Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Ceramics
Polymers
316L stainless
steel
Alumina
Ultra high
molecular
weight
polyethylene
(UHMWPE)
Zirconia
Co-Cr Alloys
Carbon
BACKGROUND
Titanium
Biomaterials improve the quality of life for an ever
increasing number of people each year. The range of
applications is vast and includes such things as joint and
limb replacements, artificial arteries and skin, contact
lenses, and dentures. This increasing demand arises from
an aging population with higher quality of life
expectations. The biomaterials community is producing
new and improved implant materials and techniques to
meet this demand, but also to aid the treatment of younger
patients where the necessary properties are even more
demanding. A counter force to this technological push is
the increasing level of regulation and the threat of
litigation. To meet these conflicting needs it is necessary
to have reliable methods of characterization of the
material and material/host tissue interactions. The main
property required of a biomaterial is that it does not illicit
an adverse reaction when placed into service [4].
BIOMATERIALS CLASSIFICATIONS
Biomedical materials can be divided roughly into three
main types governed by the tissue response. In broad
terms, inert (more strictly, nearly inert) materials illicit no
or minimal tissue response. Active materials encourage
bonding to surrounding tissue with, for example, new
bone growth being stimulated. Degradable, or resorbable
__________
1
May 2004
Hydroxyapatite
Ti6Al4V
Polyurethane
(PE)
APPLICATIONS
The range of applications for biomaterials is large. The
number of different biomaterials is also significant.
Applications of biomaterials are discussed below:
1. Orthopaedic Applications
Metallic, ceramic and polymeric biomaterials are used in
orthopaedic applications. Metallic materials are normally
used for load bearing members such as pins and plates
and femoral stems etc. Ceramics such as alumina and
zirconia are used for wear applications in joint
replacements, while hydroxyapatite is used for bone
bonding applications to assist implant integration.
Polymers such as ultra high molecular weight
polyethylene are used as articulating surfaces against
ceramic components in joint replacements.
Porous alumina has also been used as a bone spacer to
replace large sections of bone which have had to be
removed due to disease, [4].
2. Dental Applications
Metallic biomaterials have been used as pins for
anchoring tooth implants and as parts of orthodontic
devices. Ceramics have found uses as tooth implants
including alumina and dental porcelains. Hydroxyapatite
has been used for coatings on metallic pins and to fill
large bone voids resulting from disease or trauma.
Polymers, have are also orthodontic devices such as plates
and dentures, [4].
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
May 2004
May 2004
May 2004
a. Collapsed disc.
b. Non-Union
Osteoconduction
Description
Provides a
passive porous
scaffold to
support of direct
bone formation
Osteoinduction
Induces a
differentiation of
stem cells into
osteogenic cells
Osteogenesis
Provides stem
cells with
osteogenic
potential, which
directly lays
down new bone
Provides more
than one of the
above
Combined
Classes
Calcium
sulphate,
ceramics,
calcium
phosphate
cements,
collagen,
bioactive,
glass, synthetic
polymers
Demineralized
bone matrix,
bone
morphogenic,
proteins,
growth factors,
gene therapy
Bone marrow
aspirate
Figure 8. Fracture treated with synthetic bone graft and
internal fixation [7].
2. Synthetic Bone Grafts
Composites
May 2004
Density
4430
Poisson's Ratio
Elastic Modulus
GPa
Tensile Strength
MPa
Yield Strength
MPa
Elongation
%
Reduction in Area
%
Hardness
HRC
0.34
113.8
993
924
14
30
36
a. Physiological Behavior
These materials are classified as biologically inert
biomaterials or bioinert. As such, they remain essentially
unchanged when implanted into human bodies. The
human body is able to recognize these materials as
foreign, and tries to isolate them by encasing them in
fibrous tissues. However, they do not illicit any adverse
reactions and are tolerated well by the human body.
Furthermore, they do not induce allergic reactions such as
has been observed on occasion with some stainless steels,
which have induced nickel hypersensitivity in
surrounding tissues. The surface of titanium is often
modified by coating it with hydroxyapatite. Plasma
spraying is the only commercially accepted technique for
depositing such coatings. The hydroxyapatite provides a
bioactive surface (i.e. it actively participates in bone
bonding), such that bone cements and other mechanical
fixation devices are often not required [18].
b. Mechanical Suitability
Titanium and its alloys possess suitable mechanical
properties such as strength, bend strength and fatigue
resistance to be used in orthopaedics and dental
applications. This is why they have been employed in
load-bearing biomedical applications instead of materials
such as hydroxyapatite, which displays bioactive
behavior. Other specific properties that make it a
desirable biomaterial are density and elastic modulus. In
terms of density, it has a significantly lower density
(Table 4) than other metallic biomaterials, implying that
the implants will be lighter than similar items fabricated
out of stainless steel or cobalt chrome alloysHaving a
lower elastic modulus compared to the other metals is
desirable as the metal tends to behave a little bit more like
bone itself, which is desirable from a biomechanical
perspective. This implies that the bone hosting the
biomaterial is less likely to atrophy and resorb [18].
Figure 9.
Example of a titanium biomedical
applications [17].
May 2004
Density
Cortical Bone
Cobalt-Chrome alloy
316L Stainless Steel
CP Titanium
Ti6Al4V
~2.0 g.cm-3
~8.5 g.cm-3
8.0 g.cm-3
4.51 g.cm-3
4.40 g.cm-3
Elastic
Modulus
7-30 GPa
230 GPa
200 GPa
110 GPa
106 GPa
May 2004
May 2004
Abbr
Chemical
Formula
Phase
ACP
DCP
CaHPO4
Monetite
-TCP
Ca3(PO4)2
Ca/P
1.00
1.50
-TCP
Ca3(PO4)2
Whitlock
ite
HAp
Ca10(PO4)6(O
H)2
Hydroxy
apatite
1.67
TTCP
Ca4O(PO4)2
Hilgenst
ockite
2.00
1.50
Half Life
5.3 years
Cobalt 58
72 days
Cobalt 57
270 days
Cobalt 56
80 days
3. Disadvantages of Ceramics
A shortcoming noted with ceramics used as standalone bone substitutes is the initial low resistance to
impact and fracture. Due to its brittle structure, use of
a ceramic material in conditions of torsional, impact,
or shear stress is limited. However, cancellous bone
grafts likewise contribute little immediate structural
support prior to union with the host site and
remodeling along lines of stress.
Another
disadvantage found with ceramic implants is the
difficulty of radiographic assessment of the ingrowth
into the defect site until partial resorption has occurred
[1].
Aplications:
Cobalt 60 has a number of applications. These include:
Cobalt
Brandt discovered cobalt around 1735. It occurs in the
minerals cobaltite, smaltite and erythrite and is often
associated with nickel, silver, lead, copper and iron
ores, from which it is most frequently obtained as a
by-product. It is also present in meteorites. Cobalt is a
brittle, hard metal white in appearance resembling
nickel (and iron) but with a bluish tinge instead of the
yellow of nickel. It is rarer and more valuable than
nickel. It is diamagnetic and has magnetic
permeability approximately two thirds that of iron and
three times that of nickel. Cobalt exists as two
allotropes over a wide temperature range. The -form
a close-packed hexagonal crystal is stable and
predominates below approximately 417C
(782F),
and the -form a cubic crystal is stable and
predominates above this temperature until the melting
point. Although allied to nickel, it is more active
May 2004
Radiographic inspection
A gamma ray source
A tracer
A radiotherapeutic agent
Irradiation of plastics
A catalyst for the sulphonation of paraffin oil. In this
application the gamma rays emitted by the cobalt
cause the reaction of sulphur dioxide and liquid
paraffin.
May 2004
10
316
316L
316H
Tensile
Str
(MPa)
min
515
485
515
Yield
Str
0.2%
Proof
(MPa)
min
205
170
205
Elong
(% in
50mm)
min
40
40
40
Hardness
Brinell
(HB)
max
Rock
well B
(HRB)
max
95
95
95
217
217
217
316/L/H
Grade
Density
(kg/m3)
8000
Elastic
Modulus
(GPa)
193
Corrosion Resistance
It is now available with improved machinability (by
calcium injection treatment), which has little effect on
corrosion resistance and weldability while greatly
increasing feeds and/or speeds, plus extending tool
life.
Typical uses are: Architectural Components, Textile
Equipment, Pulp and Paper Processing Equipment,
Marine Equipment and Fittings, Photographic
Equipment and X-Ray Equipment etc..
May 2004
11
Thermal conductivity values for cobalt-based carbidehardened alloys such as HS 21 are typically about 15% of
those for pure cobalt [22, 23] .
Oxidation Resistance
Boat fittings.
Heat Exchangers.
Threaded fasteners.
May 2004
12
Corrosion
As already explained in connection with the composition of
the alloy, chromium and molybdenum are important for
corrosion resistance. The latter can be tested with an
immersion test. Test objects are suspended in a solution
consisting of sodium chloride and lactic acid (0.1 mol/l
each) and the dissolved alloy components are determined
by means of a suitable analytical method (e.g. atomic
absorption spectrometry, AAS).
The ion quantities determined can then be compared to
other alloys By comparing the corrosion rates of
comparable and clinically proven alloys, conclusions can
be made concerning the behaviour of the alloy examined.
This study method is therefore suitable as a pre-clinical
screening test. It has been shown that cobalt-chrome alloys
display an ion release that is somewhat higher than that of
gold alloys, but is still on the same order of magnitude. It is
known that dental processing, such as casting, grinding or
ceramic veneering, may influence the corrosion
characteristics of dental alloys. In the case of cobaltchrome alloys, this influence are relatively small. This
means that such alloys are very rugged [3, 22, 23] .
Biocompatibility
Dental processing and mechanical values
Can be used for veneering crowns and bridges with
ceramics. The dental processing of cobalt-chrome
alloys is assessed as more unfavourable in comparison
to gold alloys. This is also reflected in the slightly
higher costs for the required instruments. This
partially offsets the price advantage of the alloy. This
opinion must be qualified, however. In the veneering
of frames the difference in the required processing
between gold and cobalt-chrome alloys with veneering
capacity is not very great. In the case of fully cast
crowns, the more difficult processing of the cobaltchrome alloys is a significant negative factor. It is
recommended, therefore, that the processing
instructions be followed. Each alloy has its specific
features that must be taken into account. This applies
to non-precious alloys as well as to precious-metal
alloys [3, 22, 23]. .
Veneerability
Due to the higher melting interval, non-precious alloys
are generally more heat-resistant than gold alloys. In
particular palladium-free gold alloys are sensitive here
since palladium is responsible for the heat resistance,
among other things. Heat resistance refers to the
ability of an alloy not to deform even in the hightemperature range (slightly below the solidus point),
i.e. not to distort under its own weight. With a
coefficient of thermal expansion of 14.2 [10 6 * K.
May 2004
13
Density
(g/cm3)
11.6
Alumina
3.85
Bone - cortical
~2.0
Calcium
hydroxide
cement
Chromium
Cobalt chrome
alloy
Fluorapatite
~1.90
Glass ionomer
cement
Gold
~2.10
Hydroxyapatite
3.16
Methyl
methacrylate
Mercury
0.94
7.19
~8.50
3.22
19.3
Material
Palladium
based
alloys
Porcelain
dental
Stainless
steel
316L
Titanium
Ti6Al4V
Tooth
dentine
Tooth enamel
UHMWPE
Vitreous
carbon
Zinc
phosphate
cement
Zirconia
Density
(g/cm3)
~10.8
~2.05
8.0
4.51
4.40
2.14
This knee is still in use with a metal tibial tray, not shown
in this photo. The patellar button is also not
shown and is round and more than an inch across.
The patellar button is made of polyethylene plastic
also.
2.97
0.945
1.47
2.59
6.10
13.5
Figure 13. Total condylar knee prosthesis [19].
3. The Surgery
Total knee replacement is best done in a highly sterile
operating room. These are done as the first case in the
day because activity in the room stirs up dust. The room
is cleaned thoroughly the day before. A clean air
filtration system removes airborne dust particles and
keeps the air movement horizontal. The surgical team
wears sterile gowns that cover the head. These "space
suits" protect the patient from debris that could strike the
surgeon's face or head and fall back to the wound. The
suits also protect the surgeon from contact with bloody
material from the bone saw used. Antibiotics are given
before surgery to reduce the risk of infection. Total knee
replacement requires about 90 minutes of time with the
wound open. This means 3 hours in the operating room in
14
Property
Partially
stabilised
Fully
Stabilised
Partially
stabilised
(plasma
sprayed)
5.6-5.7
Density
(g.cm-3)
Hardness Knoop (GPa)
Modulus of
Rupture
(MPa)
Fracture
Toughness
(MPa.m-1/2)
Youngs
modulus
(GPa)
Poissons ratio
Thermal
expansion
(10-6/K)
Thermal
Conductivity
(W/m.K)
5.7 - 5.75
5.56 - 6.1
10-11
10-15
700
245
6-80
2.8
1.3-3.2
205
100 -200
48
0.23
8-10.6
0.23-0.32
13.5
0.25
7.6-10.5
1.8-2.2
1.7
0.69-2.4
1. Limitations of Zirconia
Figure 15. Figure of the Bone Cutting at the knee
surgery [19].
ZIRCONIA
Zirconia as a pure oxide does not occur in nature but it
is found in baddeleyite and zircon (ZrSiO4) which
form the main sources for the material. Of the two of
these, zircon is
by far the most widespread but it is less pure and
requires a significant amount of processing to
yield zirconia. The processing of zirconia
involves the separation and removal of
undesirable materials and impurities - in the
case of zircon - silica, and for baddeleyite, iron
and titanium oxides. Typical properties of
zirconia are:
- High strength.
May 2004
15
JOINT REPLACEMENTS
Total joint replacements of the hip and knee have been
performed at St. Anthony Central Hospital since their
introduction in the 1970s. During these surgical procedures,
mechanical prostheses crafted of specialized metals,
ceramics and plastics are used to replace joints irreparably
damaged by illnesses (such as rheumatoid arthritis and
osteoarthritis) or injury-related conditions (such as vascular
necrotitis and post-traumatic arthritis). As new and better
designs and materials have become available, outcomes
have improved remarkably. Many people having total joint
replacement surgery are able to enjoy active, full lives. St.
Anthony Central Hospital nurses and therapists conduct a
total joint preparatory class twice each month so that those
having the surgery know what to expect before, during and
after the procedure. Topics covered include pain
management, prevention of complications and early
mobility [14].
1. Reconstructive Implants
Unique metalworking capabilities and machining
techniques, helped create an array of reconstructive
implants including large joint replacements, spinal
implants, and neurocranial and maxillofacial meshes.
3. Zirconium
May 2004
16
3. Capabilities
Tecomet excels as a technically strong problemsolving partner prepared to meet the toughest
challenges in manufacturing and product development.
Through involvement at design inception they have
earned a reputation for providing engineered solutions,
reducing product launch time and lowering cost.
Tecomet's origins are in refractory metals such as
molybdenum, tungsten, tantalum and columbium.
Extensive experience in forging, machining and the
development of technologies to process high strength
May 2004
17
5. Biologically Compatible
Suboptimal alignment of hip prosthesesfor example,
excessive vertical positioning of the acetabular
componentincreases wear, especially near the
periphery of the component. Anatomic restoration of
the hip center of rotation and offset and avoidance of
impingement are associated with decreased wear.
Optimal surgical technique involves stable fixation to
minimize interfacial motion and avoidance of residual
particles that could potentially contribute to third body
wear. But not all new techniques have built on the
materials and methods first pioneered in the 1960s.
Recent studies of positive outcomes of hip procedures
using noncemented tapered stems have made them
among the most favored of orthopedic physicians.
Fresno, Calif-based orthopedist D. Kevin Lester, MD,
who specializes in minimally invasive hip procedures,
and is an assistant clinical professor at the University
of California, San Francisco, is an enthusiastic
proponent of the cementless tapered titanium femoral
prosthesis. The cementless, collarless hip implant is
totally compatible with a minimally invasive
procedure, and has zero failures due to loosening, and
12% chance of improvement, he says. With improved
materials and techniques have come less invasive
procedures, which have aided in the success of hip
arthroplasty,[2].
6. Orthopedic Biomaterials
May 2004
18
iii. Adhesives
Potential advantages
o Hardware removal not necessary,
reducing morbidity and cost.
o Stiffness of polymer decreases as
stiffness of fracture callus
increases.
o Can possibly be used in future for
controlled release of antibiotics or
stimulants to healing .
Requirements
o Adequate mechanical strength for
the application
o sufficient strength over a sufficient
period of time to maintain enough
stability for the fracture to heal
and prevent loss of reduction
o Degradability into products that
are mot harmful.
Examples
o Polyglycolic acid
o Polylactic acid
o Copolymers
Only about 1/20th the stiffness and strength
of stainless steel
Used in ankle fractures with poor results
Used in phalangeal fractures with better
results
May 2004
iv. Polyethylene
19
v. Ceramics
May 2004
20
Modulus
of
elasticity
( GPa )
Shear
modulus
of
elasticity
( GPa )
82
Poissons
ratio
Yield
stress
Mpa
0.27-0.30
min170
413
Stainless
steel
Cobalt
chrome
Zirconium
Titanium
200
200
100-120
70
39-45
0.22
0.33
Calcium
Sulfate
Calcium
Phosphate
18-21
6-10
.305
2000
7601000
-------
18-21
7-13
.315
-------
230
.30
SUMMARY
The most common materials used in
orthopedics are: titanium, zirconium, cobalt-chrome,
calcium phosphate, and calcium sulfate and stainless
steel 316-L. Titanium is used primarily for the
loading faces which include the pin structure,
fabrication of plates and femoral stems. The Modulus
of Elasticity of Titanium is much lower than Stainless
Steel 316-L, having a numerical difference in value
which ranges from 80-100 GPa. The Shear Modulus
of Elasticity is also lower than the particular value of
Stainless Steel 316-L, this difference is about 37 GPa.
The difference in Poissons Ratio is just about 3
decimal units, but the yield stress of Titanium is much
more higher in comparison to that of Stainless Steel
316-L. The difference expressed is more than 600
MPa for the yield stress. In conclusion Stainless Steel
316-L is much stronger, but that is not always good
because stress rises at end of plate or nail. Titanium
possesses a lower ultimate strength than Stainless
Steel 316-L but its yield strength is much more, this is
what causes permanent deformation of the material,
and Stainless Steel is easily expected to recover its
normal state than Titanium and its Alloys.
Cobalt-Chrome which is a cobalt alloy has a
Modulus of Elasticity 230 GPa, when compared to the
Modulus of elasticity of Stainless Steel gives us a
difference of 30 GPa. In this particular case cobalt
chromes Modulus of elasticity is higher than Stainless
Steel. The Poissons Ratio of both are very similar,
they both are near 0.30. The yield stress that cobalt
can support is 413 Mpa. When compared to Stainless
Steel 316-L the difference obtained is near to 243
Mpa. In conclusion, this material seems to be better
than Stainless Steel 316-L, but the only disadvantage
is the price and the facility to find it.
Zirconiums Modulus of Elasticity is 230
GPa which is very close to the Modulus of Elasticity
of Stainless Steel. The Shear Modulus of Elasticity is
70 GPa, when compared to Stainless Steel 316-L it
gives a difference of 12 GPa. The Poissons Ration of
zirconium is 0.33 and the difference between both is
May 2004
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Our thanks to Dr. Megh R. Goyal for his guidance.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
http://www.orthobluejournal.com.
Szpalski,
Marek and Gunzburg, Robert.
Applications of Calcium Phosphate-Based
Cancellous Bone Void Fillers in Trauma Surgery.
http://www.orthopedictechreview.com/issues/ma
yjune03/pg36.htm .
Gordon II, MA, W.A. A Technical Evolution.
21
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
http://www.azom.com.
Azom-Metals,
Ceramics
,Polymers,
Composites An Engineer Resource. 2004. A
to Z of Material.
www.azom.com
Biomaterials: An Overview.
http://www.suri.org/3pubs/ttoday/fall95/imp
lant.htm
Blanchard, Cheryl R. Biomaterials: Body
Parts of the Future.
http://www.orthobluejournal.com
Parikh, Shital N. Bone Graft Substitutes in
Modern Orthopedics.
http://www.karger.com/gazette/65/lidgren/ar
t_5_0.htm
Lindgren, Lars. Bone Substitutes.
http://www.cheresources.com/newparts.sht
ml. Building New Body Parts.
http://www.biomed.tamu.edu
http://www.goodsamdayton.com/knee.htm
Good Samaritan Hospital First in Area to
Introduce New Technology for Knee
Implants.
http://www.orthoteers.co.uk/Nrujp~ij33lm/o
rthomat. htm
Implants & Materials in Orthopedics.
http://www.bioceramics.com/knee1.htm
Knee Replacements
Hasting,G.W and D.F. Williams.,1980.
Mechanical Properties of Biomaterials.
John Wiley & Sons.
http://www.stanthon4central.org
Total Joint Replacement.
http://www.orthosupplier.com/players/4b.ht
m Tecomet
http://www.worldortho.com/history.html
Brakoulias, Vlasios. The History of
Orthopedics.
17.http://www.ae.msstate.edu/vlsm/material
s/alloys/titanium.htm.
Titanium Alloys and Their Classification.
www.azom.com
Titanium and Titanium Alloys as
Biomaterials.
http://www.ucbones.com/total_knee_replace
ment.htm
Total Knee Replacement
http://www.jbjs.org/ORS_2001/pdfs/1101
Wear Simulation Comparison of a Zirconia
and a Cobalt Chrome Femoral Knee
Implants.
www.azom.com
Zirconia (ZrO2) Is Zirconia a Viable
Alternative to Steel.
http://www.efunda.com
www.matweb.com
http://www.btec.cmu.edu/reFramed/tutorial/
mainLayoutTutorial.html
The Need for Bone Substitutes
May 2004
GLOSSARY
Alignment - Positioning the femur and tibia so as to allow
proper
articulation
at
the
knee
joint.
Allograft - A graft (occasionally bone) taken from a human
being
and
implanted
in
another.
Alloy - A mixture of two or more metals.
Anatomic - Relating to the structure of an organism. Often
used to describe a prosthesis, which closely resembles or
duplicates the shape and size of a normal part of the body.
Anatomic Axis - The axis formed by an imaginary line
down the center of the femoral canal. Usually 5-7 degrees
off
the
mechanical
axis.
Ankylosis
The
fusion
of
a
joint.
Arthrodesis - Surgical fixation of a joint.
Articulating Surface - Implant or bone surfaces which
touch each other. Typically used in referring to the
polyethylene tibial surface or patellar surface.
Autograft - A graft (sometimes bone) taken from a patient
and reimplanted in another part of his/her own body.
AVN - Avascular necrosis (particularly death of bone
through
lack
of
blood
supply).
22
May 2004
23
May 2004
24
Discussion
For the application of this problem in the biomechanics in
orthopedics, the geometry could be considered circular, as
stated for ideal behavior. The material would be changed
for the zirconium alloy that is also used in the orthopedics
applications. The load could be the weight of the body and
the base the floor where the load is applied. The load could
be of P=150 lb. The diameters could be changed for
diameters less than 3 in, assumed as 2 in. The Ez=2.9 x 107
psi is the modulus of elasticity of zirconium, and having a
length of 10 in.
According to the new values and new changes the question
should be arranged.
P = 150 lb
d = 2 inch
E = 2.9 * 107 Psi
F=p
= P/A
= 47.75 Pa
Figure 1
= 550 10
L = 400 mm = 0.4 m
= PL/EA
= (150)(10)/( 2.9 * 107)(12)
= 1.65 *10-5 inch
d in = 50 mm = 0.05 m
d out = 60 mm = 0.06 m
PL
= EA
= LL
o
= Lo = 2.20 10
= 0.220mm
If , = 40 MPa
P=?
)(
P = 40 MPa / 4 0.06
P = 0.0346 MPa
P = 34.6 KN
May 2004
0.05
25
Discussion
For the application in the biomechanics in orthopedics,
the geometry of the tube could be considered circular
as ideal behavior. The differences in diameters could
be seen in the arms bones which vary in dimensions
and are fixed to the shoulder. The length of the shaft
should be change in order to be more truthful with the
anatomy of the body. The torques applied in the shaft
could be seen as two different torques applied to the
different parts of the arm at the same time. The
material is titanium with modulus of elasticity known
(see table 3).
According to the new values and new changes the
question should be arranged.
T1 = 10lb in
T2 = 15lb in
6
G = 11 10 psi
d1 = 2.5in
q2(7) = q1(1)
d 2 = 2.0in
q2 = 21.43 lb/ft
L1 = 9.0in
Vb, Mb in b
L 2 = 10in
T
= T T = 15 10 = 5lb in
AB
1
2
16(5)
= 80 = 1.63 psi
I AB = 16T3 =
3
49.09
d
( 2.5)
Vb = (21.43) (3)
= 21.43lb
a)Mb = (21.43)(3)(1.51) = 96.44 lb-ft
TBC = T2 = 15lb in
16(15)
= 240 = 9.55 psi
TBC = 16T3 =
3
25.13
d
( 2)
(5lb in )(9in )
TL =
AB = GI
(11106 psi )( / 32)( 2.54)
P
6
= 42,18445
= 1.067 10 rad
,
471
.
67
AB
(15lb in )(10in )
TL =
= GI
BC
(11106 psi )( / 32)( 24)
P
BC
max
C
7
= 17 ,27815
rad
,759.59 = 8.68 10
=
BC
= 9.55 psi
= AB +
May 2004
BC
= 1.935 10
rad
26