Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Lindsay
TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society), 2011
^
Z&
d
W
s
Wd
Introduction
TM
491
5C superheat
15C superheat
(2)
(3)
Ratio = C + C Tbath
(4)
Equation (4) is the ratio (XS AlF3) variation purely due to pot
thermal change as expressed by bath temperature. Figure 2 shows
an example of bath ratio and %XS AlF3 as a function of bath
temperature at a constant superheat of 10C. As the temperature
increases due to increasing voltage or resistance, a part of the side
ledge will melt whereby the bath ratio increases (%XS AlF3
decreases). It is operationally impossible to run a pot at an exact
constant superheat, but it is not impossible to target a range.
Figure 3 shows an example of a pot operated at a superheat range
of 5 and 15C. The bath ratio increases as bath temperature
increases when the superheat is within this range. In this case, the
acidity change is from the freezing and thawing of cryolite in the
ledge and not from neutralizing Na2O from alumina during the
electrolysis process. Fundamentally, when a pot is in thermal
balance its ratio can be known purely based on the temperature
and this relationship can be used to judge how well and efficiently
a smelter is operated.
W
E
d
Z
^dZ
D
^dZ
W
&
s
K
d
492
99.99
99.9
99
99.9
99
9.9
99
9
99
95
90
9
95
90
9
8
80
7
70
80
70
Percent
Percent
50
30
20
.1
.1
.01
910
920
930
940
950
960
Bath Temperature, C
970
980
990
.0
01
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Bath Superheat, C
Plant B:
A similar measurement comparison caampaign was carried out in
smelter B for one month to make su
ure the measurements were
TM
capable prior to turning on the new STARprobe
S
control. The
campaign was also used to determinee the superheat distribution
during the normal pot control condition
ns
5
50
3
30
20
2
1
10
5
10
5
13
11
9
7
5
5
11
13
15
17
493
and material states are likely to change. The energy change will
result in a change of pot temperature while the material change
will result in a change of bath chemistry (ratio). Either change
individually or combined will either increase or reduce the
superheat. If the perturbation is large, a new energy and material
balance state is represented by a different bath chemistry and pot
temperature.
Pot control is aimed at maintaining a targeted
energy and material balance to minimize operational impact,
which means that the superheat needs be controlled and
maintained to achieve the maximum efficiency.
1.25
Z
1.20
1.15
1.10
1.05
1.00
^dZ
^yZ
14
13
12
1.20
1.15
%XS AlF3
1.25
1.10
1.05
1.00
1.00
1.05
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.25
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
1.30
13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65
Figure 10:
STARProbe
Sampling/XRD
13
12
%XS AlF3
%Ore
11
4
3
10
9
8
7
6
5
1
1
15
22
29
36
43
Leco
Figure 11:
50
57
64
71
78
85
92
99
13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65
STARprobe
%Al2O3 by STARprobe
TM
STARProbe
and LECO.
Figure 13:
Sample/XRD
% XS AlF3 by STARprobe
Plant C:
A third large scale side by side capability study was carried out
in smelter C before STARprobeTM was deployed. Figure 12 shows
the results from a group of measurement (66 pots). The acidity
results by STARprobeTM and sampling/XRD method matched
well except for two pots as indicated in Figure 12. After further
examination, it was found that bath samples were switched during
preparation for XRD analysis. After the correction, the two
results all matched well as shown in Figure 13.
14
12
10
8
6
4
4
10
12
14
16
Figure 14:
6.0
5.0
%Ore
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
1
13
17 21 25
29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57
Leco
Figure 15:
61 65 69
STARprobe
494
30
25
25
12
20
20
Superheat, C
950
10
940
Superheat, C
Temperature, C
30
14
16
8
6
4
930
15
10
0
1.00
Tbath
Figure 16:
Tliq
1.08
1.16
Figure 19:
1.20
1.24
,
1.28
930
940
950
960
970
980
,
990
Bath Temperature, C
960
1.11
950
1.08
940
1.05
930
Bath Temperature, C
970
1.14
Z
1.02
920
0
1.12
Bath Ratio
Superheat
10
1.04
920
15
Ratio
Superheat, C
960
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Time (hrs)
Figure 17:
30
950
20
940
Superheat, C
Temperature, C
960
10
930
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Figure 20:
45
Time (hrs)
Figure 18:
Figure 21 presents the overall pot voltage trend before and after
the implementation of the control algorithm using STARprobeTM.
The pot voltage first experienced a gradual reduction and then
stabilized after a few months of deployment. During this period, a
voltage reduction of about 50 mV was achieved. It should be
mentioned that the settings in the control algorithm were still
being fine-tuned after the deployment while at the same time pot
operation was being adjusted to maintain thermal balance.
495
/
ss
Zs
Summary
Figure 21:
/
Z
Figure 22:
Acknowledgement
Authors wish to thank Alcoa Global Primary Products for
allowing publication of Alcoa STARprobeTM and its related
applications in active pot control. We also wish to thank those
contributors (technicians, operators, engineers and management
across Alcoa R&D and smelter operations too many to be
mentioned here) for their dedication, support, and efforts during
the technology deployment.
^dZ
References
^W,d
1.
2.
3.
Amperage
(A)
240185
240414
Pot Volts
(V)
4.551
4.586
CE
(%)
94.2
94.3
240887
4.575
94.6
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
496