Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
New, Stable PDC Technology Significantly Reduces Hard Rock Cost Per Foot
Edward J. Schell, SPE, and Duane Phillippi, SPE, Anadarko Petroleum; and Robert T. Fabian, SPE, Reed-Hycalog
Copyright 2003, SPE/IADC Drilling Conference
This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference held in
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1921 February 2003.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE/IADC Program Committee following
review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the
paper, as presented, have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers or the
International Association of Drilling Contractors and are subject to correction by the author(s).
The material, as presented, does not necessarily reflect any position of the SPE, IADC, their
officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper
for commercial purposes without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers or
the International Association of Drilling Contractors is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in
print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied.
The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper
was presented. Write Librarian, SPE, P.O. Box 833836, Richardson, TX 75083-3836, U.S.A.,
fax 01-972-952-9435.
Abstract
Historically, the hardest and most abrasive rock formations,
such as the Travis Peak, Hosston, and Bossier Sands areas of
East Texas and North Louisiana, were drilled almost
exclusively by roller-cone insert bits. With some exceptions,
the only polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) runs were
small-diameter holes where the formation was predominantly
comprised of shale and limestone. Significant advances in
design and cutter technology in PDC bits during the past 510
years have made it possible for PDC to be used more
frequently on the fringes of these hard rock intervals.
Combining advanced PDC bit designs with state-of-the-art
cutter technology has opened up many new applications for
PDC bits that were once only appropriate for IADC Series 6,
7, and 8 insert drill bits. Because of this new technology, PDC
has become a practical alternative for drilling hard rock,
providing a significant reduction in cost per foot. Combining
new, highly abrasion-resistant PDC cutters with competent
stable bit designs that provide both low torque and
dynamically stable characteristics was the key to this
development.
Several case histories of hard rock drilling using PDC bits will
be discussed in this paper, illustrating the reduction in costs.
These case histories demonstrate, through descriptions of trial
and error, the problems associated with these new PDC
applications and how they were overcome.
Background
Until recently, insert bits were mandatory when drilling hard
rock intervals in areas of East Texas and North Louisiana that
have significant sandstone sections. This paper will discuss
trial applications of PDC bits designed for drilling such hard
and abrasive formations as the Travis Peak, Hosston, Cotton
Valley, and Bossier in this area. The areas and intervals
SPE/IADC 79797
SPE/IADC 79797
torque response. ibid (See Figs. 5 and 6.) It was also observed
that because of the lack of lateral bit movement, the full ring
design drilled a smooth-walled borehole, showing no bit whirl,
by drilling on center. The non-ring bit version showed clear
evidence of whirling, as the hole walls showed an obvious
spiral with a bottomhole pattern indicative of bit whirl. ibid
(See Fig. 7.)
This approach to creating a more steerable directional bit led
to the development of a full size range, with many variant
designs, for the drilling industry. However, until recently, the
inherently stable ring bit was applied primarily for its
directional responsiveness.
A breakthrough in cutter
technology has now paved the way for the stabilizing effect of
the ring bit to be tested in severe hard rock applications.
Advancements in Cutter Technology
Polycrystalline diamond has historically been manufactured in
various grades of hardness and impact resistance. This was
primarily achieved by varying the size of the diamond grit. In
the mid-1990s, PDC cutters gained improved impact and
abrasion resistance when nonplanar interface (NPI) carbide
substrates were attached to the PCD layer (polycrystalline
compact diamond). The various designs relieved the in-situ
stresses born into the diamond during manufacture. Wear life
was simultaneously improved in these designs by the
increased thickness of the diamond table. NPI cutters
continue to be very popular for general PDC applications. In
this papers topic application, such an improvement in
abrasion resistance was necessary.
Polycrystalline diamond has impact and abrasion properties
that bear an inverse relationship to each other, dependent upon
the size of the diamond grit particles that constitute the PDC
wafer. Since its entry to the market in the 1970s, there have
been a few notable improvements in these properties, such as
processing a mixture of grit sizes (multimodal) to enhance
abrasive properties, and the NPI between the diamond layer
and its tungsten carbide carrier substrate.
Recently, a new hybrid of NPI PDC cutter was synthesized
and tested in the laboratory. Test results showed that this
material possessed unusually high abrasion resistance
properties compared to industry standards for premium quality
materials. The standard and enhanced cutters were tested for
abrasion resistance using the granite log test, in which a single
cutter is ground against a log of granite turned on a lathe to
establish wear rate. The enhanced cutter material was found
to have four times the abrasion-resistant properties of default
premium materials, but with no reduction of impact properties.
Field tests confirmed the laboratory results, with increases in
section length drilled and rate of penetration. Typically, this
was without significant additional wear to the cutters. The
increase in ROP was a direct function of the cutters staying
sharp as they wear, thereby cutting the rock to optimum
efficiency. The high abrasion-resistant property of PDC
greatly improved the cutters ability to stay sharp, thus
protecting the substrate and bit body from wear. A photo of a
partially worn enhanced PDC is shown in Fig. 8. A graph
showing worldwide run data, where performance data of new
SPE/IADC 79797
SPE/IADC 79797
SPE/IADC 79797
Conclusions
1. The use of PDC in some hard rock applications is now
economically practical because of improvements in cutter
technology. New, highly abrasion-resistant cutters can make
significant cost-per-foot savings as long as proper drilling
techniques are used to control impact damage caused by bit
and drillstring vibrations.
2. Damaging bit vibrations can be reduced by using slower
rotary speeds and controlling WOB to reduce torque, thereby
reducing the effects of slip stick and bit whirl, even without
special running techniques.
3. The ring bit design, incorporating a 360 ring about its junk
slot, has proven to be stable in reducing the lateral forces of bit
whirl. It was bit whirl that prevented standard designs from
successfully drilling the hardest and most variable formations.
A ring bit with the new, highly abrasion-resistant nonplanar
cutters is a specialized breed of PDC that can drill the East
Texas-North Louisiana hard rock, sandstone bearing
formations.
4. Factors such as hole size and formation compressive
strength limit the application of this technology.
5. Because of the variability of these formations, each well
should be carefully screened, making use of offset logs when
calculating interval rock strengths.
6. Offset bit CPF economics should be predetermined,
creating realistic interval goals.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Reed-Hycalog and Anadarko
Petroleum for permission to present this paper. Special thanks
also to Southwest Energy and Samson Resources who helped
share the risk in testing. Lastly, we express thanks to the
drilling contractors, Nabors Drilling, Patterson Drilling, Scan
Drilling, H & P Drilling, and Unit Drilling, who through their
keen observations, patience, and innovative techniques, helped
push the envelope of the new PDC applications.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
2.54* E+00
ft
3.048* E-01
psi
6.894757 E+00
*Conversion factor is exact.
= cm
=m
= kPa
SPE/IADC 79797
System
East
Texas
North
Louisiana
Lower Cretaceous
Travis Peak
Hosston
Mesozoic
Era
Fig. 1 - East Texas-North Louisiana study area. Stars indicate test run locations.
Cotton Valley
Cotton Valley
Bossier Group
SPE/IADC 79797
Bit Dia:
14.75"
Casing Dia. 10.75"
MD:
2900'
Bit Dia:
12.25"
Casing Dia. 9.625"
MD:
5,000'
Approximately 9000'
Top of Travis Peak Formation
Approximately 10,500'
Top of Cotton Valley Group
Bit Dia:
8.75"
Casing Dia. 7.00"
MD:
12,500'
Bit Dia:
MD:
Bit Dia:
9.875"
Casing Dia. 7.625"
MD:
11,000'
Approximately 11,300'
Top of Cotton Valley Group
Approximately 12,500'
Top of Bossier Group
Bit Dia:
MD:
6.125"
13,500'
6.75"
14,000'
SPE/IADC 79797
140
140
120
120
100
80
Standard bit
100
60
Lateral
acceleration
60
(m/s2)
80
40
20
0
40
20
bit
ring test
t
c
a
t
n
o
180
c
Full
140 160
120
80 100
RPM
Fig. 6 - Laboratory test comparing vibration level of ring bit versus non-ring bit.
10
SPE/IADC 79797
N
or
w
ay
Be
N
nc
or
hm
w
ay
ar
k
St
U
an
K
Be dar
d
nc
h
m
U
Au
K
ar
st
k
S
ra
ta
lia
nd
ar
Au Be
nc d
st
hm
ra
M
lia
ar
al
St
k
ay
a
si
nd
In
a
ar
do
B
d
ne en
ch
si
m
a
In
ar
Be
do
k
n
c
ne
hm
si
ar
a
S
k
U
SA tan
Be dar
d
nc
U
h
m
S
Th A S ark
ta
ai
nd
la
nd
a
St rd
an
da
rd
% Improvemen
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
Fig. 9 - Worldwide data showing percent improvement of enhanced NPI cutter versus benchmark offset
data.
100.00
CPF [USD/ft
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
Inserts Avg.
Fig. 10 - Economic analysis of insert bits and standard NPI cutters vs. new NPI PDC cutters.
SPE/IADC 79797
11
Offset Performance
IADC 747
IADC 837
Fig. 11 - Freestone 8 3/4-in. Travis Peak-Cotton Valley UCS log with drilling parameters, including ring PDC
and insert bit runs, with offset insert bit performance.
12
SPE/IADC 79797
Bit Runs
Depth Depth Footage Hours ROP
Travis Peak
In
Out
FPH
Ring Bit #1
8806 9832
1026 31.0 33.1
Ring Bit #2
9096 10657
1561 85.0 18.4
Ring Bit #3
9100 10036
936 47.0 19.9
Ring Bit #4
9125 9995
870 40.5 21.5
21 Insert Bit Avg.
9050 9805
755 57.7 13.1
4 Ring Bit Avg.
9032 10130
1098 50.9 21.6
$CPF CPF
Inserts
40.37 $52.93
45.05 $56.35
49.70 $52.93
54.88 $52.93
52.93 $52.93
44.16 $53.61
Run
Savings
$12,890.18
$17,633.85
$3,024.48
-$1,698.40
RPM
60-75
60-65
60-70
60-70
55-60
WOB
KLB
20-40
22-33
20-32
25-35
60-80
$10,379.08
(Average Run Savings)
Table 1 - Economic and run parameter comparison of ring PDC bit and offset insert bit runs in
Freestone study area.
Bossier Formation
6-1/8" Interval
Interval Cost [USD]
Interval CPF [USD/ft]
Interval Savings
Offset
Inserts Only (3)
76,993.05
109.68
Well 1
Insert+NonRing PDC
48,003.35
71.12
28,989.70
Well 2
Well 3
Insert+NonRing PDC Insert+Ring PDC
63,677.25
51,550.30
86.99
69.66
13,315.80
25,442.75
$CPF CPF
Inserts
52.99 $51.95
55.43 $93.24
53.65 $91.24
44.64 $47.27
Run
Savings
-$935.10
$38,947.20
$37,812.44
$3,167.62
RPM WOB
KLB
60-75 20-32
60-65 18-30
60-70 18-30
55-60 20-25