Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ROAD MAP
Fundamental principles
Application of concepts
Fundamental
Principles
N
A
PL
A
E
AH
.
.
.
.
T
BU
Write in Pencil
Some things go
bad quickly
RATES OF DECAY
Aerobic capacity!
Power!
Speed!
Maximum strength
ACKNOWLEDGE &
RESPECT THE PHYSICAL
STIMULUS OF GAMES
UNDERSTAND THIS
Fatigue
Masks
Fitness
USE BUCKETS
Starters!
Reserves!
Non-dress!
Injured!
Mid-Season transfers!
Aerobic players
PHYSICAL DEMANDS
Logical conclusion....
run,
run,
run (slow & steady)
Flaw of Averages
FITNESS DEMANDS
ANALYSIS
SOCCER P OF MOTOR ACTIV
ITIE
LA
MARCIN A
NDRZEJ
E
YERS
WSKI 1,2
S OF
PROFESS
, JAN C
Faculty of
HMURA 3
Methodolo
2
, BEATA
g
y
and Recrea
KKS Lech
PLUTA, 1 A
tion, Unive
Poznan S.A
ND AN
rsity Schoo
, Football C
Motor Acti
DRZEJ
l of Physica
KASPRZAK 2
vity, Univ
lu
b
,
P
o
z
nan, Pozn
l
ersity Scho
E
d
u
cation, Poz
an, Poland
ol of Physi
nan, Polan
; and 3Fac
cal Educati
d;
ulty of Pla
on, Wroca
yers
w, Poland
ABSTRACT
1
IONAL
Andrzejew
ski, M, Ch
mura, J, P
of motor
luta, B, an
tactical, a
activities
d Kasprza
nd menta
o
f
p
k, A. Analy
ro
fe
l prepara
Cond Re
s
s
io
R
n
ecently, m
a
s
l soccer p
is
s 26(6):
tion from
uch atten
layers. J S
148114
the playe
tion has b
study was
tr
p
8
e
la
8
n
y
,
g
rs (23).
e
2
th
rs
0
12The o
een paid
possessing
to determ
to
b
in
je
e
th
p
c
tive of th
ro
the distan
e
p
soccer pla
p
s
e
e
ro
r
le
files, thus
ction of
anthropom
is
ce covere
yers durin
providing
etric and
d by profe
g matche
w
ized matc
fo
o
e
rk
s
ffi
r
s
s
o
ciency
io
th
u
w
nal
ts that all
e possibil
ith the us
h analysis
e of the c
ity of sys
ow playe
system Am
m
a
o
France). K
n
rs
mputertematic
ce. The pre
to achiev
isco Pro !
inematic e
paration o
e optimu
(version 1
xamination
th
m
f
e
.0
a
im
distance c
perfor.2
p
p
la
,
rovement
yer is freq
Nice,
included th
overed by
of technic
uently foc
e specific
3
o
f
1
d
p
a
u
e
a
layers part
l or tactica
veloping m
sed on
tion of the
Union of
icipating in
l skills at th
otor abilit
European
team sport
4 matches
ie
e
Football
s
e
x
(2
pense
,3
during the
,17,22,27).
s, soccer a
in the
Associatio
200
Lik
ls
n
Aerobic capacity
i
Average intensit s EXTREMELY impor tant
y
Mid-Fielder s r un approaches lactate thresh
the most
ANALYSIS
SOCCER P OF MOTOR ACTIV
ITIE
LA
MARCIN A
NDRZEJ
E
YERS
WSKI 1,2
S OF
PROFESS
, JAN C
Faculty of
HMURA 3
Methodolo
2
, BEATA
g
y
and Recrea
KKS Lech
PLUTA, 1 A
tion, Unive
Poznan S.A
ND AN
rsity Schoo
, Football C
Motor Acti
DRZEJ
l of Physica
KASPRZAK 2
vity, Univ
lu
b
,
P
o
z
nan, Pozn
l
ersity Scho
E
d
u
cation, Poz
an, Poland
ol of Physi
nan, Polan
; and 3Fac
cal Educati
d;
ulty of Pla
on, Wroca
yers
w, Poland
ABSTRACT
1
old
IONAL
Andrzejew
ski, M, Ch
mura, J, P
of motor
luta, B, an
tactical, a
activities
d Kasprza
nd menta
o
f
p
k, A. Analy
ro
fe
l prepara
Cond Re
s
s
io
R
n
ecently, m
a
s
l soccer p
is
s 26(6):
tion from
uch atten
layers. J S
148114
the playe
tion has b
study was
tr
p
8
e
la
8
n
y
,
g
rs (23).
e
2
th
rs
0
12The o
een paid
possessing
to determ
to
b
in
je
e
th
p
c
tive of th
ro
the distan
e
p
soccer pla
p
s
e
e
ro
r
le
files, thus
ction of
anthropom
is
ce covere
yers durin
providing
etric and
d by profe
g matche
w
ized matc
fo
o
e
rk
s
ffi
r
s
s
o
ciency
io
th
u
w
nal
ts that all
e possibil
ith the us
h analysis
e of the c
ity of sys
ow playe
system Am
m
a
o
France). K
n
rs
mputertematic
ce. The pre
to achiev
isco Pro !
inematic e
paration o
e optimu
(version 1
xamination
th
m
f
e
.0
a
im
distance c
perfor.2
p
p
la
,
rovement
yer is freq
Nice,
included th
overed by
of technic
uently foc
e specific
3
o
f
1
d
p
a
u
e
a
layers part
l or tactica
veloping m
sed on
tion of the
Union of
icipating in
l skills at th
otor abilit
European
team sport
4 matches
ie
e
Football
s
e
x
(2
pense
,3
during the
,17,22,27).
s, soccer a
in the
Associatio
200
Lik
ls
n
FITNESS DEMANDS
,
d
e
r
e
v
o
c
e
c
n
a
t
s
i
d
s
e
v
ro
p
m
i
e
c
n
a
l
l
r
a
u
b
d
n
e
e
h
t
c
i
h
b
t
i
o
w
s
t
n
e
Aer
m
e
v
l
o
v
n
i
,
s
t
n
i
r
p
s
f
o
number
FITNESS DEMANDS
OCCER
S
N
E
OM
W
E
T
VELS
I
L
E
L
E
F
E
1
MANC
R
ITIES O
O
O
V
I
F
T
R
ANGSB
C
B
E
S
A
N
P
E
3
DJ
AL, AN
MATCH AT DIFFERENT
IRKEND
K
D
L
2
mark;
ONA
agen, Den f Physical
S
h
ON, D
n
S
e
S
R
p
R
o
E
E
C
D
f
AN
ion o
rsity o
1
PLAY
HELENA
nce, Divis
gy, Unive
UP,
RUSTR
nt Scie
hysiolo
n Moveme
Human P
a
f
o
m
t
u
n
H
e
r
tm
3 enter fo
Depar
C
MAGN
rt Sciences, iversity, Sweden;
o
p
S
d
n
a
e
n
lina
is
U
c
r
o
e
r
C
x
b
Ore
orth aro
s,
N
1 stitute of E
e
c
l,
n
il
ie
H
c
l
S
In
e
Chap
of Health
2 epartment
Carolina,
th
r
o
D
N
ave
f
o
ersity
players h
iv
n
r
N
e
U
c
,
IO
c
y
T
o
p
s
C
a
Ther
of elite
,12,14
I NTRODU
n (1,2,10
l aspects
e
a
ic
m
s
y
h
in
p
the
ly
he
extensive
regarding
d
ts
ie
is
d
x
tu
e
s
n
r,7,
pe
tio
been
layers (5,6
d match
s informa
p
n
s
a
r
e
e
L
c
s
T
c
d
).
C
o
n
5
s
a
A
m
18,22,2
A BSTR
power
women
and 15
ysical de
mands in
m aerobic
e
top-class
y the ph
u
d
d
n
l
im
e
tu
a
x
s
te
ic
a
e
s
m
y
to
in
veral
ph
ve
.N
ht
ns (8) and
ined in se
competiti
io
er players
We soug
s
m
c
r
in
n
c
e
o
te
d
s
e
e
im
d
n
p
d
e
n
Body
of wom
y videota
e activity
have bee
layers
11,19,24).
formance
individuall
n players
amined th
e
ed. The p
x
re
e
m
e
rm
o
e
o
w
v
rf
w
a
e
f
rs
h
p
o
e
focus
s
)
ere
play
the main
(6,8,11,23
me studie
rrespond,
nalysis w
o
o
r
s
a
c
e
high-level
,
n
v
e
n
e
o
m
ti
io
w
a
o
it
o
g
be
d
a
ad
(2,24). H
and time-m
lieved to
top0 times in
studies. In
matches,
atch play
hich is be
total. The
ity .1,30
TER K
R, P E
I MOH
1
s
r
e
e
p
r
e
ss
e
l
n
a
h
t
s
un
r
y
t
i
s
n
e
t
n
e
i
m
h
a
g
i
g
h
a
e
f
r
o
o
d
m
n
e
m
r
e
s
o
h
r
f
t
r
e
s
k
e
c
d
p
r
a
t
s
a
t
r
a
w
e
to
&
ay
l
s
p
&
r
s
e
y
s
l
i
d
a
l
r
l
e
a
c
r
fi
Top develops tempo k rates than midr
e
u
o
g
i
w
t
r
a
F
e
w
lo
e
v
a
h
s
r
e
d
n
e
f
e
D
OCCER
S
N
E
OM
W
E
T
VELS
I
L
E
L
E
F
E
1
MANC
R
ITIES O
O
O
V
I
F
T
R
ANGSB
C
B
E
S
A
N
P
E
3
DJ
AL, AN
MATCH AT DIFFERENT
IRKEND
K
D
L
2
mark;
ONA
agen, Den f Physical
S
h
ON, D
n
S
e
S
R
p
R
o
E
E
C
D
f
AN
ion o
rsity o
1
PLAY
HELENA
nce, Divis
gy, Unive
UP,
RUSTR
nt Scie
hysiolo
n Moveme
Human P
a
f
o
m
t
u
n
H
e
r
tm
3 enter fo
Depar
C
MAGN
rt Sciences, iversity, Sweden;
o
p
S
d
n
a
e
n
lina
is
U
c
r
o
e
r
C
x
b
Ore
orth aro
s,
N
1 stitute of E
e
c
l,
n
il
ie
H
c
l
S
In
e
Chap
of Health
2 epartment
Carolina,
th
r
o
D
N
ave
f
o
ersity
players h
iv
n
r
N
e
U
c
,
IO
c
y
T
o
p
s
C
a
Ther
of elite
,12,14
I NTRODU
n (1,2,10
l aspects
e
a
ic
m
s
y
h
in
p
the
ly
he
extensive
regarding
d
ts
ie
is
d
x
tu
e
s
n
r,7,
pe
tio
been
layers (5,6
d match
s informa
p
n
s
a
r
e
e
L
c
s
T
c
d
).
C
o
n
5
s
a
A
m
18,22,2
A BSTR
power
women
and 15
ysical de
mands in
m aerobic
e
top-class
y the ph
u
d
d
n
l
im
e
tu
a
x
s
te
ic
a
e
s
m
y
to
in
veral
ph
ve
.N
ht
ns (8) and
ined in se
competiti
io
er players
We soug
s
m
c
r
in
n
c
e
o
te
d
s
e
e
im
d
n
p
d
e
n
Body
of wom
y videota
e activity
have bee
layers
11,19,24).
formance
individuall
n players
amined th
e
ed. The p
x
re
e
m
e
rm
o
e
o
w
v
rf
w
a
e
f
rs
h
p
o
e
focus
s
)
ere
play
the main
(6,8,11,23
me studie
rrespond,
nalysis w
o
o
r
s
a
c
e
high-level
,
n
v
e
n
e
o
m
ti
io
w
a
o
it
o
g
be
d
a
ad
(2,24). H
and time-m
lieved to
top0 times in
studies. In
matches,
atch play
hich is be
total. The
ity .1,30
TER K
R, P E
I MOH
1
FITNESS DEMANDS
n in
o
ti
c
a
l
fu
r
e
w
o
p
t
n
a
in
t dom
s
o
m
e
th
e
r
a
ts
in
r
p
s
t
Straigh
r
e
c
c
o
s
te
li
e
in
s
n
o
ti
a
u
it
e
r
a
ls
a
decisive offensive s
o
g
in
g
in
d
n
e
ts
emen
v
o
m
l
fu
r
e
w
o
p
e
iv
is
c
e
Most d
made without the ball
POSITIONAL DEMANDS
Journal
of
http://www Sports Science and
Medicine
.jssm.org
(2007) 6
Research
article
Physical d
Jonathan
, 63-70
emands o
Bloomfield
f differen
t positi on
s in FA
1
Premier L
Sports Ins
, Remco P
eague soc
titute of N
2
olman a
Exercise S
orthern Ir
cer
n
d Peter O
cie
ela
'Donoghu 3
tute Cardif nce, The Universit nd, University of
e
U
y of Hull,
f, Cardiff,
East Ridin lster, Northern Irela
UK
g of York
shire, UK 3 nd, UK, 2 Departm
, School
e
of Sport, U nt of Sport, Healt
Abstract
h&
niversity o
f Wales In
The purpo
stise
of English of this study was to
age, statu
r
Football A
e
evaluate th
,
three diffe
ss
e
recently id body mass and bo
rent posit ociation (FA) Prem physical demands
dy
e
n
io
ier Leagu
and strike
tions sugg tified between elite mass index have b
e soccer o
r). Compu nal classifications
es
ee
p
f
terised tim
(defender,
Bloomfield
may be su ting that players of layers of different p n
e-motion
midfielder
M
o
v
e
v
m
o
it
p
id
sie
a
a
n
e
purposefu
rticular siz
ble for th
positions
l moveme t Classification w o-analysis using th
e
e
d
a
e
n
m
d
a
s
n
e
a
n
h
(B
s u
ds
t (P
ap
tion of PM
had a goo M) performed by 5 ndertaken on the
tional role loomfield et al., 20 of the various pla e
d inter-tes
5 players.
y
ment ( =
0
in
5
a
). In this
ter reliabil
0
expenditu ppears to have an
respect, p g
ity strength Recogniperformin .7277). Players sp
r
in
osie
f
lu
in
e
nce on to
a match,
e
g PM. Po
of agreephysiolog
ta
sition had nt 40.6 10.0% o
s
time spen
l
u
e
g
n
g
ic
e
e
rg
s
a
ting diffe
f the matc
a
t sprinting
enced by l and bioenergetic
rent phys y
h
, running, significant influen
still (p <
ical,
requ
ce o
play
shu
0.0
1
9.2% of pu
directly forwa
rposeful mov
rd
ement going
726 203 turns
i
U
pwards of 40% n a game
of purposeful
or slowly jogg
movement is
ing
spent walking
Journal
of
http://www Sports Science and
Medicine
.jssm.org
(2007) 6
Research
article
Physical d
Jonathan
, 63-70
emands o
Bloomfield
f differen
t positi on
s in FA
1
Premier L
Sports Ins
, Remco P
eague soc
titute of N
2
olman a
Exercise S
orthern Ir
cer
n
d Peter O
cie
ela
'Donoghu 3
tute Cardif nce, The Universit nd, University of
e
U
y of Hull,
f, Cardiff,
East Ridin lster, Northern Irela
UK
g of York
shire, UK 3 nd, UK, 2 Departm
, School
e
of Sport, U nt of Sport, Healt
Abstract
h&
niversity o
f Wales In
The purpo
stise
of English of this study was to
age, statu
r
Football A
e
evaluate th
,
three diffe
ss
e
recently id body mass and bo
rent posit ociation (FA) Prem physical demands
dy
e
n
io
ier Leagu
and strike
tions sugg tified between elite mass index have b
e soccer o
r). Compu nal classifications
es
ee
p
f
terised tim
(defender,
Bloomfield
may be su ting that players of layers of different p n
e-motion
midfielder
M
o
v
e
v
m
o
it
p
id
sie
a
a
n
e
purposefu
rticular siz
ble for th
positions
l moveme t Classification w o-analysis using th
e
e
d
a
e
n
m
d
a
s
n
e
a
n
h
(B
s u
ds
t (P
ap
tion of PM
had a goo M) performed by 5 ndertaken on the
tional role loomfield et al., 20 of the various pla e
d inter-tes
5 players.
y
ment ( =
0
in
5
a
). In this
ter reliabil
0
expenditu ppears to have an
respect, p g
ity strength Recogniperformin .7277). Players sp
r
in
osie
f
lu
in
e
nce on to
a match,
e
g PM. Po
of agreephysiolog
ta
sition had nt 40.6 10.0% o
s
time spen
l
u
e
g
n
g
ic
e
e
rg
s
a
ting diffe
f the matc
a
t sprinting
enced by l and bioenergetic
rent phys y
h
, running, significant influen
still (p <
ical,
requ
ce o
play
shu
0.0
1
Conclusions...
Different positions may require
different levels & types of fitness
Aerobic demand of the sport is high
Anaerobic lactate component is less
than what many believe*
Conclusions...
Linear sprinting is a HUGE
determinant of goal scoring
!
Conclusions...
The game is primarily
characterized as short bursts of
high intensity straight ahead
acceleration punctuated by
intermittent rest periods of very
low & moderate activity
Conclusions...
Due to the intermittent high
intensity efforts with insufficient
recovery, the sport can best be
classified as an alactic-aerobic
sport
Application of
Concepts
Schedule
s
r
o
t
a
c
i
d
n
i
Objective
Biolog
ically D
ictated
Period
ization
OFF-SEASON TRAINING IS
NOTHING MORE THAN A VERY BIG WINDOW
OFF-SEASON TRAINING IS
A CHANCE TO PUT HAY IN THE BARN
IN-SEASON TRAINING IS A
BALANCING ACT
IN-SEASON TRAINING
Maintain
Set
Consider
Post-game
or no time
Points of Training
Emphasis
Considerable emphasis should be
given to developing:
Aerobic capacity
Alactic Anaerobic abilities
(especially linear speed)
Limited (but beneficial) training
should be done to enhance anaerobic
AEROBIC FITNESS
Aerobic Capacity
Aerobic capa
city fuels the
ability to per
form repeate
d
high intensity
efforts when
the rest inter
val between
efforts is insu
fficient for
complete rec
overy
AEROBIC FITNESS
Intensity must be sufficiently low that you are training aerobic pathways
and not glycolytic!
Aerobic Training
Guidelines
Continuous Method:
Duration: 15-60 min
Intensity: 70-85% of
max HR
Interval Method:
Duration: 3-8 min /
inter val
Reps: 3-5
Intensity: 85-95% of max
HR
Work:Rest Ratio: 1:0.5-3
Off-Season
In-Season
Additional (non-specific)
work may be appropriate
for maintenance,
remediation and during
critical training windows of
the year (off-season, long
stretches w/o games, etc)
SPRINT CAPACITY
ANAEROBIC
ALACTIC
ABILITIES
Speed
(especially linear)!
Power!
Strength
Quickness &
Agility?
A distinct but
related motor
pattern to
speed, power &
strength
: rest ratios = 1 : 20 - 40 !
Total
Off-Season
In-Season
Repeat Sprint
Ability
To be fit for
soccer you must be
able to sprint fast.
Repeatedly.
With minimal rest.
LIMITERS OF RSA
Fatigue from repeat efforts is inversely correlated to initial sprint
performance!
Limitations in energy supply, which include energy available from
phosphocreatine hydrolysis, anaerobic glycolysis and oxidative
metabolism, and the intramuscular accumulation of metabolic byproducts, such as hydrogen ions are key factors in performance
decrement!
Neural factors (magnitude and strategy of recruitment) are
related to fatigue!
Stiffness regulation, hypoglycemia, muscle damage and
environmental conditions may also compromise repeat sprint ability
(Bishop et al, 2011)
TRAINING RSA
1. Include traditional sprint training to
improve an athletes capacity in a single
sprint effort!
2. Some high intensity interval training is
beneficial to improve the athletes
ability to recover between sprint
efforts.!
(Bishop et al, 2011)
Off-Season
Speed should be
emphasized over RSA!
!
In-Season
RUNNING ECONOMY:
HOW STRENGTH & POWER TRAINING CAN
AFFECT ENDURANCE
MECHANISMS OF BENEFIT
2.9% Impr
o
4.6% Impr ved Performance
oved Eco
no
my
Evidence Supporting
Resistance Training
K Stkren, J Helgerud, E Stka, and J
Hoff. Maximal Strength Training
Improves Running Economy in
Distance Runners. MSSE 2008
G Millet, B Jaouen, F Borrani, and R
Candau. Effects of concurrent
endurance and strength training on
running economy and VO2 kinetics.
MSSE 2002.
J Esteve-Lanao, M Rhea, S Fleck,
and ALucia. Running Specific
Periodized Strength Training
Attenuates Loss of Stride Length
during intense Endurance Running.
JSCR 2008.
And MUCH MORE
Evidence Refuting
Resistance Training
Basic Guidelines
for Strength
TRAIN HOLISTICALLY
BASIC GUIDELINES
Multi-joint
motion!
For
For
POWER DEVELOPMENT
Exercise
75kg Female
Bench Press
300
Back Squat
1100
Deadlift
1100
Snatch
3000
1750
5500
2900
Clean
2950
1750
5500
2650
Jerk
5400
2600
POWER DEVELOPMENT
Exercise
75kg Female
Even if
use of O
300
Bench Press
lympic
inappro
lifts are
priate d
1100
Back Squat
ue to la
equipm
ck of
ent, low
1100
Deadlift
teachin
exper ti
g1750
se, or a
3000
Snatch
inexper
thlete
i
en
Snatch 2nd Pull
p5500
rincipal ce; the basic 2900
s shoul
Clean
inc2950
d still b 1750
orpora
e
ted (ex
loaded5500
Clean 2nd Pull
ternally 2650
, multi-j
oint, low
Jerk
ex5400
plosive
er bod2600
y
movem
ent)
*Total pull: Lift-off until maximal vertical velocity
Weight Training
Guidelines
1-3x/ week
Bodyweight strength exercises are great for muscular endurance, work capacity,
strength maintenance and when facility / equipment access is limited
PLYOMETRICS
Off-Season
Teach first!
Individualize to needs!
!
In-Season
Reduced volumes!
!
On-field incorporation
sessions can be useful
ANAEROBIC LACTIC
CAPACITY
ANAEROBIC LACTIC
CAPACITY
IEW
V
E
R
F
E
I
BR
91-306
2
2009, 4,
,
e
c
n
a
m
d Perfor
logy an
io
rts Phys
o
p
S
f
o
l
na
nal Jour
.
io
t
a
n
r
e
t
n
I
etics, Inc
in
K
n
a
m
Hu
2009
l
l
a
b
t
o
o
ing in F
n
i
a
r
T
y
t
i
s
n
e
t
n
I
High
, an
inini
p
m
a
R
nno
ngsb
a
B
s
n
e
dJ
ic highb
o
r
e
a
f
o
ce effects
n
e
a
c
lemenm
r
p
r
a
o
m
f
i
r
n
e
o
p
t
d
F. M
des insigh
logical an
i
o
v
i
o
s
l mear
y
a
p
h
c
i
d
p
g
n
r
o
a
o
l
j
,
o
l
a
i
l
s
m
in footba
and phy
iews the
s
g
i
v
n
s
i
e
r
y
n
g, and
l
i
e
n
a
a
l
i
r
n
c
d
t
i
t
n
A
e
r
a
.
c
a
g
n
m
s
n
a
e
i
Th
tically d
.
cal traini
ed-endur
rma
E
,
a
i
a
I
llo
ld
o
h
s
e
r
h
t
te
a
t
an
c
y
a
l
a
l
f
p
o
y
e
a
g
m
y
frin
t
i
e
c
h
a
t
p
a
n
c
o
ic
e
t
t
c
a
a
r
l
e
c
p
i
b
o
o
s
Player gh not critical anaer
u
o
h
t
l
e
A
l
o
r
t
r
o
p
up
s
t
n
y
a
c
t
n
r
e
o
i
c
fi
f
imp
e
g
n
i
n
i
a
r
t
r
o
Great f
IEW
V
E
R
F
E
I
BR
91-306
2
2009, 4,
,
e
c
n
a
m
d Perfor
logy an
io
rts Phys
o
p
S
f
o
l
na
nal Jour
.
io
t
a
n
r
e
t
n
I
etics, Inc
in
K
n
a
m
Hu
2009
l
l
a
b
t
o
o
ing in F
n
i
a
r
T
y
t
i
s
n
e
t
n
I
High
, an
inini
p
m
a
R
nno
ngsb
a
B
s
n
e
dJ
ic highb
o
r
e
a
f
o
ce effects
n
e
a
c
lemenm
r
p
r
a
o
m
f
i
r
n
e
o
p
t
d
F. M
des insigh
logical an
i
o
v
i
o
s
l mear
y
a
p
h
c
i
d
p
g
n
r
o
a
o
l
j
,
o
l
a
i
l
s
m
in footba
and phy
iews the
s
g
i
v
n
s
i
e
r
y
n
g, and
l
i
e
n
a
a
l
i
r
n
c
d
t
i
t
n
A
e
r
a
.
c
a
g
n
m
s
n
a
e
i
Th
tically d
.
cal traini
ed-endur
rma
E
,
a
i
a
I
llo
Anaerobic Glycolytic
Training Guidelines
Can primarily be addressed through small sided games
and / or HIIT Methods
Inter val Method:
Duration: 15 - 60 sec
Intensity: 100-120%
of V02max
Work:Rest ratio:
1:1-2
Repetition Method:
Duration: 40 sec - 12
min
Intensity: 95-105%
V02max
Work:Rest ratio: 1:3-5
THERE IS NO RECIPE.
LEARN TO COOK
THANKS
@MIKEYOUNG!
FITFORFUTBOL.COM!
ELITETRACK.COM!
ATHLETICLAB.COM!
HPCSPORT.COM!
MIKE@ATHLETICLAB.COM