Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Improve Distribution
Management
Kenneth G. Hardy and Allan J. Magrath
65
Kenneth G. Hardy is a professor of business administration at the University of
Western Ontario, London. Allan J.Magrath is director of marketing services for
the Canadian headquarters of a Fortune
500 multinational company,, also in London. The two co-authored Avoidin~ the
Pitfalls in Managing Distribution Channels," in the September-October 1987 issue of Business Horizons.
66
power relationships that demand innovative methods of market coverage.
CHANNEL MANAGEMENT
PRACTICE
ood channel managers share
a number of practices. These
practices concern strategies
based on an understanding of channel dynamics and the willingness to
keep channel policies and tactics relevant over time.
1. Set definite marketing objectives and clearly communicate marketing strategy to all channel
members. In 1983, IBM executives decided they would have to use indirect
channels rather than their own sales
force to establish their personal computers in multiple markets. To reach
such distinct vertical markets, they
directed various resellers to target different end users, from professionals
such as doctors and lawyers to banks,
insurance businesses, and hospitals.
They also limited their total resellers
to a fixed upper limit (2,500 in the
U.S.) to keep strong the ability of
dealers to develop and grow with their
line of PCs. IBM's strategy and tactics
reflected its goal of obtaining market
coverage in a developing mass market at a reasonable cost with some
measure of channel control. The company has been quite successful; large
customers can b u y direct, while
smaller, more dispersed customers
buy from distribution channels. Large
customers get low prices but must in
p r o mass
v icoverage
d e b esc a u s e
standard items but lacked the confidence necessary to handle the machinists' needs on complex, technical
products. Fansteel did not have the
sales resources to handle both its large
accounts and the multitude of small
and medium accounts; accordingly, it
structured a coordinated program
with its distributors to improve the
reps' comfort level on complex products. The program consisted of selfs t u d y training courses custom-designed for distributors; joint-call
blitzes on machine shops with Fansteel reps accompanying distributor
reps; newsletters reporting success
stories circulated among distributors'
reps; and redesigned, more easily referenced technical catalogs. Fansteel's
marketing manager summed up the
process this way:
We l e a r n e d . . , that the program
h a s to build on the strength of
both the distributors and the
company, making each responsible for the things they are best
equipped to perform. That may
sound obvious, but too many
times it's easy to pay lip-service
to the obvious, without actually
implementing it.
Clearly, defining channel tasks is a
crucial step in settling on priority tactics that will help ensure task efficiency.
4. Understand the partner's view
of the world and its profit-making
formula. Appeal to the channel partner's self-interest to accomplish your
own goals. A distributor or retailer
makes money by astute gross-margin
management, optimization of inventory turns, and disciplined expense
controls. With distributors, expenses
may be incurred by field or inside sales
forces, warehousing, delivery, and
credit extension to customers. Retailers' costs often relate to investments
in space for key locations, retail decor, stock, and information systems.
Any manufacturer that can improve
the profit' formula of its resellers on
margins, turns, or expenses will find
its influence over resellers markedly
higher than if its programs are totally
self-centered.
In some retail businesses, new in-
Management
67
68
had to close more than 50 percent of
its sales branches and lay off over onethird of its sales reps. This expensive
lesson on the balance of power could
have been avoided if Kroy had objectively assessed the hold its independent dealers had in their respective local
markets. Kroy has re-enlisted many
of its former dealers and is n o w
spending as much time as possible
repairing its severely damaged relations.
6. Ensure that margins and other
supports equitably reward partners
for performing distributive functions. If the costs to a reseller of
carrying a producer's inventory, displaying, promoting, assorting, selling, delivering, and handling accounts
receivable amount to 24 percent of the
selling price for an item, then a supplier offering the reseller only a 20
percent margin will not be a favored
supplier for very long! In fact, in all
likelihood the reseller will begin to cut
back its stocking levels and number
of lines to shift inventory-holding
costs back to its manufacturing suppliers. This typical response to a margin squeeze tends either to p u s h
producers into selling exclusively direct or further cutting the reseller's
margin. Inequitable margin structures can spark a sequence of negative moves and countermoves.
Manufacturers should make objective assessments of the functions performed by resellers on their behalf and
the likely costs incurred. If a reseller
is truly failing to perform agreed-upon
functions, the manufacturer should
69