Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
., 154'
,7
CHAPTER 5
Appendi'( SA
PURPOSE
History
The concept of using dressings,
sauces, and marinades to flavor food has ex
isted for many years. In this century, the pro
liferation of packaged consumer goods has
provided consumers with an array of
choices. Today, choices exist for a broad variety of tastes and preferences.
Our new venture seeks to identify and
develop a market that we believe is underserved. The market is for dressings and marinades from international cuisines such as
Japanese, Moroccan, and Thai. As people are
exposed to these cuisines through ethnic
restaurants, travel, and the media, they become interested in preparing these foods
at home. This is the market in which will we
operate.
Over the past several years, social and
economic changes have brought about a
tremendous shift in the way people prepare
meals and eat both in and outside the home.
Just 30 years ago, most meals, particularly
dinners, were prepared in tbe home by using
fresh ingredients and recipes that were
passed from parents to children.
Several trends contributed to the decline of this 'tradition. Erst. many women
work full-time outside the home. They simply don't have time to prepare complex
meals in the evening. Second, as the children
of these families reach adulthood, many have
never developed basic cooking skills that for
many years were learned as children at
home. Third. the availability of alternatives,
from restaurants, to prepared foods at the
grocery store, to frozen meals, has created viable alternatives to the traditional meal.
-----
Current Situation
The Product
Del Cano Salad Dressing
and Marinade is a ready-te-use bottled
product that will initially be available in six
to eight varieties. It can be used as a dressing
-~
----
"-
~'15S"~
Resources
Financial
The founding partners will
provide some of the equity, with the balance
provided by venture capital investors.
156
Physical
Rented facilities will include
administrative offices and a test kitchen
used for product development and quality assurance testing. We will outsource
manufacturing.
Human
OUf team has experience in
each of the primary functional areas required for this business, including mar-
Reputational
Our
reputational
re-
sources will be the brand identity we develop_ This identity is composed of our
distinctive logo, packaging. any trademarks
we acquire, and the skill of our management
team. Our message to consumers is that they
can prepare delicious meals easily and enjoy
healthful alternatives to frozen, prepared,
and restaurant foods.
Organizational
Del Cano creates value
by developing a product, facilitating its manufacture, getting it into the hands of consumers through distributors and retailers,
and even educa~g consumers in its use
through packaging and marketing communications strategy.
il.OBJECTIVES
Short Term
The near-term objective of
Del Cano, Inc., is to gain acceptance in the
natural and specialty food industry, with
plans to enter the conventional grocery market in the long term. We will market ,our
product to the natural foods market, working with food. brokers and distributors. Initially, we will launch our product in the
ill. MARKET
ANALYSIS
Over3l1 Market
Supermarket sales of pourable salad dressing 'totaled approximately $1.4 billion in
1996, up 6 percent over the year before, according to Information Resources, Inc., statistics. Despite the fact that many view it as
a mature category, there is still growth potential in salad dressings. marketers say. In
fact, the boom in sales of prepared salad
mixes has been a major boom to salad dressing sales. Besides, trends toward healthier
eating have endorsed the consumption of
salads, which has had a direct impact on the
dressing category.
The market leaders include:
Kraft. with a 39.3 percent share of the
total pourable salad dressings market,
has a handful of brands including regular Kraft. Kraft Free. and Seven Seas
Unilever's Thomas J. Lipton Co. (17.7
percent). with Wishbone,
Clorox Co. (15.1 percent). with Hidden
Valley Ranch
Specific Market
-;-
Major players in the pourable salad dressings category are finding it pays to segment
the business into three distinct product
niches: regular. light or reduced calorie. and
fat free. Fat-free dressings are currently providing better than 60 percent of the category's sales. As in many other product
categories. '"'fat free" is a major consumer
hot button for salad dressings, mark::ters report. Kraft sells close to 50 percent of fatfree. reduced-fat pourable dressings. Del
Cano will serve two of these categories: the
regUlar and the fat free. We will not provide
reduced-calorie dressings. because they generally contain chemical additives to achieve
the texture of the regular dressings.
The growth of fat-free dressings can be
attributed to consumers' healthier eating
habits. More people are buying fat-free
products. especially with the growth of
bagged salads. Organic food sales have been
growing 20 percent to 25 percent a year since
1990-versus 3 percent to 5 percent for the
food industry overall. In contrast to the organic shopper nf 20 years 3g0, today's typi-
IS7.}
,I
,I
\1
I
_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ 4
158
CPC.
Unilever. and Clorox) share over rhreequarters of the market among themselves.
The rest is shared by a vast number of small-
and medium-sized companies. not to mention the trend toward the development of
private-label brands. The industry may also
encounter an indirect substitute-product rivalry: The homemade salad dressing is an
option and is most likely to jeopardize the
sales in the pourable market.
Macroenvironmental Influences
Political and Government .4.na/ysis
Reports in recent years about the possible
cancer-causing effects of pesticides and
chemical additives have raised consumer
concern about conventionally cultivated
food. Because of this-and the improved
quality and lower prices of organic prodw;:ts as larger, more sophisticated producers
have entered the field-industry analysts
project wholesale organic product revenues to hit $4.4 billion this year. 25 percent
higher than in 1996. The industry should
also benefit from federal standards for organic products that are set to become law
next year. Only 17 states now have rules
pertaining to organic products, and their
rigor and enforcement vary. The credibility
conferred by a USDA-certified organiC seal
Macroeconomic Ana/ysis
The 1990s witnessed the emergence of the
"environmental market." This is the market
for equipment to clean and purify air and
water and for agri-biological products to replace pesticides and herbicides. That green
revolution has a strong effect on agricultural
technology.
Technological Analysis
Research and development have been focusing recently on light, low-calorie, lowcholesterol products, easyto-prepare, and
individual-portion products. These are targeted at very specific consumer segments
with a certain amount of purchasing power.
They must be able to respond to the assumed or actual consumers ' demands: flavor, service, safety, and health. To .obtain
those new product formulas. the food industry has been studying tbe use of alternative
products among foodstuffs themselves, especially in terms of substitution:The fats are
being replaced by substances having the
same technical and organoleptic properties,
but lower in calories because they have been
lightened. Thus, the agri-food industry has
been taking on a new dimension these last
few years: Cracking agricultural products
and assembling ingredients have become its
new business. As a result. new technologies
are being developed to allow product manufacturing under the most profitable conditions. They require significant investment in
equipment rather than l~bor and are supposed to increase processing capacities.
Sociodemographic AnalysiS
Changing attitudes. demographics, and
lifestyles are altering what Americans eat,
how much they eat, and where they eat. A
study conducted by McKinsey & Co. sees
age. income. family composition, and ethnic
159 ,
/
Ecologicnl Analysis
Although all glass salad bottles are -recyclable. ours are reusable: This will be ~n
couraged on our packaging. We have chosen
not to use plastic. even though it weighs less,
due to its negative ecological reputation.
The markets we will serve will definitely
note the packaging materials utilized. Companies are expected to make allowances for
ecological issues. As a result, the budgets of
many larger firms have allocations for that
area to comply with the macroenvironmental trend and avoid any possible conflicts.
160
CHAPTER 5
PRODUCTION
,/
to ensure frequent visits to the plant to resolve problems and to create a close working relationship.
Manufacturing
Selection Criteria
Del Cano products will be manufactured at
As mentioned ea rlier. LaSalle has prior exa contract manufacturer's facility to be deperience in the food industry. One of the pritermined on the criteria discussed here. Del
mary requirements was certification to meet
Cano views its recipes and marketing ability
governmental regulations. Production facilias critical to its success. Production capability. although important in terms of cost "" ties must meet strict guidelines to safely produce goods for human consumption. LaSalle
structure, will not lead to competitive admeets and exceeds all certification requirevantage in the marketplace.
ments and maintains this record. This allows
We have selected a contract manufacDel
Cano to focus on innovative products
turer located north of Cincinnati. Ohio:
instead of production processes.
LaSalle Manufacturing. laSalle is an experienced manufacturer, meeting the needs of
large companies such as Procter & Gamble
in the food industry. Del Cano strives to provide only the best dressings and sauces using
,"
.1.61',
Measurement Control
LaSalle is accustomed to working closely
with clients to ensure that products meet the
hig~est quality standards. The production
facility uses equipment with current measurement control systems to guarantee consistent quality of products. Precision is a
critical element in both the producer and
consumer areas. When consumers buy a botM
tie of Del Cano. they want to know that they
are receiving a product that delivered the
same unique flavor as a previous purchase.
LaSalle's quality control will provide for
consistent flavor for the consumer. Precision
also is a critical factor in our ability to accurately forecast production costs by avoiding
usage variances in ingredients.
Production
Steps in the production process are described
here. and illustrated later in this section.
ReceivingIHolding-Liquids
An addmix process will be used at LaSalle. This necessitates having holding tanks for bulk
liquids to be delivered to LaSalle by tank
car. Separate tanks will be used for liquids.
such as various oi ls (olive, vegetable. canola.
etc.) and vinegars (red wine. white wine.
cider, etc.).
Resource Requirements
Recipes and personnel constitute the primary assets of Del Cano. To that end, we will
strive to develop the most unique yet genume dressings and marinades qf any offered
in the marketplace. Company management
takes pride in innovation and has a passion
to pursue cooking-related Oppoftu.nities
that have the potential to have a larger exploitation in the high-end food market.
As our business grows, we will continue
to develop new recipes and will strive to hire
people wbo also possess the drive to continue the Del Cano legacy of fine gastronomical flavors from around the globe.
Quality Assurance
Del Cano will strive to have the highest quality standards in the manufacture of its products. This desire has already been evidenced
by the selection of a high-quality manufacturing site. We will also implement statistical
sampling of our completed products for
quality and taste characteristics. The sampling process will include the following areas:
Ingredient Content
1bis is to ensure
that bottles contain the correct proportions
of ingredients to deliver a consistent flavor
to the customer.
Fill Weights
A scale system is included
in the packing line to verify bottle content
weight. Product fill levels must be measured
to ensure that customers receive the amount
as stated on the bottle, thus. avoiding civil
penalties. Control charts will be used to
track performance and to identify problems
as (if) they occur.
Leakage
Leakage is a primary concern
for liquid products. This is predominantly a
measure of customer satisfaction (distributors and grocery chains) versus consumer
satisfaction. Chains have been known to
charge back amounts or to deduct from invoices when they receive leaking products.
To avoid this consequence, we will perform
ship tests of Del Cano cases and resolve any
issues during th~ beginning rollout stages of
production.
Breakage
Breakage will be tested in the
same manner as the leakage test.
Product quality is only one aspect of
the benefits a customer receives when they
purchase Del Cano Salad Dressings and
162
V. MARKETING ORIENTATION
Marketing Segments
\
\
I
I
I
I
Marketing Strategy .
Product
We will offer "food dressings" that can be
used as both salad dressings and marinades.
Our competitive advantage will be both
quality an~ our ability to keep up with
changing food trends.
Pricing
Our research indicates, not surprisingly. that
the consumer wishes to pay the lowest price
possible. After comparisons with other highquality products, we have set a retail price of
$3.99. In general, distributors demand a
gross profit of 10 percent, and the retail grocer requires 20 percent. Working backwards,
this .leaves us with a wholesale price to distributors of $3.02. We will sell all products at
the same wholesale price, encouraging retail
prices to be identical across the product line.
This will be encouraged for several reasons.
Primarily, it will provide the consumer with
the notion that all our products are identical
in terms of quality, regardless of the ingredients. It will also simplify decision making
<l~
'"
Distribution
Initially, we will offer our product through
specialty foods and natural foods distributors, such as Tree of Life and Blooming
Prairie (natural foods distributors) and
Kehe (a specialty food distributor located in
Indianapolis. Indiana). We will utilize our
contacts with the management and sales
teams of these !inns to help gain entrance
into their product catalogs and order guides.
To gain acceptance, we will me~t with the
distributor representatives and present our
program. We anticipate a move into the national grocery chains during our fifth year.
The first national chain we will target is
Kroger. Their distribution is organized geographically. with 16 regional buying centers.
We will present our product lines to each of
the individual buying offices. Once three of
the regions have accepted the product, it will
be distributed through Kroger's central dis. tribution center, Paytons. This will allow the
product to be sold through all Kroger stores
at a national level. We will use this same
process to gain acceptance into other large
chains, such as Star Market and Dominicks.
At this time, we will also move into the large
national distributors, such as Sysco.
Advertising and Promotion
The advertising and promotion budget is set
at $200,000 for year 1; $200,000 for year 2;
$400,000 for year 3: $600,000 for year 4; and
$800,000 for year 5. These expenditures will
be divided among both advertising (55 percent) and promotions (45 percent). This ra
tio will be maintained for the first 5 years.
Advertising
Print and radio advertising will be used
to raise awareness of our product .and
-y-
164.
,/
Promotion
We will administer several promotional activities as part of our marketing concept.
Despite the high design and. printing costs,
we will ~clude hang tags as part of our packaging. because they will further differentiate
our product as well as offer immediate
recipes and alternative cooking solutions to
the customer. These costs are estimated to
be $5,000 for design and $20,000 for printing. In addition, we will ask the consumer to
visit our Web page, where they can download and prinr these cooking solutions, devoted primarily to the fun exploration of DeI
Cano Salad Dressing and Marinade. We estimate the server costs and development
costs to be $5.000 for the first year. This may
seem low, but we will utilize our own pro-
1-
It-
Product Packaging
Del Cano will be packaged in 16-ounce
bottles that have resealable flip-top lids,
similar to a Grolsch beer bottle. costing
30 cents each. There are several reasons for
this packaging.
It is distinctive on the store shelf and
will create immediate interest due to its
uniqueness. This is critical. given the
large number of products and the uniformity of the packaging currently on
the shelf.
It is practical and reuseable. We will encourage buyers to reuse the bottles for
other purposes, creating an environment friendly image. This packaging will
-:;.;. . ~
Competitor Strengths
Our competitors in the major supermarket
chains are formidable. They include the major dressing manufacturers, such as Kraft
and Wishbone. The primary marinade producer is Lawry's. Although they may pose a
threat in terms of shelf space and distribution. we will carve out a unique position as
the only natural, ethnically diverse combination salad dressing/marinade. Therefore.
these flrms will compete at the margin of
our target usage segment. These competitors can be viewed more as low-cost
providers; we are positioning omselves as a
high-quality, superior value cooking solution provider. Their strengths also lie in their
ability to manufacture with enormous
economies of scale.
Because we are using a two-tiered market approach, the negative impact of the
maj.or dressing and marinade producers will
be minimal. During the first 4 years, we will
be selling through the natural food chains,
thus competing within the second tier: the
natural foods dressings, such as Annie's and
Cardini 's. By the time we gain acceptance
into the national grocery chains, we will have
developed bran9 recogtiitioti and a strong
following. In addition to our market approach, it is our positioning, packaging, and
superior flavors that further differentiate
our products. cushioning Del Cano from
competitive forces.
Our survey indicated that at a price of
$3.99. nearly 50 percent of respondents perceived our product as unique and indicated
high intention to purchase.
Sales Forecasts
In forecasting sales, we have used the
market-potenciallsales-requiI"ement (MP/SR)
method. This method allowed us to analyze
lh
165
Uses oj Funds
Our intended use of excess cash generated by
operations and financing will be growth
and expansion. Del Cano products have
tremendous opportunity that can only be
lEXiIiBIT I
_ ____
cf:'
. . . . .1
_ __. . . .
..
\Pro F~F~aJnc()u,e
State~~nt~
.riLh-'..........' -. {-i~; _j ;'!"~r'r ;t;;~l;i.: :tLr~~A1~~:~~~'~'~ j
_----'--- _ _
_ _ __ for Del CnnLt:- 'P:l:".
I't'Or 1
l'ar 5
Year 2
Year 3
Year"
...:;..t><---_,.
Sales
Less Expenses:
COGS
Selling
Administrative
Salaries
~
SNRl
Depreciation
Interest
....
Total E:.:pel/ses .
Net lBT
II/come 7in: Expel/se'
Net Income
~~
._____'~
~..........-... ~
1,045,501
1,072,106
1,886, 182
3,172,364
1,111,219
466,411
250,000
41,820
125,000
300,000
631,334
250,000
42,884
125,000
300,000
1,110,720
500,000
15,441
125,000
100,000
2,221,440
150,000
150,895
125,000
4,519,823
1,000,000
311,091
125,000
3,000
1,186,237
(140,730)
(39,404)
(101,325)
2,812
1,352,030
(279,923)
_ (78,379)
(201,545)
2,605
1,913,712
(21,590)
(7,725)
(19,865)
2,377
2,126
3.249.711
6.018.041
552,652
146,343
376,310
1,759,238
492.587
1,266,652
Assumed 28 % of IBT
-1
r~Xinfi!:r'i1: J>~;-F~;;;a '~h1h~w ~tl'.!e~en!!~I.D~(~~'~ ,-:
Operations
Net Income
Depreciation
(increase) Decrease in Accounts Receivable
(increase) Decrease in Inventories
Increase (decrease) in Al;l?ounls Payable
Increase (decrcase) in Salaries Payable
I"crease (decrease) in It.l come Taxes Payable
Cash FloW from Operations
Investing
Yearl
laIHmry
Febnmry
March
April
May
Jllne
(101,325)
(7,000)
(3,500)
(4,000)
(5,000)
(6,000)
(7,000)
(2000)
(15,000)
1,000
(138)
(1,036)
69
(69)
(518)
35
(79)
(592)
39
(99)
(740)
49
(118)
(888)
59
(138)
(1,036)
69
(39,404)
(156,730)
(2,722)
(10,828)
l!2ill
(5,414)
(6,187)
~
(7,734)
(2,333)
(9,281)
(2,722)
(10,828)
30,000
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
48,333
37,506
48,333
42,920
48,333
42,146
48,333
40,599
48,333
39,053
48,333
37,506
31,506
42,920
42,146
40,599
39,053
37,506
Change in Cash
Casll, December 31, Last Year
550.000
580,000
423,270
~
423,270
(contil/lled)
':
~.
~:~~-:.-_:-
Jllly
AllgUft
Septembu
October
Net Income
Depreciation
(increase) Decrease in Accounts Receivable
(increase) Decrease in Inventories
Increase (decrease) in Accounts Payable
Inarease (decrease) in Salaries Payable
(8,000)
(7,000)
(5,000)
(4,690)
(4,000)
(158)
(1,184)
79
(138)
(1,036)
69
(99)
(93)
(694)
46
(79)
(792)
(740)
49
(592)
(5,942)
396
.illi!l
lhllil
(10,828)
(1,944)
(7,734)
1!ml
(12,374)
(7,254)
(6,187)
(15,608)
(62,081)
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
48,333
35,959
48,333
37,506
48,333
40,599
48,333
41,079
48,333
42,146
48,333
(13,748)
35,959
37,506
40,599
41,079
42,146
(13,748)
Increase (decrease)
00
Deumbu
39
(40, 135)
Change in Cash
Cas/I, December 31, Los t Year
Operatiolls
Year 2
l'ear J
Year 4
YenrS
Net Income
(201,535)
(19,865)
376,310
1,266,652
(10,000)
(30,000)
5,000
(15,000)
(60,000)
10,000
(20,000)
(120,000)
20,000
(78,379)
(314,923)
70,653
75.689
(14,212)
331 ,999
Depreci~tion
'"
(20,000)
(240,000)
40,000
416,897
1,463,549
Change in Cash
(314,923)
(14,212)
331,999
423,270
108.347
108,347
94,135
~
426,134
(,463,549
426,134
1,889,683
'I
Cash
Accounts Receivable
Inventories
ai
AP1C
Retained Earnings
Total Owners' Equity
Total Liabilities and Owners'. Equity
}~ar3
Yt'or4
YearS
94,135
27,000
105,000
226,135
426,134
47,000
225,000
698,134
1,889,683
67,000
465,000
2,421,683
165,347
226,135
698,134
2,421,683
6,000
16,000
36,000
76,000
(47,130)
(31,130)
30,000
(1,130)
28,560
64,560
30,000
94,560
445,457
521,457
30,000
551,457
603,575
603,575
698,134
1,870,226
1,870,226
2,421,685
l't'or 1
Yt'or2
423,270
2,000
15,000
440,270
108,347
12,0CI0
45,000
165,347
440,270
1,000
(39,404)
, (38,404)
30,000
(8,404)
550,000
(101,325)
448,675
440,270
(117,783)
(! 11 ,783)
30,000
(81,783)
247,130
247,130
165,347
227,265
227,265
226,135
f,g.~~~W~\;W'#ti\,!,$:*!l}~n_Wi'~4Wi_mWJi'i}.m:$'f)'j@ljlm'\iml
PoplIlation
U.S.
emSflS
1995 Estimates
1 Akron,OH
2 Bloomington, IN
3 Cincinnati,OIl
678,834
115,208
1,900,438
8,589,913
2.224,974
1,437,512
956,412
5,279,500
210,303
1,476,865
4 Chicago,lL
5 Clc\'cland, DB
6Columbus,OH
7
8
9
10
Dayton,OH
Detroit, MI
Green Day, WI
Indianapolis.IN
Yl"ar1
Market Potential
Thrget Market
Trade Area
Number of Customers
Purchase Frequency
TO/Ill Volllllle
Tolal Sales
ltade Area % of
Target Market
Total
January
Fl"bnlary
March
April
!tIay
June
1s16 mos.
Not~s
18,196,663
1-,819,666
13,516,367
1,351,637
810,982
13,516,367
1,351,637
810,982
32,439
0.500
1.3,516,367
1,351,637 .
810,982
32,439
0.500
13,516,367
1,351,637
810,982
32,439
0.500
13,516,367
1,351,637
810,982
32,439
0.500
~
$64,716
~
$64,716
~
$64,716
~
$64,716
~
$64,716
~
$64,716
13,516,367
1,351,637
810,982
32,439
3,000
97,318
$388,298
10 cities
10% of market potential
43,672
6,000
262,032
$1,045.507
13,516,367
1,351,(137
810,982
32,439
0.500
35,435
60%
60%
60%
60%
60%
60%
1,091,800
32.43~
0,500
4% penetration
A,'erage annual purchases
(co1lfinued)
.
... .2 "
.'E
8E
Q
.~
~<
!
""
'=
~ ~
~ ~
:Co
e9* *"
~
~<
'y
~ ~ ~ ~
~$.~~.
. ;::.~
~Ig
"'"=
..0 .....
~
~
'"
t
<:
t
,: 0
t
e-
">
-~
.
.
.
.
.
~~~~8T
~$.~8."'!~_Cls
"O .....
N~Cr-S
~~5....,
N~
~~~~8T
::;ps. ::0, ~_ "'! ~. :;::.
S~5....,
N;;;
~~~~8T
~$.~_~."1~:;:s
;e&:;~~ONs
co
t"
~....;
-=
.~
.....
~~~~8T
~$_~8."1~:;::S
:e&;~~O~S
~ ~.::::
z;
~~~~8T
~$.::D_~."'! ~Cls
!l' ~f!~;J;Nl
~
NN"':
v.
""
"'j S': ~ ~ ~ "il;<;"
S
S
N
0-. "!.
-0""
\C!.
0:-,1
"'! ~. "'l.
"'"
~ S~5""
~'F~~2-p(cMJ:r
0""
N;;
:1:
5 C1eveland.OH
6 Columbus. OH
7 Dayton,OH
8 Detroit. Ml
9 Green Bay
10 Indianapolis. IN
11 Kansas City. MO
12 Lexington, KY
13 Louisville. KY
14 Madison, WI
15 Milwaukee. WI
16 Minneapolis-St. Paul,:MN
170maha. NE
18 Pittsburgh. PA
19 St. Louis. MO
20 Toledo, OH
1
E:
I'"
.-~
~]
>-
E g
~ ~
a [ ,~
> u
8~
*i
_ _ ..
u _ _ ..
.P:;~'Otl..~~u
oo
u~<i:::~<:;
-'t~.g=~~-;::;.gF
i~~z:!:~!~
172
678.834
115.208
1.907.438
8,589.913
2.224.974
1.437.512
956.412
5.279,500
210.303
1.476.865
1.663.453
435.736
987.102
393.2%
1,640,831
2.723,137
670,322
2.394.702
2.547.686
612.798
Year 2
Total
Market Potential
Target Market
Trade Area
Number of Customers
Purchase Frequency
TOlal Volume
36.946.022
3.694.602
1.477.841
59.114
6.000
Notes
20 Cities
10% of market potential
4% penetration
Average annual purchases
354.682
$1,07"..,106
40%
Y..,.3
'0
~
r_C.i
Population
City
1 Akron.OH
20 Midwest Cities
o
;!~.
Total Sales
"s
Populatl'on
2 Bloomington. IN
3 Cincinnati,OH
4 Chicago, IL
-or-o:"I.., ............
~~~
rEXiaBrrIV
173 .
Total
Market Potential
Target Market
Trade Area
Number of Customers
Purchase Frequency
Total Volume
Total S21es
Midwest
65.000.000
6,500.000
2.600.000
104.000
6.000
624.000
. 1,.886,182
Notes
Midwest
10%
4%
40%
(con.tin.ued)
.z1~
CHAPTER 5
Year"
TOlal
Market Potential
Target Market
Trade Area
Number of Customers
Purchase Frequency
Total Volume
Total Sales
Midwest, West Coast
130,000,000
13,000,000
5,200,000
208,000
6.000
1.248.000
NOles
Midwest. West Coast
. 10%
4%
$3,772,364
40%
YearS
TOlal
1
\
Market Potential
Target Market
Trade Area
Number of Customers
Purchase Frequency
Total Volume
Total &des
Nationwide
268,014,000
26,801,400
10,720,560
428,822
6.000
2,572.934
S1,771;n9
NOld
VITI. OWNERSHIP
Form of Business
40%
fully exploited through rapid growth maximizing penetration with major supermarket
chains.
The business is a limited liability partnership. As such, each partner is liable only for
the amount of hislher personal investment
in Del Cano, Inc. No other legal liability exists. The actual partnership agreement contains no special conditions or clauses.
Equity Positions
Owners' Equity Posicion.l
Partn~r
Karen Chatas
Rob Reader
Andy Rockafellow
Patrick Seiffert
Bich-Quan Tran
Total Owne r's
Equity
Investment
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10.000
$10.000
$50,000
Deal Structure
Del Cano, Inc., will require $500.000 to start
up and grow at the rapid rate necessary for
175
...
.-<;.
<J76,>
't.:",v
CHAPTER
The company cUrrently has no contingent liabilities as of October 1997. Each of
these risks has been carefully assesSed; we
have incorporated preventative measures
into the plan where possible. Although there
are no guarantees, we have attempted to reduce risks wherever possible, and we anticipate the achievement of our goals.
~t:fP:::;
~
The E-Entrepreneur
....
,,; )
. ....,,;::,
~\
?7
""~,::;
Everything has changed, nothing has changed.
X SUMMARY AND
CONCLUSIONS
We believe that our dressing and marinade
concept will be accepted for the following
reasons. FIrst, market trends indicate a shift
towards quick, easy, and tasty meal preparation. Our product is differentiated through
its use and packaging, helping the end user
to solve the problem of how to cook an exciting, fast, and nutritious meal. The sales,
marketing, and financial experience of our
team will provide the venture with the requisite skills to make this'venture a success.
'0.{
Outline
B2C
B2B
B2B2C
Niches
Clicks and Bricks '
Roll-Ups
Advertising Models
Pay-for-Content Models
What Have We Learned?
Summary
Learning Objectives
After rea.ding this c6pter, you will understand:
,I
177
_.l.