Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Chih-Hung Huang
Yubao Chen
Graduate Student
Assistant Professor
Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Eng. Dept.
University of Michigan-Dearborn
Dearborn. MI 48128
Yi Zhang
John G. Cherng
Assistant Professor
Associate Professor
Mechanical Engineering Department
University of Michigan-Dearborn
Dearborn, MI 48128
ABSTRACT
The machining spindle is one of the most important
components that are closely related to the quality of
the product.
In order to determine
its dynamic
characteristics,
a fully instrumented
machining
spindle was built by the General Motors Technical
Center and donated to the University of MichiganDearborn.
This paper presents the experimental
modal analysis of this high speed spindle.
The
experience
received from conducting
the modal
analysis,
such as the excitation
method,
the
excitation location, the selection of accelerometers,
and the test results are included in the paper.
1. INTRODUCTION
1626
of the spindle-bearing
structure
under cutting
condition; the influence of the bearing to the spindle
assembly;
spindle thermal growth;
Recently, the
trends of spindle research work toward to investigate
the influence of the rotating motion to the dynamic
properties of the spindle structure.
A spindle with
angular contact bearings exhibits very interesting
behavior at high speeds. It has been observed that
both the natural frequencies
and the dynamic
compliance
of
a spindle with angular contact
bearings change as rotational speed varies.
To
further characterize the spindle structure behaviors,
both
Finite
Element
Modeling
(FEM)
and
experimental modal analysis should be carried out.
A research project which was funded by the State of
Michigan
through
its Research
Excellent
and
Economy
Development
Fund
(REEDF)
was
established in 1992 to conduct a detailed study on
the dynamic
characteristics
of the high speed
machine
spindle.
This paper
presents
the
experimental modal analysis of the project.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
FACILITY
SET-UP
1627
3. EXPERIMENTAL
MODAL ANALYSIS
Table 1 Freauencv
4. RESULTS
J&de No
AND DISCUSSIONS
D amoino
Freauency
16.8
14.4
120.2
0.13
156.4
2.25
201.4
2.20
665.1
0.36
It is obvious
that the flexible
modes at the
frequencies of 120 Hz and 156 Hz, i.e. 7200 rpm and
9366 rpm, will definite contribute to the deviation of
the center of the spindle at these high machining
speeds. One shall look into the dynamic modes of
his machining
equipment
before selecting
an
operation speed.
In addition to frequency
and damping,
the Star
software
also provides a method to check the
orthogonality between all identified mode. It is called
Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC). When the modal
vectors are weighted by the mass matrix, the cross
products of the modal vector are orthogonal.
The
MAC is scalar constant
relating
the causal
relationship between two modal vectors. If the values
of MAC equal to zero, it indicates there is no
consistent
correspondence
between
two modal
vectors. If the MAC value equals to 1 .O. there is a full
consistent
correspondence
between
two modal
vectors.
Table 2 presents the mode assurance
coefficients between all identified modes. In general
they are no consistent correspondence
between all
modes except the mode 3 and mode 5. This table
provides some confidence
to the experimental
resuits.
JdufeNo
1
1
1 .oo
2
0.05
3
0.00
4
0.00
5
0.02
0.05
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1 .oo
0.06
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.06
1 .oo
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.23
0.03
1 .oo
1628
5. CONCLUSIONS
The experimental
modal analysis of a high speed
spindle has been presented.
It was found that the
quality of the results was very much dependent on
how the experiment was performed.
The important
factors include the location of the excitation, the
method of excitation, the mounting mechanism of the
force transducer, and the accelerometer type. The
modal parameter identified from this study indicated
that there is a potential of resonant problem in the
high speed machining spindle. An engineer should
investigate the dynamic characteristics of the spindle
in designing the operation speed of the equipment.
PI
6. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
PI
[lOI
7. REFERENCES
PI
PI
f31
I41
PI
1629
instrumented
Oynsmomaer
Accelerometer
Figure 1. Experimental
1630
Figure 3. Experimental
000
IO
00
0
00
0
OLU
0
0
0
(
Figure 5. Potential Modes and Stability Plot
1631
Plot
I--
Y
I
4-
1632