. For instance, there are no data in the annual reports on completeness,
timeliness and accuracy of reporting, or adjustments made to health facility based coverage
estimatesbasedonpopulationbasedsurveys.
3.3
Access,analysisanddissemination
Statisticalreports
The Ministry of Health publishes annual statistical bulletin and the most recent report is
available for 2006. The 2007 report was being finalized at the time of the mission. The
report is available in printed copies and contains statistics of disease burden, human
resources, availability of essential drugs, and service delivery, by province. However, no
assessmentisprovidedofreportinganddataquality.
Databases
NopublicnationaldatabaseontheMinistryofHealthwebsite
TheCentralStatisticalOfficehasnofunctioningdatabasesaccessibleonthewebatthetime
ofthisreport
Synthesisandanalysis
Joint Annual Review (JAR) report: The use of data is limited to key indicators with recent
dataandincludefinancing,humanresources,morbidityandcoveragedatageneratedfrom
health facility reports (HMIS), often by province. The preparation is fairly standardized,
although the data analysis is often done within a short time frame. The results are
disseminated through printed report and there is some kind of dashboard which evolves
overtime.ThereportisalsoavailableontheMoHwebsite.
MidTermReview(MTR)report:TheMTRfocusedontargetsandtrends,withverylittledata
analysis.ThefinalMTR2008reporthasbeenpublishedandisavailableontheMoHwebsite.
4
Institutionalcapacity
MinistryofHealth
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
MoHhasmanyfunctionsthroughtheMonitoring&Evaluationunitinthedivisionofpolicyand
planning.TherearehoweveronlyfourquantitativeprofessionalswithMasterlevelsdegreesor
higher(epidemiology,demography,statistics,publichealth)
CentralStatisticalOffice
CSOisthekeyinstitutionfordatacollectionandbasicanalysis,withofficesinallprovinces.The
division of Social Statistics has a Population & demography unit which includes the vital
registration unit. The number of staff has been going down and currently there are four high
levelprofessionals,supportedbyastatisticiansanddataprocessingstaff.
UniversityofZambia
SomedepartmentsintheUniversity,suchasDepartmentofEconomicsandtoalesserextent,
CommunityMedicine,carryoutspecificassignmentstosupportmonitoringandevaluation.The
mostprominentactivityistheNationalHealthAccountsexercise.
TheInstituteforEconomicandSocialResearch
ThisinstituteisanNGOwithasmallnumberofpermanentstaffwhichhasacademicstaffand
otherstoworkonspecificprojects.Someactivitiesweremoreanalytical.
Privateorganizations
Therearealsoprivatecompaniesthatareengagedindatacollectionandanalysis.Forinstance,
anationalmalariasurveyfundedbytheWorldBankwastenderedandfourprivatefirmsapplied.
Palm Associates successfully implemented the field work. There are also small organizations,
such as ZamFOHR which is partly supported by the Alliance for Health Systems and Policy
Research.
5
Conclusionandrecommendations
5.1
Demandanduseofinformation
Thereisaneedtostrengthentheanalysisphasepriortotheannualreview.
Theuseofdataandstatisticsshouldbeincreasedinthereviewprocesses,includingsub
nationalanalysisandbenchmarkingwithothercountriesandregionalaverages.
The PAF health indicators should be included in the IHP+ accountability and results
framework.
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
5.2
Supplyofdataandstatistics
Datasources
o Strengtheningofthedatasourcestoprovidedatashouldbepartofoverallhealth
informationsystemsstrengtheningalongthelinesoftheHMNframeworkcosted
HISplan
o HMIS:
ThereisaurgentneedtolinkthenationalHMISwithothereffortssuchas
theelectronicandsmartcardworksupportedbytheUSgovernmentwhich
coverssomedistrictsandtheWorldBanksupportedworkonresultsbased
financinginninedistricts.
ThereisaneedtostrengthenthesemipermanentdatainHMIS,including
facilities,humanresources,andfinancialinformation.
WHO and HMN, in collaboration with the HISP project, to continue to
supportMOHtocompletetheHMIS/OpenHealthintegrationandmakethe
systemoperational,includingdashboardsforthenationalpriorityindicators
toinformdecisionmakersatdifferentlevel
o Surveys: Plan a mini DHS type of survey in 2010 which should address the key
compactindicatorsandplanthenextDHSsurveyfor2012
o Vitaleventsmonitoring:Harmonizetheeffortstodevelopdemographicsurveillance
sitesbyconveningthemajorpartnersMinistryofHealth,HealthMetricsNetwork/
WHO,CentralStatisticalOffice,USgovernment/CDCandaimtodevelopasystem
run by CSO, in close collaboration with the Ministry of Health. In addition, it is
necessarytodiscussthepossibilitiesofimprovingbirthanddeathregistrationand
causeofdeathcertificationandcodinginhospitals
o Conduct a district assessment mid 2009 in nine districts, building upon the Global
Fund health impact evaluation study assessment that was conducted in nine
districts in 2008. This can evolve into an annual exercise with a rolling district
sample (replacing onethird of districts every year). Funding from WHO/GAVI can
be used to develop the instruments and implement the 2009 round. The district
assessment includes the status of service delivery, district financing, and data
quality(HMISdata).The2009reportshouldbeavailablebyNovembertofeedinto
the 2010 annual review. It is critical that a country institution is involved with
externalsupportintheinitialyears.
Dataqualityassessment
o There is a need to increase data access and transparency to allow regular
assessmentofdataquality
o ThisshouldalsoincludetheadjustmentsmadetotheHMISbasedonsurveyresults
o Increasedinstitutionalcapacityandinvolvementinthisprocesswillbeessential
Synthesisandanalysis
o Thejointannualreviewprocessesneedtobeinformedbyrecenthighqualitydata.
The HMIS data are important for such review but need to be complemented by
regular reviews of a selected number of districts in which a facility census, a data
qualitycontrol,andfinancialreviewisdone.Suchareviewshouldbedoneabout3
5months priortothejointannualreviewbyanindependentinstitutionorreview
team
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
5.3
Institutionalcapacity
Thereisaneedtomakeinstitutionalcapacityanintegralpartofthemonitoringandevaluation
component of the country compact. Currently, this occurs in a fragmented manner and core
partnersshouldworktogethertodevelopshortandlongtermplanstostrengthenandsupport
Zambia'scapacity.
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
AnnexA
NumbersofIndicatorsinNHSP,MTR,IHP+Proposal,PAF
NHSP
Section in NHSP
Key indicators
Expected
outputs
MTR
National
Health
Priorities
"Core"
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Data
available
Process (1)
17
10
Input (1),
Output (1)
Process (1),
Outcome (1)
Output (1)
Output (1)
Impact (1),
Outcome
(1)
Impact (1),
Outcome
(1)
Impact (1),
Outcome
(3), Output
(1)
Outcome
(1)
With
clear
target
Total
With
clear
target
With clear
target
Human Resources
15
15
Child Health
Impact (1),
Output (1)
Impact (1),
Output (1)
10
10
10
Output (1)
11
Tuberculosis
13
10
Output (1)
15
Malaria
12
Impact (1),
Output (1),
Outcome
PAF
Reviewed
outputs
or
indicators
Total
"Core"
Indicators
IHP+
Outcome
(1)
Outcome
(1)
Outcome
(1)
Input (1),
Process
(1),
Output (1),
Outcome
(1),
Impact (1)
Outcome
(1)
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
NHSP
Section in NHSP
Mental Health
Oral Health
Bilharzia & other parasitic
infections
Other NCD
Health Education & Promotion
Eye Care
Clinical Care & Diagnostics
Services
Essential Drugs & Medical
Supplies
Lab. Support Services
Blood Transfusion Services
Medical Imaging Services
Infrastructure & Equipment
Infrastructure
Medical Equipment &
Accessories
Transport
Key indicators
Expected
outputs
MTR
National
Health
Priorities
"Core"
Indicators
x
x
Reviewed
outputs
or
indicators
4
11
Data
available
10
2
9
1
0
4
10
4
10
11
10
10
5
4
6
0
1
0
4
10
6
4
5
3
7
9
8
4
4
5
4
0
0
0
0
0
5
6
0
4
4
0
6
5
3
3
5
3
10
10
10
10
Input (1)
8
5
6
8
3
3
8
8
8
8
7
8
Input (1)
7
10
9
7
10
5
Output (1,
also Child
Health)
"Core"
Indicators
IHP+
PAF
Indicators
Indicators
2
9
Impact (1,
also Child
Health)
Output (1)
x
6
5
5
5
6
5
5
5
7
5
6
5
10
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
NHSP
Section in NHSP
Support Systems
Strengthening
M&E
Health Systems Research
HMIS
FAMS
Procurement MS
Health Systems Governance
Policy & Legislation
Organization & Management
Gender & Health
SWAp
Hospital Management
External Coordination
Health Care Financing
Resource Mobilization
Resource Allocation
Costing & Financing of
Strategic Plan
Total
Key indicators
Expected
outputs
MTR
National
Health
Priorities
"Core"
Indicators
Reviewed
outputs
or
indicators
Data
available
11
6
4
4
3
6
7
10
7
3
4
6
6
9
7
3
3
252
185
"Core"
Indicators
IHP+
PAF
Indicators
Indicators
x
10
6
4
7
5
10
5
4
6
5
10
6
4
7
5
10
5
4
6
5
5
9
8
7
0
0
4
7
5
5
0
0
5
16
8
7
0
0
4
7
5
5
0
0
6
0
4
0
6
4
4
4
203
119
239
204
Process (1)
Input (1)
Output (1)
Input (1)
x
Input (3)
16
Input (4,
also
SWAp)
23
Input (1)
10
11
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
AnnexB
Indicatoranalysis
Impact
(x)
(x)
Impact
Impact
Wasting prevalence in
underfives
Impact
Underweight prevalence in
underfives
Output,
Impact
Impact
Impact
10
11
Impact
Impact
(x)
Total score
Data quality
(x)
Sensitive to change/
scaling-up
(x)
Impact
Global estimates
12
Int. Reprod.
Health
Nutrition?
Child
Health,
Nutrition
Child
Health,
Nutrition
Child
Health,
Nutrition
14
Malaria
13
Child
Health
Child
Health
Int. Reprod.
Health
Criteria
GOZ, other than MoH
Other in MoH
HMIS, Prog.
(x)
Data source
Facility assessment
Impact
MDG
PAF
Health
topics
Pop.-based survey
Targets
NHSP
IHP+ proposal
Documents
MTR
Indicator
type
(MoH)
NHSP
Indicators
HIV/AIDS &
STI
HIV/AIDS &
STI
x
x
12
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
TB
Impact
Comm.
diseases
Child
Health,
Basic
Healthcare
Package
Basic
Healthcare
Package
Outcome
15
Output,
Outcome
16
Output,
outcome
17
Output,
Outcome
18
Outcome
Output,
Outcome
20
Outcome
(x)
(x)
Int. Reprod.
Health
21
Outcome
(x)
(x)
Int. Reprod.
Health
x
x
Child
Health
Child
Health
Int. Reprod.
Health
Total score
10
10
13
14
Data quality
Global estimates
Criteria
GOZ, other than MoH
Other in MoH
HMIS, Prog.
Impact
14
19
Facility assessment
Data source
Pop.-based survey
MDG
NHSP
PAF
Health
topics
Sensitive to change/
scaling-up
13
Targets
12
IHP+ proposal
Documents
MTR
Indicator
type
(MoH)
NHSP
Indicators
13
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
(x)
Int. Reprod.
Health
Outcome
(x)
(x)
Malaria
Outcome
Malaria
Output,
Outcome
HIV/AIDS &
STI
29
Output,
Outcome
(x)
(x)
HIV/AIDS &
STI
30
Output,
Outcome
31
Outcome
32
% population without
sustainable access to
improved water sources
% population without
sustainable access to
improved sanitation
ITN coverage (underfives,
pregnant women)
Outcome
Outcome
Contraceptive prevalence
rate (modern methods)
26
27
28
33
34
Output
Total score
(x)
25
Data quality
Outcome
Outcome
Int. Reprod.
Health
Maternal CFR
24
Sensitive to change/
scaling-up
(x)
Outcome
Int. Reprod.
Health
Global estimates
23
Criteria
GOZ, other than MoH
Int. Reprod.
Health
Outcome
MDG
PAF
(x)
22
Other in MoH
HMIS, Prog.
Data source
Facility assessment
Health
topics
Pop.-based survey
Targets
NHSP
IHP+ proposal
Documents
MTR
Indicator
type
(MoH)
NHSP
Indicators
x
x
x
3
11
10
HIV/AIDS &
STI
Malaria
(x)
Env. Health
(x)
Env. Health
Malaria
13
14
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
Output
36
TB cure rate
Output
TB
37
Output
TB
38
Output
(Health
Service
Delivery)
39
Number of CHWs/TBAs
implementing a defined
community health care
package (to be discussed
further)
% population within 5 km of a
public health facility; % rural
households within 5 kms of a
health facility
% districts submitting
complete HMIS quarterly
returns to MoH in time
Health center staff workload
Output
41
42
HRH
Process,
Outcome
; Output
Basic
Healthcare
Package
Process
HIS, M&E
Process
HRH
43
Process
Drugs/Med.
Supplies
44
Process
Drugs/Med.
Supplies
45
Input
Financing
46
Input
Financing
Total score
Data quality
Sensitive to change/
scaling-up
Global estimates
Other in MoH
HMIS, Prog.
Facility assessment
HIV/AIDS &
STI
Criteria
35
40
Data source
Pop.-based survey
Health
topics
MDG
NHSP
Targets
PAF
IHP+ proposal
Dcuments
MTR
Indicator
type
(MoH)
NHSP
Indicators
13
15
12
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
MoH expenditure on PE
Input
Financing
48
Input
Financing
49
Input
Financing
Input
Financing
51
PE/GDP ratio
Input
Financing
52
Input
Input
53
Drugs/Med.
Supplies
Blood
transf.
services
Doctor/population ratio
Input
(x)
HRH
55
Nurse/population ratio
Input
(x)
HRH
56
Midwives/population ratio
Input
(x)
HRH
57
Input
(x)
HRH
58
Qualified HW/1000
population
Trained TBA/1000 population
Input
(x)
HRH
59
Input
(x)
HRH
60
Input
HRH
61
% JAR/MTR
recommendations fully
implemented
Input
Governanc
e
Total score
54
Data quality
Sensitive to change/
scaling-up
Global estimates
Criteria
GOZ, other than MoH
Other in MoH
HMIS, Prog.
Facility assessment
Pop.-based survey
Data source
47
50
Health
topics
MDG
NHSP
Targets
PAF
IHP+ proposal
Documents
MTR
Indicator
type
(MoH)
NHSP
Indicators
16
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
64
65
66
Input
Financing/
SWAp
Input
Financing/
SWAp
MDG
17
Total score
Data quality
Financing/
SWAp
Input
Other in MoH
HIS, M&E
Financing
HMIS, Prog.
Facility assessment
Input
Pop.-based survey
NHSP
MTR
Input
Sensitive to change/
scaling-up
Criteria
Good baseline info; target
can be set sensibly
Data source
Global estimates
63
Health
topics
NHSP
62
Targets
Documents
PAF
Indicator
type
(MoH)
IHP+ proposal
Indicators
WHOandHMN,DRAFT,March2009
Zambia,CHeSS/IHP+
AnnexC
ExampleofDatafromDifferentSources(DHS,HMIS)
60
50
HMIS
40
30
DHS2001-2002
DHS2007
20
10
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
50
40
HMIS
30
DHS2001-2002
20
DHS2007
10
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
15
DHS2007
10
5
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
0
1998
20
18