Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
pubs.acs.org/est
Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics (IBP), ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Environmental Sciences & Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
S Supporting Information
*
INTRODUCTION
Dissolved organic matter (DOM) is a complex mixture of
naturally occurring organic molecules that plays an important
role in many biogeochemical processes, including the carbon
and nitrogen cycles in aquatic systems, metal complexation and
redox reactions, contaminant fate and transport, and microbial
metabolism.13 A comprehensive understanding of the size,
molecular structure, and composition of DOM has remained
elusive despite the importance of these properties in
determining the dynamics of DOM and the interaction of
DOM with organic and inorganic constituents in water.
DOM was traditionally considered to be composed of
relatively large molecules. Early work using gel ltration and
ultraltration reported fractions of DOM with sizes up to 20
2000 kDa.46 Conversely, more recent studies indicate that
DOM is composed of supramolecular assemblies of relatively
small molecules that are stabilized by the hydrophobic eect
and hydrogen bonds.7,8 For instance, 2024% of riverine DOM
was found to pass through ultralters with a nominal pore size
cuto of 1 kDa,912 suggesting that aquatic DOM contains a
signicant fraction of low molecular weight (LMW) compounds. Fulvic acids, the acid soluble fraction of DOM
comprising the majority of aquatic DOM,13 are considered
2012 American Chemical Society
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
9350
Article
(FT-ICR MS), with <1 ppm error with internal calibration and
a resolving power up to 1 000 000 [full width at half maximum
(FWHM), mass to charge ratio (m/z) 400].30,31 The DOM
constituents are typically ionized using negative mode electrospray ionization (ESI),2022,24,26,27,32 but positive mode
ESI,2023,28 atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization, and
atmospheric-pressure photoionization also have been used.23
The results from the FT-ICR studies revealed that DOM is
comprised of thousands of unique molecular formulas, with the
most intense ions at m/z values <800.22,32,33
The mass resolution capabilities of FT-ICR MS have made it
the tool of choice for the analysis of complex samples, such as
DOM. While not a match for the extreme mass resolution of
FT-ICR MS, other types of mass spectrometers are capable of
determining accurate masses.31 The Orbitrap mass analyzer,
which can be used as a standalone mass spectrometer or in
combination with other mass selection technologies (e.g., ion
trap), features <2 ppm error using internal calibration and a
resolving power of 100 000 (FWHM, 200 m/z).30,31 Although
the mass accuracy provided by Orbitrap MS at 500 Da is better
than the 0.1 mDa accuracy required for determination of all C-,
H-, O-, and S-containing compounds,34 Orbitrap MS can be
used for unique formula determination of LMW C-, H-, and Ocontaining constituents in low S-content DOM. To date,
Orbitrap instruments have been used to determine molecular
composition of ambient organic aerosols,35,36 to identify target
compounds in soil matrices,30 and to compare chemically
fractionated humics isolated from volcanic soil.37
The objective of this work was to characterize the low
molecular weight fraction of SRFA, a well-characterized
reference aquatic fulvic acid. To this end, we combined dialysis
of SRFA through a 100500 Da molecular weight cuto
(MWCO) membrane with Orbitrap high-resolution mass
spectrometry analysis of the nondialyzed SRFA, the dialysate,
and the retentate. Furthermore, we compared the negative
mode ESI mass spectrum of SRFA collected by Orbitrap to that
collected by FT-ICR MS. We conducted additional detailed
analyses on the mass spectrum measured by Orbitrap MS in the
100290 m/z range because of the high accuracy and precision
of the Orbitrap MS in this lower mass region. These results
demonstrate the applicability of Orbitrap MS to analyze the
LMW fraction of DOM and to monitor changes in this fraction
in response to environmental perturbations and provide further
evidence for a signicant fraction of LMW constituents in
SRFA.
METHODS
Materials. Suwannee River fulvic acid (2S101F) standard, a
reference aquatic humic substance, was purchased from the
International Humic Substances Society (St. Paul, MN) and
was used as received. SRFA was chosen because it is low in
heteroatom content (e.g., N, S, P)23 and because its spectrum
as collected by Orbitrap MS can be compared to previous
analysis by FT-ICR MS.2023,27 Benzoic acid, 6,7-dihydroxycoumarin (esculetin), umbelliferone, riboavin, and Rose
Bengal were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used as
received. All solutions were prepared using 18 M cm water
(Barnstead Nanopure Diamond Water Purication System).
Dialysis. Dialysis of SRFA was performed using a 100500
Da MWCO Spectra/Por cellulose ester membrane (Spectrum
Laboratories). The dialysis membrane was stored in sodium
azide to prevent bacterial growth and was thoroughly washed
with Nanopure water prior to use. Aliquots (4 mL) of a ltered
9351
Article
Figure 1. (a) Non-purgeable organic carbon measured in SRFA solution in the retentate (diluted 1:100) and in the dialysate. (b) UVvis
absorbance and (inset) area-normalized absorbance spectra of the same solutions. van Krevelen diagrams for compounds with 100600 m/z for (c)
the initial SRFA solution, (d) the retentate, (e) the dialysate, and (f) compounds with dierent relative magnitudes in the initial SRFA solution and
the retentate after 7 days of dialysis. Compounds that increased or decreased in relative magnitude in the retentate after dialysis, as well as
compounds that were absent after dialysis, are shown. Only compounds with magnitudes >100 in the mass spectra are shown, corresponding to 45
50% of identied peaks in this experiment due to dilute samples.
Article
Figure 2. (a) Orbitrap ESI negative mass spectrum of SRFA in the 100600 m/z range and SRFA m/z relative magnitude distributions of identied
ions measured by (b) Orbitrap and (c) FT-ICR MS. The relative magnitude cutos of 10.2 and 8.2 for Orbitrap and FT-ICR, respectively,
correspond to 65% of the identied peaks and are indicated by dashed lines. The relative magnitude cuto corresponds to an absolute magnitude
cuto of 100 for the Orbitrap spectra.
carbon added to the dialysis tube, 2.24 0.05 and 1.25 0.02
mg of carbon were recovered in the retentate and dialysate
solutions, respectively.
In a control experiment, a solution containing riboavin
(MW = 376.36 g/mol) and Rose Bengal (MW = 973.67 g/mol;
smallest cross-sectional dimension = 14 )39 was dialyzed
through a separate dialysis membrane against Nanopure water.
The concentration of riboavin in the dialysate increased to 3.0
M (268 = 31 600 cm1 M1)40 after 7 days of dialysis,
corresponding to 91% of the expected concentration at
partition equilibrium (Supporting Information, Figure S2).
Conversely, Rose Bengal was conserved in the retentate and
was not detected in the dialysate, as expected based on its MW,
which is larger than the 500 Da MWCO of the dialysis
membrane. It is possible that molecules in SRFA with
molecular masses >500 Da diused through the membrane
provided that they had suciently small cross-sectional areas
Article
Article
found (H:C < 1), the dialysate showed ions with higher H:C
and lower O:C ratios, indicating a more aliphatic composition.
The changes in the van Krevelen diagrams must be carefully
interpreted since the abundance of an ion in a single mass
spectrum is not quantitative. The magnitudes of ions produced
by ESI depend on the ionization eciency of their functional
groups (e.g., carboxylic acids, alcohols, amines)29 and also may
depend on the eciency of the detector to detect the ions; they
do not necessarily correlate with the abundance of those
compounds in a mixture such as SRFA.33 Nevertheless, it is
possible to compare relative magnitudes of the same ion before
and after the dialysis to reveal trends.48 Changes in the relative
magnitude (M) of ions were calculated by comparing their
magnitudes in the retentate (t7), normalized to the sum of
magnitudes of all common ion masses in the retentate, to their
normalized magnitudes in the dilute SRFA solution (t0) before
it was dialyzed:
M t 7 / M t 7
all
m/z
log M t 7 /M t 0 = log t 0
t0
M
/
M
m/z
all
(1)
Article
Article
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S Supporting Information
*
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by an ETH Postdoctoral
Fellowship Award. We thank Prof. Alan Marshall (Florida
State University) for helpful comments.
REFERENCES
Article
Article