Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc. Doc.

300
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 300 Filed 03/02/2007 Page 1 of 2

1 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP


MICHAEL H. PAGE - #154913
2 MARK A. LEMLEY - #155830
KLAUS H. HAMM - #224905
3 AJAY S. KRISHNAN - #222476
710 Sansome Street
4 San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
Telephone: (415) 391-5400
5 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188

6
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter Defendant
7 GOOGLE INC.

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Case No. C 03-5340-JF (EAI)

12 Plaintiff, DECLARATION OF AJAY S. KRISHNAN


IN SUPPORT OF
13 v. COUNTERDEFENDANT GOOGLE
INC.’S MOTION FOR
14 AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF SEEKING
FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation LEAVE TO FILE A NON-
15 d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc., and DOES 1- ARGUMENTATIVE STATEMENT OF
100, inclusive, RECENT DECISION
16
Defendants.
17
AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER
18 FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation
d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc.,
19
Counter Plaintiff,
20
v.
21
GOOGLE INC.,
22
Counter Defendant
23

24

25

26

27

28
1
DECLARATION OF AJAY S. KRISHNAN IN SUPPORT OF COUNTERDEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S
MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF SEEKING LEAVE TO FILE A NON-ARGUMENTATIVE
391005.01 STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (EAI)
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 300 Filed 03/02/2007 Page 2 of 2

1 I, Ajay S. Krishnan, declare as follows:

2 1. I am an attorney at the firm of Keker & Van Nest LLP, counsel for Plaintiff and

3 Counterdefendant Google Inc., and am admitted to practice before this Court. I make this

4 declaration in support of Google Inc.’s Motion for Administrative Relief Seeking Leave To File

5 A Non-Argumentative Statement Of Recent Decision Unless otherwise stated, I know the facts

6 stated herein of my personal knowledge and if called as a witness, I would testify competently

7 thereto.

8 2. On March 1, 2007, I called Caroline C. Plater, attorney for American Blind and

9 Wallpaper Factory, Inc. (“ABWF”), and requested a stipulation from her for leave to file a

10 Statement of Recent Decision, notifying the Court of Universal Communication Systems, Inc. v.

11 Lycos, Inc., -- F.3d --, No. 06-1826, 2007 WL 549111 at *8-*11 (1st Cir. Feb. 23, 2007).

12 3. On March 2, 2007, Ms. Plater stated in a letter that ABWF would not stipulate to

13 a motion for leave to amend because it is ABWF’s belief that Universal Communication Systems

14 is not relevant to the trademark-use issue in the summary judgment briefs.

15 4. On March 2, 2007, I called Ms. Plater again to see whether ABWF would

16 stipulate to the Court’s granting leave to file the Statement of Recent Decision on the condition

17 that ABWF’s belief that Universal Communication Systems is not relevant to the trademark-use

18 issue would be noted in the stipulation. I stated that this would avoid the need for briefing or

19 argument on the issue by either party.

20 5. On March 2, 2007, Ms. Plater stated to me in an email that ABWF still refused to

21 stipulate to the Court’s granting leave to file the Statement of Recent Decision.

22 I state under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States of America that the

23 foregoing statements are true and correct. Executed March 2, 2007, at San Francisco, California.

24

25 /s/ Ajay S. Krishnan


AJAY S. KRISHNAN
26

27

28
2
DECLARATION OF AJAY S. KRISHNAN IN SUPPORT OF COUNTERDEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S
MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF SEEKING LEAVE TO FILE A NON-ARGUMENTATIVE
391005.01 STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (EAI)

Вам также может понравиться