Interpretation

http://int.sagepub.com/
Jeremiah 31:16

Kerry H. Wynn
Interpretation 2014 68: 184
DOI: 10.1177/0020964313517533
The online version of this article can be found at:
http://int.sagepub.com/content/68/2/184.citation

Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com

On behalf of:

Union Presbyterian Seminary

Additional services and information for Interpretation can be found at:

Email Alerts: http://int.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Subscriptions: http://int.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav

>> Version of Record - Mar 19, 2014

What is This?

Downloaded from int.sagepub.com at University of Manchester Library on May 6, 2014

Between Text and Sermon

Jeremiah 31:16

Interpretation: A Journal of
Bible and Theology
2014, Vol. 68(2) 184186
The Author(s) 2014
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0020964313517533
int.sagepub.com

Kerry H. Wynn

Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, Missouri

Email: kwynn@semo.edu

Jeremiah 3031 forms a distinct literary body within the book of Jeremiah known as the Book of
Consolation. These two chapters are bracketed by Gods command to Jeremiah to write in a book
all the words that I have spoken to you (Jer 30:2) and the return to the narrative account of
Jeremiahs actions in Jeremiah 32. Jeremiah provides no particular date for the writing of the Book
of Consolation, while the surrounding events are set in the reign of Zedekiah. Jeremiah 30:3 summarizes the theme of the book Jeremiah is to write when God says, I will restore the fortunes of
my people and I will bring them back to the land that I gave to their ancestors and they shall take
possession of it. Gods people who are to be restored are defined as both Israel and Judah.
Pamela Scalise writes:
The Book of Consolation stands as a refuge amid the storm of divine wrath that blows through
the rest of the book of Jeremiah. Yet these two chapters are thoroughly integrated with the
message and ministry of the book in its canonical form. The content of the Book of Consolation
repeatedly deals with the relationship between present suffering, further danger, and future
salvation. . . . (Gerald L. Keown, Pamela J. Scalise, and Thomas G. Smothers, Jeremiah 2652,
Word Biblical Commentary, Word, 1995, 83)

Jeremiah 31:16, the Old Testament reading for Easter Sunday (Year A), is part of this Book of
Consolation.
At one level, the poetic imagery in Jer 31:24 reflects the salvation history of Israel, recalling
the exodus, the crossing of the sea, and the wilderness wandering. Pharaoh came after Israel with
the sword, cornering the people at the Red Sea. God parted the waters so that those who crossed
over survived the sword and then found grace in the wilderness. The Egyptian army in turn
drowned within the sea, which led Miriam and the women with her to take up tambourines and go
forth in the dance of the merrymakers (cf. Exod 15:20). Even the imagery of virgin Israel recalls
Jeremiahs assertion that God remembered Israels love as a bride and how Israel followed me
in the wilderness, in a land not sown (Jer 2:2) before becoming the faithless one, Israel who
played the whore (Jer 3:6). Now, God declares a reversal that could only be achieved by the
power of the redeeming creator: I shall build you, and you shall be built, O virgin Israel.

Downloaded from int.sagepub.com at University of Manchester Library on May 6, 2014

Between Text and Sermon

185

But having survived the sword is not Jeremiahs usual way of referring to the exodus.
Typically, he speaks of God bringing Israel out of the land of Egypt (Jer 11:4; cf. Jer 7:22, 25;
11:7; 31:32, etc.). Sword, on the other hand, is central to the tripartite judgment of death by the
sword, by famine, and by pestilence (Jer 21:9), which appears 16 times in Jeremiah, far outnumbering the use of the phrase by any other prophet. Jeremiah pronounces this judgment most often
on Jerusalem (Jer 29:7, etc.), but also on those who abandon Judah for Egypt (Jer 42:17, 22; 44:13),
and, indeed, all nations that come under Gods judgment (Jer 27:8). Certainly this would be the
image Jeremiah would use to describe what Assyria had done to Israel.
While Jeremiah can describe the wilderness wandering as in the wilderness (midbar),
in a land
of deserts and pits, in a land of drought and deep darkness, in a land that no one passes through,
where no one lives (Jer 2:6), he also uses midbar (wilderness or desert) to describe the devastation following military conquest. For thus says the Lord concerning the house of the king of
Judah, declares Jeremiah, I swear that I will make you a desert (midbar),
an uninhabited city
(Jer 22:6). Of Babylon he declares she shall be the last of the nations, a wilderness (midbar),
dry
land, and a desert (Jer 50:12). When the enemy came, they made my pleasant portion a desolate
wilderness (midbar)
(Jer 12:10; see also Jer 4:26; 9:10; 17:6). The wilderness in Jer 31:2
reflects this kind of devastation, which is only reversed in Jer 31:6. Jeremiah asserts that those
who stay in the city shall die by the sword, by famine, and by pestilence; but those who go out
and surrender to the Chaldeans who are besieging you shall live and shall have their lives as a prize
of war (Jer 21:9). Ezekiel contends that The sword is outside, pestilence and famine are inside;
those in the field die by the sword; those in the cityfamine and pestilence devour them (Ezek
7:15). Whether those in Israel had survived the sword through surrender or flight into the wilderness where they found grace and preservation, the image of Israels post-war devastation at the
time of Jeremiah is clear.
The image of Israels punishment is typologically overlaid with the image of the exodus. By the
merger of these two paradigmatic images Jeremiah brings past promise and present punishment
together to create future hope. Although images of the exodus journey are used, this oracle addresses
the remnant resident in the land of Israel. The following verses in Jer 31:79 address the return of
those who are in exile. Jeremiah asserts that the exodus paradigm will be replaced by the image of
the exilic return (Jer 16:1415; 23:78). What the renewal of the land in the first oracle shares with
the return from the exile in the second is divine reversal. While the resident planters shall plant
in wilderness in Jer 31:5, the great company that returns will have among them the blind and the
lame, those with children and those in labor together (31:8). None will be left behind and those
most marginalized and vulnerable will have full status among them as equal members of the
community. The use of the name Ephraim for the northern kingdom links the two oracles with their
respective reversals. Ephraim will once again be fortified with sentinels. Jacobs reversal in crossing his hands while blessing the sons of Joseph (Gen 48:1315) will now be fulfilled as God
declares I have become a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my firstborn (Jer 31:9).
The final reversal consists of the juxtaposition of Samaria in Jer 31:5 with Zion in the following
verse. Samaria had no significance for Israel prior to the establishment of the divided kingdom. It

Downloaded from int.sagepub.com at University of Manchester Library on May 6, 2014

186

Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 68(2)

is first mentioned as a region during the reign of Jereboam I (1 Kgs 13:32) and only came into
prominence when Omri made it his new capital (1 Kgs 16:24). Jeremiahs image of restored Israel
is not a return to an idyllic time before the divided monarchy, but incorporates the intervening reality of the northern tradition and history into this future hope. Yet, he does not see restored Samaria
as a capital city but as once again a region where you shall plant vineyards on the mountains of
Samaria (Jer 31:5). This restoration of formally nationalistic names and sites for Israel takes a
startling turn in Jer 31:6 as the entire northern kingdom turns once again to Zion, the city of David,
as the sentinels cry out Come, let us go up to Zion, to the Lord our God.
Israel as an independent state fell under the sword of Assyria in 722 b.c.e., long before Jeremiah
came on the scene. He had never known Israel as anything other than a backwater in the
Mesopotamian or Egyptian empires. How Jeremiah viewed the religious and political reform under
Josiah as the king attempted to reincorporate the region of Israel under the Davidic throne and
centralize the worship at the Jerusalem temple after 622 b.c.e. is unclear (2 Kgs 22:123:28).
While Jeremiah had great respect for Josiah (Jer 22:1516), it was during Josiahs reign that
Jeremiah condemned Israel as the faithless one who played the whore and who could best be
described as less guilty than false Judah (Jer 3:611). However Jeremiah felt about the Josianic
reform, Jer 31:16 seems to look back on Josiahs dream as one might look back on Camelot. Were
this prophecy fulfilled, Josiahs dream of Israel and Judah united with worship centralized in
Jerusalem would be realized.
The post-exilic age, however, found the rift between Jerusalem and Samaria greater than ever
before. Then suddenly Easter came, imposing a third layer of imagery on Jeremiahs consolation.
With the resurrection of Christ, the mountains of Samaria and the sentinels of Ephraim cry out
Come, let us go up to Zion, to the risen Christ, to the Lord our God. Indeed, as Peter comes to
realize, in every nation anyone who fears him (Acts 10:35) may now join in this turning. For in
Christ the Lord has appeared from far away revealing that he has truly loved with an everlasting
love Judah, Israel, and all people. Thus, we, too, can go forth in the dance of the merrymakers
this Eastertide.

Downloaded from int.sagepub.com at University of Manchester Library on May 6, 2014