Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

1

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES


REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION
BRANCH 33
MANILA CITY

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,


Petitioner,
For: SERIOUS PHYSICAL
INJURIES
-versus-

VAMPIRE PRINCESS,
Respondent,
X==========================X

COUNTER AFFIDAVIT
I, VAMPIRE PRINCESS, of legal age, married, and a resident of No.
30 Luz Circle St. Corinthian Gardens, Quezon City, after being duly
sworn in accordance with law, hereby depose and state that:
1. I am one of the persons charged with SERIOUS PHYSICAL
INJURIES pending before the Trial Court, Branch 33, Quezon
City;
2. On March 2, 2015 at around 4 oclock in the afternoon, I saw
DOOR LORD in the Eastwood Mall. Also, I aver that my corespondents things were hidden in our bags and not seen by
the public as we entered the cinema house.
3. About half an hour, I saw Door Lord running out the cinema
with an object that looks like the favorite things of my corespondents;
4. I did not witness a child accidentally poured soup on Door
Lord;
5. When they checked their respective bags, it was open;
6. When we learned about this, we immediately followed Door
Lord because they wanted to get their private property back;

7. As a good friend, I was willing to help them recover their


belongings;
8. We saw Door Lord entering a restroom for the disabled. So we
went to the restroom but it was locked;
9. We tried to open the door using force and attempted to regain
our private property;
10.
When we opened the door, we saw Door Lord holding our
stuff;
11.
We used force to get back or regain back our private
property;
12.
I deny the allegation of a case of serious physical injuries
because according to RA 386, Article 429 The owner or lawful
possessor of a thing has the right to exclude any person from
the enjoyment and disposal thereof. For this purpose, he may
use such force as may be reasonably necessary to repel or
prevent an actual or threatened unlawful physical invasion or
usurpation of his property. (n) (Vl II, p54, citing 3-1
Ennecerrus, Kipp & Wolff 92-93): If the property is immovable,
there should be no delay in the use of force to recover it; a
delay, even if excusable, such as when is due to the ignorance
of the dispossession, will bar the right to the use of force
verifying that our actions in order to get back our personal
possessions was not unlawful and that we had every right to
use force under these circumstances;
13.
This Counter Affidavit is being executed to attest to the
truth of all the foregoing facts and events and to disclaim all
the accusations against me.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my signature on


th
this 16
day of March 2015 at Manila City to Quezon City.

VAMPIRE PRINCESS (sgd.)


Affiant

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 16


2015 at Manila City to Quezon City.

th

day of March

I hereby CERTIFY that I have personally examined the affiant and


that I am satisfied that he has voluntarily executed and understood his
CounterAffidavit.

Вам также может понравиться