CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc. Doc.

166
Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW Document 166 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 2

1 DAVID T. BIDERMAN, Bar No. 101577

JUDITH B. GITTERMAN, Bar No. 115661
2 M. CHRISTOPHER JHANG, Bar No. 211463
PERKINS COIE LLP
3 Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111-4131
4 Telephone: (415) 344-7000
Facsimile: (415) 344-7050
5 Email: DBiderman@perkinscoie.com
Email: JGitterman@perkinscoie.com
6 Email: CJhang@perkinscoie.com

7 Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11

12 CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a CASE NO. C O5-03649 JW

INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD
13 STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
similarly situated, PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND MOTION TO
14 SEAL PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 79-5(d)
Plaintiffs, PORTIONS OF AMENDED
15 DOCUMENTS (DOCUMENT NOS. 137-
v. 139)
16
GOOGLE, INC., Date: June 11, 2007
17 Time: 9:00 a.m.
Defendant. Dept.: Courtroom 8
18 Judge: Honorable James Ware

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 05-03649 [41063-0023-000000/13278101_1.DOC]
41063-0023/LEGAL13278101.1

Dockets.Justia.com
 Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW Document 166 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 2 of 2

1 ORDER

2 The Court finds, having considered Plaintiffs CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC, d/b/a

3 Industrial Printing, and Howard Stern’s Second Motion To Seal Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)

4 Portions Of Amended Documents Due To Confidentiality Designations By Defendant Google

5 Inc. (“Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Seal Amended Documents”) (Document Nos. 137-139), the

6 Declaration of M. Christopher Jhang In Response To Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Seal Amended

7 Documents, and the papers submitted therewith and arguments raised therein, and good cause

8 appearing:

9 1. That the redactions (i.e., sealing as confidential documents) requested in

10 Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Seal Amended Documents, in connection with Plaintiffs’ Amended

11 Supplemental Memorandum In Support Of Plaintiffs’ Motion For Partial Summary Judgment

12 (“Plaintiffs’ Amended Supplemental Memorandum”) and Amended Supplemental Declaration of

13 Michele F. Raphael (“Amended Supplemental Raphael Declaration”), are consistent with

14 Google’s confidentiality designations; and

15 2. That Google has demonstrated that Plaintiffs’ Amended Supplemental

16 Memorandum and the Amended Supplemental Raphael Declaration are subject to seal in

17 accordance with its confidential designations because of overriding confidentiality interests that

18 overcome the right of public access to the record in these documents.

19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
20
1. That Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Seal Amended Documents is GRANTED.
21

22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23

24
DATED: ___________________
25 The Honorable James Ware
United States District Judge
26

27

28 -2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 05-03649 [41063-0023-000000/13278101_1.DOC]
41063-0023/LEGAL13278101.1