Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
PROGRAM - BBA
SEMESTER - III
SUBJECT CODE & NAME BBA 303 QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Q. No 1 How is the McKinsey 7S model used for carrying out strategic planning and
implementation?
ANSWER: The 7S model is a strategic model that can be used for any of the following purposes:
Determining how best to realign an organization to a new strategy or other organization design
The model, made famous by the McKinsey consulting company, is good for a thorough discussion around an
organizations activities, infrastructure, and interactions.
-The model and its usage-
Is decision making and controlling centralized or decentralized? Is this as it should be, given what
we're doing?
What are the main systems that run the organization? Consider financial and HR systems as well
as communications and document storage.
Where are the controls and how are they monitored and evaluated?
What internal rules and processes does the team use to keep on track?
Shared Values:
What are the fundamental values that the company/team was built on?
Style:
Are there real teams functioning within the organization or are they just nominal groups?
Staff:
Application: The model is based on the theory that, for an organization to perform well, these seven
elements need to be aligned and mutually reinforcing. So, the model can be used to help identify what
needs to be realigned to improve performance, or to maintain alignment (and performance) during other
types of change.
Whatever the type of change restructuring, new processes, organizational merger, new systems, change
of leadership, and so on the model can be used to understand how the organizational elements are
interrelated, and so ensure that the wider impact of changes made in one area is taken into consideration.
You can use the 7S model to help analyze the current situation (Point A), a proposed future situation
(Point B) and to identify gaps and inconsistencies between them. It's then a question of adjusting and
tuning the elements of the 7S model to ensure that your organization works effectively and well once you
reach the desired endpoint.
Sounds simple? Well, of course not: Changing your organization probably will not be simple at all!
Whole books and methodologies are dedicated to analyzing organizational strategy, improving
performance and managing change. The 7S model is a good framework to help you ask the right
questions but it won't give you all the answers. For that you'll need to bring together the right
knowledge, skills and experience.
When it comes to asking the right questions, we've developed a Mind Tools checklist and a matrix to keep
track of how the seven elements align with each other. Supplement these with your own questions, based
on your organization's specific circumstances and accumulated wisdom.
defective products before the products are shipped to customers. Unfortunately performing appraisal
activates doesn't keep defects from happening again and most managers realize now that maintaining an
army of inspectors is a costly and ineffective approach to quality control.
Employees are increasingly being asked to be responsible for their own quality control. This approach
along with designing products to be easy to manufacture properly, allows quality to be built
into products rather than relying on inspections to get the defects out.
Internal failure Costs:
Failure costs are incurred when a product fails to conform to its design specifications. Failurecosts can be
either internal or external. Internal failure costs result from identification of defects before they are
shipped to customers. These costs include scrap, rejected products, reworking of defective units, and
downtime caused by quality problem. The more effective a company's appraisal activities the greater the
chance of catching defects internally and the greater the level of internal failure costs. This is the price
that is paid to avoid incurring external failure costs, which can be devastating.
External Failure Costs:
When a defective product is delivered to customer, external failure cost is the result.External
failure costs include warranty, repairs and replacements, product recalls, liability arising from legal
actions against a company, and lost sales arising from a reputation for poor quality. Such costs can
decimate profits.
In the past, some managers have taken the attitude, "Let's go ahead and ship everything tocustomers, and
we'll take care of any problems under the warranty." This attitude generallyresults in high external
failure costs, customer ill will, and declining market share and profits.
External failure costs usually give rise to another intangible cost. These intangible costs are
hidden costs that involve the company's image. They can be three or four times greater than
tangible costs. Missing a deadline or other quality problems can be intangible costs of quality.
Internal failure costs, external failure costs and intangible costs that impair the goodwill of the company
occur due to a poor quality so these costs are also known as costs of poor quality by some persons.
ANSWER:
Business Productivity is the ability of an organization to utilize its available resources in order to produce
profitable goods or services as desired by customers or clients. It is the productivity that measures the
performance of an organization, and it can also be used for companies themselves in order to assess their
own progress. The importance of productivity in business can be summarized as follows.
Productiveness increases the overall efficiency of an organization. When the efficiency of the
organization increases, the production capacity of the company is utilized to the optimum level. Thus, all
resources are used in an effective and efficient manner to get the best possible results. As is often
indicated by business, the more products you make, the lower your overhead, and the higher your profits.
Enhanced production lowers the cost per unit of a product which in turn, results in lower prices for better
quality, which enhances a business competitiveness in the market. In the current turbulent world, every
organization faces stiff competition from their counterparts. Hence, lower prices as a result of enhanced
production give an edge to businesses to sell products at more competitive prices. If the rates are
competitive, the business is in a better position to attract more customers and make more sales. This is the
primary motive of any business organization.
Increased production due to efficient utilization of organizational resources leads to a lower cost
production resulting in better sales and profits. If the profits of an organization shoot up, it increases the
confidence of investors in the organization. Moreover, the share value of the company increases. Due to
this, the reputation and goodwill of the organization increases.
Similarly, the business can share a portion of its profits as a result of enhanced production with its
employees. This boosts the morale of the employees as they get to enjoy a part of the profits and the
satisfaction of a job well done. As a result, their working efficiency tends to increase which in turn,
further increases the production of the company. As you can start to see, there is a snowball of business
success that starts with increased productivity.
Productivity is much more important than revenues and profits of the organization because profits only
reflect the end result whereas productivity reflects the increased efficiency as well as effectiveness of
business policies and processes. Moreover, it enables a business to find out its strengths and weaknesses.
It also lets the business easily identify threats as well as opportunities that prevail in the market as a result
of competition and changes in business environment.
A company can increase its own business productivity by making suitable changes in its business process
and policies in order to improve the weak areas and capitalize on strengths for betterment. Similarly, an
organization can formulate strategies to turn threats in to opportunities. This results in increased
profitability and stability which is vital for the continued success of any business organization.
The importance of productivity can never be ignored by any diligent business owner. Successful ventures
are often those that give priority to productivity compared to solely looking into revenues and profits of
the company. On the other hand, businesses that do not pay attention to productivity pay a huge price in
terms of reduced production and high cost of production, resulting in reduced sales and low profits. Thus,
a productivity level can be considered a measure of success or failure for any business.
The mean of this statistic using all the samples is calculated (e.g., the mean of the means, mean of
the ranges, mean of the proportions)
The standard error (e.g., standard deviation/sqrt(n) for the mean) of the statistic is also calculated
using all the samples
Upper and lower control limits (sometimes called "natural process limits") that indicate the
threshold at which the process output is considered statistically 'unlikely' and are drawn typically at 3
standard errors from the centre line
Upper and lower warning or control limits, drawn as separate lines, typically two standard errors
above and below the centre line
Division into zones, with the addition of rules governing frequencies of observations in each zone
Annotation with events of interest, as determined by the Quality Engineer in charge of the
process's quality
Guidelines: - The initial predictions for the process must be made while the process is assumed to be
stable. Because future process quality will be compared to these predictions, they must be based off of a
data set that is taken while the operation is running properly.
-
Multiple subsets of data must be collected, where a subset is simply a set of n measurements
taken over a specific time range. The number of subsets is represented as k. A subset average, subset
standard deviation, and subset range will be computed for each subset.
-
From these subsets, a grand average, an average standard deviation, and an average range are
calculated. The grand average is the average of all subset averages. The average standard deviation is
simply the average of subset standard deviations. The average range is simply the average of subset
ranges.
Involvement of people
People at all levels of an organization are the essence of it. Their complete involvement enables their
abilities to be used for the benefit of the organization.
Process approach
The desired result can be achieved when activities and related resources are managed in an organization
as process.this may also affect it
System approach to management
An organization's effectiveness and efficiency in achieving its quality objectives are contributed by
identifying, understanding and managing all interrelated processes as a system. Quality Control involves
checking transformed and transforming resources in all stages of production process
Continual improvement
One of the permanent quality objectives of an organization should be the continual improvement of its
overall performance.
Factual approach to decision making
Effective decisions are always based on the data analysis and information.
Mutually beneficial supplier relationships
Since an organization and its suppliers are interdependent, therefore a mutually beneficial relationship
between them increases the ability of both to add value.
These eight principles form the basis for the quality management system standard ISO 9001:2008.
Maslows need hierarch theory: Maslow's hierarchy of need categories is the most famous example:
self-actualization
esteem
belongingness
safety
physiological
Specific examples of these types are given below, in both the work and home context. (Some of the
instances, like "education" are actually satisfiers of the need.)
According to Maslow, lower needs take priority. They must be fulfilled before the others are activated.
There is some basic common sense here -- it's pointless to worry about whether a given color looks good
on you when you are dying of starvation, or being threatened with your life. There are some basic things
that take precedence over all else.
Or at least logically should, if people were rational. But is that a safe assumption? According to the
theory, if you are hungry and have inadequate shelter, you won't go to church. Can't do the higher things
until you have the lower things. But the poor tend to be more religious than the rich. Both within a given
culture, and across nations. So the theory makes the wrong prediction here.
Or take education: how often do you hear "I can't go to class today, I haven't had sex in three days!"? Do
all physiological needs including sex have to be satisfied before "higher" needs? (Besides, wouldn't the
authors of the Kama Sutra argue that sex was a kind of self-expression more like art than a physiological
need? that would put it in the self-actualization box). Again, the theory doesn't seem to predict correctly.
Cultural critique: Does Maslow's classification really reflect the order in which needs are satisfied, or is it
more about classifying needs from a kind of "tastefulness" perspective, with lofty goals like personal
growth and creativity at the top, and "base" instincts like sex and hunger at the bottom? And is selfactualization actually a fundamental need? Or just something that can be done if you have the leisure
time?
Herzbergs two-factor theory: The two-factor theory (also known as Herzberg's motivation-hygiene
theory and dual-factor theory) states that there are certain factors in the workplace that cause job
satisfaction, while a separate set of factors cause dissatisfaction. It was developed by Frederick Herzberg,
a psychologist, who theorized that job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction act independently of each other.
Two-factor theory fundamentals: Attitudes and their connection with industrial mental health are related
to Maslow's theory of motivation. His findings have had a considerable theoretical, as well as a practical,
influence on attitudes toward administration. [1][2] According to Herzberg, individuals are not content with
the satisfaction of lower-order needs at work, for example, those associated with minimum salary levels
or safe and pleasant working conditions. Rather, individuals look for the gratification of higher-level
psychological needs having to do with achievement, recognition, responsibility, advancement, and the
nature of the work itself. So far, this appears to parallel Maslow's theory of a need hierarchy. However,
Herzberg added a new dimension to this theory by proposing a two-factor model of motivation, based on
the notion that the presence of one set of job characteristics or incentives leads to worker satisfaction at
work, while another and separate set of job characteristics leads to dissatisfaction at work. Thus,
satisfaction and dissatisfaction are not on a continuum with one increasing as the other diminishes, but are
independent phenomena. This theory suggests that to improve job attitudes and productivity,
administrators must recognize and attend to both sets of characteristics and not assume that an increase in
satisfaction leads to decrease in unpleasurable dissatisfaction.
The two-factor, or motivation-hygiene theory, developed from data collected by Herzberg from interviews
with a large number of engineers and accountants in the Pittsburgh area. From analyzing these interviews,
he found that job characteristics related to what an individual does that is, to the nature of the work one
performs apparently have the capacity to gratify such needs as achievement, competency, status,
personal worth, and self-realization, thus making him happy and satisfied. However, the absence of such
gratifying job characteristics does not appear to lead to unhappiness and dissatisfaction. Instead,
dissatisfaction results from unfavorable assessments of such job-related factors as company policies,
supervision, technical problems, salary, interpersonal relations on the job, and working conditions. Thus,
if management wishes to increase satisfaction on the job, it should be concerned with the nature of the
work itself the opportunities it presents for gaining status, assuming responsibility, and for achieving
self-realization. If, on the other hand, management wishes to reduce dissatisfaction, then it must focus on
the job environment policies, procedures, supervision, and working conditions. If management is
equally concerned with both, (as is usually the case), then managers must give attention to both sets of job
factors.
The theory was based around interviews with 203 American accountants and engineers in Pittsburgh,
chosen because of their professions' growing importance in the business world. The subjects were asked
to relate times when they felt exceptionally good or bad about their present job or any previous job, and to
provide reasons, and a description of the sequence of events giving rise to that positive or negative
feeling.
Here is the description of this interview analysis:
Briefly, we asked our respondents to describe periods in their lives when they were exceedingly happy
and unhappy with their jobs. Each respondent gave as many "sequences of events" as he could that met
certain criteriaincluding a marked change in feeling, a beginning and an end, and contained some
substantive description other than feelings and interpretations...
The proposed hypothesis appears verified. The factors on the right that led to satisfaction (achievement,
intrinsic interest in the work, responsibility, and advancement) are mostly unipolar; that is, they contribute
very little to job dissatisfaction. Conversely, the dis-satisfiers (company policy and administrative
practices, supervision, interpersonal relationships, working conditions, and salary) contribute very little to
job satisfaction.