Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Charles Dickens did not invent the urban poverty that we now call "Dickensian." He
did not dream up the poor Victorian orphans that populate his fiction. Nor the
appalling conditions in factories characterizing the Industrial Revolution. Nor the
injustice of the debtors' prisons. Nor the class system that kept the poor trapped in
wretched circumstances. He simply saw these things unfolding around him in midnineteenth century London, and then he thoroughly documented them in the form
of truer-than-true novels such as Great Expectations, Oliver Twist, and Bleak House.
Dickens became one of the most popular and prolific writers of his time, and he
remains the gold standard of English novelists. Charles Dickens knew how to write a
page-turner. Almost all of his novels were written in the form of monthly
installments in popular magazines. But he also had a keen eye for social injustice.
While everyone else was yammering on about how super the Industrial Revolution
was, Dickens made sure that the public remembered the middle class the very
class squeezed between industrial progress and its dark underbelly.
For all of his success, Dickens's personal life was like something out of . . . well, a
Dickens novel. Dickens's cash-strapped parents sent him to work at a boot-blacking
factory when he was just twelve years old, an experience that left a deep and
painful impression upon him. His father was thrown into debtor's prison, a
completely legal practice at that time when people could not pay their debts
(declaring bankruptcy was not an option then). His mother was neglectful. Dickens
and his wife had ten children before separating bitterly. And Dickens didn't seem to
like being a father any more than being a husband.
By the time he died at age 58 in 1870, Dickens seemed always to be striving for
some happiness just out of reach, very akin to his fictional characters. "Why is it,"
he wrote near the end of his life, "that as with poor David [Copperfield], a sense
comes always crushing on me now, when I fall into low spirits, as of one happiness I
have missed in life, one friend and companion I have never made?" 1 Charles
Dickens was a complicated character. Could a novelist of his insight and talent be
any other way?
Charles Dickens: Biography
He was the most famous writer in England in his lifetime. Yet the historical details of
Charles Dickens's biography were largely unknown when he was writing his insanely
popular novels in mid-nineteenth century London. Profiles of Dickens neatly skipped
over the tragedies of his childhood, including his stint as a child worker in a
bootblack factory, his father's terms in debtor's prison, and his family's dire poverty.
Public profiles focused instead on his prodigious writing talents and his compassion
for the poor. Few suspected that within the characters of Oliver Twist, David
Copperfield, Pip, and the other inhabitants of Dickens's fiction were remnants of
himself. Dickens's acute sensitivity to social injustice was not a fluke, and the
powerful realism of his fiction was not just guesswork. It was born of his own hardearned experience.
The workhouses and debtor's prisons of Charles Dickens's London are no more. The
importance of Dickens's novels, however, lives on. The gap between the rich and
poor in our country and across the world grows wider every day. Economic progress
and technological advances for some still mean that others are left behind. Our
responsibility to take care of the poor, sick, and vulnerable has not lessened.
There's a reason that Dickens's novels have never gone out of print in the 140 years
since his death in 1870. His social consciousness is as relevant as ever. And best of
all this is the real reason he was so popular he sure knows how to tell story.
Also, in mid-nineteenth century England, most people could not afford to fork over
the cash for a whole novel, which was an expensive investment. The only person
who partially lost out in this deal was the writer himself. Dickens had to work at a
pretty ferocious pace to keep up with the magazine's schedule, and he didn't really
get too great of a cut from either the magazine or bound-book sales. Add these
factors to his killer work ethic and his deep-seated terror of poverty, and you've got
a guy who is going to be cranking out some serious wordage.
Charles Dickens: Popularity & Later Life
For the next twenty years, Charles Dickens did two things really well: write novels,
and make children (ten altogether). On the novel front, he produced Nicholas
Nickleby (1839), The Old Curiosity Shop (1841), Barnaby Rudge (1841), A Christmas
Carol (1843), Martin Chuzzlewit (1844), Dombey and Son (1848), David Copperfield
(1850, and by far his most autobiographical work), Bleak House (1853), Hard Times
(1854), and Little Dorrit (1857). He also continued to nurse his love of the theater
by writing plays and occasionally acting in them himself. He was a champion of the
poor and lent his name and efforts to many fundraising efforts for London's needy.
Dickens was a literary rock star. "Mr. Dickens has written so much and so well that
the severest ordeal any thing new that he writes has to undergo is the comparison
with what he has written before," gushed Harper's Weekly in 1860. "His published
stories are so popular that people will hardly admit that they can be equaled." 5
All of his novels shared distinct characteristics that marked them as "Dickensian."
His characters played into popular Victorian stereotypes: the innocent orphan, the
unscrupulous businessman, and the sleazy criminal. They spoke with a strong social
conscience, and reminded everyone that the much-heralded progress of the
Industrial Revolution was also leaving some people in the gutter. Dickens
unambiguously criticized the system of workhouses, debtor's prisons, and
orphanages that kept England's poor virtually enslaved. His writing relied heavily on
cliffhangers and suspense (a function of their publication in monthly parts). They
were also extremely popular. Dickens's descriptions of poverty defined the way that
Victorian England saw poverty. A Christmas Carol defined the concept of the
Christmas spirit. Dickens was a tastemaker in a way few novelists if any have
done before or since.
Families were rarely warm and huggy in Dickens's novels. They were neglectful,
abandoning their children to orphanages and workhouses a la Oliver Twist; abusive,
as in David Copperfield; shrewish and unfaithful, like the women of Bleak House; or
just chronically unable to get their act together, like Little Dorrit's father. The
frequent unflattering portrayals of family life in his novels seemed to reflect
Dickens's frustrations with his own relations. "'Why was I ever a father! Why was my
father ever a father!"6 Dickens once lamented not exactly a Hallmark-worthy
sentiment. Once he became successful, his father hounded him constantly for
money. Dickens complained that his extended family saw him as "something to be
plucked and torn to pieces for their advantage. . . . My soul sickens at the thought of
them."7 His marriage turned sour, and he wasn't all that impressed with his children,
either. He joked near the end of his life that there should be an award "for having
brought up the largest family ever known with the smallest disposition to do
anything for themselves."8
There was one bright spot in his personal life. In 1857, Dickens met the actress Ellen
"Nelly" Ternan, who was working on a production of one of his plays. The actress
was eighteen; Dickens was 45. Despite this age gap, the two began a romantic
relationship that lasted for the rest of Dickens's life. The two traveled together
frequently, though their relationship was kept a secret from the prim-and-proper
Victorian public. Dickens and his wife Catherine agreed to separate the following
year.
she have nothing else to write about? And why is everyone in her books
so
obsessed with marriage? "I am at a loss to understand why people hold Miss
Austen's novels at so high a rate," groused non-Janeite Ralph Waldo Emerson. "All
that interests in any character [is this]: has he (or she) the money to marry with?" 1
Both groups have a point. Readers of even the first editions of Austen's novels were
struck by how realistically she portrayed their world, how "alive" and honest her
characters seemed. While the novel had previously been considered a clichd,
mindless source of entertainment written by and for women, Austen's books
showed that the novel could be an original and thoughtful literary form. It's worth
noting that in her time, men from the future king of England to Sir Walter Scott were
outspoken fans of her work. The novel Emma is among "a class of fictions which has
arisen almost in our own times, and which draws the characters and incidents
introduced more immediately from the current of ordinary life than was permitted
by the former rules of the novel," Scott enthused. Austen is "presenting to the
reader, instead of the splendid scenes of an imaginary world, a correct and striking
representation of that which is daily taking place around him." 2
Austen, who was born in 1775 and died in 1817, wrote solely about the world that
she knew, which happened to be the world of middle-class society in Regency-era
southern England. Yes, her books are obsessed with marriagebut so was everyone
else at that time. In previous centuries, marriage had been far more complicated
than meeting someone special, falling in love, and getting hitched. The institution of
marriage had been, instead, primarily an economic transaction. Selecting a spouse
carried the weight of choosing a college, a profession, and a life partner all at once.
For women, who couldn't work outside the home, live alone, or legally inherit
property (at least not if there was a first-born son around), the only reliable source
of income and security, for herself and for the female relatives dependent on her,
was a husband. For men who were not their family's eldest son, marrying into
money was likely their only shot at a fortune as well. It was only during the Regency
era that love even began to be considered an acceptable motive for marriage.
Jane Austen knew this all too well. "Single women have a dreadful propensity for
being poor, which is one very strong argument in favour of matrimony," 3 she wrote
to her niece. Her role in life was determined by her status as an unmarried woman.
She, her widowed mother, and her unmarried sister were all dependent on the
charity of her brothers for support. Despite her vast intelligence, Austen was mostly
home-schooled and had no career opportunities. Her novels were published
anonymously, their author listed only as "a Lady," and she never earned enough
money from her writing to support herself. Profound social transitions are always
challenging, and Austen lived during a time of transformation in one of the most
fundamental human institutions. For women of Jane Austen's day, marriage
remained the most important of life's decisions, but the very definition of marriage
itself was in upheaval. This is reflected in characters like poor Elizabeth Bennet,
whose wise father counsels her to find a husband she "truly esteemed," while her
mother carps at her to shut up about love, already, and just get married.
Jane Austen wasn't a radicalshe wasn't suggesting that women burn their corsets
and hold out for a better deal. She was just describing life as she saw it, with
frankness and humor that no one had ever read in a novel before. Austen knew that
relations between men and women could be complicated, messy, and frustrating.
And that's just the way she liked it. For as she told her niece: "Pictures of perfection,
as you know, make me sick and wicked." 4
Jane Austen: Childhood
Jane Austen was born 16 December 1775 in Steventon, a small village in rural
southern England. She was the seventh of eight children (six boys, two girls) born to
William and Cassandra Austen. Her father was a clergyman who also tutored young
male students to supplement his income. The family was not impoverished, but it
would be fair to say they were of very modest means. As a result, the Austen
parents employed some parenting techniques that might be considered unusual
today, but were common for families of their social class. To save room in the
crowded household, each of the children was sent to live with a neighbor woman
from the time they were three months old until they were two. (Their parents visited
them daily.) Austen's brother Edward was adopted by a wealthy, childless cousins.
Jane's visits to her brother's estate exposed her to the world of the English upper
classes.
Jane Austen was extremely close to her sister Cassandra, her elder by two years.
The Austen sisters were inseparable and lived together all of their lives. When Jane
was eight and Cassandra was ten, both girls were sent for schooling with a tutor in
Oxford, England. When typhoid fever broke out a few months later and both girls fell
ill, their mother rushed them back to Steventon. A second attempt at boarding
school came two years later. Within a year it became clear that the family did not
have enough money to send both of the girls to school, and they returned home.
From the age of eleven onwards, Austen simply educated herself with books
from her father's library, which he encouraged.
Jane Austen: Juvenilia
By the time she was twelve, Austen had started her literary career. The short
stories, poems, satires and plays that she wrote during this time are known
collectively by Janeites as the Juvenilia. Her biting sense of humor was apparent
even in her earliest writings. She wrote a satiric version of English history with lines
like, "His Majesty died, & was succeeded by his son Henry, whose only merit was his
not being quite so bad as his daughter Elizabeth." 5
In 1793 Austen began writing her first lengthy piece: Lady Susan, a novella told in
the form of letters. She worked on it for two years, though it was never published in
her lifetime. In 1797 she finished the first draft of a novel entitled First Impressions
(which she later changed to Pride and Prejudice), but then set it aside without
publishing it. She read her works-in-progress to her family, who were great boosters
and editors of her work. In 1803 she sold her first manuscript, a novel entitled
Susan (no relation to the story Lady Susan) to a London publisher for 10. To
Austen's chagrin, the publisher did nothing with her manuscript, and it languished
unpublished in his office. Austen bought it back ten years later, after sending him an
angry letter.
Jane Austen: In Love
In 1801, Austen's father retired and decided that the family should move to Bath,
England. Though she was reluctant to leave Steventon, the only home she had
known, Austen agreed to move with her parents to the English resort
town (she
really didn't have much choice; it was unthinkable that an unmarried woman should
live with anyone but family). Austen was by then in her mid-twenties: prime
marrying years. So far, however, she had come up unlucky in love. In December
1795 she had met an Irish law student named Tom LeFroy while he was visiting her
neighbor in Steventon. The two engaged in some gentle flirtationAusten wrote
jokingly to Cassandra that the two had been "profligate and shocking in the way of
dancing and sitting down together" 6 at holiday parties. It's unclear how intense their
feelings for each other were (after Austen's death, her sister burned all of her most
personal letters) or if LeFroy was as interested in Austen as she was in him. Either
way, it was a moot point. Neither had enough money at the time to be considered
suitable for marriage. LeFroy left Steventon a month later and eventually became
engaged to someone else. Some Austen critics suspect that he is the model for Mr.
Darcy in Pride and Prejudice.
Jane Austen never married, but she did have the option. In 1802, she received an
unexpected proposal on a holiday visit to some friends. Twenty-one-year-old Harris
Bigg-Wither, the brother of her friends, was rather unattractive, somewhat of a
dullard, and had the unfortunate habit of a pronounced stutter. However, he had
just graduated from Oxford and was poised to have a successful career. Austen
knew that the marriage would be good not only for her own security, but for the
security of her entire family. She said yes. The next morning, however, she realized
that she just couldn't go through with a marriage to someone she had no feelings
for, and she rescinded her acceptance. "Having accepted him, she found she was
miserable and that the place and fortune which would certainly be his, could not
alter the man," her niece later wrote of the difficult decision. "I have always
respected her for the courage in cancelling that 'yes'." 7
In Pride and Prejudice, the narrator calls marriage "the only honourable provision for
well-educated young women of small fortune, and however uncertain of giving
happiness, must be their pleasantest preservative from want." 8 In real life, Jane
Austen soon felt the consequences of her decision to remain unmarried. Her father
died in 1805, leaving Jane, her mother, and her sister with no means of support
(Cassandra also never married; her fianc died of yellow fever in 1797). The Austen
women became completely dependent upon the charity of Jane's brothers. First they
moved into a rented house in Bath, and then they moved in with Austen's brother
Frank and his wife. In 1809 they finally got a place of their own when Edward, the
brother adopted by wealthy relatives, offered them a house on his estate called
Chawton Cottage.
With no husband, no children, and no job, Jane Austen spent her days doing the
things that most middle-class Englishwomen did at the time: needlework, letterwriting, the occasional piano playing. Sometimes, she confessed, she got bored. "Do
not be angry with me for beginning another letter to you. I have read [Byron's] The
Corsair, mended my petticoat, and have nothing else to do," 9 she once wrote to
Cassandra. After moving into Chawton Cottage, however, Austen spent more time
writing and less on housework. It suited her far better. "Composition seems to me
impossible with a head full of joints of mutton and doses of rhubarb," 10 she wrote
her sister.
Jane Austen: Novelist
In late eighteenth-century England, the novel was considered a lowbrow form of
entertainment with not much more literary value than the bodice-ripping harlequin
romances now sold in our supermarket checkout lines. "Where the reading of novels
prevails as a habit, it occasions in time the entire destruction of the powers of the
mind,"11 thundered the poet Samuel Coleridge, a bit drama queenishly. Part of the
reason that novels were looked down on by serious critics (who were almost always
male) was that they were usually written and read exclusively by women. Also, most
of them sucked. The Regency novel was riddled with clichsswooning women
were rescued by brooding men; the pauper always turned out to be the son of the
duke; one could not swing a dead cat without hitting a dark, foreboding manor or
forest.
The Austen family, however, had always been "great Novel-readers," Austen wrote,
"& not ashamed of being so."12 Thus it wasn't much of a surprise that she wanted to
write one herself. She had no intention, however, of writing the type of pseudohistorical romance usually associated with the genre. She wanted to write
something that reflected real life, and that exhibited her humor. "I could no more
write a [historical] romance than an epic poem," she wrote to the librarian J.S.
Clarke in 1816. "I could not sit seriously down to write a serious romance under any
other motive than to save my life; and if it were indispensable for me to keep it up
and never relax into laughing at myself or other people, I am sure I should be hung
before I had finished the first chapter." 13
Austen published her first novel, Sense and Sensibility, in 1811. The book
was
about the Dashwood sisters, the practical Elinor and the sensitive Marianne. Like the
Austen women, the Dashwood sisters and their mother are left dependent and
financially insecure after their father's death. The nuanced portrait Austen painted
of her female protagonists defied the conventional stereotypes served up by her
contemporaries. Both sisters eventually marry Austen novels tend to happy
endingsbut both end up with unlikely matches, with love and affection triumphing
over superficial concerns. Like all of the novels that appeared during Austen's
lifetime, it was published anonymously.
Two years later, she published Pride and Prejudice. More than any of Austen's other
novels, this one illustrated the pressures exerted upon women by society's shifting
and all-consuming concepts of marriage. This struggle is embodied in the
protagonist Elizabeth Bennet, wholike the authorhas to make the difficult
decision to turn down a marriage proposal from a man she doesn't care for, before
ending up with Mr. Darcy.
Readers were stunned to find themselves enmeshed in a story that they recognized
from real life. "I have finished the Novel called Pride and Prejudice, which I think a
very superior work," a woman named Annabella Milbanke wrote. "It depends not on
any of the common resources of novel writers, no drownings, no conflagrations, nor
runaway horses, nor lap-dogs and parrots, nor chambermaids and milliners, nor
rencontres [duels] and disguises. I really think it is the most probable I have ever
read."14
Mansfield Park followed in 1814. Its protagonist, Fanny Price, is so controversial that
Austen fan sites post warnings to those bold enough to enter Fanny-related
message boards. Taken from her impoverished parents and raised among wealthy
relatives, Fanny is strikingly different from Austen's other heroines. She is shy,
weakly and virtuous (sometimes to an annoying degree). Yet despite Fanny's frailty,
the novel was a complex look at class and power, and echoed the realism that
readers had so loved about Pride and Prejudice.
The heroine of 1815's Emma, however, brought Austen back to form. Emma
Woodhouse was independent, intelligent, and sassy, but she was also as flawed as
the next person, with a lack of self-awareness on par with a reality TV star. Austen
exploits this for comedy, of course, but she also made sure that Emma matured in
the course of the book
of social advantage.