Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc. Doc.

4
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 4 Filed 04/28/2006 Page 1 of 2

1 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP


JEFFREY R. CHANIN - #103649
2 DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825
ASIM M. BHANSALI - #194925
3 KEVIN T. REED - #240799
710 Sansome Street
4 San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
Telephone: (415) 391-5400
5 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188

6 Attorneys for Plaintiff


NETFLIX, INC.
7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation, Case No. C 06 2361 BZ
11
Plaintiff, DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE
12 A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND
v. REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A
13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
BLOCKBUSTER, INC., a Delaware
14 corporation, DOES 1-50,
15 Defendant.
16

17 REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18 The undersigned party hereby declines to consent to the assignment of this case to a

19 United States Magistrate Judge for trial and disposition and hereby requests the reassignment of

20 this case to a United States District Judge.

21

22 Dated: April 28, 2006 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

23

24 By: /s/ Daralyn J. Durie


JEFFREY R. CHANIN
25 DARALYN J. DURIE
Attorneys for Plaintiff
26 NETFLIX, INC.

27

28

DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND


REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
370837.01
CASE NO. C 06 2361 BZ
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 4 Filed 04/28/2006 Page 2 of 2

1 PROOF OF SERVICE

2 I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, State of Californa in the office of a
member of the bar of this cour at whose direction the following service was made. I am over the
3 age of eighteen years and not a pary to the within action. My business address is Keker & Van
4
Nest, LLP, 710 Sansome Street, San Francisco, California 94111.

5 On April 28, 2006, I served the following document(s):

6 DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND


REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT
7 JUDGE
8 0 by regular UNITED STATES MAIL by placing a tre and correct copy in a sealed envelope addressed as
shown below. I am readily familiar with the practice of Keker & Van Nest, LLP for collection and
9 processing of correspondence for mailing. According to that practice, items are deposited with the United
States Postal Service at San Francisco, Californa on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid. I
10 am aware that, on motion of the part served, service is presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or
the postage meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing stated in this affdavit.
11

12 Marshall B. Grossman, Esq.


Alschuler Grossman Stein & Kahan LLP
13
1620 26th Street, 4th Floor, North Tower
14 Santa Monica, CA 90404-4060

15
Executed on April 28, 2006, at San Francisco, Californa.
16
I declare under penalty ofpeijury under the laws of the State of California that the above is tre
17 and correct.
18

19

20
~l- ~~k-
SHELBY L. OCK

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

372095.01
PROOF OF SERVICE
NETFLIX V. BLOCKBUSTER, USDC CASE NO. C 06 2361 BZ

Вам также может понравиться