Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Competitive Analysis
AU LEE YAU
930524-01-6857
200033
CHRITINA LAU
MARCH 2015
TABLE OF CONTENT
Title
Pages
Content
4.0
Chapter 4
2-13
4.0 Introduction
4.1 Descriptive statistic of the collection
4.2 T-test of the data collection
4.3 Hypothesis Testing
4.4 Chapter summary
5.0
Chapter 5
14-18
5.0 Introduction
5.1 Respondent Profile
5.2 Discussion of the findings
5.3 Recommendations
5.4 Practical Implication
5.5 Limitation of Study
5.6 Conclusion
References
19
Coursework
20-21
4.0 Introduction
This Chapter mainly represents the result of the data analysis. This result will use to
Page
1 of 18
study the aim report the finding that we get from data analysis. Thus, in this research
data were analyzed using which several method to analysis such as Descriptive
statistic of the collection, T-test of the data collection, the hypothesis testing and the
last chapter summary.
Frequency
30
Percentage (%)
30
21-30
35
35
31-40
20
20
41 and above
Total
15
100
15
100
This results of age of respondents shown in table 4.1. The table show 30% of the
respondent (30 people respondents) is at the age below 20 years old, then follow by
35% (35 respondents) are in age between 21 until 30. Then, age from 31-40 have 20%
(have 20 respondents). Lastly, the age 41 and above there are 15respondents (15% of
the all respondents). Based on this statement the highest respondent age are between
21 until 30 years old and the lowest are the age 41 and above. Only 15 respondents
only.
Table 4.2 Gender of the respondents
Gender
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Male
50
50
Female
Total
50
100
50
100
Page
2 of 18
This results of gender of respondents shown in table 4.2. The findings show the both
male and female have same frequency and percentage. The male have 50respondents
(50% male respondents) and also the female also have 50respondents (50% male
respondents).
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Single
60
60
Married
40
40
Total
100
100
Table 4.3 show the result of the marital status of the respondents. This finding
shows the highest respondent is the single respondent which 60% (60 respondents). In
the others hand, there are 40 respondents in married respondents include also 40% out
of 100% respondents.
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Malays
30
30
India
25
25
Chinese
45
45
Total
100
100
This results of race of respondents shown in table 4.4. The table show 30% of the
respondent (30 people respondents) is the Malay respondents, then follow by 25%
(25respondents) are Indian. Then, the Chinese have the highest rate 45 respondents
(45%). Based on this statement the highest respondent race are Chinese and the lowest
are the Indians.
Page
3 of 18
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Christian
30
30
Islam
25
25
Hinduism
10
10
Buddhism
35
35
Total
100
100
The table 4.5 show 30% of the respondent (30 people respondents) is the chiristian
respondents, then follow by 25% (25respondents) are Islamic. Then, the Hindusim
only 10% in my respondents follow by Buddhism have 35% the highest rate of the all
religion, whereas the Hinduism are the weakest percentages only 10%.
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Master degree
30
30
Bachelor degree
25
25
35
35
Advance Diploma
Diploma
10
10
Total
100
100
The table 4.6 show the education level of the all respondents the highest frequency is
the Advance Diploma are 30 respondents, follow by master degree 30respondents,
25respondents are Bachelor degree, and the lowest frequency is the Diploma level
only show 10%.
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Page
4 of 18
Education
25
25
Finance
25
25
Service Industry
35
35
Others
15
15
Total
100
100
Table 4.7 show the result of the Occupation of the respondents. This finding shows
the highest respondent is the service industry which 35% (35 respondents). In the
others hand, there are same 25 respondents in the education and the finance
occupation 25%. the least occupation is the others act as students and worker only 15
respondents (15% out of 100%).
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Below 1500
10
10
1501 2000
15
15
2001 2500
20
20
Page
5 of 18
Living Area
Frequency
Percentage (%)
City
80
80
Village
20
20
Total
100
100
Table 4.9 show the result of the living area of the respondents. This finding shows the
highest respondent stay in city are 80% (80 respondents). In the others hand, there are
20 respondents stay in village respondents include also 20% out of 100% respondents.
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Yes
60
60
No
Total
40
100
40
100
Table 4.10 show the result of the buy the SMEs product of the respondents. This
finding shows the highest respondent is yes to buy the SMEs product which 60% (60
respondents). In the others hand, there are 40 respondents in respondents say No to
buying SMEs product include also 40% out of 100% respondents.
6 of 18
Mean
Variance
Observations
Hypothesized Mean
Difference
df
t Stat
P(T<=t) one-tail
t Critical one-tail
P(T<=t) two-tail
t Critical two-tail
Variable Variable
1
2
14.4
18.12
52.0816 33.5771
3
4
50
50
0
94
-2.84212
0.00274
8
1.66122
6
0.00549
6
1.98552
3
7 of 18
14.4 and 18.12 with the Variance of 52.08163 and 33.57714 for the male and female
on the packaging were insignificant. The t-value is 0.005496, in this result we can
concluded that there is has significant different of the packaging between male and
female respondents.
Table 4.12: Independent sample test between gender and purchase decision
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal
Variances
Mean
Variance
Observations
Hypothesized Mean
Difference
df
t Stat
P(T<=t) one-tail
t Critical one-tail
P(T<=t) two-tail
t Critical two-tail
Variabl
e1
15.26
40.8493
9
50
Variabl
e2
18.42
17.5138
8
50
0
84
2.92484
0.00221
5
1.66319
7
0.06443
1.98861
The result of T-test is shown in table 4.12 above. The result show that the difference
6in the mean of 15.26 and 18.42 with the Variance of 40.84939 and 17.51388 for the
male and female on the purchase decision were insignificant. The t-value is 0.006443,
in this result we can concluded that there is no significant different of the purchase
decision between male and female respondents.
8 of 18
Variable Variable
1
2
14.32
17.2
22.2220 23.5918
4
4
50
50
Mean
Variance
Observations
Hypothesized Mean
Difference
df
t Stat
0
98
-3.0087
0.00166
P(T<=t) one-tail
7
1.66055
t Critical one-tail
1
1.00333
P(T<=t) two-tail
5
1.98446
t Critical two-tail
7
The result of T-test is shown in table 4.13 above. The result show that the difference
in the mean of 14.32 and 17.2 with the Variance of 22.22204 and 23.59184 for the
male and female on the price were insignificant. The t-value is 1.003335, in this result
we can concluded that there is has no significant different of the purchase decision
between male and female respondents.
Table 4.14: Independent sample test between gender and customer loyalty
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming
Unequal Variances
Mean
Variance
Observations
Hypothesized Mean
Difference
df
t Stat
P(T<=t) one-tail
t Critical one-tail
Varia
ble 1
13.62
13.05
673
50
Varia
ble 2
17.68
17.28
327
50
0
96
5.211
99
5.35E
-07
1.660
Page
9 of 18
P(T<=t) two-tail
t Critical two-tail
881
1.07E
-06
1.984
984
The result of T-test is shown in table 4.14 above. The result show that the difference
in the mean of 13.62 and 17.68 with the Variance of 13.05673 and 17.28327for the
male and female on the customer loyalty were insignificant. The t-value is 1.07, in
this result we can concluded that there is no significant different of the customer
loyalty between male and female respondents.
Table 4. 15 One way ANOVA between age, race, religion, education level, occupation
and income with packaging.
Anova: Single Factor
Page
10 of 18
SUMMARY
Groups
Count
Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
Column 4
ANOVA
Source of
Variation
Between
Groups
Within
Groups
SS
487.31
88
69458.
33
Total
69945.
65
Su
m
77
5
75
0
82
5
65
0
Averag
e
129.16
67
Varian
ce
1604.1
67
125
1000
137.5
4187.5
130
8875
df
MS
162.43
96
3655.7
02
F
0.0444
35
3
19
Pvalue
F crit
0.9871 3.1273
57
5
22
The result of ANOVA is shown in Table 4.15. In this situation, the F value is
0.044435, and this is not significant level at the 0.987. This means there is no
significant between the packaging and the factor of the age, race, religion, education
level, occupation, and income. it can show that the analysis of the variance from the
ANOVA table indicated that F statistic produced is found to be significant at level
0.05 level. We can conclude that this regression models reaches statically significant
as p value less than 0.05.In my Conclusion, in this one way ANOVA testing we can
concluded there is no significant relationship between age, race, religion, education
level, occupation and income. This is because all the significant value is more than
0.05.
Page
11 of 18
In this chapter, the three hypothesis proposed is earlier tested. Using sample of 100
respondent, the data obtained from the Johor jaya area. First, the questionnaire was
distributed randomly. This is aim to determine the effect of new packaging toward
purchase decisions, customer loyalty and also price. Two level of statistical analysis
were conducted in two ways. The first level involved using the basic descriptive
analysis. In this analysis, we used the frequencies of the demographic data. The
second level of analysis is the ANOVA (t-test and one way). In my summary, based on
the test conducted, 2 hypothesis is reject and 1 hypothesis is acceptable. This research
shows that only purchase decisions and customer loyalty will affected if there are a
new packaging to SMEs product, there is no relationship between the packaging and
the price of the product.
5.0 Introduction
Packaging is the technology of enclosing or protecting products for distribution,
storage, sale, and use in SMEs product. Packaging also refers to the process of design,
evaluation, and production of packages. Packaging can be described as a coordinated
system of preparing goods for transport, warehousing, logistics, sale, and end use. The
importance of the Packaging in the SMEs product is a marketing tool used to reflect
the brand and to sell the product inside. This tool used design elements such as color,
Page
12 of 18
13 of 18
decisions. They have a weak price and purchase decisions because most of all already
entire in their life.
The secondly we make a investigate the between the race and the packaging, the
results show that Chinese has the highest rate in all the races. This is because most of
the Chinese very likely the wrap or packaging of the SMEs product and also the most
Chinese has the improvement buying decisions.
The most weakest religion that has effect is the Hinduism, this is due to the
Hinduism is very loyal to their religion, they are tradition and focused in their cultural
in social attitudes. The Hinduism show the percentages only 10%.
Next, the effect between the education level and the packaging displays the
Diploma level has the weakest effect. This is because the Diploma student require to
focus in their study and have least buying decisions.
Occupation in range others has the low percentages, only present the 10% out
of 100%. This is because most of the occupation are the students and worker, the have
also weak purchase decisions
The income below 1500 has the lowest percentages in the research. Only 10%
percentages, this mean that the lower income has choose the lower price product and
no influences of the packaging. The lower income affect the buying decision to
pretend save cost. Finally, the all price and customer loyalty also purchase decision in
all race, age, religion, education, occupation, income has no effect to the packaging to
SMEs product.
5.3 Recommendations
In my study, the most of the greatest effect is Packaging to the SMEs product. This
is because the nowadays, annually in the competitive world we have to have a nice
Page
14 of 18
wrapping and design for the packaging only these can make a differentiate from
others SMEs products.
The price has low effect than the packaging, we can explain through if the buyer
has greater purchase decision normally they buy the brand product with the nice look
packaging. Thus, the purchase decision and the customer loyalty can be change when
the packaging is more attract the buyer and the buyer will try another product with
classic and luxury packaging.
15 of 18
is narrow. besides, the research time is only four month during my study, this will
limited the time to get the respond from the respondents. the third limitation is the
there are some of the respondents are in cooperative with the questionnaire, this may
affect the analysis the data.
5.6 Conclusion
Packaging is the technology of enclosing or protecting products for distribution,
storage, sale, and use in SMEs product. The mainly objectives is the new packaging
of SMEs product affect the customer loyalty on that product. Then, The consumer are
willing to pay more on the new packaging in whether high or low prices. The
purchase decision affect by the new packaging SMEs product.
All the hypothesis and objectives of the research is all approved in my research.
Page
16 of 18
References
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Student%27s_t-test
2. http://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab-express/1/help-and-how-to/basicstatistics/inference/supporting-topics/test-of-means/types-of-t-tests/
3. http://www.bnm.gov.my/?ch=en_press&pg=en_press_all&ac=1279&lang=en
4. http://www.tradeforum.org/Export-Strategies-for-Small-Firms/#sthash.2yLkFCy4
Page
17 of 18