Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
REVIEW ESSAYS
MICHAEL S. ROTH
ABSTRACT
These two books approach photography with very different theoretical agendas.
Georges Didi-Huberman’s short, polemical study is concerned with epistemo-
The note is evidence of a will to document the mechanized murder that so many
had described (and still describe) as “unimaginable.” This so-called inability to
imagine or represent the annihilation is at the core of Didi-Huberman’s study.
6RPHKDYHVDLGWKDWWKHÀQDORIIHQVHWRWKHZLWQHVVVXUYLYRUZDVQRWWREHEH-
lieved. If the non-witness could not imagine that “such a thing could happen,”
then the testimony would literally fall on deaf ears. The blank stares that greeted
a witness because the testimony could not be imagined was yet another stage in
the process of obliteration.
3. Clément Chéroux et al., Mémoires des camps: Photographies des camps de concentration et
d’extermination Nazis (1933–1999) (Paris: Editions Marval, 2001).