Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
33, 286-293
(1997)
Julie A. Buchheim
Department of Biological Science, The University of Tulsa, 600 South College Avenue,
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104-3189
and
Russell L. Chapman
Department of Plant Biology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803-1705
IZBSTRACT
fers
286
287
PHYLOGENY OF CHLOROMONAS
TABLE1. List of taxa examined in this investigation.
Taxd
Source*
Outgroup
Hydrodictyon Roth
rtticulatum (L.) Lagerh.
Pediastmm Meyen
duplex Meyen
Scenedesmus Meyen
obliquus (Turp.) Kutz.
Ingroup
Asteromonas Artari
gracilis Artari
Chlamydopodium Ettl et Komarek
vacuolatum (Lee et Bold) Floyd et Watanabe
Chlumydomo~asEhrenberg
applanata Pringsheim
asymmetn'ca Korshikov
augustae Skuja
baca Ettl
bipapillata Bourrelly
jmbnata Ettl
macrostellata Lund
momusii Gerloff
noctigama Korshikov
noctigama Korshikov
mutabilzs Gerloff
pitschmannii Ettl
radiata Deason et Bold
rapa Ettl
ra'nhardtii Dangeard
zebra Korshikov
Chlorococcum Meneghini
echinozyptum Starr
Chlwnmonas Gobi emend. Wille
clathrata Korshikov
oogama (Moewus) Gerloff et Ettl
perjorata (Pascher et Jahoda) Gerloff et Ettl
rosae Ettl
serbinowi Wille
Dunaliella Teodorescu
pama Lerche
Haematococcus C. A. Agardh
zimbabwiensis Pocock
Stephanosphaera Coh n
SP,
Volvox Linnaeus
cartm' Iyengar
CBS
UTEX LB 1364
SAG 2763a
UTEX LB 635
UTEX 21 1
UTEX 225
SAG 70.72
UTEX LB 969
SAG 24.87
SAG 11-47
SAG 17.72
SAG 72.81
SAG 11.11
SAG 33.72
SAG 19.73
UTEX 578
SAG 14.73
UTEX 966
SAG 48.72
CC-400
SAG 10.83
UTEX 118
UTEX LB 1970
SAG 9.7gb
SAG l143b
UTEX 1337
UTEX 492
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
UTEX LB 1983
UTEX LB 1758
UTEX LB 2409
UTEX 1885
investigation
investigation
investigation
investigation
investigation
(U70791)
(U70793)
(U70794)
(U70796)
(U70795)
a Source of taxa used to generate the data: CBS = Carolina Biological Supply, CC = Chlamydomonas Genetics Center at Duke University,
SAG = Sammlung von Algenkulturen Gottingen, UTEX = Culture Collection at the University of Texas at Austin.
Microscopical analysis (see text) indicates that this isolate is not diagnosable as a species of Chloromonas.
amplifications were pooled to allow for the detection of heterogeneity in the 18s rRNA gene.
Sequence data: manual methods. New sequence data for most of
the ingroup taxa were obtained by using the protocols and reagents for cycle sequencing that accompany the AmpliCyclem cy-
TABLE
2. Nomenclatural changes among UTEX (Starr and Zeikus 1993) and SAG (Schliisser 1994) isolates ofChlamydomonas and Chloromonas
taxa included in the phylogenetic analysis.
Isolate
Original designation
New designation
UTEX 225
SAG 11-11
SAG 33.72
UTEX LB 1969
SAG 70.72
UTEX LB 1970
Chlamydomonas humicola
Chlamydomonas indica
Chlamydomonas monoica
Chlamydomonas nivalis
Chlamydomonaspeterjii
Chlamydomonasyellowstonensis
Chlamydomonas applanata
Chlamydomonas moewusii
Chlamydomonas noctigama
Chlamydomonas augustae
Chlamydomonas asymmetn'ca
Chloromonas clathrata
288
TAULE
3. Painmriw comparison of primaly sequence diversity among isolutes o/Chloromonas. Uncorrected distance values ( x h , where x = number of
variable posilions und 7~ = ,number ofpositzons) in painise comparisons are presented ah71e the diagonal. Absolute n u m b s uf nuckolide d@mmces an
painiiise rompnri.vons are pre.sented below the diagonal.
(>'/7Il. f b l h 7 U l U
Clm. clulhrata
Clm. (i(ig~mn
Chi. perfbruta
Clm. rosae
Clm. sprbinowi
64
68
2
38
Clm. oopma
Clm. per/or&
Clm r0.w
Clm. snln'nowi
0.038834
87
60
87
0.041262
0.052781
0.001213
0.036408
0.039441
65
88
0.023058
0.052781
0.053398
0.022451
-
37
289
PHYLOGENY OF CHLOROMONAS
FIG. 1. Phylogram from phylogenetic analysis of 18s rRNA sequence data by the MP method. The MP tree is one of eight equally
parsimonious resolutions. The areas of topological incongruence among the eight competing MP hypotheses, confined to two clades of
four taxa each, are identified by two strict consensus forks. The bootstrap values from 100 resamplings for all unambiguously resolved
nodes are included above each internode; corresponding decay index (DI) values for the MP analysis are included below each internode.
Each of the four principal lineages is identified by bracket and letter (A-D). Characters were optimized to branches under the assumption
of accelerated transformation (ACCTRAN) in reconstructing the branch lengths of the phylogram. Isolates that are microscopically
diagnosable as Chlmomonas taxa are presented in boldface.
RESULTS
290
Chloromonm serblnowf
Chlam omonas bi apillata
Chlam gmonas mu&ilis
Chlamy&onas radiata
61
loo
loo
75
Chlorom6nas oogama
Chiamydomonasrzpa
loo
Chiamvdomonasasvmnnetrka
Chlamydombnasbaca
Chlamydomonas flmbriata
+
91
fl
ID
Dunallellapawa
Chlamydomonas w l a n a f a
Scenedesmus obllquus
FIG. 2. Dendrogram from pliylogerietic analysis of 18s rRNA sequence data by the NJ method using K2P distances. The bootstrap
values from 100 resamplings are incliided above each internode. Each of the four principal lineages is identified by bracket and letter
(A-D). Isolates that are microscopically diagiiosdbk as Chl(womoncw taxa are presented in boldhce.
Chapman 1992) represents a logical future approach to addressing this systematic problem.
The two ChZ. noctigama isolates, including an isolate originally regarded as ChZ. monoica (see Table
2), are resolved as sister taxa. This observation is
consistent with the sporangial wall autolysin data
placing both taxa in group 14 (Schlosser 1984).
Three taxa, Chl. rapu, ChZ. asymmetnca, and Chl. baca,
are allied as a sister group to a clade that includes
Chlamydomonas mutabilis
Chlamydomonasradiata
Chlamydomonas b.@apillata
B
Chlamydomonasnoctigama
Chlamydomonasnactigama
Volvox carten
Chlamydomonasreinhardtii
Chbromonas oogama
Chlam domonas rapa
Cf!larnydomonas asymmetdca
Stwhanosphaera SD.
Asterbmonas gracilis
Dunaliella Darva
Chlamydomonas planata
Zenectesmus obliqruus
II
FIG. 3. Dendrogram from phylogeneiic analysis of 18s rKNA sequence data by the ML method. Each of the four principal lineages
is identified by bracket and letter (A-D). Isolates that are microscopically diagnosable as Chloromonns taxa are presented in boldface.
PHYLOGENY OF CHLOROMOht4S
291
Leeson 1985). Studies using freeze-fracture transmission electron microscopy demonstrated that the
preceding freezing-tolerant unicells have distinctive
invaginations of the cell membrane, whereas freezing-sensitive unicells lack these modifications of the
plasmalemma (Clarke and Leeson 1985). Freezingtolerant species also have been characterized as having dispersed starch plates associated with the pyrenoid matrix (if present). In contrast, compact
starch plates are associated with pyrenoids of Chl.
komma, a freezing-sensitive species (Leeson cited in
Harris 1989) that is a close ally of Chl. reinhardtii. As
a test of an hypothesis that freezing-tolerant unicells
form a monophyletic group, PCR sequencing templates were obtained from the freezing-tolerant alga
Chl. gerlofJii (SAG 20.72, Schlosser 1994). A partial
18s rRNA sequence (ca. 1600 bases, unpubl. data)
from Chl. gerlofii was included in a phylogenetic
reanalysis, and this alga is robustly placed within the
Chloromonas or cold unicell clade (data not
shown). Thus, the concept of a cold unicell clade
diagnosed by the presence of invaginations of the
plasmalemma is corroborated by the molecular evidence. No ultrastructural data are available concerning the nature of the plasmalemma in Clrn. serbinowi,
an alga collected in temperate Indiana (Starr and
Zeikus 1993). As the sister taxon to the cold unicell clade, the status of the plasmalemma in Clm.
serbinowi cannot be unambiguously predicted. However, if invaginations of the plasmalemma are correlated with cold habitats, then it is likely that Clm.
serbinowi will be found to lack these distinctive ultrastructural features.
In the context of the phylogenetic reconstruction
based on molecular evidence (Figs. 1-3), the absence of the pyrenoid in the diagnosable Chlmomonas taxa sampled in this investigation can only be interpreted as (multiple) evolutionary loss. What are
the consequences of this apparent loss? Does the
absence of a pyrenoid have a role in adaptation to
unusual habitats (e.g. snow)? Although these questions remain to be addressed, a growing body of evidence links the pyrenoid to mechanisms that enhance uptake of CO,. A large number of green algae have been shown to exhibit an inorganic carbon
(C0,)-concentrating mechanism (CCM), allowing
cells to exhibit C,-like rates of carbon uptake under
low COPconditions (Badger et al. 1980, Aizawa and
Miyachi 1986). Ramazanov et al. (1994) provided
evidence indicating that the activation of an inducible CCM in Chl. reinhardtii is linked to the development of the starch sheath surrounding the pyrenoid. More recently, E. C. Smith and Griffiths
(1996) showed that green algal phycobionts in lichen associations have a demonstrable CCM only if
that phycobiont (e.g. Trebouxia) bears a pyrenoid.
These observations coupled with our molecular phylogeny raise the question of the existence of a CCM
in Chlwomonas. Although the relevant experiments
remain to be completed (and are beyond the scope
292
,.
1 he Oklahoma University Genetic Computer Group is supported
by grants from the Center of Excellence in Molecular Medicine
and the Oklahoma Center for Arademic Excellence in Science
and Technology. This research was supported by grants from the
National Science Foundation (DEB 9220834 to M.A.B. and
R.L.C., DEB 9408057 to R.L.C., NSF EPSCoR-Louisiana Board of
Regents LaSER ro R L C . ) , the DOE/NSF/USDA Joint Program
on Collaborative Research in Plant Biology (USDA grant
9437105-0173 to M.A.B. and R.L.C.), The University of Tulsa
(Faculty Research and Summer Faculty Development grants to
M.A.R.), and the Mervin Bovaird Center for- Molecular Biology
and Biotechnology (to M.A.B.). Jenny Michalopulos, Karen
Jacohsmeyer, Whitney Palmer, and Tonya Leonard assisted with
DNA extractions and amplifications. We thank Karen Draeger for
preparing and runiiirig reactions for automated DNA sequencing.
We thank,James Moroney for sharing his unpublished data. James
Moroney, Debra Waters, Kami Rynders, and Jenny Michalopulos
provided c o ~ r i i n ~ ithat
i t ~ improved the manuscript.
Ai7awa, K. & Miyachi, S. 1986. Carbonic anhydrase and CO, concentrating mechanisms i n microalgae and cydnobacteria.
FEMS Miff-0.Rpii. 39~215-33.
Badger, M. R., Kaplan, A. & Berry, J. A. 1980. Internal inorganic
carbon pool of Chlamydomonas rpinhnrdtii: evidence for a car-
PHYLOGENY OF CHLOROMONAS
alga Chloromonas pichinchae (Chlorophyta, Volvocales). Phycologia 141213-26.
1980. Unicellular chlorophytes-snow algae. In Cox, E. R.
[Ed.] Phyto_flagelhtes.Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp.
61-84.
Hoham, R. W., Roemer, S. C. & Mullet, J. E. 1979. The life history and ecology of the snow alga Chloromonas lneuispina
comb. nov. (Chlorophyta, Volvocales). Phycologia 18:55-70.
Huss, V. A. R. & Sogin, M. L. 1990. Phylogenetic position of some
Chlorella species with the Chlorococcales based upon complete small-subunit ribosomal RNA sequences. J. Mol. Evol.
31 1432-42.
Iyengar, M. 0. P. & Desikachary, T. V. 1981. Volvocales. Indian
Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
Kimura, M. 1980. A simple model for estimating evolutionary
rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-20.
Kluge, A. G. & Farris, J. S. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the
evolution of Anurans. Syst. ZooZ. 18:l-32.
Kumar, S., Tamurd, K. & Nei, M. 1993. MEGA: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis, version 1.01. The Pennsylvania
State University, University Park.
Lewis, L. A,, Wilcox, L. W., Fuerst, P. A. & Floyd, G. L. 1992.
Concordance of molecular and ultrastructural data in the
study of zoosporic chlorococcalean green algae. J. Phycol. 28:
375-80.
Mattox, K. R. & Stewart, K. D. 1984. Classification of the green
algae: a concept based on comparative cytology. In Irvine, D.
E. G. &John, D. M. [Eds.] Systematics ofthe Green Algae. Academic Press, London, pp. 29-72.
Melkonian, M. 1990. Phylum Chlorophyta class Chlorophyceae.
In Margulis, L., Corliss,J. O., Melkonian, M. & Chapman, D.
J. [Eds.] Handbook of Protoctista. Jones and Bartlett, Boston,
pp. 608-16.
Mishler, B. D., Donoghue, M.J. & Albert, V. A. 1991. The decay
index as a measure of relative robustness within a cladogram
(abstract). Willi Hennig Society Meeting, Toronto, Ontario.
Olsen, G. J., Matsuda, H., Hagstrom, R. & Overbeek, R. 1994.
fastDNAml: a tool for construction of phylogenetic trees of
DNA sequences using maximum likelihood. M Z O S 10:41-8.
Ramazanov, Z., Rawat, M., Henk, M. C., Mason, C. B., Matthews,
293
S. W. & Moroney, J. V. 1994. The induction of the C0,concentrating mechanism is correlated with the formation of
the starch sheath around the pyrenoid of Chlumydomonas reinhardtii. PZanta 195:210-6.
Rausch, H., Larsen, N. & Schmitt, R. 1989. Phylogenetic relationships of the green alga Volvox carteri deduced from smallsubunit ribosomal RNA comparisons. J. Mol. Evol. 29:255-65.
Saitou, N. & Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new
method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol.
4:40625.
Schlosser, U. G. 1984. Species-specific sporangium autolysins
(cell-wall-dissolvingenzymes) in the genus Chlamydomonm. In
Inine, D. E. G. &John, D. M. [Eds.] Systematics ofthe Green
Algae. Academic Press, London, pp. 409-18.
1994. SAGSammlung von Algenkulturen at the University of Gottingen: catalogue of strains 1994. Bot. A d a 107:
11 3-86.
Smith, E. C. & Griffiths, H. 1996. The occurrence of the c h b
roplast pyrenoid is correlated with the activity of a CO,-concentrating mechanism and carbon isotope discrimination in
lichens and bryophytes. Planta 198:&16.
Smith, G. M. 1950. Freshwater Algae of the United States. McGrawHill, New York.
Starr, R. C. & Zeikus, J. A. 1993. UTEX-the culture collection
of algae at the University of Texas at Austin 1993 list of cultures. J. Phycol. 29(Suppl.):1-106.
Swofford, D. L. 1993. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. 1990. Amplification
and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for
phylogenetics. In Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J.
& White, T. J. [Eds.] PCR Protocols. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 315-22.
Wilcox, L. W., Fuerst, P. A. & Floyd, G. L. 1993. Phylogenetic
relationships of four charophycean green algae inferred from
complete nuclear-encoded small subunit rRNA gene sequences. Am. J. Bot. 80:1028-33.
Wilcox, L. W., Lewis, L. A., Fuerst, P. A. & Floyd, G. I,. 1992.
Assessing the relationships of autosporic and zoosporic c h l e
rococcalean green algae with 18s rDNA sequence data. J.
Phycol. 28:381-6.