Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
715
CHAPTER 10
ARBITRATION
SYNOPSIS
DISPUTE SETTLEMENT: ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
DRAFTING AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT/Clause
Arbitration Agreement
Judicial Analysis
Halsburys Laws
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
Advantages of alternative dispute resolution
Disadvantages of alternative dispute resolution:
ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARDS
Detrimental Reliance
ARBITRATION CLAUSE
DAMAGES IN ARBITRATION
716
Arbitration Agreement
Section 7 of the Act defines arbitration agreement to mean an agreement by
the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or
which may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether
contractual or not. Section 7(2) provides that an arbitration agreement may be in
the form of an arbitration clause in a contract or in the form of a separate
agreement. In particular, section 7(3) mandatorily provides that an arbitration
agreement shall be in writing.
According to section 7(4), an arbitration agreement is in writing, if it is
contained in
(a) a document signed by the parties;
(b) an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other means of
telecommunication which provide a record of the agreement; or
(c) an exchange of statements of claim and defence in which the existence
of the agreement is alleged by one party and not denied by the other.
It is further stipulated in section 7(5) that the reference in a contract to
document containing an arbitration clause, constitutes an arbitration agreement, if
the contract is in writing and the reference is such as to make that arbitration
clause as part of the contract. Therefore, the emphasis under the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996, is clearly and unambiguously on an arbitration agreement
in writing as the basis for invoking the proceedings for arbitration and/or
conciliation.
The expression arbitration agreement as defined in section 2(a) of the
Arbitration Act, 1940 (which has since been repealed by the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996) had been defined earlier to mean a written agreement to
submit present or future differences to arbitration, whether an arbitrator is named
therein or not. Therefore, in the absence of a written agreement between the
parties, the nature of the dispute as well as the terms of reference to the
arbitrator(s) cannot be determined and, hence the agreement in writing is insisted
upon as a pre-requisite for ascertaining the dispute(s) and for making reference
thereof to the arbitrator(s). The statute does not recognise any oral or implied
agreement for arbitration.
The very purpose of requiring in section 7(3) of the Act that the arbitration
agreement shall be in writing is to secure that an oral agreement is not
recognised in Law and, hence, does not constitute an arbitration agreement. The
cases and circumstances in which an arbitration agreement is to be regarded as
being in writing, have been narrated in section 7(4) and the instances given therein
are illustrative and cannot be regarded as exhaustive.
The English Arbitration Act, 1996, also contains special provisions in
section 5(2) to secure that there is an agreement in writing, if the agreement is
made in writing whether or not it is signed by the parties, or if the agreement is
made by exchange of communications in writing or if the agreement is evidenced
in writing.
Arbitration
717
Judicial Analysis
The requirement of arbitration agreement in writing is also taken note of by the
Supreme Court in M.M.T.C. Ltd v. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd, AIR 1997 SC 605
in which it has been made clear that
Sub-section (3) of section 7 requires an arbitration agreement to be in
writing and sub-section (4) describes the kind of that writing. There is
nothing in section 7 to indicate the requirement of the number of arbitrators
as a part of the arbitration agreement. Thus the validity of an arbitration
agreement does not depend on the number of arbitrators specified therein.
The number of arbitrators is dealt with separately in section 10, which is a
part of machinery provision for the working of the arbitration agreement. It
is, therefore, clear that an arbitration agreement specifying an even number
of arbitrators cannot be a ground to render the arbitration agreement invalid
under the new Act as contended by the learned Attorney General.
It may be noted that prior to the enactment of the Arbitration Act, 1940, oral
agreements for arbitration were considered as valid in law and any award made in
pursuance of such oral agreements could validly form the basis for the suit as also
for reference to arbitration and/or as a defence in the suit. After the requirement
of arbitration agreement in writing became statutorily mandatory, the determination
of how to find an arbitration agreement in writing, became necessary in various
cases, as may be seen from the various cases decided by the courts. The
signatures of the parties to the agreement was not considered essential earlier, but
in view of section 7(4) of the 1996 Act, the signature of the parties is essential.
The insistence on identity of parties to the agreement for arbitration and the
signature of the parties is essential. The insistence on identity of parties to the
agreement for arbitration and their signature is only to secure that the parties are
ad idem so that the arbitration agreement could be read to ascertain and establish
that the Parties agreed to the same thing in the same sense. The absence of ad
idem would invalidate the arbitration agreement and make the proceedings for
arbitration unsustainable in law.
The judgement of the Supreme Court in U.P. Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Ltd. v.
Indure (P) Ltd, AIR 1996 SC 1373 illustrates a case in which there was no
arbitration agreement between the parties and, hence, the plea for reference to
arbitration was rejected because an agreement for arbitration cannot be inferred,
nor could be implied. After referring to the earlier decision in Ramji Dayawala &
Sons (P) Ltd v. Invest Import, AIR 1981 SC 2085, the court held that, in the facts
of a given case, acceptance of a suggestion may be sub silentio reinforced by
subsequent conduct. It was further held that
Where there is mistake as to terms of a document, amendment to the draft
was suggested and a counter offer was made, signatory to the original
contract is not estopped by his signature from denying that he intended to
make an offer in the terms set out in the document. Where the contract is
in a number of parties, it is essential to the validity of the contract that the
contracting party should either have assented to or taken to have assented
to the same thing in the same sense or as it is sometimes put, there should
718
Arbitration
719
Halsburys Laws
It is stated by Lord Halsbury in Laws of England, 4th Edn., vol. 2, page 267,
para 522:
If the agreement is written, it may be included in a particular contract by
reference or implication. The agreement between the parties may
incorporate arbitration provisions, which are set out in some other
documents, but in order to be binding, the arbitration provisions must be
brought to the notice of both parties
It is inherent in cases of incorporation by reference that the parties are
concerned not with one document alone, but with at least two one of which
contains an arbitration clause and the other of which does not. In some
case, the one document may constitute a contract between other parties.
A common case is where the two documents concerned are a charter party
and a bill of lading. If the relevant contract between the relevant parties is
contained in the document, which does contain the arbitration clause, no
question of incorporation arises. Where this is not the case, the question
whether the document containing the arbitration clause is incorporated in
the relevant contract between the relevant Parties is, always, a question of
construction.
A brief epilogue
The need for an arbitration agreement in writing between the parties is to
secure that the terms and conditions of the agreement are clear and certain and
they are capable of being enforced to give effect to binding legal relationships
between the Parties in regard to their rights and obligations. In the absence of an
agreement in writing between the same parties, there can be no arbitration of a
dispute which needs to be resolved and in every such case where no arbitration
is permissible, the only remedy is to pursue civil suit in accordance with the law
of contract and the Indian Civil Procedure Code. The significance of a written
arbitration agreement cannot, therefore, be under-estimated, nor could it be
disregarded for settlement of any dispute between the parties to decide whether
the arbitration is permissible or not and whether civil suit is the only remedy left
to be pursued by and between the parties to the dispute.
International Commercial Arbitration
Commercial arbitration has been going through incredible growth over the last
decades and has become a hot-topic. An entire industry has developed around
alternative dispute resolution. (ADR) Certain countries have even adopted
arbitration laws that limit judicial reviews of arbitration awards (Belgium,
Switzerland, and England) in order to facilitate this growth market and get their
share of this multimillion-dollar industry.
If the parties to a contract decide to use commercial arbitration to resolve any
dispute they might have, they will have to do so either by inserting a clause to
that effect into the written agreement, or agree to submit a conflict to arbitration
when it arises. Since it can be safely stated that parties in dispute will be having
a hard time agreeing on, anything, it is better to include an arbitration clause in
the original agreement.
720
Arbitration
721
Detrimental Reliance
In India, the cause of action would not be based on detrimental reliance but
on estoppel. Estoppel is defined in section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act as
follows:
115. When one person has, by his declaration, act or omission,
722
Arbitration
723
(b) There shall be three arbitrators. In the case of a Dispute between any
two (2) persons Party hereto, each shall select one arbitrator. The two arbitrators
thus appointed shall select the presiding arbitrator of the arbitral tribunal who shall
act as chairman of the arbitral tribunal within twenty days of the appointment of
the second arbitrator. If any arbitrator has not been appointed within the time limits
specified herein and in the Rules, the appointment of such arbitrator shall be made
by the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce
upon the written request of any party to any such dispute within twenty (20) days
of such request.
(c) Any arbitration proceedings or award rendered hereunder and the validity,
effect and interpretation of this Agreement to arbitrate shall be governed by the
laws of .................... The arbitration proceedings shall be conducted in
...................., ...................., and the award shall be rendered, in the english
language.
(d) The award shall be final and binding upon the parties thereto, and shall be
the sole and exclusive remedy between them regarding any claims, counter
claims, issues, or accountings presented to the arbitral tribunal. The arbitrators
award shall, as between the disputing Parties and those in privity with them, be
final and entitled to all of the protections and benefits of a final judgment, e.g., res
judicata (claim preclusion) and collateral estoppel (issue preclusion), as to all
claims, including compulsory counterclaims, that were or could have been
presented to the arbitrators. The arbitrators award shall not be appealable to any
court.
(e) The parties hereto expressly agree that leave to appeal under section 45
or section 69 of the English Arbitration Act of 1996 shall not be sought with
respect to any question of law existing in the course of the arbitration or with
respect to any award made. Furthermore, each party hereto hereby waives
irrevocably any rights of application or appeal to the courts of India and the courts
of the United States to the fullest extent permitted by law in connection with any
questions of law arising in the course of the arbitration or with respect to any award
made except for actions to obtain a judgement recognising, enforcing or setting
aside an arbitral award and except for actions seeking interim or other provisional
relief in any court of competent jurisdiction in aid of arbitration.
(f) It is the intent of the parties hereto that the arbitration proceeding shall be
conducted expeditiously, without initial recourse to the courts and without
interlocutory appeals of the arbitrators decisions to the courts. However, if a
disputing party refuses to honour its obligations under this agreement to arbitrate,
any other disputing party may obtain appropriate relief staying litigation and/or
compelling arbitration in any court having jurisdiction over the disputing parties; the
order compelling arbitration shall require that the arbitration proceedings take place
in ...................., ...................., as specified above. The disputing Parties may
apply to any court having jurisdiction for orders requiring witnesses to obey
subpoenas issued by the arbitrators. Moreover, any and all of the arbitrators orders
and decisions may be enforced if necessary by any court having jurisdiction. The
arbitrators award may be confirmed in, and judgement upon the award entered by,
724
Arbitration
725
(k) A disputing Partys breach or alleged breach of this Agreement shall not
affect this agreement to arbitrate. Moreover, the obligations of the parties hereto
under this arbitration provision are enforceable even after this Agreement has
terminated. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement to
arbitrate shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the obligation of the parties
hereto to submit their claims to binding arbitration or the other provisions of this
Agreement to arbitrate. This Agreement to arbitrate shall be binding upon the
successors, assigns and any trustee or receiver of each party hereto.
Damages in Arbitration
Arbitration a Judicial Process: It is a settled principle of law that Arbitration
is a process by which a dispute or difference.................... is referred to and
determined judicially. Halsbury Law of England 4th Edition, Reissue, Volume 2
page 332 333; See also Dobson v. Groves, 1844 (6) QB 637, 647. Hence, an
arbitration tribunal is bound to determine the dispute in a judicial manner.
Indian law regarding award of damages.Indian law stipulates that in case of
breach of contract, damages may be awarded by way of compensation for any
loss or damage which naturally arose in the usual course of things, or which the
parties knew when they made the contract likely to result from the breach thereof.
Further, compensation is not to be given for any remote and indirect loss or
damage sustained by the breach (the Contract Act, section 73). As regards,
liquidated damage, the Act provides that where such damages are stipulated, the
party complaining of breach is entitled to receive reasonable compensation not
exceeding the amount stipulated (section 74). A bare perusal of sections 73 and
74 makes it clear that in law damages can only be compensatory in nature and
not penal and must be such which naturally arose in the usual course of things.
Further remote or indirect damages cannot be awarded. Even where the parties
have stipulated liquidated damages, the court can only award reasonable
compensation. Any award of damages, which is contrary to sections 73 and 74,
would be an award contrary to Indian law.
Scheme of Arbitration Act.Section 28(1)(b) mandates that the arbitral
tribunal shall decide the dispute in accordance with the rules of law designated
by the parties. In the present case, the parties have agreed (vide Article 12.1 of
the JDA) that the governing law shall be the law of India. Hence, the arbitrators
have to decide the dispute in accordance with (inter alia) sections 73 and 74 of
the Contract Act. Further, under UNCITRAL Rules if a party so requests, the
arbitral tribunal shall hold hearings for the presentation of evidence including
experts witnesses.
Consequence of literal interpretation of Article 13.4.It cannot be that after
taking evidence, hearing arguments, establishing correct facts and legal position,
the arbitrators cast aside all this, and merely select the position of one of the
parties.
The arbitrators cannot abdicate their role of deciding in accordance with law.
Such an award would be a mockery of the law and the arbitration proceedings, and
hence invalid and unenforceable under Indian law.
726
The above proposition can be supported by the following illustrative Indian and
International arbitration cases:
The Delhi High Court has held that if the arbitrators have not decided the
dispute in accordance with the law, the award can be set aside [1998 (2)
Arb. LR 345].
ICC Case No. 4462 Year Book Commercial Arbitration Volume XVI page 54.
In this case, the arbitration tribunal disregarded the liquidated damages
contractually agreed between the parties holding the same to be grossly
exaggerated and awarded a lesser sum based on the applicable law and
evidence presented to it.
ICC Case No. 5759; Year Book of Commercial Arbitration, Volume XVIII
page 39. It was held that failure to provide sufficient evidence to prove
damages and failure to mitigate the loss was a ground for the arbitrators to
reduce damages from the contractually stipulated amount.
Interpretation of the Article 13.4.A perusal of Article 13.4 shows that the
Clause is perhaps intended to apply only to a certain class of disputes. These are
disputes where the project has to be proceeded with, but the parties have
differences between two commercial viewpoints. Here, the arbitrators are directed
to adopt one of the parties position, giving due considerations to the commercial
reasonableness of each partys position. It is for this reason, that it is stipulated,
that the parties should not only state their position to the tribunal, but also state
the proposed resolution (line 2 of Article 13.4). The types of disputes, which
would fall under Article 13.4, would be perhaps choice of EPC/O&M Contractor,
selection of Suppliers, Manufacturers or other commercial decisions. These are
disputes which are not suitable for a judicial determination, and hence the
arbitrators, have to give due consideration to the commercial reasonableness of
each Parties case, and then select one Partys position. Article 13.4 cannot apply
to a claim for damage which has to be judicially determined in accordance with
law, nor can it compel the arbitrators to decide contrary to established facts and
settled law. Such a decision would be invalid in law, contrary to public policy and
liable to be set aside.