Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Calculations
Current Process
Mike's Plan
Regular Shirts
Ike's Plan
Regular Shirts
Custom Shirts
196 * 60 =11,760
396 * 5 =
1980 shirts
8 hours * 60 minutes /
8 hours * 60 mins / 0.5
0.5 =
= 960 shirts/day
960 shirts / day
9,060 shirts
30 units at sewing + 5
units being cut + 15
units being finished = 50
WIP(given in case)
480 / 0.666 =
8 * 60 / 3.9 =
720 shirts/day
123 shirts/day
Current Process
Mike's Plan
Regular Shirts
Ike's Plan
Regular Shirts
Custom Shirts
80 remaining shirts *
0.67 = 53.6 minutes
65 ( $6 * 8hours) / 900
64 (6 * 8) / 800 =$3.84
= 31200 / 900 = $3.47
53.6 / 60 * 9 = 8.04
49 * 8.04 = 393.96
Total: (393.96 + 2352) /
800 =3.43
Explanation
1.
a.
Cycle time for each station = total station time / # of workers at station
i.
ii.
b.
Manufacturing Lead Time (MLT) = Cycle Time (CT) * Works in Progress (WIP)
i.
CT = 0.5 minutes
ii.
iii.
MLT in days = (0.5 * 11,760) / 480 minutes per day = 12.25 days
c.
Total individual shirts as WIP = Sum of average batches * 60 shirts per batch
i.
WIP shirts = 196 batches * 60 shirts per batch = 11,760 shirts as WIP
d.
i.
ii.
Production capacity = 480 / 0.5 = 960 units per day @ continuous 100% utilization
e.
i.
ii.
Total monthly capacity = 19,200 (920 per day * 20 days per month)
iii.
f.
Direct Labor content = sum of time at all stations + time per shirt for cutting
i.
ii.
iii.
Total cutting time = (1.5 minutes * 60 layers) + (30 minutes cutting) = 120 minutes
iv.
Cutting time per shirt = 120 minutes / 480 shirts = 0.25 minutes per shirt
v.
Total labor content (time) per shirt = 25.51 + 0.25 = 25.76 minutes per shirt
g.
Direct Labor Utilization = Total used labor time / Total labor time available
i.
Total labor time available = 64 workers * 480 minutes per day = 30,720 minutes
ii.
Total time used = time per shirt * daily production (16,000 per month / 20 days)
iii.
Total time used = 25.76 minutes * 800 shirts per day = 20,608 minutes
iv.
Direct Labor Utilization = 20,608 minutes used / 30,720 minutes available = 67.08%
h.
Total Direct Labor Cost per shirt = (# workers * 8 hours per day * $6 per hour) / 800
i.
Total Direct labor cost = (64 * 8 * 6) / 800 (total daily production = 16,000 / 20 days)
ii.
2.
Mikes plan for production of regular and custom shirts using existing facilities with the addition
of a new cutting machine and one worker.
a.
System CT remains unchanged = 0.5 (the cuffs station still has the longest station CT)
b.
Manufacturing Lead Time (MLT) = Cycle Time (CT) * Works in Progress (WIP)
i.
CT = 0.5 minutes
ii.
iii.
MLT in days = (0.5 * 1,980) / 480 minutes per day = 2.06 days
c.
Total individual shirts as WIP = Sum of average batches * 5 shirts per batch
i.
WIP shirts = 396 batches * 5 shirts per batch = 1,980 shirts as WIP
d.
i.
ii.
Production capacity = 480 / 0.5 = 960 units per day @ continuous 100% utilization
e.
i.
Current monthly production is 16,000 regular + 2000 custom shirts (given in case)
ii.
Total monthly capacity = 18,000 (900 per day * 20 days per month)
iii.
f.
Direct Labor content = sum of time at all stations + time per shirt for cutting
i.
ii.
ii.Custom cutting time = 5 shirts / 2.5 minutes = 0.5 minutes per custom shirt
iii.
Total cutting time = Weighted average of old & new machine cutting times
iii.(16,000 reg / 18000 total) * 0.25 + (2000 / 18000) * 0.5 = 0.278 min/shirt
iv.
Total labor content (time) per shirt = 25.51 +0.28 = 25.79 minutes per shirt
g.
Direct Labor Utilization = Total used labor time / Total labor time available
i.
Total labor time available = 65 workers * 480 minutes per day = 31,200 minutes
ii.
Total time used = time per shirt * daily production (18000 per month / 20 days)
iii.
Total time used = 25.79 minutes * 900 shirts per day = 23,211 minutes
iv.
Direct Labor Utilization = 23,211 minutes used / 31,200 minutes available = 74.39%
h.
Total Direct Labor Cost per shirt = (# workers * 8 hours per day * $6 per hour) / 900
i.
Total Direct labor cost = (65 * 8 * 6) / 900 (total daily production = 18,000 / 20 days)
ii.
3.
Ikes plan for shifting labor from the regular assembly floor to create a separate assembly line
dedicated to custom shirts, thus separating the two streams of production.
(A) Regular Shirt Production:
a.
System CT = 0.67 (the cuffs station still has the longest station CT @ 2.0 min / 3 workers )
b.
Manufacturing Lead Time (MLT) = Cycle Time (CT) * Works in Progress (WIP)
i.
CT = 0.67 minutes
ii.
iii.
MLT in days = (0.67 * 9,060) / 480 minutes per day = 12.58 days (for regular shirts)
c.
Total individual shirts as WIP = Sum of average batches * 60 shirts per batch
i.
WIP shirts = 151 batches * 60 shirts per batch = 9,060 shirts as WIP
d.
i.
ii.
Production capacity = 480 / 0.67 = 720 units per day @ continuous 100% utilization
e.
i.
ii.
Total monthly capacity = 14,400 (720 per day * 20 days per month)
iii.
f.
Direct Labor content = sum of time at all stations + time per shirt for cutting
i.
ii.
iii.
Total cutting time = (1.5 minutes * 60 layers) + (30 minutes cutting) = 120 minutes
iv.
Cutting time per shirt = 120 minutes / 480shirts = 0.25 minutes per shirt
v.
Total labor content (time) per shirt = 25.51 + 0.25 = 25.76 minutes per shirt
g.
Direct Labor Utilization = Total used labor time / Total labor time available
i.
ii.
Total labor time available = 49 workers * 480 minutes per day = 20,608 minutes
iii.
Total time used = time per shirt * daily production (16000 per month / 20 days)
iv.
Total time used = 25.76 minutes * 800 shirts per day = 23,211 minutes
v.
Direct Labor Utilization = 20,608 minutes used / 23,520 minutes available = 87.62%
h.
Total Direct Labor Cost per shirt = (# workers * 8 hours per day * $6 per hour) / 800
i.
Overtime is incurred for all employees in order to reach excess of normal hour production levels
(calculated above @ 11% above capacity)
ii.
Total Direct labor cost = (49 * 8 * 6) + 393.96 / 800 (total daily production = 18,000 / 20 days)
iv.
(B) Custom shirt production on separate assembly line (15 workers + 1 new hire):
a.
Cycle time for each station = total station time / # of workers at station
i.
ii.
Cuffs station = System CT = 3.90 minutes / 1 worker = 3.90 minutes (collar station)
b.
Manufacturing Lead Time (MLT) = Cycle Time (CT) * Works in Progress (WIP)
i.
CT = 0.5 minutes
ii.
iii.
MLT in days = (3.90 * 50) / 480 minutes per day = 0.41 days
c.
Total individual shirts as WIP = Sum of average batches * 5 shirts per batch
i.
i.
ii.
Production capacity = 480 / 3.90 = 123 units per day @ continuous 100% utilization
e.
i.
ii.
Total monthly capacity = 2460 (123 per day * 20 days per month)
iii.
f.
Direct Labor content = sum of time at all stations + time per shirt for cutting
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Cutting time per shirt = 2.5 minutes / 5 shirts = 0.50 minutes per shirt
v.
Total labor content (time) per shirt = 25.51 + 0.50 = 26.01 minutes per shirt
g.
Direct Labor Utilization = Total used labor time / Total labor time available
i.
ii.
Total labor time available = 16 workers * 480 minutes per day = 7680 minutes
iii.
Total time used = time per shirt * daily production (2000 per month / 20 days)
iv.
Total time used = 26.01 minutes * 100 shirts per day = 2601 minutes
v.
Direct Labor Utilization = 2601 minutes used / 7680 minutes available = 33.87%
h.
Total Direct Labor Cost per shirt = (# workers * 8 hours per day * $6 per hour) / 200
i.
Total Direct labor cost = (16 * 8 * 6) / 200 (total daily production = 2000 / 20 days)
ii.
Part B
Recommendation to Management
Using the calculations in Part A it is possible to evaluate each of the two proposals in terms of their cost
and efficiency. Firstly, to deduce the total cost for the custom shirts each month, the Direct Labour Cost
from each plan can be multiplied by 2000 (the desired quantity produced). By doing this we learn that Ikes
total cost for custom shirts is $7.68 x 2000 = $15,360, compared to Mikes $3.47 x 2000 = $6,940. This
results in an $8,420 cost difference in favour of Mikes plan. Production of regular shirts on the other hand
are cheaper using Ikes process, that is Ikes labour costs are $3.43 x 16,000 (desired quantity of regular
shirts) = $54,880 compared with Mikes labour costs of $3.47 x 16,000 = $55,520. The difference between
the two is only $640, which is fairly insignificant, and leaves the total cost difference between the two
plans at $7,780 in favour of Mike.
The great disparity in cost between the two is mainly due to the efficiency of each proposal. Whilst Mike
increases the efficiency of both capacity and labour utilization in the factory (absorbing excess capacity
and increasing efficiency from 83% to 93.75% as well as improving labour efficiency by 7.31%), Ike overutilizes capacity in his regular shirt production line and severely under-utilizes capacity in his custom shirts
production line. The result of this is that he has to pay the workers on the regular shirt line overtime whilst
the workers on the custom shirt line are frequently starved and sitting idle.
Furthermore, when considering the logistics of each production line layout, Mikes proposal is favourable
over Ikes because it allows for more flexibility. Whilst Mike retains the existing process layout in the
batch shop process, where similar operations are performed in common functional areas, Ike instead adopts
a product layout structure, where the operations are located according to the progressive steps involved in
making a shirt. Having only one worker completing each production task, as is the case in Ikes plan,
means that if one worker is slowed down for any reason or needs to take a break, then there is no one to
pick up the slack. As a result, the whole process is negatively affected. An ideal assembly line should allow
workers to trade elements of work and it should be unproblematic to add workers to the line to increase
efficiency, however the straight-line layout of Ikes plan does not satisfy these requirements.
Based upon our analysis, although both processes do essentially satisfy Dwight Colliers production lead
management time conditions, we would recommend that he should trial Mikes plan. If there does indeed
prove to be a market for mid price range custom shirts, then implementing Mikes proposal is the
companys best shot at making a lucrative profit from this initiative.