Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
4) Conclude
o On a side note, a subsidiary which a parent decides to sell can also be
classified as NCAHFS if criteria are met.
Onerous Contracts
1) When an unavoidable loss is set to take place i.e. loss is inevitable
2) Show alternatives and their losses i.e. that their costs (mention costs)
exceed their FEBs (mention FEBs, e.g. use etc)
3) Conclude that there is an onerous contract and that a provision must be
recognised to the value of the lowest net cost of the alternatives and that
the time value of money must be taken into account if material.
4) Note, if finance leased asset, cant recognise a provision, as this would be
double counting.
Leases
1) IAS 17 (IFRIC 4 only for things that legally arent leases but in
substance may be) Does it contain a lease? 4 Thing to look for Dont
list, simply speak about whether criteria are met e.g. Carlisle has the use
of a specific asset, no other parties take an insignificant amount of the
output
Is there use of a specific asset?
Are no other parties taking more than an insignificant amount of
the output?
Is the price paid by the lessee not contractually fixed nor equal to
the current market price?
2) Conclude that there is a lease
3) Operating or finance? Must meet IAS17:10 criteria. If operating simply
say its operating because none of these criteria are met and thus the
payments will be treated as operating lease payments, measured on the
straight line basis with the disclosure being split into 3 time periods
given.
4) If meets ONE of criteria, finance lease Asset included on the SOFP of
lessee, recognise a liability, payments split between capital (SFP) and
interest portion (SOCI), depreciation will occur and disclosure as per IAS
17 for finance leases will apply
Be very careful however, question may only ask for recognition and
measurement for example
Related Parties
Discuss if they are related and why. Simply turn to IAS24:9 and thus the
related party can influence the entity(ies) to transact.
Disclosure
1) Mention the relationship between the related parties.
2) Transactions:
o Mention who the transaction occurred between
o Mention the nature of the transactions, their amounts, and any
change in selling price which occurred as a result of the related
party relationship.
o Mention whether amounts are outstanding, where amounts have
been included and (if applicable which will probably be the
case) that the transaction was not at arms length.
Operating segments
Is the component of the entity an operating segment?
1) Does it engage in business activity (where revenues are earned and
expenses are incurred?)
2) Are its operating results regularly reviewed by the chief operating
decision maker of the entity? (not the component of the entity)
3) Is the components discrete financial information available?
Can operating segments be aggregated i.e. combined?
1) Do they have similar economic characteristics and
2) Do they have similar
2.1) Nature of products and/or services
2.2) Nature of production processes
2.3) Types/ classes of customers
2.4) Distribution methods
2.5) Regulatory environments
Is the operating segment a reportable segment? Do they meet one of the
quantitative thresholds?
1) Is total segment revenue (internal + external) >= 10% of total entity
revenue or
2) Is the absolute profit/loss of segment >= 10% of the greater of 1)
combined profit of all profitable segments or 2) absolute value of
General
Look at as many perspectives as possible
Always look at big picture. It depends is usually the best answer
Think recognition, measurement (initial and subsequent [i.e. transactions
and tax],) classification and disclosure
Dont list, simply speak about whether criteria are met and why e.g. The
amount of revenue can be reliably measured as the transaction price of X
is known.
Impairment reversal Asset cannot be recognised at an amount higher
than if it had not been impaired i.e. CA if there had been no impairment
less current CA. So be careful if depreciation occurs.
Acquisition of more of subs shares is effectively a transaction with the
owner, thus gain/loss is directly recognised to equity
If we are dealing with an exception, speak about what usually would
happen
Keep discussion as open as possible, especially if not enough info given,
as this is often done deliberately.
Be very careful to only answer what question asks e.g. if recognition and
measurement are asked to be discussed, dont speak about presentation
and disclosure.
If a big question, there are many marks for stating the obvious e.g. in an
IFRS15 revenue question, speak about why there is a contract.
Decommissioning fund treatment depends on level of influence (Control
subisidiary, thus consolidate ; Significant influence assosciate, thus
equity account.)