Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
I/I Project
Area
34 Local Component
Agencies
Most of Seattle is
Combined System
75% of Peak Flows in
King County System is
I/I
95% of I/I is from
Local Agencies
50% From Private
Property
I/I
Modeling
Isolates Inflow
vs. Infiltration
Determines
Severity of I/I
Assessment
Protocols
Ranked Basins
Targets for
Rehabilitation
Revised Findings
per Pilot Project
Results
I/I Reduction
Cost
Based on
Experience
Industry Standards
Pilot Projects
"
8
Calibrated to flows
measured during 2
wet seasons
1,000 acres
100,000 linear feet
"
8
#
S
"
8
"
8
"
8
Mini-Basins
10 weeks of measured
flow
150 acres
22,000 linear feet
"
8
"
8
"
8
"
8
Model Basin
Definition
150 Model Basins
Isolate Flow
Contributions
Evaluate System
Performance
Components of Flow
Rainfall
Event
Flow
Response
Total Flow
Inflow
Rainfall
Dependent
Infiltration Dry Weather
Flow
Ground Water
Infiltration
RDII Components
RAINFALL
POTENTIAL EVAPORATION
MODEL
PARAMETERS
RDII COMPONENTS
EVAPORATION
RECHARGE
Precip
Evapotransp
Root Suction
Soil Storage
Surface
Runoff
Slow Response
Rainfall
Dependant
Infiltration
Capillary Flux
GroundWater
Recharge
Infiltration
Snow
Storage
Precipitation
Slow Response
Fast Response
(Inflow)
BROKEN
HOUSE LATERAL
ROOT INTRUSION
INTO LATERAL
Rainfall
Derived
Infiltration
FOUNDATION DRAIN
SANITARY
SEWER
STORM
SEWER
CRACKED/BROKEN PIPE
DETERIORATED MANHOLE
Rainfall
Dependent
Infiltration
Inflow
ROOF DRAIN
CONNECTION
UNCAPPED
CLEANOUT
STORM DRAIN
CROSS-CONNECTION
SUMP PUMP
SANITARY
SEWER
STORM
SEWER
Inflow
Calibration Process
Plot Model Results
Plot Measured Flow Data
Plot Rainfall
All Flow Components
Adjust Parameters
Statistical Comparison
Scatter Plots
Overall Season Criteria
Volume
Correlation Coefficient
Event Criteria
Peak Flow
Volume
Probability Analysis
Peak Extraction
25
12
0.1
20
Rank
Extracted Peaks
10
0.2
15
0.4
0.5
10
0.6
(cfs)
FlowFlow
(cfs)
Rainfall (in/hr)
0.3
0.7
0.8
Plotted peaks
Select
return period and flow
0
0.9
1
10
2/
9/
99
1
ReturnDate/Time
Period (years)
1/
20
/9
9
12
/3
1/
98
12
/1
1/
98
11
/2
1/
98
11
/1
/9
8
0.1
10
/1
2/
98
9/
22
/9
8
100
Modeling Objectives
Estimate I/I Flows for Design Flow
Conditions
Identify Needed Wastewater System
Predict System Response to I/I
Rehabilitation Scenarios
Establish Optimum I/I Rehabilitation
vs. System Expansion
Precip
Evapotransp
Root Suction
Precipitation
Soil Storage
Surface
Runoff
Slow Response
Rainfall
Dependant
Infiltration
Capillary Flux
GroundWater
Recharge
Infiltration
Snow
Storage
Inflow
Slow Response
Fast Response
(Inflow)
CE Analysis
Alternatives/Options
Pilot Projects
20-year Design Flow Projections
Hydraulic Model Calibration
Hydrologic RDII Model Calibration
Model Basin Flow Quantities
Flow Monitoring Data
Rain Gauge Data / CALAMAR
Ground Water
Storage
Root Suction
Evapotransp
Precipitation
Soil Storage
Surface
Runoff
Slow
Slow Response
Response
Rainfall
Dependant
Infiltration
Capillary Flux
GroundWater
Recharge
Infiltration
Snow
Storage
Rainfall Derived
Infiltration
Slow Response
Slow
Response
Fast Response
(Inflow)
CALAMAR Output
System
Background
34 Local Agencies
Two Regional
Treatment Plants
17.5 Million LF of
Separated Sewer
Service within 1100
Mile2 Area
1000 Feet of Relief
Expected Results
Estimated Quantity of I/I
Likely Rehabilitation Measures
Estimated Cost of I/I Reduction
Estimated Savings over RWSP
Capital Savings
Operating Savings
Technical
Policy
Financial
Inventory
Monitoring
Standards
Pilot Projects
Modeling
Alternative Options
Construction Contracting
Regulatory Proposal
Implementation
Schedule
Cost Sharing
Alternatives
Incentive-based Cost
Sharing Program
Surcharge Program