Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
claimed about it. If the inductive argument is not only strong but also has
all true premises, then it is called cogent. Weak inductive arguments are
always uncogent. Here is an example:
Strolling through the woods is usually fun. The sun is out, the temperature
is cool, there is no rain in the forecast, the flowers are in bloom, and the
birds are singing. Therefore, it should be fun to take a walk through the
woods now.
Assuming that we care about those premises, then the argument
is strong. Assuming that the premises are all true, then this is also
a cogent argument. If we didnt care about the factors mentioned
(perhaps you suffer from allergies and dont like it when the flowers are in
bloom), it would be a weak argument. If any of the premises turned out to
be false (for example, if it is actually raining), then the argument would
be uncogent. If additional premises turned up, like that there have
reports of a bear in the area, then that would also make the argument
uncogent.
To critique an argument and show that it is invalid or possibly unsound or
uncogent, it is necessary to attack either the premises or the inferences. It
must be remembered, however, that even if it can be demonstrated that
both the premises and the intermediate inferences are incorrect, that
does not mean that the final conclusion is also false. All that has been
demonstrated is that the argument itself cannot be used to establish the
truth of the conclusion.
In an argument, the premises offered are assumed to be true and no effort
is made to support them. But, just because they are assumed to be true,
this does not mean that they are. If you think that they are (or may be)
false, you can challenge them and ask for support. This would require the
other person to create a new argument in which the old premises become
the conclusions.
If the inferences and reasoning process in an argument are false, that will
usually be because some fallacy has been committed. A fallacy is an error
in the reasoning process whereby the connection between the premises
and the conclusion is not what has been claimed. There are numerous
types of fallacies, which are described and defined in this FAQ.