Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
Backdrop
Objectives
Findings
5
6
7
Dowry in India
Section 406
10
Section 304B
10
Section 498
11
12
1
Crime against women in a Marital Relationship
sex by employees of the organization. At times, it could be voluntary for a better pay and
designation in the office.
Violence against young widows has also been on a rise in India. Most often they are cursed
for their husbands death and are deprived of proper food and clothing. They are not allowed
or encouraged for remarriage in most of the homes, especially in rural areas. There have been
cases of molestation and rape attempts of women by other family members in nuclear
families or someone in the neighbourhood. At times, women are even sexually coerced by
their partner themselves against their will. They are brutally beaten and tortured for not
conceiving a male child. Incidents like, ripping off a womans womb for killing the female
foetus when she disagrees for abortion have also come to light especially in rural areas.
Female foeticide and female infanticide continue to be a rising concern.
Also as expressed by Rebecca J. Burns in the following lines, When I am asked why a
woman doesnt leave abuser I say: Women stay because the fear of leaving is greater than the
fear of staying. They will leave when the fear of staying is greater than the fear of leaving. A
common Indian house wife has a tendency to bear the harassment she is subjected to by her
husband and the family. One reason could be to prevent the children from undergoing the
hardships if she separates from the spouse. Also the traditional and orthodox mindset makes
them bear the sufferings without any protest.
Other forms of physical abuse against women include slapping, punching, grabbing,
burdening them with drudgery, public humiliation and the neglect of their health problems.
Some of the other forms of psychological torment against them could be curtailment of their
rights to self-expression and curbing the freedom to associate with the natal family and
friend.
The Backdrop
Violence against women is a phenomenon that cuts across boundaries of culture, class,
education, ethnicity and age. The feminist movement of the 70s and 80s made a major
contribution in getting VAW recognised as a critical area of concern in India. In the 1980s,
the incidences of 'dowry death' were steadily rising in India, so women's organisations across
the country pressurised the Criminal Law Amendment Committee (1982) and urged the
government to provide legislative protection to women against domestic violence and dowry,
so that the victim gets justice while she is still alive1. As a result of the intense campaigning
and lobbying, significant amendments were made in the Indian Penal Code, the Indian
Evidence Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act, with the intention of protecting women from
marital violence, abuse and dowry demands. The most important amendment came in the
form of the introduction of Section 498A in the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This was the first
time that an attempt was made to consider domestic violence against women a criminal
offence.
The legislation Indian Penal Code - Section 498A, IPC
Introduced in the Penal Code by Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act of 1983
(Act No. 46 of 1983)
498A. HUSBAND OR RELATIVE OF HUSBAND OF A WOMAN SUBJECTING
HER TO CRUELTY: Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman,
subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may
extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.
Explanation: For the purposes of this section, "cruelty" means
(a) Any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit
suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical)
of the woman; or
(b) Harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any
person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is
on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.
1 http://www.indiatogether.com/manushi/issue148/dowry.htm
5
Crime against women in a Marital Relationship
Analysis of the section shows that this law deals with four types of cruelty: " Any conduct
that is likely to drive a woman to suicide, " Any conduct which is likely to cause grave injury
to the life, limb or health of the woman, " Harassment with the purpose of forcing the woman
or her relatives to give some property, or " Harassment because the woman or her relatives
are either unable to yield to the demand for more money or do not give some share of the
property.
Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code: Violation of this is a criminal offence. It is a
cognizable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable offence.
Need for the Study
In March 2003, the Committee on Reforms of the Criminal Justice System formulated by the
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, under the Chairmanship of Dr. Justice V.S.
Malimath, made several suggestions regarding the Criminal Justice System. The committee
suggested amendments to section 498A on the plea that it was being misused. In the context
of the Malimath Committee's recommendations and the landmark judgement of Justice J.D.
Kapoor, the Centre for Social Research (CSR) with the support of IFES and USAID took up
the present study to investigate some of the issues relating to IPC Section 498A.
Key Objectives:
a) To analyse the prevalence, patterns and trends of DV (Domestic Violence) related cases
filed under section 498A and to assess the need of this provision.
b) With the help of secondary and primary data, to understand and analyse whether section
498A is being used or misused as indicated in the Malimath Committee Report.
c) To serve as a base for conducting further detailed studies pertaining to the legal
effectiveness of the current statutes and the need for new statutes to combat DV.
Study Area: Delhi Karnataka (Banglore, Mysore) Rajasthan (Jaipur, Ajmer) and West Bengal
(Kolkata, 24 Pargana south).
The states represent four regions of the country with different socio-cultural backgrounds,
where the rate of incidences of cruelty towards women by husbands and relatives vary.
Findings of the studyNearly five crore married women in India are victims of domestic violence
(DV). only 0.1 percent (1 out of 1000 DV cases) of these are being reported.
6
Crime against women in a Marital Relationship
Out of 100 cases that are ordered for investigation under 498A, only in 2 cases does the
accused get convicted.
According to the available statistical information from the National Crime
Records Bureau and information available from NGOs working with victims of violence,
there is a general tendency to avoid seeking redressal among the victims of domestic
violence. However, when a victim of domestic violence seeks help from any of the agencies,
be it family, friends, NGOs, or lawyers, before registering a complaint, at each stage she is
asked to reconcile the matter or to put up with the situation. Reconciliation in 498A cases
takes place at every stage including the police station, Crime Against Women Cells and
courts.
We found that in five cases filed under Section 498A the parties settled the matter after
agreeing on maintenance and divorce. In a majority of the cases before a victim filed the
complaint under Section 498A, the minimum period she suffered physical and mental torture,
was for about three years. The trial process is quite lengthy and the proportion of pending
cases is quiet high (out of the 40 cases based on victims' interviews which went for trial in
court, 28 cases are still pending). In the cases tracked, the normal trial period was between
five to ten years.
It was found that it was difficult to prove physical and mental torture. In all the eight cases in
which the accused were acquitted, the victims were found to have suffered physical and
mental torture, but as there was not enough evidence to prove torture, the accused were let
off.
The cases where the accused were convicted had been filed under Section 498A along with
section 304B and 302, which are applicable after the death of the victim. There were no
convictions in any of the cases registered only under Section 498A.
It has been found that out of 30 cases there is not a single case where the accused has been
convicted only under Section 498A. The accused have been acquitted (11 cases) by the court
where the prosecutor failed to provide evidentiary proof of cruelty, mainly mental, inflicted
on the victim as provided under Section 498A IPC. It is difficult to prove cruelty when the
victim is still alive. This makes conviction only on the basis of Section 498A, difficult. Only
in cases where Section 498A is used along with other Sections is the conviction rate high.
In most of the cases where there is acquittal at the District Court, the matter is not taken up at
higher courts. Only where there is a conviction at the lower courts are cases taken to higher
courts.
7
Crime against women in a Marital Relationship
The study also has observed that 6.5 percent of the total cases studied through victims'
interviews were found false at the level of investigation. Many of the accused, police, judges
and lawyers, categorically said that 'educated and independent minded women' misuse the
section.
On the basis of the interviews conducted, we can conclude that victims find the Section
somewhat useful and felt the need for further strengthening it. In the perception of the NGOs,
the provision (498A) is the only Section, which acts as an effective redressal mechanism for
victims of domestic violence.
Dowry in India
The payment of a dowry gift, often financial, has a long history in many parts of the world.
In India, the payment of a dowry was prohibited in 1961 under Indian civil law and
subsequently by Sections 304B and 498a of the Indian Penal Code was enacted to make it
easier for the wife to seek redress from potential harassment by the husband's family. Dowry
laws have come under criticism as they have been misused by women and their families.
In India, there are civil laws, criminal laws and special legislative acts against the tradition of
Dowry. Someone accused of taking dowry is therefore subject to a multiplicity of legal
processes.
Dowry
Section 2.. "Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961" Definition of dowry Definition of dowry.In
this Act, dowry means any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given either
directly or indirectly (a) by one party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage; or (b)
by the parents of either party to a marriage or by any other person, to either party to the
marriage or to any other person, at or before 1[or any time after the marriage] 2[in connection
with the marriage of the said parties, but does not include] dower or mahr in the case of
persons to whom the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) applies. Explanation I. 3[***]
Explanation II.The expression valuable securityhas the same meaning as in Section 30 of
the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).
8
Crime against women in a Marital Relationship
Introduced and taken up by then Indian law minister Ashoke Kumar Sen2, this Act prohibits
the request, payment or acceptance of a dowry, "as consideration for the marriage", where
"dowry" is defined as a gift demanded or given as a precondition for a marriage. Gifts given
without a precondition are not considered dowry, and are legal. Asking or giving of dowry
can be punished by an imprisonment of up to six months, or a fine of up to Rs. 15000 or the
amount of dowry whichever is higher and imprisonment up to 5 years. It replaced several
pieces of anti-dowry legislation that had been enacted by various Indian states.
Section 4 of the said Act states:
4. Penalty for demanding dowry.- If any person demands, directly or indirectly, from the
parents or other relatives or guardian of a bride or bridegroom, as the case may be, any
dowry, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six
months, but which may extend to two years and with fine which may extend to ten thousand
rupees. Provided that the Court may, for an adequate and special reasons to be mentioned in
the judgment, impose a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than six months.3
However, as per section 3 of the Act, both the giver and the receiver are sought to be
punished.4
3. Penalty for giving or taking dowry.- [(Note: Section 3 re-numbered as sub-section (1)
thereof by Act No.63 of 1984, sec.3) (1)] If any person, after the commencement of this Act,
gives or takes or abets the giving or taking of dowry, he shall be punishable with
imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than [(Note: Subs. by Act 43 of 1986, Sec.3)
five years, and with fine which shall not be less than fifteen thousand rupees or the amount of
the value of such dowry, whichever is more:]
2 http://indiacode.nic.in/rsPaging.asp?tfnm=196128&Page=1
3 http://www.vakilno1.com/bareacts/dowryprohibitionact/s4.html
4 http://www.vakilno1.com/bareacts/dowryprohibitionact/s3.html
9
Crime against women in a Marital Relationship
Provided that the Court may, for a adequate and special reasons to be recorded in the
judgment, impose a sentence of imprisonment of a term of less than [(Note: Subs. by Act 43
of 1986, Sec.3) five years.]
(2) [(Note: Ins. by Act 63 of 1984, sec.3) Nothing is sub section (1) shall apply to, or in
relation to, (a) Presents which are given at the time of a marriage to the bride (without any demand
having been made in that behalf).
(b) Presents which are given at the time of a marriage to the bridegroom (without any demand
having been made in that behalf).
Provided that such presents are entered in a list maintained in accordance with the rules made
under this Act.
Provided further that where such presents are made by or on behalf of the bride or any person
related to the bride, such presents are of a customary nature and the value thereof is not
excessive having regard to the financial status of the person by whom, or on whose behalf,
such presents are given.
11
Crime against women in a Marital Relationship
(a) Any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit
suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health whether mental or physical)
of the woman; or
(b) Harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any
person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is
on account of failure by her or any person related to her meet such demand.
This section is non-bailable,non-compoundable (i.e. it cannot be privately resolved between
the parties concerned) and cognizable.
Prosecution for a non-compoundable offense can only be quashed by a High Court of India
under its powers under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code of India. Usually, cases under
498A are quashed by mutual agreement when the husband and wife reconcile with each other,
or agree to divorce by mutual consent.
After registration of an FIR for a cognizable, non-bailable offense, the police in India can
arrest any and all of the accused named in the complaint.
Status of Second wife under Anti-Dowry Law- I [2008] DMC 279- Bombay High CourtJustice C.L. Pangarkar Ranjana Gopalrao Thorat Vs. State of Maharashatra- Hindu
Marriage Act,1955Section 17BigamySecond wife cannot assume a character as
wife--- It is no marriage in eyes of law[Pg.280 {Para6}]-- Indian Penal CodeSection
498Acrueltyword relativemeaning of- Person who is related to husband either by
blood or marriageThus she does not fall within scope of Section 498A-- Indian Penal Code
Pg.280 {Para6}]
"Every Suicide After Marriage cannot be presumed to be Suicide due to Dowry
Demand"- 2011[1] JCC Page No.668- In The High Court of Delhi- Honble Mr. Justice Shiv
Narayan Dhingra- Dated: - 2 December 2010- Rani Vs. State of NCT of Delhi- Criminal
Appeal No. 93 of 2004- Indian Penal Code, 1860- Section 304B/ 498A Read With Section
34- Conviction- allegation of demanding of Rs.50,000/- and scooter were vague in natureWhether it was done by husband, mother-in-law or father-in-law- Answers to all these
12
Crime against women in a Marital Relationship
questions are absentIngredients of Section 304B IPC were totally absent- Unnatural Death
can be called a dowry death only if after making a demand made by accused is not fulfilled
by perpetuation of cruelty upon the victim- The list of dowry show that both parties belonged
to poor strata of society- No evidence, whatsoever was collected by police about the real
facts- Every suicide after marriage cannot be presumed to be a suicide due to dowry demandThe tendency of the court should not be that since a young bride has died after marriage, now
somebody must be held culprit and the noose must be made to fit some neck.
6 http://pwdvhyd.ap.nic.in/bareacts.html#s1
13
Crime against women in a Marital Relationship
This Act empowered the lower courts to issue "protection orders" on the complaint of a
woman against her male relatives. The protection orders could include restraining orders on
the husband and others, monetary compensation, and residence orders.
Though it is a Civil remedy, violation of protection orders result in Criminal penalties
(including imprisonment).
Bibliographyhttp://www.helpguide.org/mental/domestic_violence_abuse_types_signs_causes_
effects.htm
http://ipc498a.wordpress.com/2008/05/24/sc-explains-the-applicability-of-section498a-in-a-judgment-2002/
http://www.csrindia.org/attachments/Research%20-%20498A.pdf
www.wikipedia.com
14
Crime against women in a Marital Relationship