Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
e-ISSN: 2278-5728, p-ISSN: 2319-765X. Volume 11, Issue 2 Ver. IV (Mar - Apr. 2015), PP 10-23
www.iosrjournals.org
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Abstract
Details of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre conjecture
Introduction and the results
A general method in the form of formulae, to find complete solution of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 in whole
numbers.
Theorem 1: (Non- trivial primitive solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 in whole numbers, when an odd number
x 3 ,x N={1,2,3,4,5,6, })
Theorem 2 :( Non-trivial primitive solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 in whole numbers, when an even number
x 4 where x N={1,2,3,4,5,6, })
Theorem 3 :( Derived solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 in whole numbers, from its non-trivial primitive
solutions when an odd number x3, xN={1,2,3,4,5,6, })
Theorem 4 :( Derived solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 in whole numbers, from its non-trivial primitive
solutions when an even number x4, x = {1,2,3,4,5,6, } )
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the equation + = :
Case-1
Case-2
Case-3
Case-4
Solved examples
Developing chain solutions like n12 + n22 + n23 + n24 + n25 + n2 6 +. . .
= n2 in whole numbers, of the equation x 2 + y 2 = z2 , formulae
Total pages
1
1
2
3
3
4
5
5
6
7
8
9
13
14
I.
1.
Formula for finding Non-trivial primitive solutions of the equation x^2+y^2=x^2 in whole numbers, when
an odd number x 3, x N and = 2 + 1, =
12+
2+12122=
2+12+122
OR
When an odd number x 3, x N={1,2,3,4,5,6 }
2 1
2 +
2
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11241023
(2+1)2 1
2
2 + 1
=
2
, =
2+1 2 +1
2
2 +
N={1,2,3,4,5,6,}
www.iosrjournals.org
10 | Page
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the solutions of the
2.
Formula for finding non trivial primitive solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = z 2 in whole numbers, when
an even number x 4, x N={1,2,3,4,5,6 } and when x=2n+2, y = + 1 2 1 , and z = + 1 2 +
1,
2n + 2 2 + [ n + 1)^2 1 2 = [ n + 1)^2 + 1 2 n N = {1,2,3,4,5,6, }
OR
When an even number x 2 N then 2 2 + x 2 1 2 = x 2 + 1 2
3. Formula for finding derived solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 from its non trivial primitive
solutions, in whole numbers, when an odd number x 3, n N={1,2,3,4,5,6, } and x=2n+1, =
2+1 2 1
, z =
2
{1,2,3,4,5,6, }
2 +1 2 +1
2
2+1 2 1
then [(n 2n + 1 ]2 + [n
2+1 2 +1
]2 = [n
]2 =
OR
2 1
2 +1
(2+1)2 1
2
, =
2+1 2 +1
2
2 + 1 1
2
Proof :( Using Mathematical Induction)
Let be P the statement
2 + 1
2+
2 + 1
,
2 + 1
2
2 + 1
2
2+
+1
N = {1,2,3,4,5,6, }
2 + 1
2
+1
2
3 2 +1
2
10 2
2
21+1 2
2
= 32 + 42 = 52
= 52
.. . 32 + 42 = 52
.. . L. H. S = R. H. S.
Induction step:
Let k be an integer and assume
is true
That is assume that
2
2 + 1 2 1
2 + 1
2 + 1 2 +
=
2
2
Required to show is true +1 i.e. that
2
2( + 1) + 1 2 1
2( + 1) + 1 2 +
=
2
= {1,2,3,4,5,6, }
+1
N = {1,2,3,4,5,6, }
2( + 1) + 1
2
+1
( + 1) N
2
2( +1)+1 2 1
L.H.S= 2( + 1) + 1 2 +
2
Consider
2( + 1) + 1 2 = 2k + 2 + 1 = 2k + 3
Consider
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11241023
= 4k 2 + 12k + 9
www.iosrjournals.org
(1)
11 | Page
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the solutions of the
2
2(+1)+1 2 1
2
2
(2 +3) 2 1
2
4 2 +12+8
2
162=44+123+522+16++48+16
= 2 2 + 6 + 4 2 = 4 4 + 36 2 + 16 + 12 3 + 48 +
(2)
2
2( +1)+1 2 +1
2
2 2
2 +3 2 +1
(3)
2
4 2 +12+10
2
= 2 2 + 6 + 5
=4 4 + 24 3 + 56 2 + 60 + 25
(4)
From (3) & (4) we have
L.H.S. =R.H.S.
Hence +1 is true is is true
By principle of mathematical induction is true for all nN={1,2,3,4,5,6, } Hence the proof. QED.
Theorem 2: (Non-trivial primitive solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 in whole numbers, when an even
number x 4 where x N={1,2,3,4,5,6, })
= 2 + 2, = + 1 2 1, = + 1 2 + 1
2 + 2 2 + + 1 2 1 2 = + 1 2 + 1 2
for all n N =
{1,2,3,4,5,6 }
Proof: (Using Mathematical Induction)
Let be the statement
2 + 2 2 + + 1 2 1 2 = + 1 2 + 1 2
Basic step: Show 1 is true
For n=1
L.H.S. = 2 1 + 2 2 + 1 + 1 2 1 2 = 32 + 42 = 52
(1)
R.H.S.
=
1 + 1 2 + 1 2 = 52
(2)
From (1) & (2) we have
L.H.S. =R.H.S.
Induction step:
Let k 1 be an integer and assume
is true. That is, assume that
2 + 2 2 + + 1 2 1 2 = + 1 2 + 1 2
Required to show +1 is true i.e. that
2( + 1) + 2 2 + ( + 1) + 1 2 1 2 = ( + 1) + 1 2 + 1 2
L.H.S. = 2( + 1) + 2 2 + ( + 1) + 1 2 1 2
Consider
2
2( + 1) + 2 2 = 2 + 2 + 2 = 4 2 + 16 + 16
(3)
Consider
+ 1) + 1 2 1 2 = ( + 2) 1 2 = ( 2 + 4 + 3 2 = 4 + 8 3 + 22 2 + 24 + 9
(4)
From (3) & (4) we have
L.H.S.
=
4 + 8 3 + 26 2 + 40 + 25
(5)
2
R.H.S.
=
+1 +1 +1 =
+2
+ 1 = 2 + 4 + 4 + 1 2 = 4 + 8 3 + 26 2 + 40 +
25
(6)
From (5) & (6) we have
L.H.S. =R.H.S.
Hence +1 are true if is true. By the principle of Mathematical Induction Pn is true for all n =
1,2,3,4,5,6, . Hence the proof.
QED.
Theorem 3: (Derived solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 in whole numbers, from its non-trivial primitive
solutions when an odd number x3, xN={1,2,3,4,5,6, })
When x=2n+1, =
2+1 2 1
2
, and =
2+1 2 +1
2
2
2 + 1 1
(n 2n + 1) +
2
= {1,2,3,4,5,6 }
Proof: (Using Mathematical Induction)
Let be statement
2
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11241023
2 + 1
2
+1
www.iosrjournals.org
for all n N
12 | Page
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the solutions of the
2
(n 2n + 1)
2 + 1
2
2 + 1
2
+1
21+1 2 +1
+ 1
= 32 + 42 = 52
(1)
10
= 1
21+1 2 1
= 52
(2)
. . . = . . .
Induction step:
Let k1 be an integer and assume true, that is, assume that
2
(k 2k + 1)
Required
to
((k + 1) 2(k + 1) + 1)
2 +1 +1 2 1
+1
( + 1)
2k + 3
= k+1
is
2( +1)+1 2 1
2 + 1 2 + 1
2
true
= ( + 1)
2(+1)+1 2 1
( + 1)
2 + 1 2 1
2
Pk+1
show
2( +1)+1 2 +1
i.e.
2
2
=( k+1
2k 2 + 6k + 4
( + 1)
that
2(+1)+1 2 +1
(4)
(5)
= k+1
2k 2 + 6k + 5
201k 2 + 110k + 25
(6)
From (5) & (6) we have
L.H.S.=R.H.S.
Hence +1 are true if is true. By the principle of Mathematical Induction is true for all n
N={1,2,3,4,5,6, } Hence the proof.
QED
Theorem 4 :( Derived solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 in whole numbers, from its non-trivial primitive
solutions when an even number x4, x = {1,2,3,4,5,6, })
= 2 + 2, = + 1 2 1, = + 1 2 ,
2
2
2 + 2) 2 + ( + 1 2 1
= +1 2 +1
Proof :( Using Mathematical Induction)
Let be the statement
2
2
2 + 2) 2 + ( + 1 2 1
= +1 2 +1
Basic step: Show 1 is true.
For n=1
L.H.S
=
2
2
2
2 + 2) 2 + ( + 1 2 1
= 1 21+2
+ 1 1+1 21
= 42 + 32 = 52
(1}
2
R.H.S. = + 1 2 + 1
= (1 1 + 1
L.H.S. =R.H.S.
Induction step:
Let
k1
be
an
integer
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11241023
+1
and
= 52
assume
(2)
www.iosrjournals.org
is
true
that
is
that
13 | Page
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the solutions of the
2
2 + 2) 2 + ( + 1 2 1
= +1 2 +1
Required
to
show
is
+1 true
i.e.
2
2
2
(+1) 2( + 1) + 2) + ( + 1)( ( + 1) + 1 1
= ( + 1) ( + 1) + 1 2 + 1
that
2
2 + 4 + 5 2 = 2 + 2 + 1 4 + 8 3 +
262+40+25=6+105+434+1003+1312+90+25
(6)
From (5) & (6) we have
L.H.S= R.H.S.
Hence +1 are true. By the principle of Mathematical Induction is true for all n N={1,2,3,4,5,6, }
Hence the proof.
QED.
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the equation + =
Birch and Swinnerton Dyre conjecture
When the solutions are points of an abelian variety the conjecture asserts that the size of the group of rational
points is related to the behavior of an associated zeta function () near the point s=1.
In particular this amazing conjecture asserts that if (s) is equal to 0, then there are an infinite number of rational
points(solutions), and conversely, if (1) is not equal to 0, then there is only a finite number of such points.
Case-1
(When non-trivial primitive solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 in whole numbers and an odd number x
3, x N={1,2,3,4,5,6, })
(2 + 1)2 1
2 + 1 2 + 1
= 2 + 1, =
, =
,
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 + 1 1
2 + 1 + 1
2 + 1 2 +
=
N
2
2
R.H.S.
+1
=( +1
2
2 +1 2 1
2
2 +1 2 +1
2
2
2 +1 2 1
2
2
2+1 2 +1
2 + 1 +
=0
2
2
Using this weight value a series can be developed such that each term of series converges to 0 having one-to-one
correspondence between the weight value of the term and the solution of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 where
each term represents one and only one districts solution of the equation. i.e.
=1 n =
=1
2 + 1
2
2+1 2 1
2
2 +1 2 +1
2
=0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + o +
1
(1)=
0
=1 n = =1
0
0
0
0
2
2 +1 2 1
2
2 +1 2 +1
2
= + + + + + +
3
2+1 2 +
2
2 +1 2 1
2
2 +1 2 +1
2
(4 4 +8 3 +8 2 +4+1 4 4 +8 3 +8 2 +4+1
www.iosrjournals.org
14 | Page
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the solutions of the
Suppose (1) 0
2+1 2 +
Hence
2
2 +1 2 1
2
2 +1 2 +1
2
2 + 1
where n 0
2 + 1
2
2+
2 + 1
2
+1
2 + 1 2 1
2 + 1 2 + 1
2 + 1 +
2
2
A contradiction to the formula, for finding non -trivial primitive solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 in
whole
numbers,
when
an
odd
number
x 3,
x N,
i.e.
(2 + 1)2 1
2 + 1 2 + 1
= 2 + 1, =
, =
,
2
2
2
2
2 + 1 2 1
2 + 1 2 + 1
2 + 1 2+
=
N
2
2
2
=1 =
=1
2 + 1
2
2 +1 2 1
2+
2
2+1 2 +1
2
=0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 +
o+
So at the most, we can say that if (1) 0 then there is a finite number of solutions, if we consider 0 solutions
as finite.
Hence, the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyre conjecture holds true for case 1.
QED
Case 2: (When non-trivial primitive solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 in whole numbers and an odd
number x 3, xN={1,2,3,4,5,6, })
Consider the formula
When = 2 + 2, y = n + 1 2 1, and z = n + 1 2 + 1
then 2n + 2 2 + n + 1 2 1 2 = n + 1 2 + 1 2 for all n N
Take
2n + 2 2 + n + 1 2 1 2 = n + 1 2 + 1 2
2n + 2 2 + n + 1 2 1 2 n + 1 2 + 1 2 =
L. H. S = 2n + 2 2 +
8n2 + 8n + 4 = 0
n+1
n+1
+1
L. H. S. = R. H. S
2n + 2 2 + n + 1 2 1 2 n + 1 2 + 1 2 =
(1)
Using this weight value a series can be developed such that each term of series converges to 0 having one-to-one
correspondence between the weight value of the term and each solution of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 where
each term represents one and only one district solution of the equation. i.e.
2
+ +1 2 1 2 +1 2 +1 2 = 0+0+0+0+
=1 = =1 2 + 2
1
1
1
Associating (1) with
=1 n ), where Riemann zeta function (1)=1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
We get
2
2
2 +2 2 + +1 2 1
+1 2 +1
(1)=
=1 n = =1
Partial sum of terms
2
2
2+2 2 + +1 2 1
+1 2 +1
=1+2+3+4+5+
lim = 0=(1)
1 =0
1. Hence the series is a trivial infinite series of which each term has one-to one correspondence with the
distinct non-trivial primitive solution of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 . It proves that there are infinite
distinct non-trivial primitive solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 , in whole numbers when an even
number x 4 , xN= {1,2,3,4,5,6, })
Conversely if (1) 0
Suppose (1) 0
2
2
2 +2 2 + +1 2 1
+1 2 +1
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11241023
Where n 0
www.iosrjournals.org
15 | Page
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the solutions of the
2 + 2 2 + + 1 2 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 0
2 + 2 2 + + 1 2 1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2
2. A contradiction to the formula, for finding, non-trivial primitive solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 in
whole numbers, when an even number x 4, x N= {1,2,3,4,5,6, }, i.e.
When = 2 + 2, y = n + 1 2 1, and z = n + 1 2 + 1
then 2n + 2 2 + n + 1 2 1 2 = n + 1 2 + 1 2 for all n N = {1,2,3,4,5,6, }
and to our developed series i.e.
2
+ +1 2 1 2 +1 2 +1 2 = 0+0+0+0+
=1 n= =1 2 + 2
So at the most, we can say that if (1) 0 then there is a finite number of solutions, if we consider 0 solutions
as finite.
Hence, the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyre conjecture holds true for case 2.
QED
Case 3:
When derived solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = z 2 in whole numbers, from its non-trivial primitive
solutions, when an odd number x 3 , x = {1,2,3,4,5,6, }.
Consider the formula
(2 + 1)2 1
2 + 1 2 + 1
, =
,
2
2
2
2
2 + 1 2 1
2 + 1 2 + 1
=
N = {1,2,3,4,5,6 }
2
2
= 2 + 1, =
(2 + 1 )2+
Consider
2+
(2 + 1 )
2+
(2 + 1 )
L.H.S= (2 + 1 )2+
2 + 1
2
2+1 2 1
2 + 1
2
=
2
2 + 1
2
+1
+1
=0
2 +1 2 +1
2 + 1
2
= 46 + 85 + 84 + 43 + 2
46 + 85 + 84 + 43 + 2 = 0
. . = . .
2+
(2 + 1 )
2 + 1
2
2 + 1
2
+1
=0
Using this weight value a series can be developed such that each term of series converges to 0 having one-toone correspondence between the weight value of the term and the solution of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 where
each term represents one and only one districts solution of the equation. i.e.
=1 =
=1
2 + 1
2+1 2 1
2
2 +1 2 +1
=0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + o +
2
1
(1)=
=1 n
2+
2 +1
2
=1
Partial
2+1
0
2 +1 2 1
2
2 +1 2 +1)
(
2
2 +1
2
+1
=1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 +
sum
2
of
the nth
term
(4 6 +8 5 +8 4 +4 3 + 2 4 6 +8 5 +8 4 +4 3 + 2
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11241023
www.iosrjournals.org
16 | Page
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the solutions of the
solutions from each of distinct non-trivial primitive solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 , in whole numbers
when an odd number x 3 , x N= {1,2,3,4,5,6, })
Conversely if (1) 0
Suppose (1) 0
Hence
2
2+1
2 +1 2 1
2
2
2 +1 2 +1)
2
2 + 1
Where n 0
2 + 1
2
2 + 1
2
+ 1)
2 + 1 2 1
2 + 1 2 + 1)
2 + 1 +
(
)
2
2
A contradiction to the formula, for finding derived solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = z 2 in whole numbers,
from its non-trivial primitive solutions, when an odd number x 3 , x . i. e.
(2 + 1)2 1
2 + 1 2 + 1
= 2 + 1, =
, =
,
2
2
2
2
2 + 1 2 1
2 + 1 2 + 1
(2 + 1 )2+
=
N = {1,2,3,4,5,6, }
2
2
and to our developed series i.e.
2
=1 =
=1
2 + 1
2+1 2 1
2
2 +1 2 +1
=0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + o +
So at the most, we can say that if (1) 0 then there is a finite number of solutions, if we consider 0 solutions
as finite.
Hence, the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyre conjecture holds true for case 3.
Case 4: (When derived solutions from non-trivial primitive solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 in whole
numbers when an odd number x 3, xN={1,2,3,4,5,6, })
Consider the formula
When = 2 + 2 , y = (n n + 1) 2 1, and z = (n n + 1) 2 + 1
then(n 2n + 2) 2 + (n n + 1 2 1) 2 = (n n + 1 2 + 1) 2 for all n N = {1,2,3,4,5,6 }
Take
n(2n + 2) 2 + (n n + 1 2 1) 2 = (n n + 1 2 + 1) 2
(n 2n + 2) 2 + (n n + 1 2 1) 2 (n n + 1 2 + 1) 2 =
L. H. S = (n 2n + 2) 2 + (n n + 1 2 1) 2 (n n + 1 2 + 1) 2 = n6 + 4n5 + 8n4 + 8n3 + 4n2
(n6 + 4n5 + 8n4 + 8n^3 + 4n^2 = 0
L. H. S. = R. H. S
(n 2n + 2) 2 + (n n + 1 2 1) 2 (n n + 1 2 + 1) 2 =
(1)
Using this weight value a series can is developed such that each term of series converges to 0 having one-to-one
correspondence between the weight value of the term and each solution of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 where
each term represents one and only one district solution of the equation. i. e.
2
2
2 + 2
+ +1 2 1
( + 1 2 + 1) 2 = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 +
=1 = =1
=1 n
=1
2
2
( 2+2) 2 +( +1 2 1)
( +1 2 +1)
(1)=
=
Partial sum of term
=
2
2
( 2 +2) 2 +( +1 2 1)
( +1 2 +1)
= + + + + +
lim = 0=(1)
1 =0
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11241023
www.iosrjournals.org
17 | Page
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the solutions of the
Hence the series is a trivial infinite series of which each term has one-to one correspondence with the distinct
derived solutions from non-trivial primitive solution of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 . It proves that there are
infinite distinct derived solutions from non-trivial primitive solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 , in whole
numbers when an even number x 4 , xN={1,2,3,4,5,6, })
Conversely if (1) 0
Suppose (1) 0
Hence
2
2
( 2 +2) 2 +( +1 2 1) ( +1 2 +1)
0 , 0
(n 2n + 2) + (n n + 1 2 1) 2 (n n + 1 2 + 1) 2 0
(n 2n + 2) 2 + (n n + 1 2 1) 2 (n n + 1 2 + 1) 2
A contradiction to the formula, for finding derived solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = z 2 in whole numbers,
from its non-trivial primitive solutions, when an even number x 4 , x = {1,2,3,4,5,6, }. i. e.
When = 2 + 2 , y = (n n + 1) 2 1, and z = (n n + 1) 2 + 1
then(n 2n + 2) 2 + (n n + 1 2 1) 2 = (n n + 1 2 + 1) 2 for all n N
and to our developed series i.e.
2
2
2 + 2
+ +1 2 1
( + 1 2 + 1) 2 = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 +
=1 = =1
So at the most, we can say that if (1) 0 then there is a finite number of solutions, if we consider 0 solutions
as finite.
Hence, the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyre conjecture holds true for case 4.
QED
Proofs of cases 1-4 resolves the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyre conjecture with respect to the equation 2 + 2 =
2 whose solutions are in whole numbers, i.e. if (1)=0, then there are infinite number of solutions to the
equation 2 + 2 = 2 in whole numbers and conversely if (1) 0, there are finite number of solution to the
equation 2 + 2 = 2 in whole numbers. So the Birch and Swinnerton Dyre conjecture holds true with
respect to the equation 2 + 2 = 2 .
SOLVED EXAMPLES
Formula for finding Non-trivial primitive solutions of the equation x^2+y^2=x^2 in whole numbers, when an
odd
number
x 3,
x
N= {1,2,3,4,5,6, }
and
= 2 + 1, =
2+1 2 +1
2
(2+1)2 1
2
, =
2+1 2 +1
2
2 + 1
2+
21+1 2 +1
10
2
2+1 2 1
N = {1,2,3,4,5,6 }
Examples
When
n=2
we
(21+1)2 1 8
have
=2=4, =
32 + 42 = 52
(22+1)2 1
x=2*2+1=5, =
52 + 122 = 132
(23+1)2 1
48
= 2 = 24, =
2
2
7 + 242 = 252
= 4 = 2 4 + 1 = 9, =
(24+1)2 1
80
=5
24
2
= 12, =
23+1 2 +1
2
= 2 = 40, =
2
2
9 + 40 = 412
120
= 5 = 2 5 + 1 = 11, =
= 2 = 60, =
2
When
2
2
32 1
32 + 1
2
3 +
=
2
2
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11241023
www.iosrjournals.org
50
2
24+1 2 +1
(25+1)2 1
22+1 2 +1
26
2
= 13
= 25
=
25+1 2 +1
2
82
2
= 41
122
2
= 61
x=3,
18 | Page
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the solutions of the
32 + 42 = 5^2
2
52 1
52 + 1
= 5 52 +
=
2
2
52 + 122 = 13^2
= 7
We
have
2
2
2
2
7 1
7 +1
72 +
=
2
2
2
2
2
7 + 24 = 25
When
x=9
we
have
2
2
2
2
9 1
9 +1
92 +
=
2
2
2
2
2
9 + 40 = 41
2
2
2
11
1
112 + 1
= 11 112 +
=
2
2
112 + 602 = 612
Formula for finding non trivial primitive solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = z 2 in whole numbers, when an
even number x 4, x N and when x=2n+2, y = + 1 2 1 , and z = + 1 2 + 1,
2n + 2 2 +
2
2
[ n + 1)^2 1 = [ n + 1)^2 + 1 n N = {1,2,3,4,5,6, }
Examples
When n=1, then we have = 2 1 + 2 = 4, y = 1 + 1 2 1 = 3 , and z = 1 + 1 2 + 1 = 5
42 + 32 = 52
= 2, = 2 2 + 2 = 6,
y = 2 + 1 2 1 = 8, and z = 2 + 1 2 + 1 = 10
62 + 82 = 102
= 3, = 2 3 + 2 = 8, = 3 + 1 2 1 = 15, = 3 + 1 2 + 1 = 17
82 + 152 = 172
= 4, = 2 4 + 2 = 10, = 4 + 1 2 1 = 24, = 4 + 1 2 + 1 = 26
102 + 242 = 262
= 5, = 2 5 + 2 = 12, = 5 + 1 2 1 = 35, = 5 + 1 2 + 1 = 37
122 + 352 = 372
OR
When an even number x 4 N then 2 2 + x 2 1 2 = x 2 + 1 2
When x=4, then 2 4 2 + 42 1 2 = 42 + 1 2
82 + 152 = 172
= 6, 2 6 2 + 62 1 2 = 62 + 1 2
122 + 352 = 372
= 8, 2 8 2 + 82 1 2 = 82 + 1 2
162 + 632 = 652
= 10, 2 10 2 + 102 1 2 = 102 + 1 2
202 + 992 = 1012
Formula for finding derived solutions of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 from its non trivial primitive solutions, in
2
2+1 2 1
then [(n 2n + 1 ]2 + [n
When n=1, then
x=2*1+1=3, =
21+1 2 1
2
= 4, z =
]2 = [n
2+1 2 +1
2
2 +1 2 1
2
, z =
]2 = {1,2,3,4,5,6 }
21+1 2 +1
then [(1 2 1 + 1 ]2 + [1
=5
21+1 2 1 2
] = [1
2
21+1
2
+1
]2
22+1 2 1
2
[(2 2 2 + 1 ]2 + [2
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11241023
= 12, z =
22+1
2
22+1 2 +1
2
]2 = [2
= 13
22+1
2
www.iosrjournals.org
+1
]2
19 | Page
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the solutions of the
(2 5)2 + (2 12)2 = (2 13)2
(10)2 + (24)2 = (26)2
23+1 2 1
23+1 2 +1
24+1 2 1
24+1 2 +1
= 3, x=2*3+1=7, =
= 24, z =
= 25
2
2
2
2
3 7 + 3 24 = (3 25)^2
212 + 722 = 752
= 4, x=2*4+1=9, =
= 40, z =
= 41
2
2
4 9 2 + 4 40 2 = 4 41 2
362 + 1602 = 1642
25+1 21
25+1 2 +1
= 5, = 2 5 + 1 = 11, =
= 60, =
= 61
2
2
2
2
2
5 11 + 5 60 = 5 61
552 + 3002 = 3052
And so on
Take any non-trivial solution of the equation 2 + 2 = 2 in whole numbers and multiply both sides of the
solution by n = 1,2,3,4,5,6,
Example-1
32 + 42 = 52
When n=1, we have
13 2 + 14 2 = 15 2
32 + 42 = 52
When
n=2,
we
have
23 2 + 24 2 = 25 2
62 + 82 = 102
When
n=3,
we
have
33 2 + 34 2 = 35 2
92 + 122 = 152
= 4, 4 3 2 + 4 4 2 = 4 5 2
122 + 162 = 202
= 5, 5 3 2 + 5 4 2 = 5 5 2
152 + 202 = 252
And so on
Example-2
52 + 122 = 132
= 1, 1 5 2 + 1 12 2 = (1 13)2
52 + 122 = 132
= 2, 2 5 2 + 2 12 2 = (2 13)2
102 + 242 = 262
= 3, 3 5 2 + 3 12 2 = (3 13)2
152 + 362 = 392
= 4, 4 5 2 + 4 12 2 = (4 13)2
202 + 482 = 522
= 5, 5 5 2 + 5 12 2 = (5 13)2
252 + 602 = 652
OR
When an odd number x 3, xN= {1,2,3,4,5,6, }, then
When X=3 and n=1 we have
When X=3 and n=2 we have
13
23
+
+
1 3 2 1
2
=
2
1 3 2 +1
2 1
2
2 +1
2
for all n
3 + 42 = 52
2 3 2 1
2 3 2 +1
62 + 82 = 102
When X=3 and n=3 we have
33
3 3 2 1
2
3 3 2 +1
92 + 122 = 152
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11241023
www.iosrjournals.org
20 | Page
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the solutions of the
When X=3 and n=4 we have
43
4 3 2 1
4 3 2 +1
53
5 3 2 1
5 3 2 +1
1((1 + 1
= 1 1+1
+1
42 + 32 = 52
= 2, , = 2 2 2 + 2 , = 2 + 1 2 1,
= 2 + 1 2 + 1, , 2 6 2 + (2 (32 ) 1))^2 =
122 + 162 = 202
= 3, , = 3 2 3 + 2 , = 3 + 1 2 1, = 3 + 1 2 + 1, ,
(3 8)2 + (3 15)2 = (3 17)2
242 + 452 = 512
= 4, , = 4 2 4 + 2 , = 4 + 1 2 1, = 4 + 1 2 + 1, ,
(4 10)2 + (4 24)2 = (4 26)2
402 + 962 = 1042
= 5, , = 5 2 5 + 2 , = 5 + 1 2 1, = 5 + 1 2 + 1, ,
5 12 2 + (5 35)2 = 5 37 2
602 + 1752 = 1852
OR
When an even number x2, xN={1,2,3,4,5,6, }
2
2
+ (x 2 1) 2 = (x 2 + 1) 2
For all n N={1,2,3,4,5,6 }
2
= 2, = 1, 1 2 2
+ 12
42 + 32 = 52
2
= 2, = 2, 2 2 2
+ 22
82 + 152 = 172
2
= 2, = 3, 3 2 2
+ 32
2
2
12 + 35 = 372
2
= 2, = 4, 4 2 2
+ 42
162 + 632 = 652
2
= 2, = 5, 5 2 2
+ 52
12
+1
22
+1
32
+1
42
+1
52
+1
14
+1
= 4, = 1, 1 2 4
+ 14 2 1 2 =
2
2
8 + 15 = 172
2
= 4, = 2, 2 2 4
+ 2( 1 4 2 1) 2 =
2
16 + 302 = 342
2
= 4, = 3, 3 2 4
+ 3( 1 4 2 1) 2 =
242 + 452 = 512
2
= 4, = 4, 4 2 4
+ 4( 1 4 2 1) 2 =
322 + 602 = 682
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11241023
www.iosrjournals.org
2 14
+ 1)
3 14
+ 1)
4 14
+ 1)
21 | Page
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the solutions of the
2
= 4, = 5, 5 2 4
+ 5( 1 4 2 1) 2 = 5 1 4 2 + 1)
2
40 + 752 = 852
2
= 6, = 1, 1 2 6
+ 16 2 1 2 = 16 2 +1 2
www.iosrjournals.org
22 | Page
Resolution of Birch and Swinnerton Dyre Conjecture, with respect to the solutions of the
62 + 82 + 242 + 1682 + 72242 = 72262
72262 + 130537682 = 130537702
2
2
6 + 8 + 242 + 1682 + 72242 + 130537682 = 130537702
And so on.
Acknowledgement
Clay Mathematics Institute of Cambridge Massachusetts (CMT)
Bibliography
[1].
[2].
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11241023
www.iosrjournals.org
23 | Page