Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Te Maximize Cemfert
By David A. John, P.E., Member ASHRAE
ASHRAE Journal
ashrae.org
September 2012
-1 Slightly Cool
-2 Cool
-3 Cold
/
\
\
Figure
\
/
/
2:
Pre-
dicfed percenfage
dissatisfied based
on predicted mean
vote from Sfandard 55-2010.
y
4
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
September 201 2
0 Neutral
00
+2 Warm
PREDICTED PERCENTAGE
OF DISSATISFIED ( P P D )
-1-3 Hot
21
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
80
When applying this Graphic per Section 5.2.1.1, the follov^'ing limitations appiy:
Applies to Operative Temperature oniy - cannot be applied based on dry
bulb temperature atohe. See Appendix C for acceptabie approximations.
Appiies oniy when requirements of Sections 5.2.3 through 5.2.5.2 are met.
For other compliance paths, see Sectioh 5.2.1.2 for the
Computer Modei Method and Section 5.3 for the
Optional Method for Naturaiiy Conditioned Spaces.
For further compiianoe requirements,
see Sections 6 and 7.
z o n e l.5.2.3todetermine
\
\ cooiing effect of
elevated air speed
.002
- No lower humidify
recommendation for graphical
method: See Section 5.2.?
OPERATIVE TEMPERATURE
("F)
ASHRAE Journal
differ from the dry-bulb temperature in a space. Standard 552010 does include allowable radiant temperature asymmetry
for a space. Also, Chapter 9, HandbookFundamentals, is a
good reference.
Standard 55-2010 lists four methods for evaluating comfort:
1. Graphic Comfort Zone Method for Typical Indoor Environments;
2. Computer Model Method for General Indoor Applications;
3. Graphical Elevated Air Speed Method; and
4. Standard Effective Temperature (SET) Model.
All four methods include human factors that determine
comfort such as metabolic rate and clothing insulation, and
thermal factors such as space temperature, air velocity, humidity, and radiant temperature.
1. Graphic Comfort Zone Method
The graphical method for predicting comfort in Standard
55-2010 assumes the occupants' metabolic rate is between
1.0 and 1.3 met and the clothing worn is between 0.5 and 1.0
clo (typical for an office). This method predicts comfort for
an acceptance level of 80%. This is based on a 10% PMVashrae.org
September 201 2
1.1
3.3
72
300
76
79
90
276
82
UJ
B
tL
0,0
0.0
2.0
4.0
TEMPERATURE RISE, "F
6,0
8,0
IB
t9
20
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Figure 4 (left): Graphical elevated air speed method. Figure 5 (right): Standard effective temperature (SET) method.
Diffuser Type
Characteristic Length L
^
PPD index plus an additional 10% dissatisfaction that may occur from local
High Sidewall Grille
Distance to Wall Perpendicular to Jet
thermal discomfort. Air speeds are not
Circular Ceiling Pattern Diffuser
Distance to Closest Wall or Intersecting Air Jet
greater than 40 fpm (0.20 m/s). The
Length of Room in Direction of Jet Flow
Sill Grille
method includes two areas of comfort:
one for clothing insulation of 0.5 clo
Ceiling Slot Diffuser
Distance to Wall or Midplane Between Outlets
and one for 1.0 clo (Figure 3).
Distance to Midplane Between Outlets Plus
Light Troffer Diffusers
Added to Standard 55-2010 is preDistance from Ceiling to Top of Occupied Zone
diction of comfort using elevated air
Distance to Wall or Midplane Between Outlets j
speeds. The graphical method includes VCross-Flow Pattern Ceiling Diffusers
Figure 4 to calculate the required air Table 1: Characteristic room length for several diffusers from 2009 Handbook
speed for applications with both mean
Fundamenfals.
and radiant temperatures. This figure
allows for elevated air speeds of more than 150 fpm (0.76 ASHRAE Thermal Comfort Tool
m/s).
The ASHRAE Thermal Comfort Tool is a convenient method
to predict PMV/PPV for a space. The tool allows designers to
2. Computer Model Method
predict PMV based on standard conditions, elevated air speeds,
The computer model method predicts the PMV and PPD for and adaptive method. The program allows users to input air tema given space. The standard includes computer code (Norma- perature, air speed, humidity ratio, mean radiant temperature,
tive Appendix D) that assumes an average metabolic rate be- activity level (that converts to met) and clothing (that converts
tween 1.0 and 2.0 met, and where clo values of the occupants to clo). The program output shows PMV and PPD, as well as inare 1.5 or less.
dicates whether the selection complies with Standard 55-2010.
This method in Standard 55-2010 uses a thermophysiological simulation of the human body and skin heat loss
to predict the occupant's comfort level. This model enables
air velocity effects on thermal comfort to be related across
a wide range of air temperatures, radiant temperatures, and
humidity ratios (Figure 5).
24
ASHRAE Journal
A method to calculate the ADPI value in a space with overhead mixing air distribution operating in cooling is outlined in
Standard 113-2009, which defines a repeatable method of testing
steady-state air diffiision performance of an air-distribution system in occupied zones of building spaces. The standard is based
on air velocity and air temperature distributions at specified cooling loads and operating conditions. The standard can be applied to
ashrae.org
September 2012
ASHRAE Journal
r
Terminal Device
Room
Load,
Btu/hft2
Circular Ceiling
Diffusers
Range of
TsolL
68
60
1.8
72
70
1.5 to 2.2
40
1.6
78
70
1.2 to 2.3
20
1.5
85
80
1.0 to 1.9
<10
1.4
90
80
0.7 to 2.1
80
0.8
76
70
0.7 to 1.3
60
0.8
83
80
0.7 to 1.2
40
0.8
88
80
0.5 to 1.5
20
0.8
93
80
0.4 to 1.7
<10
0.8
99
80
0.4 to 1.7
80
1.7
61
60
1.5 to 1.7
60
1.7
72
70
1.4 to 1.7
40
1.3
86
80
1.2 to 1.8
20
0.9
95
90
0.8 to 1.3
80
0.7
94
90
0.6 to 1.5
60
0.7
94
80
0.6 to 1.7
40
0.7
94
20
0.7
94
80
0.3
85
80
0.3 to 0.7
60
0.3
88
80
0.3 to 0.8
40
0.3
91
80
0.3 to 1.1
20
0.3
92
80
0.3 to 1.5
60
2.5
86
80
<3.8
40
1.0
92
90
<3.0
20
1.0
95
90
<4.5
11 to 50
2.0
96
90
1.4 to 2.7
11 to 50
2.0
96
80
1.0 to 3.4 y
Sill Grille,
Straight Vanes
Sill Grille,
Spread Vanes
Ceiling Slot
Diffusers (for
Light Troffer
Diffusers
Cross-Flow
IPattern Diffusers
For ADPI
Greater Than
1.8
80
High Sidewall
Grilles
Maximum
75o/Lfor
ADPI
Maximum ADPI
Table 2: Air diffusion performance index (ADPI) selection guide from 2009 HandbookFundamenfals,
(this would not apply to naturally ventilated space, or high velocity, high
temperature designs). This method
can be used to select the type of outlet, the size, and throw distance and
spacing to maximize the performance
of an outlet. Tg is the manufacturers'
cataloged throw data to 50 fpm (0.25
m/s) and L is the characteristic length
of the space being evaluated. L is defined per Table 1 (Page 24) dependent
of the outlet type and layout.
By determining the value of T^g
from a manufacturer's catalog, and
measuring the characteristic length
L from the projects plans, the ratio
can be determined and the predicted
ADPI value can be estimated from
Table 2.
ashrae.org
Conclusion
Copyright of ASHRAE Journal is the property of ASHRAE and its content may not be copied or emailed to
multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users
may print, download, or email articles for individual use.