Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
(PHI 310)
3 credits
Spring 2010
Aquinas Institute
Diocese of Lafayette, Louisiana
Course Syllabus
Instructor: Richard C. Chiasson
BS, MBA, MA (Philosophy), MA (Theology)
Telephone:
e-mail:
richardcc01@bellsouth.net
If you wish to speak with me privately, call the above telephone number or send an e-mail to
schedule an appointment.
All of the following apply to students taking the course for credit.
Auditors are only subject to dress policies and class protocol requirements.
Time and Location of Classes
Classes will be held every Tuesday at the Immaculata Center (John XXIII Room), 1408 Carmel
Avenue, Lafayette, Louisiana. Each class will meet from 6:00 PM to 9:00 PM with a break from
7:15 PM to 7:30 PM.
Course Description
An overview of the fundamental philosophical teachings of St. Thomas Aquinas including a
study of his life, the historical framework in which he developed his philosophical positions, the
structure of the medieval university, the controversies in which Thomas was embroiled, his
impact on education, Thomas insistence on the necessity of both faith and reason, and the
importance of Pope Leo XIIIs revival of Thomistic philosophy. Specific philosophical
disciplines examined from St. Thomas Aquinas perspective include, but are not limited to, the
philosophy of nature, the philosophy of human nature, epistemology, natural theology,
metaphysics, moral philosophy and political philosophy. The Christian and perennial philosophy
of St. Thomas Aquinas is studied from the writings of the Angelic Doctor.
Course Goals
After successfully completing the course, the student will:
Have a fundamental knowledge of the philosophic teachings of St. Thomas Aquinas.
Page 1 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
[Thomistic philosophy] is simply the teachings of St. Thomas, as opposed to some ism which
purports to be the true representation of his thought. A system of his thought is not possible
because truth for Thomas was inexhaustible and . . . can never be grasped in its totality, much
less represented by some school of human thought. Those who adhere to any form of Thomism
have done nothing but limited what St. Thomas teaches truth, however, cannot be limited. If
we narrow Thomas teachings, we narrow reality.
Joseph Pieper, The Silence of St. Thomas
Method of Instruction
The primary method of instruction will be lectures with active participation of the student,
assigned readings and the writing of research papers the purpose of which is to permit the student
to individually delve deeper into certain topics discussed in the lectures.
Taking good notes is essential to doing well in this course. Lectures will not simply be a
repetition of assigned readings but will usually include topics that are not in assigned readings.
Thus, it is imperative that credit students have accurate notes for every class in order to prepare
for the final examination.
Students are permitted to audio tape lectures if they so wish for personal use only.
Required Texts
1. Thomas AquinasSelected Writings, edited and translated with an introduction and notes by
Ralph McInerny, published by Penguin Books.
2. The Silence of St. Thomas, by Josef Pieper, published by St. Augustines Press, South Bend,
Indiana.
3. Either The Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy, edited by Thomas Mautner, published by
Penguin Books or the Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, by Simon Blackburn, published by
Oxford University Press.
[N.B.: if any required texts are no longer in print, obtain them from a used book dealer. Use
bookfinder.com to locate a dealer who has the book.]
Some Suggested Readings for Your Own Edification1
The Thought of Thomas Aquinas, by Brian Davies, published by Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Some of the below texts may be out of print but can be obtained from used book dealers such as Preserving
Christian Publications at http://www.pepbooks.com or Book Finder at http://www.bookfinder.com.
Page 2 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
On Being and Essence, by St. Thomas Aquinas, published by The Pontifical Institute of
Mediaeval Studies, Toronto.
Guide to Thomas Aquinas, by Josef Pieper, published by Ignatius Press, San Francisco.
An Aquinas ReaderSelections from the Writings of Thomas Aquinas, edited, with and
introduction by Mary T. Clark, Fordham University Press, New York.
Preambula FideiThomism and the God of the Philosophers, by Ralph McInerny, published
by The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, D.C.
Aquinas Against the AverroistsOn There Being Only One Intellect, translated with analysis
by Ralph McInerny, published by Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Disputed Questions on Virtue, by Thomas Aquinas, translated and preface by Ralph
McInerny, published St. Augustines Press, South Bend, Indiana.
Faith, Reason and TheologyQuestions I-IV of Commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius,
y Thomas Aquinas, translation and notes by Armand Maurer, published by The Pontifical
Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto.
A Preface to MetaphysicsSeven Lectures on Being, by Jacques Maritain, Published by Ayer
Company Publishers, Inc., Salem, New Hampshire.
Introduction to the Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas, Volume IV Metaphysics, by H.D.
Gardeil, published by B. Herder Book Company, St. Louis, Missouri.
Being and Some Philosophers, by Etienne Gilson, published by The Pontifical Institute of
Mediaeval Studies, Toronto.
Quodlibetal Questions 1 and 2, by Thomas Aquinas, translated with an introduction and
notes by Sandra Edwards, published by The Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies,
Toronto.
An Introduction to the Metaphysics of St. Thomas Aquinas, translated by James F. Anderson,
published by Regnery Gateway.
On Spiritual Creatures, by St. Thomas Aquinas, published by Marquette University Press,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
The Division and Methods of the SciencesQuestions V and VI of Commentary on the De
Trinitate of Boethius, by St. Thomas Aquinas, translated by Armand Maurer, published by
The Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto.
Aquinas and Analogy, by Ralph McInerny, published by Catholic University Press,
Washington, D.C.
Commentary on the Book of Causes, by St. Thomas Aquinas, translated by Vincent A.
Guagliardo, O.P., Charles R. Hess, O.P., Richard C. Taylor, published by The Catholic
University of America Press, Washington, D.C.
Encyclical Letter Fides et RatioOn Faith and Reason, Pope John Paul II. This can be
downloaded from the Vatican website free of charge. [http://www.vatican.vaclick on the
papal archives button on the home page]
A Students Guide to Philosophy, by Ralph M. McInerny, published by Intercollegiate Studies
Institute, Wilmington, Delaware.
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Excused/unexcused absences.
The student should incur no more than one (1) excused absence and one (1) unexcused
absence. An excused absence is one in which the reason for the absence has been
approved by the Instructor at least 48 hours prior to the time of the class to be missed. An
unexcused absence is one where the Instructor has not approved the reason for the
absence at least 48 hours prior to the time of the class missed or any reason for an
2
Page 4 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
absence which has not been approved by the Instructor. Violations of the absence policy
may result in dismissal from the course.
The Instructor has the authority to extend the excused and/or unexcused absence limits
for individual students if unusual situations should arise.
Auditors are not required to attend every class. However, if an auditor misses class they
may well find themselves unable to comprehend future lectures. Accordingly, if an
auditor is absent more than six (6) times, as determined solely by the Instructor, they will
be dismissed from the course since with that many absences it will not be possible to
truly benefit from the series of instructions. All auditors when attending a class are
expected to come on time and to remain until the class is completed, unless prior
permission has been obtained from the Instructor to come late or leave early.
(b.)
If you cannot attend a class, please call the Instructor at [337] 235-0071 [home] or [337]
849-3642 [cell]. You must speak directly with the Instructorleaving a voice message or
sending an E-mail is not acceptable and will be considered to be an unexcused absence.
(c.)
Acceptable reasons for missing a class include, but are not limited to the
following:
Your illness.
Illness of a spouse or child.
Death of a near relative or close personal friend.
Business travel or other required travel (vacation or holiday travel is not
considered to be required travel).
University examination.
Job related event.
Pregnancy and childbirth.
(d.)
Obtain the lecture notes from a student who attended the class you missed.
There will be no make-up lectures.
If you miss a class, it is also your responsibility to obtain any handout(s) which were
distributed during that class. Any handouts from the prior lecture will be displayed in the
lecture room.
(e.)
If you arrive late for class simply enter quietly and take an available seat. Do not inform
the Instructor as to why you were late until after the class.
Page 5 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Anyone who arrives more that 30 minutes late for class, as determined by the Instructor,
will be documented as an unexcused absence. Be on time.
(f.)
If you must leave class early, inform the Instructor prior to the beginning of the class as to
the reason.
Anyone who leaves without having spent at least 1 hours in class, as determined by the
Instructor, will be documented as an unexcused absence.
Class Protocol
All students, both auditors and those taking the course for credit, are expected to observe the
following minimum code of conduct at all times during class. Any behavior deemed
inappropriate by the Instructor, whether or not stated below, may result in dismissal from
the course.
Page 6 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
If rest room facilities are required, quietly leave the room. It is not necessary to inform the
class.
Guests are not permitted to accompany you to class.
Course Grade
The credit students final grade is the total points out of a possible 100 and will be determined as
follows:
Writing Assignments
45%
Final Examination
45%
Class Participation
10%
Writing Assignments
Two required papers are to be in the following format:
3 pages of text single spaced, in 12 point regular font, preferably Times New Roman.
All margins 1 inch justified; headers and footers 0.5 inches.
Paragraphs are to have the first line indented 0.5 inches.
A cover page with the students name, title of course [Thomistic Philosophy, PHI 310], date
paper is due and the issue being addressed.
A Bibliography and Endnotes (not Footnotes) are to comprise the last page.
Direct quotations in the papers should be no longer than three (3) lines. Excessively long
quotations will result in a deduction of points. Quotations are needed to show that you have
researched the topic, but you must demonstrate critical thinking, creativity and understanding
of the subject matter and not just quote other authors.
The essay is to have an introduction, statement of the purpose of the paper and how the
purpose will be accomplished. The major part of the text will accomplish the purpose and is
to be followed by a combined summary and conclusion paragraph.
Endnotes are to be limited to between ten (10) to fifteen (15) and the bibliography to between
four (4) to six (6) sources.
Violations of these guidelines will result in the deduction of points.
Credit students are given a sample paper in the above format and should use it as a guideline
in writing their papers.
It is recommended that you select a topic as soon as possible and begin your research.
If you wait until the topic is discussed in class it will be too late.
1st Writing Assignment Due March 2, 2010: [choose one of the following]
1. Present and comment on Chapter VI of Pope John Paul IIs Encyclical Letter Fides et
Ratio.
2. Analyze St. Thomas Aquinas How are Things Good? Exposition of On the Hebdomads
of Boethius.
3. What is the distinction among divine names which are negative, relative and affirmative?
Page 7 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
2nd Writing Assignment Due April 27, 2010: [choose one of the following]
1. What are the metaphysical implications of: to be and to be changeable are not
identical?
2. What are the philosophical differences between St. Thomas Aquinas and Aristotle with
regard to the following: the world, ideas and knowledge, the nature of God, the theory of
being, and moral and political philosophy?
3. Analyze Thomas commentary on Aristotles argument for an ultimate end: Commentary
on Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics (I Ethic., lectio 2).
Papers turned in after the due date will receive a grade of 0/F, unless a later date has
been approved in advance by the Instructor.
With regard to the writing assignments, you may use any source you feel is applicable. For
example, you may consult Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics or Metaphysics, St. Thomas Aquinas
Summa Theologiae or Summa Contra Gentiles, any assigned reading, any book on philosophy or
any writing by a philosopher that will help in achieving the objective of the writing assignment.
Final Examination
On the final examination the credit student will be asked to answer six (6) questions out of
thirteen (13). Questions are to be answered in short essay form, with thirty (30) minutes
allocated to each question. The questions will be taken from lecture notes only. A review
will be conducted during the class immediately prior to the date of the final examination.
A make-up final examination may be permitted only for a serious reason approved by the
Instructor at least twenty-four (24) hours before the scheduled examination time. Any make up
final examination must be taken within seven days of the original test date. The make-up test
will consist of an oral examination with the Instructor. Failure to meet these requirements will
result in a grade of 0/F on the final examination.
Class Participation
All credit students are expected to participate in the class. Participation includes, among other
things, coming to class on time, attention to the material presented during class, staying current
on reading assignments, the response to questions posed by the Instructor directly to a student
and the asking of questions that show critical thinking skills.
Class participation will affect your final grade. For example, if your grade on the two writing
assignments is an A- and your grade on the final examination is a B+, I will use your grade in
class participation to determine if you will receive an A or B as your final grade for the course.
Determination of Final Course Grade
Grades for papers, classroom participation and the final examination are distributed according to
their respective percentage values and converted into letter grades as follows:
90 to 100 points
=
A
80 to 89 points
=
B
70 to 79 points
=
C
60 to 69 points
=
D
0 to 59 points
=
F
Page 8 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
The last date to drop the course with a grade of W will be Class 9 on March 9, 2010. After that
date a grade will be assigned. (N.B.: The Aquinas Institute will not grant tuition refunds for
those who withdraw from the course after registration).
Academic Dishonesty
Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, cheating, plagiarism, collusion, academic
misconduct, falsification, fabrication, and the attempt to commit such a violation (Student
Handbook, p. 31). Refer to the Student Handbook for definitions and examples. A student
involved in academic dishonesty will receive a 0/F for that assignment/examination.
Based on the severity of the violation, academic dishonesty may be reported by the Instructor to
the Director of the Aquinas Institute and/or the appropriate Dean in the manner outlined in the
student handbook. Ultimately, a student found guilty of academic dishonesty may be dismissed
from the Aquinas Institute and Our Lady of Holy Cross College.
A copy of the Student Handbook may be downloaded at olhcc.edu.
Class Schedule and Reading Assignments
The particular topics stated below are the subject matter of the lectures in outline format and may
or may not correspond to the reading assignment. Reading Assignments are to be completed for
the particular class and not for the next class. Thus, you are to read the first two assignments for
Class 2.
Class 1: January 5, 2010
OVERVIEW OF COURSE
Course Introduction
Nature of Aquinas Institute and Direction
Purpose of Philosophy in the Aquinas Institute
Tentative Schedule of Philosophy Courses to be Offered by the Institute Through Fall of
2010
Review of Syllabus and Course Requirements
Introduction To Philosophy in General:
Beginning of Philosophy in Wonder
All Men by Nature Desire to Know
Classical Definition of Philosophy
Philosophy Contrasted with Theology
Pope John Paul II: Encyclical Letter Fides et Ratio, Chapter VI The Interaction between
Philosophy and Theology
Historical Rise of Philosophy
As a Science
The Perennial Principles of the Classical Realist Tradition
Divisions of Philosophy: Speculative and Practical
Page 9 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Reading Assignment:
Life
Early life: birth, education at Monte Cassino, religious vocation
Influence of St. Albert the Great
University of Paris: licentiate to teach theology, Latin Averroist controversy
Erudition in the service of God
Brief chronology of the life of Thomas Aquinas
Life As Bibliography: Major Works
Theological Syntheses: Commentary of the Sentences of Peter Lombard, Summa Contra
Gentiles, Summa Theologiae
Structure of the Summa Theologiae
Academic Disputations: Quaestio disputata and Quaestiones quodlibetales
Expositions of Holy Scripture: Expositions of Job, the Psalms, Song of Songs, Isaiah,
Jeremiah, Lamentations of Jeremiah, Gospels of St. Matthew and St. John, Epistles of St.
Paul.
Expositions of some Aristotelian Works: Commentaries on On Interpretation, Posterior
Analytics, Physics, On the Soul, Metaphysics, Nicomachean Ethics, Politics
Other Expositions: On Boethius The Trinity and The Hebdomads, on The Divine Names
of Pseudo-Dionysius, on Procluss Book of Causes
Polemical Writings: Against Those Impugning the Religious Life, On the Perfection of
the Spiritual Life, On There Being only One Intellect, against the Averroists
Treatises on Special Subjects: On Fallacies, On Being and Essence, The Compendium of
Theology, On Separate Substances, On the Rule of Princes, to the King of Cyprus
Expert Opinions: The Errors of the Greeks
Letters on a range of topics as answers to questions
Page 10 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Liturgical Pieces and Sermons: Office for the Feast of Corpus Christi, Lenten Cycle
Sermons, Various Prayers
Medieval Education
From Liberal Arts to the University
The Structure of the University
Thomass Polemics against the Latin Averroists
Mode of Exposing St. Thomas Philosophy
Thomistic system?
Divergences of interpretation
The Spirit Of St. Thomas Philosophy
Realist and concrete
Importance of esse
Influence of various philosophers
General relation and comparison to Aristotle
Philosophical knowledge neither sufficient nor final
Reading Assignment: How are Things Good? Exposition of On the Hebdomads of Boethius,
from Thomas Aquinas Selected Writings, pp. 142-162.
Class 3: January 19, 2010
PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY ACCORDING
TO
Page 11 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Reading Assignment: Theology, Faith and Reason. On Boethius On the Trinity, 1-2 from
Thomas Aquinas Selected Writings, pp. 109-141.
Class 4: January 26, 2010
PRINCIPLES OF LIMITED BEING
Reasons For Starting With Corporeal Being
Formal object of the human intellect: being as the first thing known (ens ut primum
cognitum)
Proper object of the human intellect: the essence of material things
Hylomorphism
The nature of material substances
Aristotelian categories
Accidental vs. substantial change
The Physical or Natural ThingThe Basic Vocabulary
Act and potency
Accident and substance
Form and matter
Being and becoming
Rejection Of Rationes Seminales
St. Augustines theory of seedlike principles
Prime matter: pure potentiality
Act without act
Rejection Of Plurality Of Substantial Forms
Plurality defined
Man: human being accidentally or substantially
St. Thomas and the problem of the soul in the thirteenth century
Restriction Of Hylomorphic Composition To Corporeal Substances
St. Bonaventure and hylomorphic composition of angels
The great chain of being
Separated substances
Poseidonius and the Aristotelian doctrine of separate intelligences
The angels
The nature of spiritual substances
Consequence of denial of hylomorphic composition of separated substances
Page 12 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Conclusion
The First Three Proofs
First way: Aristotelian motor causality principle and Aristotelian definitions of
motion
Second way: starts with the cause while the first begins with the effect or rather with the
process of causation itself
Third way: this argument, of both Aristotelian and Platonic origin, is considered the
foundation of all others
Comments about the first three proofs
The Fourth Proof
This argument is of Platonic origin, but as presented by St. Thomas, is more dependent
on causality than in the original Platonic exposition
The Proof From Finality
Teleological proof
The Third Way Fundamental
The principle of sufficient reason
The reason why something exists
Evaluation Of The Five Proofs
Do they comply with requirements of demonstrative logic?
Assessment of each proof
Reading Assignment: Proof of Gods Existence. Summa Contra Gentiles, I, 9-14, from
Thomas Aquinas Selected Writings, pp. 243-256.
Class 6: February 9, 2010
GODS NATURE
The Negative Way
Knowledge of Gods existence is not knowledge of his essence or nature
How can we come to know a being which transcends sense experience?
Quid sit vs. quod sit
Via remotionis or via negative
Removes or denies something to the divine substance
What God is not
The Affirmative Way
Affirmative predication of the divine substance
Perfections of creatures are known first
Perfections in God exclude all imperfections and limitations of creatures
Analogy
Names of creatures and God not understood in univocal wayextreme formalism or
realism/pantheism
Page 14 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Page 15 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Page 17 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Reading Assignment: The Meanings of Truth. Disputed Question on Truth, from Thomas
Aquinas Selected Writings, pp. 163-192.
Class 10: March 16, 2010
METAPHYSICS
What Is Metaphysics?
On the division of speculative sciences
Degrees of abstraction
Notion
Being in general
On the grandeur and the misery of metaphysics
Being
Common
Real
Categories
Without a genus
Analogy
Kinds of analogy
Prologue Of Aquinas Commentary On Aristotles Metaphysics
The science we are seeking
Wisdom the mistress of all other sciences
The characteristics of the wise man: knows all, even difficult matters, with certitude and
through their causes; seeks this knowledge for its own sake; and directs others and
induces them to act
Most intelligible objects: from the point of view of the order of knowing; comparing
the intellect with the senses (particulars vs. Universals); the intellects own knowledge
(separate from matter)
First philosophy or metaphysics studies the three above objects, not any one of them as
its subject, but only being in general
Ways Of Predicating Being
Apprehension of being: ens in quantum ens
Conceptualization of being: ens ut primum cognitum
Is physics everything?
Subject Matter Of Metaphysics
Page 19 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Page 21 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Page 22 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Final end of man for Aquinas: not to live virtuously but by living virtuously to attain the
Beatific Vision
Individual And State
Subordination of the individual to the state?
The individual and the law
Law
Four kinds of law: eternal, natural, divine positive law, human positive law
Diagrams of the relationship between the different kinds of law
Primary function of the legislator: defining or making explicit the natural law by
applying it to particular cases and making it effective
All authority comes from God
Unjust laws
Sovereignty
Sovereignty given by God to the people as a whole who delegate it to actual rulers?
Abuse of power makes ruler a tyrant
Deposition of a tyrant is legitimate under certain conditions
Best constitution is a mixed constitution in which some place is given to aristocracy
and democracy
Forms of Government
Aquinas follows Aristotle on the different types of political regimes
Different political regimes according to Aristotle
For Aquinas the precise form of decent government is not important as long as it
promotes the common good
God has not mandated any form of government
Aquinas Political Theory Is An Integral Part Of His Philosophy
For Thomas political philosophy is not something added on
Right of any creature to direct another is founded on reason
Legal justice (equity and common legal justice), particular justice (distributive and
commutative), social justice (legal justice plus distributive justice)
Schematic representation of the basic forms of justice
Forms of government may change, but human nature is fixed
State is neither God nor Antichrist
Rights
Rights are not based on radical indeterminism
Rights according to St. Thomas Aquinas: means to fulfill obligations
Natural rights
Hierarchy of rights
Criteria For A Just War
Proper authority
Just cause
Right intention
Page 23 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Reading Assignment: On Law and Natural Law. Summa Theologiae, I-II, 90-94, from Thomas
Aquinas Selected Writings, pp. 611-651.
Class 13: April 20, 2010
Epilogue
Aquinas Utilization of Aristotle
Why a full reconciliation of the Aristotelian system with Christian theology was desirable
Philosophical influences on St. Thomas
Examples of Aquinas utilization of Aristotle
Aquinas and the so-called errors of Aristotle
Non-Aristotelian Elements In Thomism
Aristotles god vs. Thomas God as efficient and final cause vs. final cause only
God the Creator vs. a multiplicity of unmoved movers
Divine ideas vs. no exemplary ideas
Supernatural end of man (Beatific Vision) vs. natural end of man (metaphysical
contemplation of the first cause)
Church needed to perfect whole man vs. State only
Examples of how Thomas faith effected his philosophy
Latent Tensions In The Thomist Synthesis
Aristotle: the universal and the totality really matter not the individual as such
Aquinas: each human being is more valuable than the whole material universe
Aristotelianism: a closed system
Aquinas: an open systemfaith reveals to reason truths it cannot know on its own and
purges reason of certain errors
Opposition To Thomistic Novelties
Background: Averroism
Unicity of substantial form, passivity of matter, simplicity of angels
Condemnations of 1277: Paris and Oxford
Dominican to the rescue
Pope Leo XIII
Encyclical Letter Aeterni Patris
The Universal or Common Doctor of the Church
The Twenty-Four Fundamental Theses Of Thomistic Philosophy
Comparison of Aquinas with other philosophers
The Formal Object of Philosophy
The Role of Philosophy
The Foundation of Philosophy
Moderate Realism
Hylomorphism
Human knowledge
Knowledge of God
Page 24 of 25
Thomistic Philosophy
Course Syllabus
Spring 2010
Reading Assignment: On the Teacher. Disputed Question on Truth, 11 from Thomas Aquinas
Selected Writings, pp. 194-216.
Class 14: April 27, 2010
Second Writing Assignment Due
Review for Final Examination
Reading Assignment: None.
Class 15: May 4, 2010
Final Examination 6:00 pm to 9:00 pmCredit Students Only
Page 25 of 25