Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract
Green innovation, which enables us to extract energy from food crops, caused a food
shortagein2008.Countriessufferingseveredamagestartedtoreconsidertheiragricultural
policywiththeaimofbecomingmoreautonomous.Thefoodpricehikeofthetimelooks
like a reversal of the celebrated SingerPrebisch thesis proposed in the 1950s. This paper
examinestheconsequencesofthistrendonthecomparativeadvantagesanddevelopment
strategiesofdevelopingcountries.Forthatpurpose,first,trendsandshortrunfluctuations
inthepricesoffuelandbioenergycropsareinvestigated.Itisshownthatthepriceseries
offuelsandthecropsaresynchronizedonlyafterthefuelextractingtechnologycameinto
effect.Second,thereversaloftheSingerPrebischthesisisunderpinnedbythegenericform
of an endogenous growth model developed by Rebelo (1991). It is shown that as an
economygrows,appreciationofthenonreproducible,suchasmineralresourcesandraw
labor, over the reproducible, such as capital goods, is the norm rather than an anomaly.
Third,theconsequencesofthefoodpricehikeandunderlyingcapitalaccumulationonthe
development strategies of laborabundant and lowincome countries are explored. It is
concluded that the impact of the food price hikes on the alteration of a development
strategy is only incremental, without reinforcement from rawlaborsaving innovation. A
case study of inventions by JUKI Corporation, a worldleader in the sewing machine
market exemplifies the fact that, of all the major inventions the company have made,
rawlaborsavinginventionshavenotdominated,althoughJUKIsmachinesaresoldtoone
ofthemostrawlaborintensiveindustries.
Publication does
not imply endorsement by the Institute of Developing Economies of any of the views
expressed within.
TheRiseandFallinthePriceofFood,FuelandManufacturedGoods:
InterdependencybetweenPricesandTechnologyDeterminingComparative
AdvantagesandDevelopmentPaths*
TatsufumiYamagataandYokoAsuyama
InstituteofDevelopingEconomies,JETRO
March2011
Abstract
Greeninnovation,whichenablesustoextractenergyfromfoodcrops,causedafoodshortagein2008.
Countries suffering severe damage started to reconsider their agricultural policy with the aim of
becoming more autonomous. The food price hike of the time looks like a reversal of the celebrated
SingerPrebischthesisproposedinthe1950s.Thispaperexaminestheconsequencesofthistrendonthe
comparative advantages and development strategies of developing countries. For that purpose, first,
trendsandshortrunfluctuationsinthepricesoffuelandbioenergycropsareinvestigated.Itisshown
that the price series of fuels and the crops are synchronized only after the fuel extracting technology
cameintoeffect.Second,thereversaloftheSingerPrebischthesisisunderpinnedbythegenericformof
an endogenous growth model developed by Rebelo (1991). It is shown that as an economy grows,
appreciationofthenonreproducible,suchasmineralresourcesandrawlabor,overthereproducible,
suchascapitalgoods,isthenormratherthanananomaly.Third,theconsequencesofthefoodpricehike
andunderlyingcapitalaccumulationonthedevelopmentstrategiesoflaborabundantandlowincome
countries are explored. It is concluded that the impact of the food price hikes on the alteration of a
developmentstrategyisonlyincremental,withoutreinforcementfromrawlaborsavinginnovation.A
casestudyofinventionsbyJUKICorporation,aworldleaderinthesewingmachinemarketexemplifies
thefactthat,ofallthemajorinventionsthecompanyhavemade,rawlaborsavinginventionshavenot
dominated,althoughJUKIsmachinesaresoldtooneofthemostrawlaborintensiveindustries.
Keywords:Bioenergy,SingerPrebischthesis,directedtechnicalchange,developmentstrategy
ThispaperwaspresentedattheERIAIDEUNIDOExpertGroupMeetingGreenEconomy,Sustainable
Innovation,andStructuralChange:ChallengesandOpportunities,inJakartaonMarch78,2011.
I.Introduction
Aninnovationmaydrasticallychangesubstitutabilityandcomplementarityamong
commodities.Therecentdevelopmentoftechnologytoextractenergyfromsomegrainsandplantsis
oneexampleamongmany.Someediblecrops,suchasmaize,sugarandrapeseed,withethanolbeing
extractedfromthem,becamegoodsubstitutesforpetroleum,coalandnaturalgas.Itisnotablethatthe
additionaldemandforcropsforenergybroughtaboutahikeintheirpricein2008,aswellasahikefor
othercrops.Netimportersofgrain,suchasIndonesiaandthePhilippines,sufferedfromthehikeand
fromashortageintheirgrains,andsomenetexporters,suchasIndiaandVietnam,imposedexport
restrictionstosecuresufficientfoodfortheircitizens.Thisiscompletelyoppositetothesituation
predictedbyHansSingerandRalPrebischhalfacenturyago.
Thisseriesofchangesinthepricesofgrainhasalreadyaffectedtheallocationofresourcesto
somesectors.ThePhilippinesmovedtowardsareductionintheirdependenceonimportedfoodandan
expansionofdomesticproduction.Ifsimilarinnovationsaremadeinthefuture,theywillinevitably
changethestructureofthecomparativeadvantageofcommoditiesamongcountries,andmay
consequentlyalterthedevelopmentpathsofdevelopingcountries(Figure1).
Thispaperaimstoinvestigatetheimpactoftheinnovationofbiomassfuelonfoodpricesand
theirinfluenceonthestructureofcomparativeadvantageandthedevelopmentpathsofdeveloping
countries.Firstly,comovementsofthepricesofmineralcommoditiesforenergyandcropsforbiomass
fuelareexaminedthroughtimeseriesanalyses.Itisfoundthatbothlongtermtrendsandshortterm
fluctuationbetweenthemineralandbiomassfuelshavenotbeensignificantlyrelateduntilrecently,
whilethecomovementsinthelastfiveyearsareremarkable.
Secondly,acelebratedgrowthmodelproposedbyRebelo(1991),whichisabletoexplainthe
reversaloftheSingerPrebischthesis,isreviewed.Themodelindicatesthattherelativepriceofthe
nonreproducible,suchasnaturalresourcesandrawlaborforce,overthereproducible,suchas
manufacturedgoods,isdestinedtoriseastheproductionofthereproducibleexpands.Accordingtothis
model,theappreciationoffoodandfuelpricesovermanufacturedgoodsisnotatransitorymovement
butanunderlyingtrend.
Thirdly,theconsequencesofthechangesinthepricesofmineralandbiomassfuelsare
discussed.Theconsequencesmaybestaticordynamic,usingtheterminologyofeconomics.Thatis,the
pricechangesmayderivestaticadjustmentofresourceallocationbysectoranddynamicevolution
throughinnovationandfactoraccumulation.Thus,thegreeninnovationenablingthetransformationof
cropsintofuelmightinducefurtherinnovationthatisdirectedbypricechanges.
2
Therestofthepaperisorganizedasfollows.Thenextsectionshowstheevolutionintheprices
ofnaturalandbiomassfuels,whichshowsareversaloftheSingerPrebischthesis.Anendogenous
growthmodel,whichunderpinsthetrendinrelativeprice,isgiveninthethirdsection.Thestaticand
dynamicconsequencesofchangesinthepricesofmineralandbiomassfuelsarediscussedinthefourth
section.Finalremarksaregivenattheend.
II.ThereversaloftheSingerPrebischthesis
Abriefhistoryoftheriseandfallinprices
Inthe1950s,mostcountrieswereyettocompletelyrecoverfromthedamageofWorldWarII
andcolonization.Monoculturewasatypicalfeatureoftheindustrialstructureofdevelopingcountries.
Industrializationandinnovationintheworlddevelopedmanufacturedgoods,someofwhichwere
replacingprimaryproducts.Asymbolicinnovationisthedevelopmentofchemicalproductssuchas
syntheticfibers,rubberandplastic,whichsubstitutedfornaturalfibers,rubber,andwooden,ceramic
andmetalproducts.Seeingthis,RalPrebischestimatedthetrendinthepricesofprimarycommodities
andmanufacturedgoods,andreleasedareportin1949whichstatedthattherewasalongterm
tendencyinwhichthepriceofmanufacturedgoodswouldappreciateincomparisonwiththatfor
primarycommodities(Prebisch[1962]1).HansSingerinterpretedPrebischsfinding,whichfeaturedthe
roleofforeigninvestmentandinnovationinstrengtheningthecompetitivenessofmanufacturedgoods
overthatofprimaryproducts(Singer[1950]).Thisobservationhasbeencriticallyexaminedbymany
researchersanddubbedtheSingerPrebischthesis.2
Inthe1970s,thereweretwooilpricehikes.Thefirstcausedtheappreciationofallother
primarycommoditiesintandem.Thisalmostcoincidedwithariseinconcernaboutenvironmental
pollution,andthescarcityofresourcesbecameahottopic.Sincethen,therehavebeenupsanddownsin
1
ThepaperwasoriginallypublishedinSpanishinamimeographedformin1949.Itwastranslatedinto
EnglishandpublishedbytheEconomicCommissionforLatinAmerica(ECLA).Thisisareprintofthe
paperthatwaspublishedinajournaloftheECLAin1962.
2
Althoughmanyempiricalstudieshavetestedwhetheraseculardownwardtrendinrelative
commoditypricesisobservedaspredictedbytheSingerPrebischthesis,theresultssofarhavebeen
mixed.Forexample,GrilliandYang(1988),LenandSoto(1997),Zanias(2005),andHarveyetal.(2010)
providesomesupportingevidence,whileCuddingtonandUrzua(1989),Cuddington(1992),Kellard
andWohar(2006),Cuddingtonetal.(2007),andGhoshray(2010)castdoubtonthethesis.Itshouldbe
notedthatthesestudiesdifferintermsoftheirmodelspecifications(e.g.whethertheychoose
trendstationaryordifferencestationarycontainingaunitroot,andwhethertheyallowforstructural
breaksornot),theperiodstheycover,andthecommoditiestheyexamine.
3
commodityprices.Oneunderlyingtrendbehindthepricechangeswasinnovationdirectedtoward
scarceresourcesthatneededtobesaved.Suchdemanddriveninnovationscontinue,andthemostrecent
andinfluentialinnovationshaveenabledtheextractionofindustrialenergyfromfoodcrops,suchas
rapeseed,maizeandsugar.
Trendsandfluctuationsintherelativepricesofprimarycommoditiestomanufacturedgoods
Thefirstfocusinthispaperistolookintolongtermtrendsandshorttermfluctuationsinthe
pricesofgroupsofcommodities.
Figures2and3displaytimeseriesofrelativepricesofenergyandnonenergyprimary
commoditiestomanufacturedgoods,respectively.Thepriceofmanufacturedgoodshasincreased
almostmonotonicallysincethe1960s.Exceptfortheperiods19811985and19952002,thetrendlooks
smoothandrisescontinuously.Hence,theupsanddownsintherelativepricesarelargelydueto
changesinthecommodityprices.Bothfiguresshowthattherewerehikesinpriceinbothenergyand
nonenergycommoditiesagainstmanufacturedgoodsinthe1970sandduringthefirstdecadeofthe
newmillennium.Atthesametime,downwardtrendsareapparentinthe1980s.Astarkdifferenceisthat
theenergypriceappreciatedinthelate1970s,becauseofthesecondoilcrisis,whilethepricesof
nonenergycommoditiesremainedstable.
Theincreaseinenergypricesinthelastdecadehasbeensteepenoughfortheleveltoexceed
thepeakreachedin1980,sotheoveralltendencyofthetrendslopesupward.Inotherwords,thetrend
goesagainsttheSingerPrebischthesisasfarastherelationshipofenergytomanufacturedgoodsis
concerned.
PricesofEnergyandBioEnergyCrops
Itisconsideredthatanimportantdeterminantofhikesincommoditypricesisthefood
shortagecausedbythedevelopmentoftechnologytoextractindustrialenergyfromsomefoodcrops.3
RapeseedisthemainbiodieselfoodstockinEuropewhilemaizeisthemaincropforbioethanolinthe
UnitedStates(IMF[2008],p.97).Sugarisanotherpotentialfoodcropsupplyingethanolforindustrial
use.Doestheevolutioninthepriceofthesecropsandoftraditionalenergyreflectthisrecentinnovation
toextractindustrialenergyfromthesecrops?
3
Mitchell(2009)claimsthatthemostimportantfactorbehindtherapidincreaseinfoodpricesbetween
2002 and 2008 was the increase in biofuel production in the US and EU. Baffes and Haniotis (2010)
reviewvariousstudies,includingMitchell(2009),andconcludethattheimpactofbiofuelproductionon
therecentfoodpricehikehasnotbeenverylargesofar.
4
Timeseriesofthepricesofenergycommoditiesandthesefoodcropsprovideempirical
materialwithwhichtoaddressthisquestion.
Figure4displaysatimeseriesofthenaturallogarithmofthepricesofcrudeoilandnaturalgas.
Therearesomeinterestingobservations.Firstly,sincethemid1970s,themovementsofthetwotime
serieshavebeenquitesimilar.Secondly,fromthemid1970sonwardthepriceofcrudeoiltendstolead
thatofnaturalgas.Thirdly,crudeoilwasmorevolatileintheearly1970s.
Docrudeoilandnaturalgassynchronizebecausetheyarebothenergycommodities?Or,do
allotherprimarycommoditiestendtocomove?Theanswertothelastquestionisno.Figure5
demonstratesthatthepricesoffoodcropswhichturnedouttobeusedforenergyfluctuatedistinctly
fromthatofcrudeoil.Butwhataboutthelongtermtrendandshorttermfluctuations?Oncethetwo
partsaredecomposed,eitheronemightcomovewellwithitscounterpart,crudeoil.
Fortheinvestigationofthelongtermtrend,cointegratingrelationsareestimatedbetween
crudeoilandthecommoditiesmentionedabove.Thebaselineformulaforthecointegratingrelationsis
thefollowing4:
ln
ln
(1)
Iftheerrorterm( )isstationaryintime,therelationbetween ln
and ln
issustainableinthe
longrun.
Figure4hintsthatthepriceofcrudeoilandthatofnaturalgasshareacommontrend,evenif
eachseriesfollowsarandomwalk.Table1summarizestheresultsofexercisestoestimatethe
cointegrationrelationsbetweenthepriceofcrudeoilandthoseofrapeseedoilandmaizefor19752010.
Irrespectiveofvariousassumptionsconcerningtrendsandinterceptsforthecointegratingrelations,the
hypothesisthatthereisacointegratingrelationbetweenthepriceofcrudeoilandthatofnaturalgasis
accepted5.Moreover,theestimatesofthecoefficientonthelogarithmofthepriceofnaturalgas()areall
closetounitywithsmallstandarderrors.Theseobservationsimplythatnaturalgashasbeenagood
substituteforpetroleumsincethemid1970s.
Thesameestimationexerciseindicatesthattherewasnostationarylinearrelationbetweenthe
priceofcrudeoilandthepricesofeitherrapeseedoilormaize(Table1).Thisobservationsuggeststhat
4
Asforthevariationinassumptionsoninterceptsandtimetrends,seethefootnotetoTable1.
Onereservationisthatoncetheperiodisextendedtowards1960,anycointegratingrelationsarenot
detectedwiththesamesetofexercises.Naturalgasdoesnotseemtohavebeenaneffectivesubstitutefor
crudeoilbeforethemid1970s.
5
fromalongtermperspective,rapeseedoilandmaizehavenotbeengoodsubstitutesforpetroleum,in
contrasttonaturalgas.
Inthemeantime,theshorttermfluctuationinpricesmightbedifferent.Inordertoexamine
shorttermcomovementamongtheprices,HodrickPrescott(HP)filteredseriesarescrutinized.The
HPfilterisanoperatorforatimeseriestosingleoutcyclesatfrequenciesofeightyearsorhigher.Cycles
incorporatedinatimeseriesatfrequencieslowerthaneightyearsarecountedasalongterm
(nonlinearandlinear)trendwhichremainsaftertheHPfilterisapplied6.
HPfilteredlogpricesofcrudeoilandnaturalgasareshowninFigure6.Generallyspeaking,
theHPfilteredpriceofnaturalgasmimicsthatofcrudeoilwell.Thepriceofcrudeoiltendstoleadthat
ofnaturalgasanditsvariationismoreamplifiedthanitscounterpartforthe1960s90s.
HPfilteredpricesofrapeseedoilandmaizebehaveintotallydifferentways.Untilvery
recently,theshorttermfluctuationinthepriceofrapeseedoilisalmosttheoppositeofthatofits
counterpartforcrudeoil.Ontheotherhand,for200710thesealmostcoincide(Figure7).Similarly,the
priceofmaizehasfollowedthatofcrudeoilonlyfaintlyuntil2006,whilethecomovementsofthetwo
for200709areimpressive.Thissuddenchangeinthecomovementsinpriceamongcrudeoil,rapeseed
oilandmaizeappearstoreflecttheinnovationmakingrapeseedoilandmaizeeffectivesubstitutesas
sourcesofenergy.
TheRelativePriceofEnergytoCapitalGoods
Acriticalissueiswhetherthisappreciationinfuelsandfoodcropsisatransitoryor
fundamentaltrend.Agrowthmodelthatshedslightonthisaspectwillbeintroducedinthenextsection.
Herewemakesomestatisticalobservations,whichwillbeincorporatedinthemodel.
Animportantobservationisthattherelativepriceofcapitalgoodstobothenergyand
consumptiongoodshassteadilydeclinedsincetheendofWorldWarII.Therelativepriceofcapital
goodstoenergygraduallyincreasedintheinterwarperiodanditexhibitsaremarkabledeclineinthe
latterhalfofthecentury(Figure9).Thispostwardeclineintherelativepriceofcapitalgoodstoenergy
6
Moreprecisely,theHPfilterisanapplicationofthefollowingoptimizationproblemtoattaina
nonlineartrend:
Min.
cannotbecompletelyattributedtocontinuousincreasesinthepriceofenergyasshowninFigure2,
becausethepriceofcapitalgoodsdeclinedagainstconsumptiongoods,too7(Figure10).Thistendencyof
adeclineinthepriceofcapitalgoodsandariseinthepriceofenergyisexplainedinconjunctionwith
SergioRebelosAKmodelofeconomicgrowth,whichiselaboratedinthenextsection.
III.AgrowthmodelunderpinningthereversaloftheSingerPrebischthesis
Acontinuousriseinthepriceofenergyandarelativedeclineinthepriceofcapitalgoodsmay
beconsistentoutcomesofthereasonablemechanismofeconomicgrowththatwasdepictedinaseminal
paper,Rebelo(1991),knownastheAKmodelintheliteratureofendogenousgrowth.Thetwosector
versionoftheAKmodeliselaboratedinthepaper,whichischaracterizedbyadeclineintherelative
priceofacommodityproducedwithaconstantreturnstoscaletechnologyinreproducibleinputsanda
riseintherelativepriceofnonreproduciblegoodsandacommodityproducedwith
diminishingreturnstoscaletechnologyinreproducibleinputs8.Thesefeaturesareharmoniouswiththe
observationsdemonstratedintheprevioussection.
Themodelworksasfollows.Thereisacapitalgoodproducedwithaconstantreturnstoscale
technology:
(2)
where ,
,andAaretheamountsofinvestmentandcapitalstock,andtheproductivityparameter,
isassumedtobeusedtoproducebothinvestmentgoodsandconsumptiongoods.
respectively.
denotesthepercentageshareofcapitalstockusedtoproduceconsumptiongoods,sothattherest,
1
,istobeusedtoproduceinvestmentgoods.
Capitalisaccumulatedfrominvestmentwithdepreciationattherateof:
(3)
Akeyassumptionisthatconsumptiongoodsareproducedwithaconstantreturnstoscale
Thedeclineintherelativepriceofcapitalinthepostwarperiodmotivatedresearchoncapitalskill
complementarityanddirectedtechnicalchange.SeeHornsteinetal.(2005,pp.13081311)asanexample.
8 Thistechnologymaybeconstantreturnstoscaleinallinputs,includingboththereproducibleandthe
nonreproducible.
7
technologyincapitalstockandnonreproducibleinputs,T.Inotherwords,thetechnologyis
diminishingreturnstoscaleinreproducibleinputs:
(4)
where 0
1.Typicalnonreproducibleinputsarelaborandland.
,whereandare
Assumingatimeadditivelyseparableutilityfunction,
parameterssignifyingtimepreferenceandrelativeriskaversion,respectively,arationalconsumer
allocatesresourcessothatthegrowthrateofconsumption,
,isequalto
,where istheinterest
rateinconsumptiongoods.Nationalincomeisformulatedas
istherelativepriceofcapitalgoodstoconsumptiongoodsand
,where
isthefactorpriceofthe
nonreproducible.Notethattherelativepriceofcapitalgoodstothenonreproducibleis
Inanequilibrium,thevalueofthemarginalproductofcapitalisequalizedbetweenthe
productionofinvestmentgoodsandconsumptiongoodsthroughthefreemovementofcapital.
Therefore,bydifferentiatingtherighthandsidesofeqs.(2)and(4),thefollowingstaticequilibrium
conditionisattained:
(5)
Themarketequilibriumgrowth9ofthiseconomyischaracterizedbythefollowingrelations:
(6)
(7)
Thatis,capitalgoodsgrowby
whichisfasterthantherateofgrowthforconsumptiongoods
.Therelativepriceofcapitaltoconsumptiongoodsdeclinesby
priceofcapitaltononreproducibleinputsdecreasesevenfaster,by
,andtherelative
.10
Asamatteroffact,whatdeterminesthegrowthrateinthismodelisnotthefunctionofa
commodity,suchasinvestmentandconsumption,butwhetherthetechnologyis
Notethatthereisasteadystateequilibriuminthiseconomyandthatwithouttransitionthesteady
stateequilibriumisachieved.
10
.
constantreturnstoscaleinreproducibleinputsordiminishingreturnstoscale.However,the
fundamentalmechanismbehindtheeconomicgrowthisthattheoutputofacommoditygrowsmore
slowlyifitspricerisesmorequickly. Putdifferently,thepriceadjuststoquantitativechangessothata
stableindustrialstructureandexpenditurecompositionaremaintainedinthelongrun.
Aconsequenceofthiseconomicmechanismisthatinagrowingeconomythereproducible
growwhilethenonreproducibledonot(byconstruction).Offsettingthissetofevolutions,therelative
priceofthereproducibletothenonreproducibledeclines.Moreover,ifthereproducibleare
heterogeneous,thosegrowingfasterdepreciateintermsofpriceovertherest.Thus,therelativepriceof
capitalgoodstothenonreproducibledeclinesfasterthanthatbetweencapitalgoodsandconsumption
goods.
ThisisexactlywhatappearstohavehappenedwiththeU.S.dataforthepostwarperiod,see
Figures9and10.Iftheabovementionedmechanismliesbehindthefigures,thereversalofthe
SingerPrebischthesisisnottemporarybutdeepseated.Thispossibilitymustbetakenseriously.
IV.ImpactsonComparativeAdvantagesandDevelopmentPaths
Reproducibleandnonreproduciblefactors
SupposeRebelosmodelunderpinstheevolutioninthepricesofcommoditiesobservedin
sectionII.Then,howisthestructureofcomparativeadvantagesandthedevelopmentpathsof
lowincomecountriesaffected?Inordertoaddressthisquestion,letusapplyRebelosgeneralmodelfor
therealeconomyofalowincomecountry.Table2summarizesthecharacteristicsoffactorsof
productionthatareavailableinlowincomecountries.ThefactorsstudiedinsectionIIwereenergyand
capitalgoods,theformerarenonreproduciblewhilethelatterarereproducible.Theconventional
conceptoflaborcanbedividedintorawlaborandskill.Theformerisnothingbutmanhours
devotedtoproduction,sothisisnonreproducibleanditsgrowthisboundedbythegrowthrateofthe
population.Skillrepresentsallqualitativefactorsenhancingthehumancontributiontoproduction,
includingphysicalskills,techniques,knowledge,knowhow,evendisciplineandattitude.Thisportion
ofhumaninputsmaybereproduciblethrougheducation,training,learningbydoingandscientific
research,andcan,intheory,growunboundedly.Finally,landisanothernonreproducibleandbounded
factor.
AccordingtoRebelosmodel,therelativepriceofthereproducibletothenonreproducibleis
likelytodeclineinthelongrun.Thedirectionofchangeintherelativepriceamongreproduciblefactors
9
dependsontheintrinsicpotentialforthegrowthofthecommodityasreflectedbyitsmarginal
productivitywithrespecttoacompositeofreproduciblefactors(Table2).
Staticanddynamicsubstitutabilityamongfactors
TheevolutionofrelativepricesinTable2hasimportantimplicationsforthestructureof
comparativeadvantagesandthedevelopmentpathsoflowincomecountries.First,countrieswith
mineralandbiomassenergywillheightentheirdegreeofspecializationinenergyproduction.Second,
othernonreproducibleinputs,suchasrawlaborandland,becomescarcer,solabor(land)abundant
countriesmayderiveanadvantagefromspecializinginlabor(land)intensiveindustries.Generally,
developedcountriesownreproducibleinputsduetotheirgreateraccumulationofphysicalandhuman
capital.Thus,theoriginalstructureofcomparativeadvantagesmightbestrengthenedbyeconomic
growthofRebelostype.11
However,thisisnottheendofthestory.Whatalsomattersissubstitutabilityamongfactors.If
thesubstitutabilitybetweenanonreproduciblefactor(e.g.rawlabor)andareproduciblefactor(e.g.
capitalgoods)ishigh,then,asthereproduciblefactorisreproducedandaccumulates,thescarcityofthe
nonreproduciblefactorisattenuated.Moresimply,iftherearecheapmachineswhicharegood
substitutesforrawlabor,theabundanceofrawlaborisnolongerasourceofcomparativeadvantage.
Substitutabilitybetweenfactorsisgenerateddynamically,too.Inparticular,theevolutionof
relativepricesamongfactorsinducesinnovationinordertosavefactorsthatcandemandahigherprice.
Thisisdubbedinducedinnovationordirectedtechnicalchange.12Itiswellknownthattheenergy
pricehikesinthe1970swerefollowedbyenergysavingtechnicalprogress.Thus,demanddriven
innovationmayplayanimportantroleinchangingthestructureofcomparativeadvantages.Thisis
missinginRebelosmodel,wheretheelasticityofsubstitutionisassumedtobeconstant.
Oncethepossibilityofstaticanddynamicsubstitutionbetweenfactorsistakenintoaccount,
ourperspectiveontheevolutionofcomparativeadvantagesanddevelopmentpathsismodified.In
11
Infact,theauthorsfindthatsomelaborabundantandlowincomecountries,suchasBangladeshand
Cambodia,succeededinnurturingthegarmentindustry,atypicallaborintensiveindustry,andin
raisingwagesinasporadicmanner.SeeAsuyamaetal.(2010),Bakhtetal.(2009),Fukunishietal.(2006),
andYamagata(2006,2009).
12
ThisideawasalreadymentionedinHicks(1932),andwasexaminedeithertheoreticallyorempirically
bytheearlyinducedinnovationliterature(e.g.Habbakuk,1962;Kennedy,1964;Samuelson,1965;and
HayamiandRuttan,1970).Morerecently,Acemoglu(2002)constructedamoresophisticatedtheoretical
modelthatexplainsthedirectedtechnicalchangemechanism.Regardingtheimpactofenergyprices
oninnovation,Newelletal.(1999)andPopp(2002)foundpositiveassociationsbetweenenergyprices
andenergysavinginnovation.SeeAcemoglu(2009,chapter15)forasurvey.
10
additiontotheendowmentofnonreproduciblefactors,thedirectionsanddegreeofinnovationtomake
areproduciblefactormoresubstitutableforanonreproduciblefactormatter,too.Forexample,the
accumulationofreproduciblefactors,whichisnothingbutcapitalaccumulation,raisesthecapitalto
laborratioandtherelativewageintermsofcapital(seeTable3).Thatis,thepriceofrawlabor
appreciatesoverthatforcapitalgoods.Thischangemayinduceeffortstoinventnewmachinesasa
substituteforrawlabor.Ifthisissuccessful,theadvantagethatliesinabundantlaborisdilutedbecause
oftheproliferationofnewmachines.Ifthismomentumisgreatenough,theHecksherOhlinlikechoice
ofstrategicindustriesdoesnotmakesenseanymorebecauseinnovationcompletelyreorganizesthe
structureofanycomparativeadvantagebasedonfactorendowment.
Casestudy:Varioustypesofinventionsforthesewingmachine
Isongoinginnovationstrongenoughtonullifythestaticstructureofcomparativeadvantages?
Toaddressthisquestion,theauthorstakeacoreproductionprocessinatypicallaborintensiveindustry
foracasestudy.Thisisthesewingprocessintheapparelindustry.Obviously,themaindeviceusedin
thesewingprocessatpresentisthesewingmachine.Aleadingfirmsupplyingsewingmachinesallover
theworldisJUKICorporation,aJapanesefirmwhichwasfoundedin1938.Majorinventionsinthe
sewingmachinesmadebyJUKICorporationaresummarizedinTable4.
AninterestingobservationfoundinTable4isthatthereareasmanyskillsaving(denotedby
SS)inventionsasrawlaborsavinginventions(RT,RW)forthesewingmachineduringthisfirmslife.
Thisobservationprobablyreflectsthefactthatskilledworkersarenotabundantinthecountriesto
whichJUKIexportsitsmachines.Therefore,inventionsthatsaveskilledworkersmakesense.
Inanutshell,rawlaborsavinginventionsarenotdominantenoughtooverturnthestructure
ofcomparativeadvantagebasedonfactorendowment.
V.Concludingremarks
Hasgreeninnovationwhichenablestheextractionoffuelfromfoodcropsdramatically
changedtheincentivestructureforfactorsofproductionintherecentpast?Istheriseinthepricesof
foodandenergytransitory,orisitbasedonfundamentals?Ifthelatteristrue,howdoesitaffectthe
structureofcomparativeadvantagesandthedevelopmentpathsoflowincomecountries?Theseare
threequestionsposedinthispaper.Eachoftheabovequestionswasassignedadifferentsection(sections
IIIVinorder).
11
Theanswertothefirstquestionisyes.Thisisobviousfromthefactthatthegreeninnovation
causedfoodshortagesforsometimeperiod.Theanswertothesecondquestionisbasedonthesimple
twosectorgrowthmodelformulatedbyRebelo(1991).Aslongasreproduciblecommoditiesare
reproducedsteadily,therelativepriceofthenonreproduciblerisestobalanceindustrialstructureandto
maintainanequilibrium.Fromthisviewpoint,thereversaloftheSingerPrebischthesisisnotan
anomalybutthenorm.
Finally,facedwithadramaticriseinfoodprices,whilemoderatelylaborabundantcountries
haveturnedtheirresourcestofoodproduction,extremelylaborabundantcountrieshavetakenoverthe
releaseddemandforlaborintensiveproductsfrommoderatelylaborabundantcountries.Therefore,the
modificationofthedevelopmentstrategyforhighlylaborabundantcountriesisincremental.Inreality,
however,thereisanotherunderlyingforce,innovation,whichcreatesnewproductiveinputsthat
substituteforotherfactorsofproduction.Ifmanysortsofnewmachinesareinventedandeffectively
substituteforrawlabor,thenthegroundforcomparativeadvantageinrawlaborintensiveindustries
willbefurtherdiminished.Thecasestudyoftheinventionsinsewingmachinesforthegarment
industryshowsthattheactualdirectionofinventionsisnotmonotonicbecausemultiplefactorsof
production(inparticular,skilledandlowskilledworkers,andvarioustypesofmachinesand
equipment)areallinvolvedinafactory.
Marketforcesraisethevalueofthenonreproducible,i.e.naturalresourcesandrawlabor,
evenly,asthereproducibleaccumulate.Greeninnovationsmayplayaroleinreorganizingthestructure
ofcomparativeadvantages.However,notmanyinventionsseemtobegreatenoughforalowincome
countrytoswitchtheirdevelopmentstrategy.
12
References
Acemoglu,Daron(2002)DirectedTechnicalChange,ReviewofEconomicStudies,Vol.69,No.4,pp.
781809.
Acemoglu,Daron(2009)IntroductiontoModernEconomicGrowth,PrincetonandOxford:Princeton
UniversityPress.
Asuyama,Yoko(2009)Gijutsushinponokoseibunseki:Hoseigyowotsuujitarodoshuuyakuteki
kogyoukahenoshisa(inJapanese:WelfareAnalysisofTechnicalProgress:Implicationsfor
laborintensiveindustrializationledbythegarmentindustry),inTatsufumiYamagata,ed.,Kohatsu
TojokokunoKaihatsuSenryaku(DevelopmentStrategiesofLowIncomeCountries),Chiba,Japan:
InstituteofDevelopingEconomies,pp.2949.
Asuyama,Yoko,DalinChhun,TakahiroFukunishi,SeihaNeouandTatsufumiYamagata(2010)Firm
dynamicsintheCambodiangarmentindustry:Firmturnover,productivitygrowth,andwageprofile
undertradeliberalization,DiscussionPaperNo.268,InstituteofDevelopingEconomies
(http://www.ide.go.jp/English/Publish/Download/Dp/268.html).
Baffes,John,andTassosHaniotis(2010)PlacingThe2006/08CommodityPriceBoomIntoPerspective,
WorldBankPolicyResearchWorkingPaper,No.5371.
Bakht,Zaid,TatsufumiYamagataandMohammadYunus(2009)Profitabilityanddiversityamong
knitwearproducingfirmsinBangladesh:TheprospectsofalaborintensiveindustryinaLeast
DevelopedCountry,DevelopingEconomies,Vol.47,No.3,September,pp.340366.
Cooley,ThomasF.andEdwardC.Prescott(1995)Economicgrowthandbusinesscycles,inThomasF.
Cooley,ed.,FrontiersofBusinessCycleResearch,Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress,pp.138.
Cuddington,JohnT.(1992)LongRunTrendsin26PrimaryCommodityPrices:ADisaggregatedLook
atthePrebischSingerHypothesis.JournalofDevelopmentEconomics,Vol.39,No.2,pp.207227.
Cuddington,JohnT.,andCarlosUrza(1989)TrendsandCyclesintheNetBarterTermsofTrade:A
NewApproach.EconomicJournal,Vol.99,No.396,pp.426442.
Cuddington,JohnT.,RodneyLudema,ShamilaA.Jayasuriya(2007)PrebischSingerRedux,inDaniel
LedermanandWilliamF.Maloney,eds.,NaturalResources:NeitherCursenorDestiny,PaloAlto,
CaliforniaandWashington,D.C.:StanfordUniversityPressandWorldBank,pp.103140.
Fukunishi,Takahiro;MayumiMurayama;TatsufumiYamagataandAkioNishiura(2006)
IndustrializationandPovertyAlleviation:ProPoorIndustrializationStrategiesRevisited,Vienna:UNIDO
(http://www.unido.org/index.php?id=o59645).
Ghoshray,Atanu(2010)AReexaminationofTrendsinPrimaryCommodityPrices,Journalof
DevelopmentEconomics,doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.04.001.
Grilli,Enzo,andMawChengYang(1988)PrimaryCommodityPrices,ManufacturedGoodsPrices,and
theTermsofTradeofDevelopingCountries:WhattheLongRunShows.WorldBankEconomicReview,
Vol.2,No.1,pp.147.
Habbakuk,H.J(1962)AmericanandBritishTechnologyintheNineteenthCentury:TheSearchfor
LabourSavingInventions,Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.
Harvey,DavidI.,NeilM.Kellard,JakobB.Madsen,andMarkE.Wohar(2010)ThePrebischSinger
Hypothesis:FourCenturiesofEvidence,ReviewofEconomicsandStatistics,Vol.92,No.2,pp.367377.
Hayami,Yujiro,andV.W.Ruttan(1970)FactorPricesandTechnicalChangeinAgricultural
Development:TheUnitedStatesandJapan,18801960,JournalofPoliticalEconomy,Vol.78,No.5,pp.
11151141.
Hicks,John.R.,(1932)TheTheoryofWages,London:Macmillan.
Hodrick,Robert,andEdwardC.Prescott(1997),PostwarU.S.BusinessCycles:AnEmpirical
Investigation,JournalofMoney,Credit,andBanking,29(1),116.
13
Hornstein,Andreas,PerKrusellandGiovanniL.Violante(2005)Theeffectsoftechnicalchangeonlabor
marketinequalities,inPhilippeAghionandStevenN.Durlauf,eds.,HandbookofEconomicGrowth,Vol.
1B,Amsterdam:Elsevier,pp.12751370.
InternationalMonetaryFund(IMF)(2008)WorldEconomicOutlook2008,Washington,D.C.:IMF.
Ishikawa,Kinzo(1994)ShinApareruKogakuJiten(InJapanese:NewEncyclopediaforApparel
Engineering),Osaka,Japan:Seniryutsukenkyukai.
JUKI(2008)Tokushu:OkagesamadeJUKIha70syunenwomukaerukotogadekimashita.(In
Japanese:Featurearticle:JUKImarksits70thanniversary),JUKImagazine,Vol.236,pp.27.
Kellard,Neil,andMarkE.Wohar(2006)OnthePrevalenceofTrendsinPrimaryCommodityPrices,
JournalofDevelopmentEconomics,Vol.79,No.1,pp.146167.
Kennedy,Charles(1964)InducedBiasinInnovationandtheTheoryofDistribution,EconomicJournal,
Vol.74,No.295,pp.327368.
Len,Javier,andRaimundoSoto(1997)StructuralBreaksandLongRunTrendsinCommodityPrices.
JournalofInternationalDevelopment,Vol.9,No.3,pp.4457.
Mitchell,Donald(2008)ANoteonRisingFoodPrices,WorldBankPolicyResearchWorkingPaper,No.
4682.
Newell,RichardG.,AdamB.Jaffe,andRobertN.Stavins(1999)TheInducedInnovationHypothesis
andEnergySavingTechnologicalChange,QuarterlyJournalofEconomics,Vol.114,No.3,pp.941975.
Popp,David(2002)InducedInnovationandEnergyPrices,AmericanEconomicReview,Vol.92,No.1,
pp.160180.
Prebisch,Ral(1962)TheeconomicdevelopmentofLatinAmericaanditsprincipalproblems,
EconomicBulletinforLatinAmerica,Vol.7,No.1,February,pp.122.
Rebelo,Sergio(1991),Longrunpolicyanalysisandlongrungrowth,JournalofPoliticalEconomy,Vol.
99,No.3,June,pp.500521.
Samuelson,PaulA.(1965)ATheoryofInducedInnovationAlongKennedyWeisackerLines,Reviewof
EconomicsandStatistics,Vol.47,No.4,pp.343356.
Singer,Hans(1950)Thedistributionofgainsbetweeninvestingandborrowingcountries,American
EconomicReview,Vol.40,No.2,May,pp.473485.
Stock,JamesH.andMarkW.Watson(1999)BusinesscyclefluctuationsinUSmacroeconomictime
series,inJohnB.TaylorandMichaelWoodford,eds.,HandbookofMacroeconomics,Vol.1A,
Amsterdam:Elsevier,pp.364.
Yamagata,Tatsufumi(2006)ThegarmentindustryinCambodia:Itsroleinpovertyreductionthrough
exportorienteddevelopment,CambodianEconomicReview,Issue2,December,pp.81136
(http://www.ceaCambodia.org/pdf/Cambodian_Economic_Review_II.pdf).
Yamagata,Tatsufumi(2009)Industrializationcumpovertyreduction:ThecasesofBangladeshand
Cambodia,inTakashiShiraishi,TatsufumiYamagataandShahidYusuf,eds.,PovertyReductionand
Beyond:DevelopmentStrategiesforLowIncomeCountries,Houndmills,UK:PalgraveMacmillan,pp.
93111.
Yasuda,Satoko(2004)Maikuroelekutoronikusugijutsuniyorujukurendaitaikoka:Higashiajiani
okeruMEhoseikikinojirei(InJapanese:Substitutioneffectofskillbymicroelectronicstechnology:
CasesofMEsewingmachinesinEastAsia),AjiaKeizai,Vol.45.No.5,pp.3457.
Zanias,GeorgeP.(2005)TestingforTrendsintheTermsofTradebetweenPrimaryCommoditiesand
ManufacturedGoods.JournalofDevelopmentEconomics,Vol.78,No.1,pp.4959.
14
Table1.NumberofCointegratingRelationsbetweenthePriceofCrudeOilandthatofOtherFuels
(19752010)
Model
1
2
3
4
5
TrendinOriginalSeries
No
No
Linear
Linear
Quadratic
InterceptsinC.E.
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
TrendsinC.E.
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
NaturalGas
TraceTest
1
1
1
1
1
MaximumEigenvalueTest
1
1
1
1
1
Coefficient:
0.992
1.130
1.130
1.155
1.155
Standarderror
0.006
0.038
0.038
0.050
0.050
RapeseedOil
TraceTest
0
0
0
0
0
MaximumEigenvalueTest
0
0
0
0
0
Coefficient:
0.894
1.926
1.926
2.387
2.365
Standarderror
0.030
0.314
0.320
0.423
0.429
Maize
TraceTest
0
0
1
0
0
MaximumEigenvalueTest
0
0
1
0
0
Coefficient:
0.966
4.485
4.466
4.172
4.191
Standarderror
0.046
0.941
0.952
0.889
0.907
Notes:C.E.standsforcointegratingequation.Acointegratingequationisformulatedasalinear
combinationoftheloggedpriceofcrudeoilandthatofthepriceofitscounterpartcommodity,plus
,formsalinearcombinationas
interceptsandtrends,ifany.Thecointegratingvector,
1
ln
ln
.TheTraceTestandMaximumEigenvalueTestprovidethenumberof
cointegratingrelations,ofwhichthemaximumisthenumberoftheoriginalseries,whichistwointhis
case.Themodels#1#5areasfollows:
Model1:
Model2:
Model3:
Model4:
Model5:
15
Table2.DifferencesinCharacteristicsbyFactor
Energy
Capitalgoods
Rawlabor
(Manhour)
Skill
Land
(Area)
Reproducibility/
Unboundedgrowth
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Relativepriceto
capitalgoods
Rise
Rise
Rise
Table3.
EventsEncounteredbyLaborAbundantandLowIncomeCountriesandTheirConsequences
BiofuelDevelopment
CapitalAccumulation
UnderlyingEvent
Greeninnovationenablingthe
Accumulationofreproducible
extractionoffuelfromcrops
factors
Initialimpact
Riseinthepriceofland
Riseinthecapitaltolaborratio
RepercussionontheRelative
Declineintherelativepriceof
Riseintherelativepriceofraw
PriceofRawLabor
rawlabortoland
labortocapitalgoods
Secondaryimpact
Directedtechnicalchangetosave
rawlabor
ComparativeAdvantagein
Dichotomized
Weakened
LaborintensiveIndustries
Lost:moderatelylaborabundant
countries
Kept:highlylaborabundant
countries
RecommendedDevelopment
Conventionalmarketoriented
(noguideline)
Strategy
(endowmentbased)strategy
16
Table4.MajorinventionsonthesewingmachinemadebyJUKICorporation
Machine
type
Technology
Automatic
machines
Details of technology
Major expected
effects
1953
SS, RT, QC
1969
RT
1979
SS, QC
1992
QC
1996
RT
1996
Eliminates oil stains from the frame by reducing the amount of oil needed.
RT, QC
This reduces the work involved in removing the stain and re-stitching.
Direct-drive motor
1999
RT
Makes the surface of the sewing machine white, and thus improves the
brightness of the needle drop point. This is better for operators' eyes.
ENV
Lockstitch
sewing
Bobbin thread automatic feeder
machines
and sewing
machines in Dry-head
general
Special
sewing
machines
Year of
introduction
Bartack
1958
A sewing machine which makes special stitches that prevent open seams
SS, RT, QC
in areas such as pocket openings.
Buttonholing
1961
SS, RT, QC
1962
SS, RT, QC
Overlock
1964
SS, RT, QC
1979
SS, RT, QC
Computer-controlled
buttonholing
1999
SS, RT, QC
Buttonholing indexer
1968
1973
A machine which automatically cuts the edges of the material and sews SS, RW, RT, QC,
them so that they do not fray. A sensor prevents any mistakes in cutting. RWT
1976
1979
1991
Reduces the time for specification changes through a panel that is easy
to operate.
SS, RW, RT
Computer-controlled operation
panel
Attachments (e.g. folder, hemmer, binder,
needle plate, feed dog, presser feet
Notes : Year of introduction indicates when JUKI introduced the model with the technology cited onto the market. The major expected effects are SS:
substitution of skilled labor with a machine + unskilled labor; RW: reduction of the number of workers necessary for the production process; RT:
reduction in processing time; QC: quality stabilization and improvement; RWT: reduction in waste; ENV: improvement in the working environment; and RE:
reduction in the amount of electricity used.
Source: Asuyama (2009). Compiled from JUKI (2008), JUKI's website, Ishikawa (1994), and Yasuda (2004).
17
Figure1.Motivation
18
Figure2.TheRelativePriceofEnergytoManufacturedGoods
300
Energy,2000=100,constant2000$
250
200
150
100
50
0
Source:WorldBank,GlobalEconomicMonitordatabase(accessedonJan.13,2011).
Note:ThenumeraireindicatoristheManufacturesUnitValueIndex.
Figure3.TheRelativePriceofNonEnergyPrimaryCommoditiestoManufacturedGoods
300
Nonenergycommodities,2000=100,constant2000$
250
200
150
100
50
0
Source:ThesameasFigure2.
Note:ThesameasFigure2.
19
Figure4.PricesofCrudeOilandNaturalGas(logarithm)
6
1
60
65
70
75
80
85
Crude Oil
90
95
00
05
10
Natural Gas
Source:WorldBank,GlobalEconomicMonitordatabase.
Note:Bothseriesareindicessetat100intheyear2000.
Figure5.PricesofCrudeOil,RapeseedOil,MaizeandSugar(logarithm)
7
1
60
65
70
75
80
85
Crude Oil
Maize
90
95
00
05
10
Rapeseed Oil
Sugar
Source:WorldBank,GlobalEconomicMonitordatabase.IMF,PrimaryCommodityPrices.
Note:ThesameasFigure4.
20
Figure6.HPFilteredFluctuationintheLogPricesofCrudeOilandNaturalGas
.8
.6
.4
.2
.0
-.2
-.4
-.6
60
65
70
75
80
85
Crude Oil
90
95
00
05
10
Natural Gas
Figure7.HPFilteredFluctuationintheLogPricesofCrudeOilandRapeseedOil
.8
.6
.4
.2
.0
-.2
-.4
-.6
60
65
70
75
80
85
Crude Oil
21
90
95
Rapeseed Oil
00
05
10
Figure8.HPFilteredFluctuationintheLogPricesofCrudeOilandMaize
.8
.6
.4
.2
.0
-.2
-.4
-.6
60
65
70
75
80
85
Crude Oil
22
90
95
Maize
00
05
10
Figure9.TheRelativePriceofCapitalGoodstoEnergyintheUnitedStates
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
2009
2005
2001
1997
1993
1989
1985
1981
1977
1973
1969
1965
1961
1957
1953
1949
1945
1941
1937
1933
1929
Source:BureauofEconomicAnalysis,UnitedStates,NIPAtables(http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb
/SelectTable.asp?Selected=N).
Figure10.TheRelativePriceofCapitalGoodstoConsumptionGoodsintheUnitedStates
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
Source:ThesameasFigure9.
23
2009
2005
2001
1997
1993
1989
1985
1981
1977
1973
1969
1965
1961
1957
1953
1949
1945
1941
1937
1933
1929
0.00
Author(s)
Title
300
The Rise and Fall in the Price of Food, Fuel and Manufactured
Goods: Interdependency between Prices and Technology Determining 2011
Comparative Advantages and Development Paths
299
2011
298
Tatsuya SHIMIZU
2011
2011
2011
298
296
295
294
Abu S. SHONCHOY
293
Futaba ISHIZUKA
292
Miki HAMADA
291
MURAKAMI Kaoru
Negotiating Social Assistance: The Case of the Urban Poor in Turkey 2011
290
2011
289
Miwa YAMADA
2011
288
Yasushi HAZAMA
2011
287
Hisao YOSHINO
286
Natsuko OKA
285
284
Hitoshi SUZUKI
2011
283
Kozo KUNIMUNE
2011
2011
2011
282
281
280
279
278
277
276
275
2011
2011
2011
2011
Strategic Trade Policy and Non-Linear Subsidy -In The Case of Price
2011
CompetitionNeither Exit nor Voice: Loyalty as a Survival Strategy for the Uzbeks
2011
in Kazakhstan
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
No.
274
273
272
271
270
Author(s)
Kenmei TSUBOTA,
Yujiro KAWASAKI
Ayako OBASHI, Kazunobu
HAYAKAWA, Toshiyuki
MATSUURA, Kazuyuki
MOTOHASHI
Kazunobu HAYAKAWA, HyunHoon LEE, Donghyun PARK
Takeshi INOUE, Shigeyuki
HAMORI
Bo MENG, Norihiko YAMANO,
and Colin Webb
Title
Myopic or farsighted:
Bilateral Trade Agreements among three
symmetric countries
2011
2010
2010
2010
269
2010
268
2010
267
266
Abu S SHONCHOY
265
264
Zhang Yu
263
Yuichi WATANABE
262
Yasushi HAZAMA
261
2010
260
Takeshi KAWANAKA
2010
259
Jose Ramon Albert, Soya Mori, Celia Income Disparity among Persons with Disabilities Assessed by
Reyes, Aubrey Tabuga, and
Education and Sex: Findings from a Field Survey Conducted in Metro 2010
Tatsufumi Yamagata
Manila, the Philippines
258
257
256
The Role of Home and Host Country Characteristics in FDI: FirmLevel Evidence from Japan, Korea and Taiwan
Determinants of Government Consumption Expenditure in
Developing Countries: A Panel Data Analysis
COMMERCIALIZATION OF AGRICULTURE IN THE
HIMALAYAS
Yangtze River Deltas System Integration: Institutional Barriers and
Countermeasures
Tax Differentials and Inflow of Foreign
g Direct Investments: Evidence
from Foreign Operations of U.S. Multinational Companies
The Making of a State-Centered Public Sphere in Turkey:
A Discourse Analysis
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
2010
255
Mitsuhiro KAGAMI
2010
254
2010
253
2010
252
2010
251
250
249
2010
2010
2010